JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2008. 91:2893-2900. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0891
© 2008 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chebel, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, J. E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chebel, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, J. E. P.

Leptin Genotype Is Associated with Lactation Performance and Health of Holstein Cows

R. C. Chebel*, F. Susca* and J. E. P. Santos{dagger},1

* Cooperative Extension, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Tulare 93274
{dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611

1 Corresponding author: jepsantos{at}ufl.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The objectives were to evaluate the associations among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the R4C locus in exon 2 of the leptin gene and the lactational performance and health of Holstein cows. Eight hundred and fourteen lactating dairy cows had their DNA sequenced in exon 2 of the leptin gene to determine the presence of SNP in the R4C locus. Cows were milked 3 times daily, and yields of milk and milk components were recorded monthly individually during the first 305 d of lactation. Cows were examined daily by herd personnel for diagnosis of health events such as retained fetal membranes, displacement of abomasum, lameness, and mastitis. Resulting genotypes were CC (34.6%), CT (48.2%), and TT (17.2%). Cows bearing the CT genotype had lower body condition (2.98 ± 0.02) during the first 62 d in milk (DIM) than cows homozygous for the C (3.02 ± 0.02) and T (3.04 ± 0.03) alleles. Leptin genotype was associated with yields of milk and milk components, and cows homozygous for the C allele were less productive than those carrying the CT and TT genotypes. The 305-d yields of 3.5% fat-corrected milk, milk fat, and milk true protein were less in CC compared with CT cows by 258, 12, and 10.7 kg, respectively. Cows carrying the TT genotype had increased incidence of displacement of abomasum (4.3%), but genotype did not affect the incidence of retained fetal membranes, clinical and subclinical mastitis, or lameness. Risk of developing at least one clinical health disorder was influenced by leptin genotype, and cows carrying the CT genotype had the lowest risk for developing any disease (19.6%). Mating decisions to increase the frequency of cows heterozygous in the R4C locus may improve productivity and health.

Key Words: dairy cow • health • leptin • single nucleotide polymorphism


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Leptin is a peptide hormone secreted primarily by white adipocytes (Zhang et al., 1994) and it acts on the central nervous system as a satiety signal (Block et al., 2003) through specific receptors that are mainly expressed in the hypothalamus. During most of the lactation, the energy intake of dairy cows generally exceeds energy needs; however, in the first 4 to 8 wk of lactation the reverse is observed, because voluntary DMI is insufficient to meet the nutrient needs of the lactating dairy cow. Therefore, early in lactation, milk yield is supported by strenuous mobilization of adipose tissue, resulting in loss of BW and BCS and a sharp decrease in concentrations of leptin, which reach the nadir approximately 10 d after parturition (Kadokawa et al., 2000). Reduced concentrations of plasma leptin signal the brain to conserve energy by lessening functions such as reproduction and immunity, which are not essential for short-term survival (Houseknecht et al., 1998). Thus, leptin is an important physiological marker of BW, DMI, energy expenditure (Houseknecht et al., 1998; Nkrumah et al., 2005), reproductive function (Cunningham et al., 1999), and certain immune functions (Lord et al., 1998).

Studies evaluating the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the promoter exon and intron regions of the bovine leptin gene and performance of cattle have demonstrated correlations between SNP and serum leptin concentration (Liefers et al., 2003; Nkrumah et al., 2005), feed intake (Liefers et al., 2002; Nkrumah et al., 2005), milk yield (Liefers et al., 2002; Buchanan et al., 2003; Kaminski et al., 2006), and body fat percentage (Buchanan et al., 2002; Nkrumah et al., 2004). The frequency of polymorphism in exonic sequences of the leptin gene was 1 per 84 bp.

The SNP in the R4C locus results in the substitution of a cytosine (C) by a thymine (T) nucleobase and the addition of an unpaired cysteine to the leptin protein, which has been suggested to influence its tertiary conformation and the affinity of leptin to its receptors (Konfortov et al., 1999; Liefers et al., 2003, 2005). Kinetic studies demonstrated that free leptin has a significantly shorter half-life than bound leptin, which could explain why cows homozygous for the C allele have greater concentrations of leptin than those homozygous for the T allele (Liefers et al., 2003). Therefore, interest exists regarding the potential relationships between SNP in the R4C locus of exon 2 of the leptin gene and productivity traits in dairy cattle. It is important to determine whether difference in genotype in cattle populations might in fact influence productivity and health, because of potential application of this technology for selection or arranged mating of cattle.

The hypothesis was that cows of different genotypes at the R4C locus of exon 2 of the leptin gene would have different lactational performance and would experience different incidence of health disorders during their lactation. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to characterize the lactational performance and the incidence of health disorders in cows with R4C SNP in exon 2 of the leptin gene.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals, Housing, Diets, and Management
Lactating Holstein cows, 458 multiparous and 356 primiparous, from a commercial dairy farm located in the San Joaquin Valley of California were used. The rolling herd milk production average was 12,035 kg of 3.5% FCM. Cows were housed in free-stall barns, and individual pens were similar in design, size, and number of cows housed. Primiparous and multiparous cows were housed separately. Cows calved from October 2003 to February 2004, and data were collected for the first 305 d of lactation.

Cows were fed 2 different diets as TMR according to the stage of lactation, with an immediate postpartum diet fed in the first 3 wk postpartum, and a lactating diet fed during the remainder of the lactation. Cows were fed twice daily and diets were based on corn silage, alfalfa hay, soybean meal, steam-rolled corn, whole cottonseed, calcium salts of palm oil, and a mineral and vitamin and protein supplement. The 2 diets were designed to meet or exceed the requirements set forth by the NRC (2001) for lactating Holstein cows weighing 650 kg and producing 45 kg/d of milk containing 3.5% fat. All cows received 500 mg of exogenous bST (Posilac, Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO) every 14 d, initiated between 100 and 110 d postpartum until 2 wk before dry off.

Weekly, approximately 0.5 kg of TMR was sampled and dried at 55°C for 48 h in an air circulating oven. Dried samples were ground in a Wiley mill (Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA) to pass a 2-mm screen, and then passed through a cyclone mill (Udy Co., Fort Collins, CO) to pass a 1-mm screen. Samples were composited for 2-mo periods and analyzed for their contents of DM at 105°C, OM and ether extract (AOAC, 2000), ADF and NDF (Van Soest et al., 1991), and minerals. The N content of samples was analyzed using an N analyzer (FP-528 Nitrogen Determinator, Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI), and CP was calculated by multiplying the N content by 6.25. Mineral content was analyzed at the Dairyland Laboratory (Arcadia, WI) using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (Thermo Jarrell Ash, Franklin, MA). Nutrient composition of diets fed is in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Chemical composition of diets offered immediately after calving, in the first 3 wk postpartum, and after 3 wk postpartum
 
BCS and Yields of Milk and Milk Components
Cows were scored for body condition (1 = emaciated, 5 = obese) at 3 ± 3, 35 ± 3, and 62 ± 3 DIM as described by Ferguson et al. (1994). Cows were milked 3 times daily and milk yields were recorded for individual cows once monthly during the official California DHIA test. Individual milk samples were collected from 3 consecutive milkings, composited, and analyzed for SCC, fat, and true protein concentrations (Foss 303 MilkoScan, Foss Foods Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) at the DHIA laboratory in Tulare, California. Data from 305-d yields of milk, fat, and true protein were obtained when cows completed 305 DIM or when they left the herd if earlier than 305 DIM from DHI records.

Incidence of Health Disorders
Herd personnel evaluated cows daily for retained fetal membranes, displacement of abomasum, lameness, mastitis, and other miscellaneous diseases. Fetal membranes were considered retained if present past 24 h after calving. Diagnosis of left displacement of abomasum was based on the presence of an acute ping sound at auscultation and percussion on the left or right side of the abdomen. Cows diagnosed with left displacement of abomasum were treated by toggle pin suture procedure and those with displacement to the right side by surgery, supportive therapy with glucose precursors, and antibiotics were administered as needed. Clinical mastitis cases were characterized by the presence of abnormal milk or by signs of inflammation in one or more glands, and were treated by intramammary infusion of antibiotics according to treatment protocols established by the herd veterinarian. A cow had a new case of mastitis when a different gland was affected or when a period of 21 d had elapsed since the previous diagnosis. Incidence of lameness was determined based on diagnosis performed by visual observation of abnormal gait by herd personnel. In addition to evaluating individual diseases, the proportion of cows affected by at least one of the health problems described above was evaluated.

Calving Data
Calving difficulty was scored based on a 5-point scale; 1 = no assistance, 2 = slight assistance, 3 = needed assistance; 4 = considerable force for extraction, and 5 = extreme difficulty (National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia, MO). Cows with calving score >2 had dystocia. Sex of calf was recorded as female, male, or twins. Stillbirths were calves born at term but that died during or immediately after delivery before receiving colostrum and being moved to individual hutches.

Blood Sample Collection and Leptin Genotyping
Blood (7 mL) was sampled from the median coccygeal vein or artery using evacuated tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) containing K2 EDTA. Immediately upon collection, samples were placed in ice and transported to the laboratory. Whole blood samples were sent to Igenity (Lincoln, NE) for genotyping of the R4C locus of exon 2 of the leptin gene. Gentra kits (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) were used for extracting DNA from the whole blood. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) was used to capture the SNP allele.

Study Design and Statistical Analyses
Monthly yields of milk, 3.5% FCM, fat and true protein, and concentrations of fat and true protein in milk, SCS, and BCS were analyzed by ANOVA as repeated measures using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS/STAT, ver. 9.1; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The models included leptin genotype (CC, CT, and TT), parity (primiparous and multiparous), month postpartum, disease event (yes or no), interaction between genotype and month postpartum, and interaction between genotype and parity. Cow nested within genotype was used as the random error. The Schwarz Bayesian information criterion was utilized to identify the best covariance structure in the REPEATED statement for each dependent variable analyzed. The 305-d yields of milk, 3.5% FCM, fat, and true protein were analyzed by ANOVA with the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Institute) with models that included the effects of leptin genotype, parity, disease, and interaction between genotype and parity.

Incidence of diseases was analyzed by logistic regression using the LOGISTIC procedure of SAS (SAS Institute). All models included leptin genotype, parity, and the interaction between genotype and parity, except for incidence of lameness, which did not include the interaction between genotype and parity because of a quasi-complete separation of data points. Body condition score at 3, 35, and 62 DIM and change in BCS from 3 to 35 and from 3 to 62 were only included in the logistic regression models when their effect on the outcome analyzed was P ≤ 0.20 according to univariate analyses. Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were generated to compare the risk of disease among genotypes.

Treatment differences with P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant and those with 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10 were considered a tendency. For ANOVA, when overall treatment effect resulted in P ≤ 0.05, mean separation and individual comparisons were then performed using the PDIFF statement in SAS (SAS Institute).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Eight hundred and fourteen Holstein cows had their R4C polymorphism of the exon-2 region of the leptin gene sequenced to evaluate the occurrence of the arginine to cysteine mutation (C to T). The observed genotype frequencies were 34.6, 48.2, and 17.2% for CC, CT and TT, respectively, resulting in 82.8% of cows bearing the C allele and 65.4% bearing the T allele.

BCS
There was a tendency (P = 0.09) for the leptin genotype to influence BCS during the first 62 DIM (Figure 1Go), and CT cows had lower (P = 0.05) BCS than TT cows. Cows of different genotype experienced similar (P = 0.42) BCS loss from 3 to 35 DIM (CC = –0.58 ± 0.03, CT = –0.56 ± 0.02, TT = –0.53 ± 0.03). The amount of BCS lost in the first 35 DIM by cows that experienced or did not experience diseases was not different (P = 0.27), and they averaged –0.57 ± 0.03 and –0.54 ± 0.02 for cows with or without diagnosis of diseases, respectively. Similar to the first 35 d postpartum, BCS losses in the first 62 DIM did not differ (P = 0.13) among cows of different genotypes.


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Body condition score of lactating Holstein cows according to their leptin genotype (a C/T substitution resulting in an amino acid change from arginine to cysteine). The mean BCS during the first 62 d postpartum were CC = 3.02 ± 0.02, CT = 2.98 ± 0.02, TT = 3.04 ± 0.03. Effect of leptin genotype (P = 0.09), day postpartum (P < 0.01), and interaction between genotype and month postpartum (P = 0.54).

 
Production Measures
Cows with the CT genotype tended (P = 0.06) to have greater milk yield during the lactation before enrollment (Table 2Go). However, leptin genotype was not associated with monthly milk yield during the current lactation (Table 2Go). Cows that experienced at least one disease event during their lactation had lower (P < 0.01) milk yield than those that did not experience any disease events (38.69 ± 0.59 and 40.91 ± 0.46 kg/d, respectively). Monthly production of 3.5% FCM was influenced (P = 0.02) by leptin genotype, and cows homozygous for the C allele yielded less 3.5% FCM than CT (P = 0.01) and TT (P = 0.04) cows (CC = 39.2 ± 0.6 vs. CT = 40.8 ± 0.6 vs. 40.9 ± 0.7 kg/d), but CT and TT cows did not differ (P = 0.93). Cows that experienced at least one disease event during their lactation produced less (P < 0.01) 3.5% FCM than those that did not experience disease events (39.0 ± 0.7 and 41.6 ± 0.5 kg/d, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Lactation performance of cows with different leptin genotypes (LSM ± SEM)
 
Concentration of fat in milk was not affected by leptin genotype. Similarly, parity (P = 0.15) or occurrence of disease (P = 0.47) were not associated with fat concentration in milk (Table 2Go). Fat yield was influenced (P = 0.02) by leptin genotype (CC = 1.37 ± 0.02 vs. CT = 1.43 ± 0.02 vs. 1.43 ± 0.02 kg/d), and cows homozygous for the C allele had lower production than CT and TT cows (Table 2Go). There was no (P = 0.90) difference in fat yield between CT and TT cows. Yield of fat was influenced (P < 0.01) by occurrence of diseases, in which cows diagnosed with at least one clinical disease event produced less milk fat than healthy cows (1.37 ± 0.02 vs. 1.46 ± 0.02 kg/d). Similar to concentration of fat, true protein in milk was not affected (P = 0.28) by leptin genotype, but it varied (P = 0.04) for primiparous and multiparous cows according to leptin genotype. For CC and TT cows, multiparous cows had greater concentrations of milk protein, whereas for CT cows, primiparous cows had milk with increased concentrations of true protein. Occurrence of disease affected (P = 0.05) true protein concentration, and cows that experienced disease had greater concentrations than cows that did not experience disease (3.00 ± 0.02 vs. 2.97 ± 0.01%). Leptin genotype affected (P = 0.04) milk true protein yield, and cows of CC genotype produced less true protein than CT cows (CC = 1.15 ± 0.02 vs. CT = 1.19 ± 0.01 vs. 1.18 ± 0.02 kg/d). Cows that experienced disease during the lactation had lower (P < 0.01) yields of true protein than those that did not experience disease (1.15 ± 0.02 vs. 1.20 ± 0.01 kg/d). At completion of a 305-d lactation, cows of the CT genotype tended (P = 0.08) to produce 282 kg more milk than CC cows, and they produced 258 kg more 3.5% FCM (P = 0.04), 12 kg more fat (P = 0.05), and 10.7 kg more true protein (P = 0.01) than CC cows, although only protein production differed between CT and TT cows (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Lactation yields at 305-d of cows with different leptin genotype (LSM ± SEM)
 
There was a tendency (P = 0.07) for the leptin genotype to influence SCS and they were 2.54 ± 0.13, 2.78 ± 0.12, and 2.48 ± 0.14 for CC, CT, and TT cows, respectively (Table 2Go). The SCS did not differ between parity, but cows that experienced disease during lactation had greater (P < 0.01) SCS than those that did not experience any disease (3.01 ± 0.13 vs. 2.19 ± 0.10). The proportions of cows with subclinical mastitis, based on SCC >200 x 103/mL in any of the first 10 mo postpartum were similar (P > 0.12) for the different genotypes, and approximately 16.8% of the cows had subclinical mastitis at any given month postpartum.

Incidence of Health and Calving Disorders
Risk of retained fetal membranes was not influenced by leptin genotype, and it affected 5.8% of the cows (Table 4Go). Leptin genotype was associated (P = 0.02) with the incidence of displacement of the abomasum, and cows homozygous for the T allele were more likely (P < 0.01) to experience displacement of the abomasum compared with cows bearing the CT genotype. A total of 114 (14.0%) cows experienced at least one case of clinical mastitis, and it was not (P = 0.16) associated with leptin genotype. Similar to mastitis, leptin genotype did not alter the risk of lameness.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Incidence of health disorders of cows with different leptin genotypes
 
The risk of cows to be affected by at least one of the diseases described above was associated (P = 0.004) with leptin genotype, and cows with the CT genotype were less likely to experience disease compared with CC and TT cows, but there was no (P = 0.17) difference between CC and TT cows (Table 4Go). Interestingly, there was a tendency (P = 0.10) for the leptin genotype to be associated with the risk of cows developing multiple diseases during their lactation (Table 4Go), and CT cows had the least risk.

The mean and median calving scores of cows of different genotypes were similar (Table 5Go). Similarly, genotype was not associated with the proportion of cows experiencing dystocia, stillbirths, delivering female calves, or having twin births.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Calving difficulty, dystocia, stillbirth, and calf gender according to leptin genotype of the dam
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Considerable interest exists in determining the relationship between SNP for different genes and productive and health traits of economic importance for the cattle industry. Recently, a C to T transition in the R4C locus of exon 2 of the leptin gene, which encodes an amino acid change from arginine to cysteine, was identified (Konfortov et al., 1999). Such a change is considered a nonconserved substitution that could alter the functionality of the leptin hormone and was linked with changes in important economic traits of beef and dairy cattle (Konfortov et al., 1999; Buchanan et al., 2002, 2003). In the present study, the distribution of dairy cows with CC, CT, and TT genotypes was 34.6, 48.2, and 17.2%, respectively, resulting in 82.8% of cows bearing the C allele and 65.4% bearing the T allele. This prevalence of cows bearing C and T alleles was similar to that reported for Holstein cattle (Buchanan et al., 2003), which probably reflects the similar gene pool used by different dairy producers that rely upon proven sires from bull studs for AI.

Cows bearing the CT genotype tended to have lower BCS during the first 62 DIM compared with those bearing TT and CC genotypes. This is an intriguing finding considering that cows with the CT genotype only had greater yield of FCM compared with CC cows, but not TT cows. It was demonstrated that polymorphisms in the coding region of the leptin gene were associated with DMI (Liefers et al., 2002; Lagonigro et al., 2003) and carcass merit (Nkrumah et al., 2004), and that animals homozygous for the T allele in exon 2 of the leptin gene had greater body fat and grade fat compared with those homozygous for the C allele (Buchanan et al., 2002). Cows with the CT genotype had lower BCS during the first 62 DIM compared with TT cows, despite having similar milk yield, which could be an indication that the latter may have had greater feed intake during early stages of lactation or that they may be more competent in storing energy as fat depots and have less energy expenditure.

Cows with the CT genotype tended to have greater milk production compared with cows homozygous for the C and T alleles during the lactation before enrollment in this study. Cows of the same leptin genotype produced more 305-d 3.5% FCM, milk fat, and true protein than cows of the CC genotype. Buchanan et al. (2003) observed that cows homozygous for the C allele had lower milk yield than those bearing CT and TT genotypes. On the other hand, CC cows tended to have greater fat concentration in milk from 101 to 200 DIM compared with CT and TT cows, resulting in similar FCM yields among cows of different leptin genotypes (Buchanan et al., 2003), which contrasts our results. Silva et al. (2002) demonstrated that bovine mammary epithelial cell lines cultured in the presence of leptin had less incorporation of [3H]-thymidine, which indicated less DNA synthesis, suggesting a negative feedback role of leptin on mammary gland development. Contrary to these findings, Thorn et al. (2006) observed that bovine mammary epithelial cells had negligible leptin receptor expression and did not respond to leptin in vitro; thereby, indicating that leptin could not influence lactation by acting directly on mammary epithelial cells. Therefore, changes in lactation performance observed for cows of different leptin genotype were likely the result of differences in partition of nutrients with CT cows prioritizing yields of milk and milk components as opposed to CC cows that stored more body reserves, which later in lactation might reflect in differences in serum leptin concentrations (Liefers et al., 2003).

As expected, cows that experienced at least one disease event during their lactation had reduced productivity and yielded 2.2 and 2.7 kg/d less milk and 3.5% FCM, respectively, compared with healthy cows. This was expected as all the diseases evaluated reduce lactation performance of dairy cows (Rajala and Gröhn, 1998; Hernandez et al., 2005).

Interestingly, CT cows tended to have greater SCS than TT and CC cows, even though the risk for clinical mastitis did not differ among genotypes. Increased SCC in milk in the absence of clinical signs of mastitis could indicate an increased occurrence of subclinical mastitis in CT cows; however, the proportions of cows that experienced subclinical mastitis based on SCC >200 x 103/mL were similar among genotypes. Buchanan et al. (2003) observed that cows homozygous for the T allele had significantly greater SCS compared with CC and CT cows, but no data regarding incidence of clinical mastitis was presented. These data suggest that risk for mastitis was not influenced by leptin genotype.

In the present study, there was no association between leptin genotype and incidence of lameness. It is important to note that the incidence of lameness observed in the present study was considerably less than that observed previously (Hernandez et al., 2005; Espejo et al., 2006). Espejo et al. (2006) observed that when lameness was diagnosed by study personnel the incidence was approximately 3.1 times greater compared with the observed incidence of lameness when farm personnel were responsible for its diagnosis.

Cows of TT genotype more likely experienced displacement of the abomasum compared with CT cows. Displacement of abomasum usually occurs in cows with depressed appetite prepartum and early postpartum, and a major risk factor is excessive degree of fatness at calving, which results in delayed postpartum increase in DMI (Van Winden and Kuiper, 2003). Furthermore, cows with high BCS during the last 30 d before calving had increased concentrations of NEFA and BHBA during the transition period (Bernabucci et al., 2005), indicating that they underwent more severe negative nutrient balance. In the current study, cows homozygous for the T allele tended to have the highest BCS throughout the study, but differences were too small to justify major increments in the risk for displacement of abomasum, and mean BCS at 3 d postpartum does not suggest that cows were overconditioned immediately before calving. Another risk factor for postparturient diseases was calving-related problems, which did not differ among genotypes. Because TT cows experienced not only increased risk for displacement of abomasum, but also overall morbidity and risk for multiple diseases, it is possible that cows bearing the homozygous T allele were more susceptible to postparturient diseases.

Interestingly, heterozygous cows not only produced more 3.5% FCM and milk components, they also experienced the lowest risk for displacement of abomasum, morbidity, and multiple diseases. Inbreeding has been demonstrated to be detrimental to health and production, and heterozygosis reduces the consequences of inbreeding depression, maintaining genetic interactions that result in improved productive and health performance (VanRaden and Sanders, 2003).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
It is known that other polymorphisms in the leptin gene that could affect productivity and health traits of dairy animals exist, and that productive responses to polymorphisms of the R4C locus of exon 2 of the leptin gene have not been consistent in dairy cows. Yet, in the current study, cows bearing the CT genotype had lower BCS than CC or TT cows during the first 62 DIM, which could be explained by their increased monthly yields of 3.5% FCM, milk fat, and true protein, resulting in greater 305-d yields of milk and milk components. Cows homozygous for the T allele had greater BCS during the first 62 DIM compared with CT cows, despite having similar yields of milk and 3.5% FCM, which could indicate that they had greater feed intake or were more efficient in energy expenditure and storage. Heterozygous cows were less likely to experience disease during their lactation compared with cows homozygous for the C and T alleles. Heterozygosis in the R4C locus in exon 2 of the leptin gene appears to confer on dairy cows characteristics of hybrid vigor. Therefore, mating decisions to increase the frequency of cows heterozygous in the R4C locus may improve productive and health performance.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors want to thank Brent Woodward from Merial (Duluth, GA) for providing the Igenity L genotype testing for this study.

Received for publication November 23, 2007. Accepted for publication March 21, 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD.

Bernabucci, U., B. Ronchi, N. Lacetera, and A. Nardone. 2005. Influence of body condition score on relationships between metabolic status and oxidative stress in periparturient dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:2017–2026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Block, S. S., J. M. Smith, R. A. Ehrhardt, M. C. Diaz, R. P. Rhoads, M. E. Van Amburgh, and Y. R. Boisclair. 2003. Nutritional and developmental regulation of plasma leptin in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3206–3214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buchanan, F. C., C. J. Fitzsimmons, A. G. Van Kessels, T. D. Thue, C. Winkelman-Sim, and S. M. Schumtz. 2002. Association of a missense mutation in the bovine leptin gene with carcass fat content and leptin mRNA levels. Genet. Sel. Evol. 34:105–116.[CrossRef][Medline]

Buchanan, F. C., A. G. Van Kessel, C. Waldner, D. A. Christensen, B. Laarveld, and S. M. Schumtz. 2003. An association between a leptin single nucleotide polymorphism and milk and protein yield. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3164–3166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cunningham, M. J., D. K. Clifton, and R. A. Steuner. 1999. Leptin’s actions on the reproductive axis: Perspective and mechanisms. Biol. Reprod. 60:216–222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Espejo, L. A., M. I. Endres, and J. A. Salfer. 2006. Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. J. Dairy Sci. 89:3052–3058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ferguson, J. D., D. T. Galligan, and N. Thomsen. 1994. Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2695–2703.[Abstract]

Hernandez, J. A., E. J. Garbarino, J. K. Shearer, C. A. Risco, and W. W. Thatcher. 2005. Comparison of milk yield in dairy cows with different degrees of lameness. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 227:1292–1296.[CrossRef][Medline]

Houseknecht, K. L., C. A. Baile, R. L. Matteri, and M. E. Spurlock. 1998. The biology of leptin: A review. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1405–1420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kadokawa, H., D. Blache, Y. Yamada, and G. B. Martin. 2000. Relationships between changes in plasma concentrations of leptin before and after parturition and the timing of first post-partum ovulation in high-producing Holstein dairy cows. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 12:405–411.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaminski, S., P. Brym, A. Rusc, and E. Wojcik. 2006. Associations between milk performance traits in Holstein cows and 16 candidate SNPs identified by arrayed primer extension (apex) microarray. Anim. Biotechnol. 17:1–11.[CrossRef][Medline]

Konfortov, B. A., V. E. Licence, and J. R. Miller. 1999. Re-sequencing of DNA from a diverse panel of cattle reveals a high level of polymorphism in both intron and exon. Mamm. Genome 10:1142–1145.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lagonigro, R., P. Wiener, F. Pilla, J. A. Woolliams, and J. L. Williams. 2003. A new mutation in the coding region of the bovine leptin gene associated with feed intake. Anim. Genet. 34:371–374.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liefers, S. C., M. F. W. te Pas, R. F. Veerkamp, Y. Chilliard, C. Delavaud, R. Gerritsen, and T. van der Lende. 2003. Association of leptin gene polymorphisms with serum leptin concentration in dairy cows. Mamm. Genet. 14:657–663.[CrossRef]

Liefers, S. C., M. F. W. te Pas, R. F. Veerkamp, and T. van der Lende. 2002. Association between leptin gene polymorphisms and production, live weight, energy balance, feed intake and fertility in Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1633–1638.[Abstract]

Liefers, S. C., R. F. Veerkamp, M. F. W. Te Pas, Y. Chilliard, and T. Van der Lende. 2005. Genetics and physiology of leptin in periparturient dairy cows. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 29:227–238.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lord, G. M., G. Matarese, J. K. Howard, R. J. Baker, S. R. Bloom, and R. I. Lechler. 1998. Leptin modulates the T-cell immune response and reverses starvation-induced immunosuppression. Nature 394:897–900.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nkrumah, J. D., C. Li, J. A. Basarab, S. Guercio, Y. Meng, B. Murdoch, C. Hansen, and S. S. Moore. 2004. Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the bovine leptin gene with feed intake, growth, feed efficiency, feeding behavior and carcass merit. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84:211–219.

Nkrumah, J. D., C. Li, J. Yu, C. Hansen, D. H. Keisler, and S. S. Moore. 2005. Polymorphisms in the bovine leptin promoter associated with serum leptin concentration, growth, feed intake, feeding behavior, and measures of carcass merit. J. Anim. Sci. 83:20–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Rajala, P. J., and Y. T. Gröhn. 1998. Effects of dystocia, retained placenta, and metritis on milk yield in diary cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81:3172–3181.[Abstract]

Silva, L. F., M. J. VandeHaar, M. S. Weber Nielsen, and G. W. Smith. 2002. Evidence for a local effect of leptin in bovine mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3277–3286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thorn, S. R., S. Purup, W. S. Cohick, M. Vestergaard, K. Sejrsen, and Y. R. Boisclair. 2006. Leptin does not act directly on mammary epithelial cells in prepubertal dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1467–1477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

VanRaden, P. M., and A. H. Sanders. 2003. Economic merit of cross-bred and purebred US dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1036–1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.[Abstract]

Van Winden, S. C., and R. Kuiper. 2003. Left displacement of the abomasum in dairy cattle: recent developments in epidemiological and etiological aspects. Vet. Res. 34:47–56.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang, Y., R. Proenca, M. Maffei, M. Barone, L. Leopold, and J. M. Friedman. 1994. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature 372:425–432.[CrossRef][Medline]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chebel, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, J. E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chebel, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, J. E. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS