|
|
||||||||



* Department of Animal Science, and
Department of Microbiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
In Silico LLC, Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
1 Corresponding author: Vivek_Fellner{at}ncsu.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: ionophore soybean oil rumen microbial diversity continuous culture
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When fed alone, monensin and oil improve the efficiency of fermentation, but their effects do not seem to be additive (Clary et al., 1993; Zinn and Borques, 1993). Some data suggest that the inhibition of gram-positive bacteria alone by monensin may not fully explain the response. Gram-positive bacteria are known to hydrogenate the fatty acid C18:2 to C18:1, yet this step can occur during monensin supplementation (Fellner et al., 1997; Sauer et al., 1998). Lipolytic and hydrogenating bacteria are reported to be mostly gram negative, but monensin has been shown to inhibit lipolysis. It is therefore possible that in addition to inhibiting gram-positive bacteria, monensin may alter the metabolism of gram-negative bacteria (Van Nevel and Demeyer, 1995).
Rumen microbes require fatty acids to incorporate into their cell membranes (Demeyer et al., 1978). In the presence of excess dietary fatty acids, incorporation can exceed synthesis (Bauchart et al., 1990). Fat supplementation has been shown to alter the microbial lipid profile and subsequent microbial function (Kucuk et al., 2008). The mode of ionophore function is dependent on the fluidity of the membrane lipid bilayer (Sankaram et al., 1987), and altering the lipid composition can lower membrane fluidity and decrease the rate of transport of the ionophore across the membrane (Kolber and Haynes, 1981). Monensin and bacitracin have similar effects, but their mechanism of action is different. This study was conducted to identify the effect of ionophores and soybean oil on fermentation. A second objective was to determine whether the sequence in which microbes received ionophores and soybean oil altered the fermentation pattern and microbial populations in mixed cultures of ruminal organisms.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diets and Additives
The feed consisted of alfalfa hay pellets purchased from a local feed store. Monensin and bacitracin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), and soybean oil (Wesson brand) was purchased at a local grocery store. One kilogram of alfalfa hay per treatment was placed in a blender and 22 mg of the respective antibiotic was gradually added and mixed thoroughly to ensure complete distribution of the antibiotic. Alfalfa pellets (13.8 g of DM/d) were fed in equal portions at 0700 and 1400 h to all fermentors during the experiment. Soybean oil was added (345 µL/feeding) directly into the liquid phase of the culture contents. Total fatty acid content of soybean oil was 88.1% and consisted predominantly of C18:2 (55%) and cis C18:1 (22.5%).
From d 1 to 4 (stabilization period), all fermentors received only alfalfa pellets. From d 5 to 10, two fermentors received soybean oil (O; 5% of diet DM), one fermentor received monensin (M; 22 mg/kg), and one received bacitracin (B; 22 mg/kg). From d 11 to 16, M was included in one of the O treatments (OM) and B was included in the other O treatment (OB). During this same time, O was included in the M (MO) and B (BO) treatments. Each run consisted of a total of 5 fermentors. One fermentor served as the control and received 100% alfalfa pellets throughout the experiment. Each run was replicated 3 times.
Sample Collection and Fermentation Measurements
Samples for bacterial quantification were collected on d 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 15, and 16. Samples for VFA, long-chain fatty acids, ammonia, and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analyses were obtained at 2 h after the morning feeding on d 4, 10, and 16. Culture contents were mixed thoroughly before sampling to obtain a homogeneous sample. Methane and pH were recorded daily 2 h after feeding. Methane gas measurements were obtained by filling a gastight syringe (Hamilton Co., Reno, NV) with 10 µL of fermentor headspace gas. The fermentor headspace samples were analyzed directly by gas chromatography (model CP-3380; Varian, Walnut Creek, CA), and daily methane output (mmol/d) was calculated using the following equation: methane concentration in fermentor headspace (mmol/mL) x CO2 gas flow through the fermentor headspace (20 mL/min) x 60 min x 24 h. Digestibility was calculated as the grams of feed used for VFA plus methane per 100 g of dry feed added to the fermentors each day. On d 4, 10, and 16 at 0900 h, two 1-mL samples were obtained for VFA and ammonia analysis. Samples for ammonia were stored immediately at –70°C. The VFA samples were immediately processed by suspending them in metaphosphoric acid and were centrifuged (model Micromax; International Equipment Co., Needham Heights, MA) at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Samples were then stored at –70°C until subsequent analysis. Ammonia was analyzed by a colorimetric procedure (Beecher and Whitten, 1970) and the VFA were analyzed by GLC (model CP-3380; Varian) using a fused-silica capillary column, 30 m x 0.25 mm with 0.25-µm film thickness (Nukol; Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA) according to the method of Fellner et al. (1997).
Bacterial Counts
Bacterial counts were obtained for the fresh inoculum and for the culture contents 2 h after feeding on d 4, 9, 10, 15, and 16. Bacterial counts were done with a phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Type 119; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) using a hemocytometer (Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA) after diluting the sample with Luria Bertani broth.
T-RFLP Analysis
The T-RFLP analysis was similar to that reported earlier (Liu et al., 1997; Kent et al., 2003) with some modifications. A 10-mL sample was taken from each fermentor on d 4, 10, and 16. Each sample was obtained 2 h after the morning feeding and stored at –70°C until genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated. Samples were thawed, one 250-mg subsample was taken, and DNA was extracted using a PowerSoil DNA isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Solana Beach, CA). The 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was amplified from the isolated gDNA samples using the bacterial-specific 16S rDNA primers 8F (5'-AGAGTTTGATC(A/C)TGGCTCAG-3') and 1492R (5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3'). The forward primer for the PCR reaction was labeled on the 5' end with a hexamide fluor marker to allow the terminal fragment to be tracked. Each gDNA sample was amplified in 2 PCR reactions, with each reaction (100 µL) containing 10 µL of 10x buffer, 0.8 µL of deoxynucleotide 5'-triphosphate (40 mmol), 0.5 µL (100 pmol/µL) of fluorescently labeled forward primer, 0.5 µL (100 pmol/µL) of reverse primer, 0.5 µL of Taq polymerase (2.5 U total; Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA), 86.7 µL of PCR grade water, and 1 µL of gDNA. The PCR was performed using an iCycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and a thermal profile of an initial 3-min denaturing step at 94°C, followed by 25 cycles of a 94°C denaturing step for 1 min, 50°C annealing step for 1 min, and 72°C extension step for 2 min, with a final 7 min of extension at 72°C. One microliter of each PCR reaction was run on a 1% agarose gel at 120 V for 60 min to verify amplification of bacterial 16S rDNA sequences and confirm that the reactions were not contaminated.
The 2 PCR reactions amplifying each DNA sample were pooled and purified using the UltraClean PCR Clean-up Kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.), and 1 µL of each purified PCR reaction was run on a 1% agarose gel at 120 V for 60 min for visualization. The PCR products were then aliquoted and digested in 3 separate reactions. Each of 3 tubes contained 15 µL of the purified PCR reaction, 74 µL of PCR grade water, 1 µL of 1 of 3 enzymes (RsaI, MspI, or HhaI), and 10 µL of its corresponding buffer. The HhaI reaction required 1 µL of 100x BSA and contained 73 µL of water. All enzymes were purchased from New England BioLabs (Beverly, MA). The digestion reactions were incubated overnight at 37°C and heat inactivated by immersing in a 60°C water bath for 20 min. The digested DNA was purified using the QIAquick Nucleotide Removal Kit (Qiagen Inc.) and was eluted into 50 µL of heated PCR grade water. Ten microliters of each purified sample was run on a 1% agarose gel at 120 V for 60 min. Thirty microliters of each sample was placed in 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes, wrapped in Parafilm, and stored at –80°C until shipped to the Genomic Technology Support Facility at Michigan State University (East Lansing) for analysis on an Applied Biosystems Prism 3100 Gene Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The fragment data files were filtered so only information associated with the tagged PCR products remained. The resulting fragment patterns were analyzed using the In Silico software package (In Silico LLC, Fuquay-Varina, NC).
Analyses of T-RFLP Data
In Silico has built-in single-value diversity indices for the T-RFLP analysis. These indices include the Shannon-Weaver index (H'), Simpson diversity (reported as 1-D), the reciprocal Simpson (1/D), and evenness (E). The diversity equations used in In Silico have been described previously (Tajima et al., 1999; Blackwood et al., 2007). For calculation of the indices, the T-RFLP analysis peak area was used as the amount measurement and its relative abundance was measured by dividing individual peaks by the total fluorescence of the sample. The results for each diversity measure are representative of the number of fragments in each fermentor.
Statistical Analysis of Fermentation Data
Fermentation data from the last 2 d of each treatment period were analyzed according to a randomized complete block design using the MIXED procedure (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). From d 5 to 10, an average of the 2 fermentors receiving O was used in the analysis. Sources of variations in the model included additive, sequence, and the additive x sequence interaction tested against residual error. Day and run were included as the repeated and random variables, respectively. Significance is reported at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Fragment patterns in the multiple classification fit into more than one distinct phylogenetic group and consist of all the unique species from phylogenetically different groups that match a single fragment pattern. Approximately one-half of the unique patterns in the samples across all treatments were from unclassified microorganisms and approximately one-fourth belonged to patterns with multiple phylogenies. This is consistent with previous clone library studies, which also suggest that many of the organisms in the rumen are currently uncharacterized (Tajima et al., 1999, 2000; Edwards et al., 2004).
Fermentation in Control Cultures
After the stabilization period (4 d), fermentation patterns in the control cultures remained stable. Rufener et al. (1963) also reported a normal in vitro fermentation pattern in continuous cultures for experimental periods from d 3 to 10. Methane production averaged 28 mmol/d, pH was 6.0, and ammonia averaged 24.3 mg/100 mL. Total VFA concentrations averaged 55.7 mM and individual VFA did not change; the A:P ratio remained constant at 3.8 throughout the study. Bacterial cell numbers in the control fermentors averaged 1.35 x 109 cells/mL and did not change over time. Bacterial counts were high but were similar to those reported earlier in vivo (Thorley et al., 1968) and in continuous cultures (Rufener et al., 1963). Data on the concentrations and proportions of VFA, methanogenesis, bacterial numbers, and culture pH indicate that a stable fermentation was maintained in vitro from d 5 and 16 of the experimental period. Hence, fermentation data averaged across d 5 to 16 for the control were used to compare the effect of treatments and their sequence (Table 2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Treatments
Total VFA concentrations were not affected by treatment and averaged 49.8 mM for the control and 49.2, 52.8, and 48.6 mM for the M, B, and O treatments, respectively (Table 2). There was a treatment x sequence interaction for total VFA concentrations; the addition of B or O alone had no effect, but BO increased concentrations of total VFA (P < 0.05).
As expected, both M and O decreased the molar percentages of acetate (P < 0.01) and increased those of propionate (P < 0.05) compared with the control, which also decreased the A:P ratio (P < 0.05); B had no effect on concentrations of acetate and propionate (P > 0.10). Butyrate (P < 0.01) and valerate (P < 0.01) increased with M, B, and O compared with the control; M and O also increased isovalerate (P < 0.05), whereas B had no effect.
Methane production decreased (P < 0.05) with M, B, and O when compared with the control (Table 2). The decrease was greatest with M and O (40.5 and 35.5%, respectively) and less with B (17.6%). Culture pH was greater (P < 0.01) with M and B (6.2 and 6.1, respectively) when compared with the control (6.0); the addition of O resulted in a lower pH (5.9) compared with the control (P < 0.01). Treatments had no effect (P > 0.10) on cell numbers or ammonia concentration.
Compared with the control (264), the total number of unique fragment patterns (d 10) was numerically lower with M (177), but was greater with O (473) and B (612; Table 3). Similarly, the numbers of unclassified and multiple fragment patterns were reduced in cultures receiving M when compared with B, O, and the control. Fragment patterns identifying one unique species in both the Chloroflexi and Deferribacteres classes were detected in M but not in the control, B, or O. In contrast, fragment patterns identified as Flavobacteria or Nitrospira were detected in the latter 3 treatments, but not in M. Eleven unique patterns were classified as Actinobacteria in the control, whereas M, B, and O had 4, 21, and 14, respectively. The total number of Delta-proteobacteria patterns was similar in O, M, and B (10, 10, and 11, respectively), compared with the control (6).
Compared with the control, fermentors that received B had more unique fragment patterns in several classes, including Actinobacteridae, Alpha-proteobacteria, Bacilli, and Clostridia. Although M did not change the number of Alpha-proteobacteria or Clostridia patterns, a greater number of Bacilli patterns (7 vs. 5), as well as a lower number of Actinobacteridae patterns (2 vs. 6), were detected when compared with the control. With the exception of Actinobacteridae, O increased the number of patterns in all classes compared with the control. Compared with the control, Beta- and Gamma-proteobacteria patterns were detected in greater numbers in B and O, whereas M had no effect. Numerically, there were fewer patterns in the Bacteroidetes class with M, B, or O when compared with the control (Table 3).
The H', 1-D, and 1/D index values were greater for B and O compared with the control, and the E value for O was greater and for B was lesser than for the control. (Table 4). In contrast, M resulted in a reduction in all 4 indices when compared with the control, B, and O. Although M had a lower index value when compared with the control, it had a greater total number of fragments for the 3 restriction digests. These data suggest that even though more fragments may be detected in a sample, the calculated diversity index of the sample may be lower because the fluorescence intensity of certain fragments is higher in proportion, thereby skewing the contribution of each individual fragment and lowering the calculated diversity values.
As expected, M and O decreased the A:P ratio and methane production (Russell, 1987; Jenkins et al., 2003) when compared with the control; addition of B did not affect the A:P ratio and was intermediate in its effect on methane (Russell and Strobel, 1988). In contrast, B had the greatest impact on microbial populations compared with either M or O. Both M and B are known to preferentially target gram-positive microbes, where M disrupts cell membrane permeability and B inhibits cell wall synthesis and subsequent growth. The mechanism of action of O is less well known and is related to toxicity coupled with coating of substrate, in this case fiber, thereby restricting access of the fiber to microbial degradation (Siewert and Strominger, 1967). Clearly, there were differences in microbial patterns in cultures that received M, B, and O. These differences would reflect the difference in their mode of action. However, the data also indicate that changes in microbial patterns were not reflected in the fermentation parameters.
Based on the data at the class level, M reduced and B increased microbial diversity. Although lower numbers of unique patterns were detected in the fermentors that received M, the same fermentors also had increased numbers of unmatched fragments. This suggests that M caused preferential growth of bacteria that have not yet been studied and sequenced; therefore, they are not represented in the current pattern database.
Bacitracin treatment more than doubled the number of patterns associated with the Actinobacteria class; O increased the number of patterns detected by 3, and M reduced the number of detected patterns by 7. A unique fragment pattern detected in the Actinomyces genus in the B-treated fermentors partially accounts for the increase in the Actinobacteria class. In contrast, the number of detected patterns associated with the Streptomyces genus was not affected by any of the additive treatments. Therefore, other genera within the Actinobacteria class must also be responsible for some of the changes observed with M and B.
The number of patterns associated with Gamma-proteobacteria increased with B and O and decreased with M. This was likely due to the change in the patterns identified in the genera Pseudomonas and Vibrio, with the latter being observed only in cultures that received B. However, the change in patterns belonging to these 2 gram-negative genera was not sufficient to account for all of the observed increase in unique patterns. It is likely that some of the increase in Gamma-proteobacteria patterns is attributable to an increase in other member organisms of the Gamma-proteobacteria belonging to other genera, such as Ruminobacter. Overall, total proteobacteria accounted for a greater increase in total patterns with B and O, whereas they were relatively similar between the control and M. Proteobacteria stain gram negative and are the largest and most diverse group of bacteria found in the rumen. Gram-positive bacteria are more sensitive to M, so it is not surprising that numbers of Proteobacteria were relatively similar between M and the control. However, B resulted in a substantial increase in Proteobacteria, which is an anomaly because B also targets gram-positive microbes.
Although M inhibits cellulolytic species such as Ruminococcus, other cellulolytic organisms, such as Bacteroidetes, have been shown to increase in the presence of this ionophore (Russell, 1987; Russell and Strobel, 1989). We found that M increased fragments belonging to the Bacteroides genus primarily because of an increase in Bacteroidetes patterns. Changes over time in microbial populations in the rumen have not been monitored previously by T-RFLP, and this observed increase in Bacteroides may be due to long-term selective adaptation of Bacteroides over Ruminococcus (Russell, 1987). Bacitracin did not have an effect similar to M. For the O treatment, there was a decrease in the number of patterns identified that belonged to the Bacteroides genus. However, the number of patterns associated with the Bacteroidetes class was maintained at the same level as the control, suggesting that O affected other genera within the Bacteroidetes class.
Monensin seemed to have reduced the total number of fragments belonging to the Clostridia class when compared with the control, whereas both O and B resulted in an increase (Figure 5 and Table 3). It also seems that when M was added first in the sequence (MO), fewer total fragments within Clostridia were detected compared with either the control or the other additive sequences (OM, BO, and OB). The unique patterns detected in the Selenomonas and Megasphaera genera, both of which are gram-negative organisms, do not explain the changes observed with M. The reduced microbial diversity with M may have resulted in changes in species that belonged in the multiple category, which, as a proportion of the total, was greatest with M compared with any other treatment.
|
Effect of Treatment Sequence
Culture pH was lower (P < 0.01) with OM compared with MO (Table 2). The number of unique fragment patterns for all treatment sequences is shown in Figure 5, with the numerical breakdown of each treatment presented in Table 3. At d 16, the control had a total of 125 detectable fragment patterns, MO had 88 patterns, OM had 216 patterns, BO had 197 patterns, and OB had a total of 346 patterns. The total number of unique fragment patterns detected was much lower in cultures that received the MO treatment than those that received the OM treatment (88 compared with 216). The lower number of detectable patterns in the MO treatment could be due to a lower fragment use by the In Silico database.
The OM sequence resulted in the detection of 14 unique patterns in the Gamma-proteobacteria class, which was similar to the number detected in the control; no patterns were detected in the MO sequence. The OM had 3 times the number of detectable Beta-proteobacteria patterns as compared with the control (Table 3). The number of Epsilon-proteobacteria patterns decreased from 3 to 1 in the OM fermentor and to 2 detected patterns in the MO-treated fermentor. In contrast, the OM sequence resulted in a greater number of detectable patterns in Alpha-proteobacteria (2) in comparison with the control (0), whereas the MO-treated fermentor yielded one detectable pattern. The number of Bacilli patterns was 2 and 4 times greater in the OM and MO treatments, respectively, when compared with the control. Similarly, the number of detected Clostridia patterns in the control was 1, compared with 2 and 5 in OM and MO, respectively. The OM treatment sequence also had unique patterns in the Chloroflexi class (1 pattern) and the Sphingobacteria class (2 patterns), neither of which was present in the MO sequence.
The MO sequence had patterns unique to it in comparison with the OM sequence (1 Acidobacteria pattern and 1 Actinobacteridae pattern). Both the MO and the OM sequences had one unique fragment pattern in the Deferribacteres class, which was not detected in the control fermentor. Neither MO nor OM had fragment patterns matching the Chlorobia, Flavobacteria, Mollicutes, Nitrospira, Planctomycetacia, or Verrucomicrobiae classes.
The BO sequence had fewer total unique patterns (197) than the OB sequence (346). There were, respectively, 94 and 168 unique patterns identified as unclassified for BO and OB, and 49 and 79 were identified as multiple. The greater number of patterns detected for OB is a result of both a larger number of fragments detected in the T-RFLP digests and a greater percentage of fragment utilization.
Compared with OB, BO resulted in a greater number of patterns in the Actinobacteria and Epsilon-proteobacteria classes. The number of Actinobacteria patterns detected in the BO sequence was 10, compared with 8 in the OB sequence and 4 in the control. Greater numbers of Epsilon-proteobacteria patterns were also found in BO, both in comparison with OB (8 detected patterns in BO compared with 6 for OB) and in comparison with the control (3 patterns). The BO treatment resulted in unique fragment patterns in the Acidobacteria (1), Actinobacteridae (3), Chlorobia (1), and Flavobacteria (2) classes, but none was detected in OB.
One Acidobacteria and 3 Actinobacteridae patterns were detected for BO and the control, respectively (Table 3). The BO treatment had one unique Chlorobia pattern and twice as many Flavobacteria patterns compared with the control. The OB treatment resulted in a greater number of patterns for several classes. For Bacilli, the OB resulted in 12 patterns compared with 2 each for BO and the control. Twelve patterns were detected for Beta-proteobacteria in the OB fermentor, compared with 9 and 2 for BO and the control, respectively. The OB sequence resulted in 32 Gamma-proteobacteria patterns, compared with 12 for BO and 14 for the control. Similarly, Clostridia (8 patterns), Delta-proteobacteria (7 patterns), and Mollicutes (9 patterns) were greater in the OB treatment compared with either BO or the control.
The H' values were greater for MO, OM, BO, and OB when compared with the control (Table 4). However, the 1-D and 1/D values were greater in the control when compared with MO, OM, and OB but were lesser when compared with BO. The BO treatment also had a greater 1/D value compared with the control. The MO, OM, and OB treatments all had lower reciprocal Simpson values of 24.213, 29.416, and 22.035, respectively. The E values were less for MO, OM, BO, and OB than for the control. However, fragment numbers were greater for all treatment sequences when compared with the control. As mentioned earlier, low values indicate that certain fragments are increasing in proportion to the rest of the fragments in the sample.
The presence of 11 rumen genera within the unique classified patterns and the multiple patterns at d 16 are presented in Figure 6 and Table 5. As with the d-10 samples, multiple patterns cannot be linked to a specific identity. This classification, however, holds a large amount of diversity.
|
We observed a shift in microbial diversity in the control cultures across the 16-d experimental period as well as a change in diversity as a consequence of treatments. It is worth noting that the index values reported are based on the number of fragments detected and that the values will differ because the numbers of fragments detected differ for each of the treatment conditions. It is also important to note that these values are reflective only of the fragments themselves and not of the subsequent patterns identified. Thus, the diversity values could be an underrepresentation of the true diversity, with multiple patterns being assigned to the same detected fragments (Blackwood et al., 2007). Although the diversity values are affected by the number and intensity of the fragments, they do not truly reflect the identity of the microbial population that generated the fragments.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication October 27, 2008. Accepted for publication June 2, 2009.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |