|
|
||||||||



* Instituto del Frío (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), José Antonio Novais 10, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Estación Agrícola Experimental (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Finca Marzanas, 24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
1 Corresponding author: mafl{at}if.csic.es
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: oleic acid olive oil conjugated linoleic acid monounsaturated fatty acid
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In dairy ewes, most attention has also focused on lipid supplements enriched in PUFA from oilseeds or plant and marine oils (Pulina et al., 2006; Sanz-Sampelayo et al., 2007). Oleic acid is the major monounsaturated FA (MUFA) in ruminant feeds, but its conversion in animals is uncertain. Although research has been undertaken to assess the effect of incorporating protected MUFA in the form of calcium soaps in rations (Pulina et al., 2006) on lipid metabolism or animal performance, less information has been reported on unprotected olive oil (OO) supplementation in sheep. According to some accounts, oleic acid conversion by rumen microorganisms yields only stearic acid without the formation of any intermediates (Kellens et al., 1986; Harfoot and Hazlewood, 1997), whereas in vitro batch culture studies reported the conversion of oleic acid to a variety of trans monoenes (Mosley et al., 2002; Abu-Ghazaleh et al., 2005).
The use of high doses of oil in the diet was not recommended in ruminants, particularly ewes, because it apparently inhibits rumen microbial activity and could affect milk yield and composition (Jenkins, 1993). High concentrations of fat added to sheep rations seemed to decrease the fermentative activity of the rumen microbiota, thus reducing the positive effect of the greater energy density of the diet (Broudiscou et al., 1994). Fortunately, more recent research has demonstrated the feasibility of incorporating high levels of unprotected oil in sheep diet. Diets supplemented with soybean oil modified the FA profile of milk fat but did not have any detrimental effects on animal performance (Mele et al., 2006; Gómez-Cortés et al., 2008). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of feeding dairy ewes with a diet supplemented with a high level of OO (6%) on milk yield and composition, paying particular attention to the FA profile.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ewes were milked at about 0830 and 1830 h in a 1 x 12 stall-milking parlor (DeLaval, Madrid, Spain). The experiment lasted for a total of 5 wk and was carried out in accordance with the Spanish Royal Decree 1201/2005 for the protection of animals used for experimental purposes. The diets consisted of a total mixed ration, including molasses to avoid selection of dietary components, based on alfalfa hay and concentrate supplemented with 0 (control) or 60 g of OO/kg of DM. The ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets are given in Table 1
. For the first week of the trial (adaptation week), all the animals received the control diet. Fresh diets were offered daily ad libitum at about 0900 and 1900 h.
|
-amylase and sodium sulfite. Individual milk yield was recorded once a week (d 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28). Milk samples for the determination of fat, protein, and total solid concentrations were also collected weekly from each animal. Fat, protein, and total solid concentrations were determined (AOAC, 2006) in samples treated with natamycin, by infrared spectrophotometry using a Milko-Scan 255 A/S N (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark).
FA Analysis
Fatty acid composition was determined in untreated samples of milk from each experimental lot, composited according to individual milk yield. Milk fat was extracted following the Luna et al. (2005) procedure. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were prepared by base-catalyzed methanolysis of the glycerides according to ISO-IDF (2002). The FAME analysis was performed on a gas-liquid chromatograph (Agilent 6890 N Network System, Palo Alto, CA) with an auto injector onto a CP-Sil 88 fused silica capillary column (100 m x 0.25 mm, Varian, Middelburg, the Netherlands) according to Gómez-Cortés et al. (2008).
Correction factors of FAME were determined by analyzing butter oil of a known FA profile with certified values (CRM 164; European Community Bureau of Reference, Brussels, Belgium). Each conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) peak was identified by comparing it with standards from Nu-Chek Prep Inc. (Elysian, MN): pure CLA methyl ester isomers (cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 C18:2) and a mixture of trans-8, cis-10; cis-9, trans-11; trans-10, cis-12; cis-11, trans-13 C18:2 with small amounts of a variety of all cis and all trans C18:2 isomers.
The preparation of dimethyloxazoline (DMOX) derivatives from FAME was based on the Fay and Richli (1991) procedure. The CLA DMOX derivatives were separated with the same column on an Agilent GC chromatograph (model 6890N) connected to a mass spectrometer detector (MS 5973N). The filament trap current was 400 µA at 70 electronvolts. The DMOX derivatives were injected splitless into the same column in the following conditions: initial oven temperature was 75°C for 2 min after injection, then temperature was programmed at 5°C/min to 180°C and held there for 30 min, and then temperature was programmed at 5°C/min to 220°C and held there for 30 min. The column inlet pressure was set at 28.7 kPa.
Silver ion HPLC separation of CLA methyl esters was carried out using an HPLC (model SPE-MA10AVP, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a diode array detector operated at 233 nm. Three ChromSpher 5 Lipid analytical silver-impregnated columns (250 mm x 4.6 mm i.d. stainless steel; 5 µm particle size; Varian) were used in series. The mobile phase was 0.1% acetonitrile and 0.5% diethyl ether in hexane and was operated isocratically at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The chromatographic areas for 7–9, 8–10, and 9–11 CLA were used for comparison with the peak area of the 3 isomers from the gas chromatogram. The amounts of the other CLA isomers were calculated from their silver ion HPLC areas relative to the area of the main positonal isomer 9–11. The results were expressed as absolute values in milligrams per gram of fat.
Statistical Analyses
Data on DM intake, milk yield and composition, as well as FA composition and CLA profile were analyzed by repeated-measurement analysis (Wang and Goonewardene, 2004), using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and assuming a compound symmetric structure on the basis of Schwarzs Bayesian information model fit criteria. The statistical model included the fixed effects of diet (D), time (T), their interaction (D x T), and the initial record measured at 0 wk (covariate). For all data collected either individually (milk yield and composition) or per lot (DM intake, FA composition, and CLA profile), the lot was nested within the diet to contrast the effect of the OO supplementation. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were generated for associations between FA using the CORR procedure of SAS. Regression analyses were performed using the REG procedure of SAS. Significance was considered at P < 0.05, and differences of P > 0.05 to P < 0.10 were discussed as trends. Least squares means (adjusted for the covariance) are reported throughout.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In sheep, milk fat content and yield are not generally reduced but are often increased by vegetable oil supplementation (Chilliard et al., 2003; Pulina et al. 2006; Sanz-Sampelayo et al., 2007). In cow milk, some trans FA (trans-10 C18:1, trans-10, cis-12 C18:2, and trans-9, cis-11 C18:2) have been proposed as milk fat synthesis inhibitors. The current study would support the idea that factors other than trans-10 C18:1 are probably involved in regulating mammary lipogenesis in ewes. Very recent research in cow milk (Lock et al., 2007), which provides no support for the idea that changes in rumen production of trans-10 C18:1 play a role in the regulation of FA synthesis during diet-induced milk fat depression, would be in agreement with the current results (Table 3
).
The increase in trans-10, cis-12 and trans-9, cis-11 C18:2 due to OO supplementation did not decrease ewe milk fat content (Table 2
), contrary to observations in cows (Griinari and Bauman, 1999; Shingfield et al., 2006; Gama et al., 2008). An argument to explain these discrepancies between species could be based on the low amounts of these trans FA in ewe milk fat. A synthetic CLA supplement containing trans-10, cis-12 C18:2 reduced milk fat synthesis in lactating sheep (Lock et al., 2006), indicating that the milk fat depression mechanism in sheep is apparently similar to that of cows. Following this line, Pulina et al. (2006) argued that sheep would probably be less prone to milk fat depression because of their ability to ruminate and have normal rumen function, even when fed finely ground diets that cause rumen acidosis in cows. However, definitive evidence to clarify this controversy has to be obtained.
Saturated FA
The potential for decreasing saturated FA from C10:0 to C16:0 in milk is very great with lipid supplementation. This FA group is produced by de novo lipogenesis in the mammary gland. Part of the reduction in de novo FA synthesis could be due to a greater uptake to the mammary gland of dietary and ruminally derived long-chain FA. These FA would compete for esterification with medium-chain FA synthesized in the mammary gland, which may lead to feedback inhibition of lipogenesis enzymes (Palmquist et al., 1993). This effect would be more marked when FA are more unsaturated and contain more trans double bonds (Chilliard and Ferlay, 2004). Thus, when the bioavailability of C18 FA increases as a result of increased dietary intake, C10:0 to C16:0 de novo synthesis decreases as does their (C10:0 to C16:0) concentration in milk. Fewer medium-chain saturated FA and more C18:1 and C18:0 were also reported in the milk of ewes fed a diet supplemented with olive cake (Chiofalo et al., 2004). In dairy cows, supplementation of the control diet with rape-seed, which is rich in oleic acid, resulted in lower concentration of the saturated FA C10:0 to C16:0 and greater levels of stearic and oleic acids compared with the control diet (Jaros et al., 2001; Collomb et al., 2004b).
MUFA
The increase in C18:0 in milk from the supplemented diet (Table 3
) must be attributed to the FA intake. Stearic acid secretion in milk can be increased either by increasing stearic acid intake or by supplementing with C18 unsaturated FA, because they can be completely hydrogenated in the rumen. Also cis-9 C18:1 can either be the result of the diet or the action of mammary
9-desaturase on C18:0. When unprotected vegetable oils rich in oleic acid are given to ruminants, the main response will be an increase in the stearic acid produced in the rumen, which is then partly converted into oleic acid in the udder (Chilliard and Ferlay, 2004). In cows, approximately 40% of C18:0 taken up by the mammary gland is desaturated to cis-9 C18:1 (Lock and Garnsworthy, 2003).
The different ratios reported in Table 3
are commonly used as a proxy for
9-desaturase activity. In our study, all the ratios, with the exception of 18:1/18:0 + C18:1, were greater (P < 0.05) in milk from ewes fed unsupplemented diets. Similar results were also reported for dairy ewes fed a diet enriched with 4% soybean oil (Mele et al., 2006). The results observed for the C18:1/C18:0 + C18:1 ratio (Table 3
) would be less reliable, because they could be greatly affected by the high intake of oleic acid as well as the biohydrogenation rates in the rumen. It seems more appropriate to trust the C14:1/C14:0 + C14:1
9-desaturase index (which was reduced by the OO treatment), because C14:1 is almost exclusively produced in the mammary gland from C14:0. An inhibitory effect of trans FA generated in the rumen on
9 activity may exist, because these FA are putative inhibitors of this enzyme (Chilliard and Ferlay, 2004), which may explain the lower levels of C14:1 and other cis-9 MUFA (Table 3
) in OO-supplemented diets.
Previous accounts of oleic acid biohydrogenation by rumen microorganisms were generally depicted as a direct conversion of oleic to stearic acid without the formation of trans intermediates (Kellens et al., 1986). The sharp increase in trans-C18:1 content (Figure 1
) in supplemented milk, however, would support more recent studies (Mosley et al., 2002; Proell et al., 2002) that oleic acid biohydrogenation in the rumen involves the formation of several positional isomers of trans monoenes rather than only direct biohydrogenation to form stearic acid. These in vitro experiments already indicated that oleic acid undergoes extensive isomerization by rumen microorganisms yielding several monoene positional isomers. Feeding high-oleic canola oil also resulted in greater concentrations of trans-6 to trans-10 C18:1 compared with other diets in the rumen of lactating cows (Loor et al., 2002).
Among the trans monoenes, 2 specific isomers, 10 and 11, are of particular interest. Under most dietary conditions, VA is the major trans isomer produced during PUFA biohydrogenation (Chilliard and Ferlay, 2004). The pattern observed in the current study (Figure 1
) could be attributed to different causes. Biohydrogenation pathways of oleic acid generate no RA and little VA (Mosley et al., 2002; Abu-Ghazaleh et al., 2005) and thus should not lead to enhanced VA concentrations in milk. Additionally, the increased concentration of trans-10 C18:1 with the intake of oleic acid found is further evidence that this isomer is primarily produced from isomerization of cis-9 C18:1 (Loor et al., 2002; Mosley et al., 2002) rather than from trans-10, cis-12 C18:2 (Harfoot and Hazlewood, 1997; Griinari and Bauman, 1999), because this pathway would require the presence of a high amount of linoleic acid as precursor.
The significant D x T interactions found for trans-10 and VA might be due to the sharp changes in the OO-supplemented animal milk fat observed during the second week of the supplementation, which then remained constant in the rest of the experiment (wk 3 and 4). In contrast, the lack of D x T interactions for some trans MUFA (6+7+8 and 9) would show a prompt response of these FA to OO supplementation during the first week and the persistence of this effect until the end of the experimental period. This different behavior might indicate that trans-FA C18:1 from 6+7+8 and 9 would be the first products in the biohydrogenation pathway of the oleic acid, whereas other MUFA isomers, such as trans-10, would be formed later on.
PUFA
Decreases in linoleic acid levels can be partly justified because of their lower content in the OO-supplemented ration (Table 1
). The decrease in RA content (Tables 3
and 4
) should be attributed to the same reasons as the decrease in the VA percentage.
In contrast to RA, increases (P < 0.01) were observed for other CLA isomers. Enhanced trans-7, cis-9 positional isomer content in milk from ewes fed OO-supplemented rations is in agreement with studies on other ruminants. In a previous work (Collomb et al., 2004a), a highly significant correlation was also found between the daily intakes of oleic acid and the concentration of the CLA isomer trans-7, cis-9 in cow milk fat. The increase observed in this CLA isomer in ewe milk fat was closely associated with the rise in the peak where trans-7 C18:1 eluted (R2 = 0.98; P < 0.01). Corl et al. (2002) demonstrated that the trans-7, cis-9 C18:2 in cow milk fat was derived almost exclusively from endogenous synthesis, whereas Piperova et al. (2002) found that virtually all of this CLA isomer in milk fat was produced postruminally via
9-desaturase. The precursor would be trans-7 C18:1 generated in the rumen.
The increase in trans-10, cis-12 and mainly trans-9, cis-11 (Tables 3
and 4
) levels could be attributed to the shift in the rumen biohydrogenation pathways. In contrast to RA and trans-7, cis-9 C18:2, most CLA isomers found in milk appear to originate exclusively from rumen output. In dairy cows, diet-induced changes in trans-10, cis-12 have been well described (Griinari and Bauman, 1999), and more recent studies have reported sharp increases in trans-9, cis-11 C18:2 (Roy et al., 2006; Shingfield et al., 2006) in the milk of cows fed with different fat-enriched rations. Lactating ewes fed with 6% soybean oil in their rations and a similar for-age: concentrate ratio also produced significant increases in milk trans-10, cis-12 and trans-9, cis-11 C18:2 content (Gómez-Cortés et al., 2008). This would support the argument that high fat content in diet together with a low forage:concentrate ratio could induce changes in the rumen biohydrogenation pathways.
The less remarkable amounts observed for trans-10, cis-12 C18:2 compared with trans-9, cis-11 C18:2 could be justified because of the biohydrogenation pathway of that CLA isomer. Its precursor would be linoleic acid (Griinari and Bauman, 1999), whose content is lower in the supplemented ration than in the control diet (Table 1
). On the other hand, the pathway of trans-9, cis-11 C18:2 formation still remains unclear. The high correlation observed between the content of this CLA isomer and trans-10 C18:1 (r = 0.93; P < 0.01) could be evidence of a common intermediate in the biohydrogenation pathways for both unsaturated FA, coinciding with previous studies on cow milk (Gama et al., 2008). However, this potential intermediate has not been identified and is still unknown.
The significant D x T interactions observed for some CLA isomers (Tables 3
and 4
) indicate that the effect of OO supplementation on the rumen biohydrogenation pathways was not constant throughout the period of supplementation, which may be related to changes in the rumen environment.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication December 17, 2007. Accepted for publication April 8, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
9-desaturase in dairy cows. Lipids 37:681–688.[CrossRef][Medline]
9-desaturase in dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 79:47–59.[CrossRef]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. F. De La Fuente, E. Barbosa, J. A. Carriedo, C. Gonzalo, R. Arenas, J. M. Fresno, and F. San Primitivo Factors influencing variation of fatty acid content in ovine milk J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3791 - 3799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |