|
|
||||||||



* Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 1000, Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada
1 Corresponding author: nina{at}interchange.ubc.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 g/L on d +3 were 6.7 times more likely to develop severe or mild metritis; this predictive threshold has a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 87%. These results indicate that an acute phase inflammatory response precedes clinical metritis and that Hp screening may assist in the early detection of metritis, providing increased opportunities for early treatment and prevention.
Key Words: transition cow haptoglobin metritis
Metritis, also known as early metritis or puerperal metritis, is a uterine infection characterized by fetid discharge and systemic signs of illness (fever, dullness, anorexia) occurring within the first few weeks after calving (Sheldon et al., 2006). This disorder occurs frequently and is known to impair reproductive performance (Opsomer et al., 2000; Melendez et al., 2004) and reduce milk yield regardless of the severity of the infection (Rajala and Gröhn, 1998; Huzzey et al., 2007). Improved detection of cows at risk for metritis would assist early treatment and the development of management strategies aimed at prevention.
Many studies in both cattle and sheep have reported an association between circulating concentrations of haptoglobin (Hp), an acute phase protein, and uterine infection after calving (Skinner et al., 1991; Smith et al., 1998a; Regassa and Noakes, 1999; Sheldon et al., 2001). For example, Regassa and Noakes (1999) found a greater Hp concentration in postpartum ewes with uterine bacterial contamination than in comparable ewes with normal uterine involution. Williams et al. (2007) showed that bacterial contamination of the uterine lumen in cattle was associated with an increase in Hp concentration. Haptoglobin binds to hemoglobin and so inhibits bacterial proliferation by reducing the availability of iron. Although there are many different acute phase proteins, the measurement of Hp has been of particular interest for detecting inflammation in cattle due to its virtual absence in the serum of healthy animals (Eckersall and Conner, 1988; Eckersall, 2000). Moreover, Hp is more commonly available as a routine analyte in veterinary diagnostic laboratories (Eckersall, 2000) and has the potential to be measured using semiautomatic assays or robotic systems (Smith et al., 1998b).
Previous work has shown an association between elevated Hp and clinical metritis in cows (Hirvonen et al., 1999; Humblet et al., 2006) but it is not clear whether these changes precede or are a consequence of uterine infection. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe how Hp levels vary in relation to the onset of clinical metritis, and 2) determine if Hp levels can be used to identifying cows at risk for metritis.
A total of 32 primiparous and 69 multiparous (parity of the calving event that occurred during the study = 3.2 ± 1.3; mean ± SD) Holstein dairy cows were monitored. These are the same cows described in Huzzey et al. (2007), but the present study reports additional data that were not available at the time of that report. All animals were cared for according to the guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (1993). Cows were housed in pre- and postpartum group pens, each maintained at 20 cows. The experimental pens provided 20 free-stalls, 12 electronic feeding stations, and 2 electronic water stations [Insentec, Marknesse, Holland; see Chapinal et al. (2007) for a description and validation of this system]. Cows entered the prepartum pen 25 ± 2 d before their expected calving date and were moved to the maternity pen when they showed signs of imminent calving (i.e., udder enlargement, milk letdown, relaxation of tail ligament). The maternity pen consisted of a sand-bedded pack with 6 Insentec feeders and 1 Insentec water trough. Cows were moved to the postpartum pen within 24 h of calving and were monitored for an additional 21 d. After calving, cows were milked twice daily at approximately 0700 and 1700 h.
The electronic feeding system was used to continuously monitor individual feed intakes for all experimental cows. The average DMI during the week before calving was included as a covariate in the logistic model evaluating Hp as determinant of metritis risk, following Huzzey et al. (2007) who identified a decline in DMI from 2 wk prepartum as a significant predictor of metritis risk. Cows were fed twice daily at approximately 0800 and 1600 h. Prepartum BCS (Wildman et al., 1982) was evaluated on d –20 ± 2 and d –10 ± 2 (relative to expected calving date) and prepartum BW was measured over 3 consecutive days on d –20 ± 2 relative to the expected calving date. Calving ease was recorded as either assisted or unassisted. Retained placenta (RP) was diagnosed if, 24 h after calving, the placenta was observed hanging from the vulva. Cows with RP were treated with procaine penicillin G intramuscularly for 3 consecutive days as per standard operating procedures on the farm.
Blood serum was sampled on d –20 ± 5, –6 ± 2, –2 ± 1, 0, +3, +6, +9, +12, +15, +18, and +21, relative to each cows actual calving date. Blood was collected from the coccygeal vein (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at approximately 0900 h. Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for up to 3 h and then was centrifuged at 1,400 x g for 10 min. Serum was harvested and frozen at –20°C for later analysis. Haptoglobin was measured using a Hitachi 911 Autoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Montreal, Quebec, Canada) at the University of Guelph Animal Health Laboratory (Ontario, Canada).
Vaginal discharge (VD) for each individual was assessed immediately following the morning milking (0730 to 0900 h) every 3 d after calving until d +21. The appearance and smell of the discharge was evaluated and assigned to category: no mucus or clear mucus = 0; cloudy mucus or mucus with flecks of pus = 1; mucopurulent (
50% pus present) and foul smelling = 2; purulent (
50% pus present) and foul smelling = 3; or putrid (red/brown color, watery, foul smelling) = 4. Rectal temperature was taken daily after calving using a digital thermometer (GLA M525/550, GLA Agricultural Electronics, San Luis Obispo, CA). These following categorization of cows (severely and mildly metritic) is based on the definitions for puerperal (severe) and clinical (mild) metritis as defined by Sheldon et al. (2006). Cows were classified as having severe metritis if they had at least one VD score of 4 and one recorded fever (
39.5°C) within ± 1 d of the VD score of 4. Cows were classified as having mild metritis if they had a VD score of 4 and no fever or at least one VD score of 2 or 3 and no VD score of 4 (these cows may or may not have had a fever). Healthy cows had a maximum VD score of 1 and no fever after calving. Cows that had clinical signs of other transition-related disorders within the first 21 DIM [i.e., mastitis (16), miscellaneous health problems (7) and cows with a VD = 0/1 and an unexplained fever (11)] were not included in the study. Following the removal of cows that did not meet the classification criteria for the 3 health categories, 67 cows were included in the study: 12 with severe metritis (5 primiparous and 7 multiparous), 32 with mild metritis (13 primiparous and 19 multiparous), and 23 healthy cows (5 primiparous and 18 multiparous).
The PROC MIXED procedure in SAS (version 9.1; SAS Institute, 2003) was used to analyze differences in Hp and VD between the 3 health categories using cow (n = 67) as the experimental unit. The models included the fixed effects of parity (primiparous or multiparous), day of sample relative to calving, health status (healthy, mild metritis, or severe metritis), and the day by health status interaction. Cow was treated as a random effect, day as the repeated measure, and a compound symmetry and autoregressive covariance structure was used for the Hp and VD models, respectively (Bayesian information criterion closest to zero). When a significant (P < 0.05) day x health status interaction was detected the dependent variable was stratified by day of sample relative to calving.
Logistic regression was used to analyze Hp as a potential determinant of postpartum metritis risk (both mild and severe metritis combined). Calving ease, BCS, and BW were analyzed in univariate logistic models to determine which covariates to offer to the final logistic model evaluating Hp as potential determinant of post-partum metritis risk. The presence or absence of an RP could not be included as a covariate as it destabilized the model because there were no RP in the healthy group of cows. Because RP may cause an increase in serum Hp concentration in the days following calving, we tested if this would be a confounding factor that influenced the association between Hp and metritis by assessing Hp in a separate logistic model with RP as the outcome variable.
A range of cut-points for Hp concentration for a range of days relative to calving were evaluated for association with subsequent metritis incidence. Only metritis cases that occurred after the Hp sample of interest were included in this analysis. For example, to determine if a Hp cut-point on d +3 relative to calving was a predictor of metritis, the only cows used in this analysis were those that showed no signs of clinical metritis (mild or severe) from calving up to and including d +3. Sensitivity was the proportion of animals diagnosed with mild or severe metritis that were at or above a given cut-point, and specificity was the proportion of animals that did not have mild or severe metritis that were below a given cut-point. The odds ratio represents the ratio of the odds of a cow developing metritis at or above a set cut-point to the odds of a cow developing metritis below the set cut-point. For example, an odds ratio of 1 indicates that the chance of developing metritis is equally likely in groups below or above the given cut-point, and an odds ratio of 2 would indicate that cows at or above the set cut-point are 2 times more likely to develop metritis (severe or mild) than cows below the set cut-point. The likelihood ratio [LR = sensitivity/(1 – specificity)] describes the probability of an animal, subsequently diagnosed with mild or severe metritis, having a test result at or above a given cut-point compared with a similar result in an unaffected animal.
There was a day by health status interaction for Hp (P = 0.001), and subsequent analysis revealed that cows with mild or severe metritis had greater Hp concentrations than healthy cows between d 0 and d +12 relative to calving (Figure 1
; P
0.02). In the present study, cows with normal uterine health after calving showed a spike in Hp concentration on d +3 after calving followed by a gradual decline until d +12 when Hp levels stabilized at approximately 0.1 g/L. These results are consistent with those of others (Uchida et al., 1993; Humblet et al., 2006; Drillich et al., 2007) showing that the period around calving is associated with an acute phase response that can be detected by a change in Hp concentration. Haptoglobin concentration peaked on d +3 in the mildly metritic cows (1.06 ± 0.15 g/L) and on d +6 in the severely metritic cows (1.62 ± 0.47 g/L). Haptoglobin concentration in healthy cows averaged 0.58 ± 0.12 and 0.31 ± 0.08 g/L on d +3 and d +6, respectively.
|
2) in the cows with mild and severe metritis occurred, on average, at 8.6 ± 3.9 d and 5.3 ± 1.9 d after calving, respectively.
|
|
Because Hp is a nonspecific indicator of inflammation, several factors can make relationships between this metabolite and metritis difficult to interpret. In this study the response was not associated with inflammation of the udder because cows with clinical mastitis were removed from the analysis. We tested to see if the elevated Hp levels immediately after calving were simply due to the presence or absence of a RP. There was a 58% incidence rate of RP in the severely metritic group, whereas only 9% of the mildly metritic cows had an RP. The Hp levels on d 0 and d +3 were not related to the presence or absence of RP after calving (P = 0.4). Calving difficulty was included as a covariate in the logistic model evaluating the association between d +3 Hp and metritis risk; therefore, the elevated Hp concentrations on that day were not simply an effect of dystocia. This study utilized a relatively small sample size, and we therefore strongly encourage future work to evaluate the usefulness of Hp as a predictive measure on large commercial herds.
Although an Hp cutoff of 1 g/L had the greatest combined sensitivity and specificity, potential field application of these results should consider the type of proposed intervention. For example, if antibiotic treatment for all positive tests was the intervention of choice, then a cut-point with the greatest specificity might be more appropriate; based on the results of this study that cut-point would be an Hp level
1.4 g/L (specificity = 91.3%). Treatment based on a test with high specificity would minimize the number of cows being treated unnecessarily and would also minimize milk lost due to withdrawal periods. If, however, the intervention of choice involved increased monitoring of "high-risk" animals so that prompt treatment could occur when necessary, then a greater sensitivity may be preferred. For example, based on the results of this study an Hp cut-point of
0.4 g/L (sensitivity = 83%) might identify a subset of animals that warrant daily monitoring of rectal body temperatures to detect the first signs of illness.
Early detection of disease is critical for improving health management programs on dairy herds. This study provides evidence that there is an inflammatory response that precedes clinical signs of metritis and that this response can be detected by evaluating serum Hp concentration.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication July 4, 2008. Accepted for publication October 3, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |