|
|
||||||||


* Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, STN Lennoxville, Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1M 1Z3 Canada
Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, AB21 9SB United Kingdom
Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, AB21 9SB United Kingdom
1 Corresponding author: lapierreh{at}agr.gc.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endogenous secretion amino acid dairy cow leucine
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endogenous secretions have received considerable attention in pigs, and numerous studies have been conducted to determine factors that affect EN flows at the ileum, the true ileal igestibility of feed ingredients and subsequent true availability of dietary AA (Jansman et al., 2002). Corresponding data are scarce in ruminants, although important because estimations of EN in ruminants have a dual purpose: in addition to their contribution to metabolic losses of protein, EN also contributes substantially to the duodenal flow. Currently, RUP flow is usually estimated by difference between duodenal and microbial N flows. Therefore, ignoring the fact that EN can contribute up to 20% of duodenal N flow, as "free" EN or incorporated into bacterial protein (Ouellet et al., 2002, 2005), results in an overestimation of AA available on a net basis from RUP and microbial protein synthesis. The main challenge in ruminants is to find an adequate method for the measurements of EN. The earliest methods used in pigs (e.g., N-free diet method, diets with highly digestible protein sources, regression, and enzymatically hydrolyzed casein/ultrafiltration techniques; Jansman et al., 2002) cannot be transferred directly to the ruminant, because rumen microbial protein synthesis even in the absence of N intake.
More recently, stable 15N isotope approaches have been used to estimate EN flows, based on either labeling the animal or the diet (Sève and Lahaye, 2003). A common approach is to infuse [15N]Leu over several days to label EN. Leucine is used because of its involvement in transamination reactions and, on a practical basis, due to a relatively low cost. The EN flows are estimated from the dilution of the isotopic enrichment (IE) in the digesta at any GIT site, relative to the IE of EN. Although offering improvements compared with earlier approaches, the isotopic dilution method also has limitations (Sève and Lahaye, 2003). In particular, the choice of the pool to represent the IE of the EN is critical, and the heterogeneity and sampling of EN represent real challenges. For practical purposes, initial studies in pigs used the IE of total N of the TCA-soluble fraction of plasma as representative of the IE of EN (Sève and Lahaye, 2003). Such an approach is questionable in pigs (de Lange et al., 1990; Lien et al., 1997a) and would be even less satisfactory in ruminants because of the large presence of urea derived from unlabeled ammonia in the plasma TCA-soluble fraction. Alternative, and better, representation of the IE of EN would be from the various endogenous protein sources, including mucins (Lien et al., 1997a; Leterme et al., 1998), the mucosa of the GIT (Hess et al., 1998; Ouellet et al., 2002), pancreatic secretions (Souffrant et al., 1993) and even milk casein, an easily accessible "export" protein (Ouellet et al., 2002).
Although labeled Leu is infused, the dilution of the IE of total N is traditionally used to calculate the EN flows. The contribution of 15N-Leu in total 15N depends on the extent of transamination with other AA and the relative AA composition of EN. In addition, in ruminants, the transfer of labeled N from Leu to other AA may also occur through microbial protein synthesis in the rumen, using labeled N from either preformed labeled AA from EN or urea, and this may expand the distribution of labeled N to AA other than Leu and therefore improve the suitability of the 15N-Leu infusion method. In pigs, because EN quantified from 15N-Leu dilution were lower than estimations from dilution of total 15N or the transamination product 15N-Ile (de Lange et al., 1992; Lien et al., 1997a), it has been suggested that transamination products would be better than Leu to estimate EN by dilution method. These results, however, were obtained using plasma TCA-soluble fraction as representative of the IE of EN. For these reasons, the validity of EN flows estimated using isotope dilution of total-N or single AA during a 15N[Leu] infusion needs to be assessed in ruminants, with appropriate representation of the IE of EN.
We hypothesized that estimation of EN in duodenal and fecal N flows in dairy cows would not differ when predicted using the dilution of 15N in either total N or Leu during a [15N]Leu infusion, provided an appropriate representation of the IE of the EN was chosen. Therefore, our objectives were 1) to determine, during infusion of [15N]Leu, the distribution of 15N in AA from different pools that might be used as representative of the IE of EN and 2) to estimate and compare the EN flows in the duodenal and fecal flows using the isotopic dilution of total-N, Leu and other AA that become labeled during a [15N]Leu infusion.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diet was fed as a TMR and distributed every other hour in 12 equal meals per day with automated feeders (Ankom, Fairport, NY). In addition to the TMR, 1 kg (as fed) of unchopped hay was fed to prevent ruminal disturbances. The chemical composition of the diet and ingredients are presented in Martineau et al. (2007). During the experiment, the ration was restricted at 95% of the ad libitum DMI measured the first week of period 1 to maintain steady-state conditions and minimize variation in DMI. Animals were housed in individual tie stalls equipped with rubber mats and had free access to water throughout the trial. Animals were cared for according to the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC, 1993) and all procedures involving animals were previously approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of the Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre.
Infusions and Sampling
Experimental periods lasted for 35 d and detailed procedures are presented in Martineau et al. (2007). Adaptation to the diet was from d 1 to 16. From d 16 to 22, a total collection of urine and feces was performed. Cows were catheterized in one jugular vein on d 18 and infused, starting on d 19 with [15N2]urea (0.5 mmol/h; 98% purity, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., Andover, MA) for 72 h to estimate urea kinetics. On d 18 (to determine natural abundance) and 22, urine, duodenal, and fecal samples were collected at 0900 and 1000 h and pooled by day. To label EN, starting on d 27, an infusion of L-[15N]Leu (0.45 mmol/h; 99% purity, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc.) was performed for 200 h. Duodenal and ileal digesta, feces, and urine were sampled at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500 h on d 34 and at 0800, 1000, 1200, and 1400 h on d 35. Duodenal sub-samples were formolized (300 mL plus 75 mL of formol physiological saline solution). Biopsies of the rumen and duodenal mucosa were taken following the same schedule, with an endometrial biopsy forceps for the rumen mucosa (approximately 10 mg) and with an optical fiber endoscope for the duodenal mucosa (approximately 5 mg) as described in Ouellet et al. (2002). Samples were rinsed with saline (0.9% NaCl) immediately after collection and frozen until further analysis. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture from a coccygeal vessel according to the same schedule, into heparinized tubes, and immediately put on ice; plasma was harvested after centrifugation (15 min, 1,800 x g at 4°C). All samples were stored at –20°C for analyses. Feed samples were taken on both days and pooled. Milk samples were collected on d 34 at the evening milking and d 35 at the morning milking. Casein was isolated from the milk by precipitation with acetic acid at pH 4.6. All biological tissues were sampled the morning before the initiation of the 15N-Leu infusion to determine natural abundance.
Analyses
Samples collected during the urea infusion were pooled by day (d 18 and 22) and analyzed for the IE of urea (total N) and duodenal bacteria and milk casein (total N and individual AA), as described below for samples taken during the [15N]Leu infusion.
Samples collected at the end of the [15N]Leu infusion were analyzed individually for DM and N content. Dry matter in digesta and fecal samples was determined by lyophilization. All dried samples were ground through a 1-mm screen Wiley mill (Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA) and analyzed for lab DM (135°C forced-air oven for 2 h for feed samples or 70°C vacuum-oven for 12 h for fecal samples). Chromium in digesta and fecal samples during the N balance period and in digesta collected on d 34 and 35 was measured by atomic absorption with an air-acetylene flame (Siddons et al., 1985). Amino acids in feed, digesta, and fecal samples were determined by an amino acid analyzer (Biochrom 20, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) after 24-h acid hydrolysis with 6 N phenol-HCl at 110°C.
A bacterial pellet was harvested from duodenal formolized digesta samples and used as reference for the ratio of purine to N in bacteria. Purine bases in bacteria and duodenal digesta were determined according to Zinn and Owens (1986) using 2 M HClO4 (Makkar and Becker, 1999) and the modified washing solution as proposed by Aharoni and Tagari (1991). An equimolar mixture of guanine and adenine was used as standard for the analysis of purine bases (Obispo and Dehority, 1999). Nitrogen concentration was determined after total combustion with a Leco Nitrogen Determinator (model FP-428, Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI), whereas AA concentration in the bacteria were determined after acid hydrolysis with 6 N phenol-HCl for 24 h at 110°C (AOAC, 2000), and AA concentrations of the hydrolysates were determined by the isotope dilution method (Calder et al., 1999) using GC-MS (model CG6890-MS5973, Hewlett Packard, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE).
Samples were analyzed individually for the IE of total N in the ruminal and duodenal biopsies and in milk casein. Paired digesta and urine samples were pooled twice daily (0900 and 1100 h, 1300 and 1500 h on d 34 and 0800 and 1000 h, 1200 and 1400 h on d 35) for the determination of the IE of total N. All samples were pooled by day (d 25, 34, and 35) for the IE of individual AA. The IE of 15N-total were performed by total combustion using an elemental analyzer (Carlo Erba Strumentazione NA 1500, Milan, Italy) coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (C-IRMS: SIRA 12, VG Isogas, Middlewich, UK). The IE of 15N-AA were measured, after protein hydrolysis, using GC-C-IRMS (Delta + XL fitted with a GC C II-III interface; Thermo Scientific, Winsford, UK). Approximately 10 mg of protein was hydrolyzed in 7 mL of 6 M HCl in sealed tubes at 110°C for 18 h with added phenol crystals (to protect aromatic AA) and dithiothreitol (to protect methionine from oxidation). After drying under reduced pressure, the samples were dissolved in 0.1 M HCl and a portion converted to the N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-N-methyl-trifluoroacetamide derivatives (Calder and Smith, 1988) before GC-C-IRMS analyses. The presence of a strongly colored hydrolysate (e.g., ileal and fecal samples) was found to interfere with the derivatization process and, when necessary, these hydrolysates were first partially decolored by passage through 0.6 mL of AG-50 resin (x8, 100–200 mesh, Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), washed with 3 x 2 mL of water, and then eluted with 2 mL of 2 M NH4OH, followed by 1 mL of water; this was freeze-dried before dissolution in 0.1 M HCl and derivatization.
Calculations and Statistical Analyses
Duodenal, ileal, and fecal flows were calculated as described in Martineau et al. (2007). The EN flows were estimated as described previously (Ouellet et al., 2002). Continuous infusion of [15N]Leu for several days results in labeling of proteins throughout the body and as a consequence, EN secretions into the GIT are enriched in 15N. Briefly, the model developed for ruminants allows estimations of EN at the different sites of samplings with the separation at the duodenum of EN already incorporated into bacteria as opposed to "free" EN. It also allows separation of the contribution of urea-N recycled into the rumen and EN to duodenal protein flows. This model, however, considers that incorporation of 15N in the intestine is solely attributable to EN and does not account for the potential contribution of microbial synthesis using labeled urea. This is also ignored in pig models (e.g., Sève and Lahaye, 2003), as knowledge about microbial synthesis within the small intestine is limited and currently precludes any sensible inclusion of such microbial synthesis within the model.
The IE of the rumen and duodenal mucosa were used as representative of the IE of EN for pre-duodenal and intestinal EN proteins, respectively. In addition, based on estimations of EN passing into the GIT (Egan et al., 1984) indicating that approximately half of the protein EN were secretions and the other half was from epithelial abrasion, EN flows were estimated using the average enrichment of the corresponding gut mucosa and milk casein, the latter taken as representative of protein exported outside the tissue in which they are synthesized, as the gut secretions. Because the IE of Gly in the intestinal mucosa and of Phe in all the pools measured were not different from zero (P > 0.10), estimations of EN with the isotopic dilution of these 2 AA were not included. To allow comparison between the different isotope dilution calculations, AA flows were converted to flows of CP, using the composition of abomasal isolate (36, 42, 69, 94, 35, 49, and 46 g of AA/kg of CP for Leu, Ala, Asx, Glx, Ile, Ser, and Val respectively; Ørskov et al., 1986) and of endogenous CP at the terminal ileum of pigs (42.0, 42.6, 66.2, 80.6, 27.3, 48.2, and 38.6 g of AA/kg of CP for Leu, Ala, Asx, Glx, Ile, Ser, and Val, respectively; Jansman et al., 2002). Allowance was also made for the synthesis of microbial-N from urea-N based on the values for total IE and that of individual AA during the 15N-urea infusion.
Flows were analyzed with the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 2001), with cow and the dilution method (total N or individual AA) as main effects, according to the model
![]() |
where Yij is the response variable, µ is the overall mean, ai is the effect of cow i (1, ..., 4), Mj is the effect of dilution method j (1, 2, 3, ...), and eij is the residual error.
In addition, the IE were analyzed initially testing the interaction between dilution method and pools used to estimate the IE of EN; because the interaction was always significant (P < 0.001), IE were then analyzed as follows. Within any particular pool that could be used to represent the IE of EN, cow and dilution method (total N or individual AA) were tested as the main effects (see previous model). Also, within an individual dilution method, cow and pool used to represent the IE of EN were tested as the main effects. The Tukey-Kramer test was used to separate the means, with P < 0.05 regarded as significant.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Variations of the Enrichment of AA Between Pools.
The impact of differential inflows of free AA from plasma plus intracellular transamination at the various sites in the body is indicated by the difference in the ratio of the IE of the individual AA against that of Leu (Table 2
). Ratio values for most AA were greater in duodenal than in ruminal mucosa and, indeed, for Glx, Ile, and Val even greater than in the plasma. Together, these data indicate that substantial transamination occurs for several AA within the duodenal mucosa. In contrast, for milk casein, Ala, Glx, and Ser had greater relative enrichments than in plasma, also suggestive of active transamination and this is in agreement with observations made across the mammary gland of dairy cows (Lapierre et al., 2005a).
|
The IE of the duodenal mucosa was consistently greater than that of ruminal mucosa, the difference reaching significance (P < 0.05) for Asx, Glx, Ile, Ser, and Val, but with no difference for the IE of Leu. On one hand, it might be expected that the precursor pool used for the synthesis of duodenal proteins would be diluted by dietary and microbial-derived AA compared with the arterial supply used at the rumen level but the biopsies were taken at the entrance of the duodenum and at this site, the availability of free AA from digested protein may be limited. On the other hand, the rate of protein synthesis is greater in the duodenum than in the rumen (Lobley et al., 1994), leading to more rapid incorporation of labeled AA, but after 8 d of infusion this will not necessarily lead to greater IE in the former, as both these high-turnover tissues should approach plateau enrichments (Early et al., 1990). The fact that the IE was not different for Leu between the rumen and duodenal mucosa would rather suggest an overall high transamination activity in the small intestine.
The IE of individual AA in milk casein was systematically greater (P < 0.05) than the IE of gut mucosa, except for Ile. They were similar to IE in plasma and were even higher (P < 0.05) for Glx and Ser, supportive of their mammary synthesis from labeled essential AA extracted in excess by the mammary gland (Lapierre et al., 2005a). The IE of milk protein has been shown to reach a level close to the IE of plasma after 30 h of infusion in dairy goats (Bequette et al., 1999). Milk casein can be compared with other proteins such as EN secretions that are exported from the tissue where they are synthesized. Indeed, pancreatic secretions also rapidly reached stable high IE during [15N]Leu infusion in pigs (Souffrant et al., 1993) and this is in line with other export proteins in sheep (Connell et al., 1997).
Pattern of Labeling in Dairy Cows Compared with Nonruminants.
These labeling patterns can be compared with observations in nonruminants, where tissue transamination will be the major route of transfer of 15N from Leu to other AA. It might be expected that the dairy cow would have a more even distribution of 15N between AA, because a proportion of the microbial protein used as an anabolic source by the animal becomes labeled from 15N-ammonia derived from rumen entry of urea. Such N-transfer into microbes gives a more uniform labeling pattern across the AA (Table 3
). In practice, however, this route of label contribution is less than 20% (from Table 4
). Therefore, although the IE of duodenal bacteria during the [15N]Leu infusion showed less variation between AA than in the endogenous proteins, Leu still dominated the total 15N in the bacteria (Table 3
).
|
|
Choice of Pool(s) that Could Best Represent the Enrichment of Endogenous Secretions
A critical issue with the isotopic dilution technique concerns the choice of the best representation of the IE of the EN secretions during the infusion of [15N]Leu. In dairy cows, an initial comparison has been made between 3 potential pools when using the IE of total N (Ouellet et al., 2002): 1) the duodenal mucosa, that would mainly represent the EN originating from sloughed cells; 2) milk casein, an easily accessible export protein that may mimic gastric or pancreatic enzyme secretions; 3) plasma TCA-soluble fraction, traditionally used to estimate EN in pigs. The current study extends those comparisons to individual AA within these fractions.
Although in initial studies using isotopic dilution technique in pigs, it was assumed that the IE of the TCA-soluble fraction would be representative of the precursor pool for the synthesis of the EN secretions (Sève and Lahaye, 2003), this assumption has been challenged. Indeed, Lien et al. (1997a) have shown that only 51% of the N in this plasma fraction was as urea + ammonia + AA, which could therefore be linked to the IE of AA used for synthesis of EN. The situation is even less acceptable in ruminants: in nonruminants, urea is mainly derived from AA catabolism and therefore the IE of urea can approach the IE of total AA-N. Indeed, in pigs, the IE of urine during [15N]Leu infusion is greater than the IE of total N in plasma TCA-soluble fraction in pigs (Souffrant et al., 1982; de Lange et al., 1990), probably reflecting the presence of N-components other than free AA in this plasma fraction, such as peptides and small proteins. In contrast, in dairy cows and other ruminants, a large proportion of urea-genesis originates from absorbed ammonia (Lapierre et al., 2005b): this will be mainly unlabeled and therefore should decrease the IE of urea. This is exactly as observed, with the IE of urine lower than the IE of the plasma TCA-soluble fraction during a [15N]Leu infusion in dairy cows (Ouellet et al., 2002). Furthermore, in the current study, the concentration of plasma urea-N (8.5 mM) was approximately 4-fold greater than that of total AA-N (2.2 mM; Martineau et al., 2007). For these reasons, the IE of total N in plasma TCA-soluble fraction is not a suitable representative pool for the estimation of the IE of EN in ruminants and has not been used for the calculations presented in this study.
Nonetheless, the different IE of AA within the pools used as representative of endogenous secretions illustrates the challenge to identify which are most appropriate to use during the isotopic dilution method. One simple option is to assume that the IE of the rumen mucosa would closely represent the IE of pre-duodenal EN and that the IE of the duodenal mucosa would match the IE of the intestinal EN. This site-specific distinction is necessary because of the different absolute enrichments of individual AA and their relative enrichments compared with 15N-Leu (Table 2
). A more complex but biologically valid option is to allow for non-mucosal inputs. Indeed, export proteins from specialized tissues such as the pancreas form part of the EN flows and may account for as much as 50% of EN flows (Egan et al., 1984). Gut export proteins are not easy to access, however, but the IE of another export protein such as milk casein can be used as a substitute. This would introduce EN inputs at greater IE than present in gut mucosa and therefore decrease the estimates of EN flows. Clearly, there is a need to further refine our knowledge on the contribution of each of these fractions, but as a first approximation and for simplification, we have made a second set of estimations, assuming that half of the endogenous flow was from export proteins, whereas the other half was of mucosal origin (Egan et al., 1984). These latter calculations would yield a lower limit for EN estimations, whereas the sole utilization of gut mucosa would yield an upper limit.
Endogenous Flows of N and AA Across the Gut
A major challenge of working with dairy cows is size and relatively slow tissue protein turnover: these factors lead to high costs for isotope infusion. For this reason, we were constrained to use doses of [15N]Leu much smaller pro rata than those employed in pigs. This difficulty has been partly overcome by use of atom percent rather than atom percent excess in the calculation (Ouellet et al., 2002). Nevertheless, we have checked for carry-over between the urea and leucine infusions: background samples were taken before every infusion and the Leu enrichments (atom percent) measured for the 3 corresponding samples (casein, duodenal and fecal bacteria) analyzed by GC-C-IRMS on both d18 (pre-urea) and d25 (pre-Leu) were not different (P > 0.50). Furthermore, greater sensitivity is achieved by analysis of the greater enrichment for 15N-Leu compared with total 15N in both the pools and the sites of gut flow (intake, duodenum, and feces: Table 4
). Flows of N and individual AA, measured directly (duodenal digesta, duodenal bacteria, feces) or estimated with the model developed for ruminants (duodenal bacteria from urea, EN, and feed; duodenal free EN; duodenal RUP; fecal EN, from undigested duodenal EN and from intestinal source; Ouellet et al., 2002) are presented in Table 5
. At the duodenum, EN flows are separated between free EN and EN incorporated into the bacterial protein, whereas in the feces, EN flows are divided between EN originating from undigested EN duodenal flow and EN from the intestine. The EN flow at the duodenum also excludes the contribution from urea to bacteria flow because this was estimated separately based on the ratio of the IE of N or AA in the duodenal bacteria relative to the IE of urea measured during the [15N2]urea infusion (Table 3
). Although this proportion differed (P < 0.05) across AA, the differences were small, mainly between 0.13 and 0.15, except for Pro (average 0.11).
|
|
|
Estimations of Endogenous Flows Using Dilution of Leu vs. Other AA.
In addition, total EN flows at the duodenum level did not differ when estimated using the dilution of the different AA with the combination of mucosa and export proteins, and estimations with Leu were only lower (P < 0.05) than estimations with Ala and Asx when mucosa was used alone. In contrast, in the feces, estimations of EN flows differed more across AA than at the duodenum level. Fecal EN flows estimated with dilution of Leu was lower (P < 0.05) than when estimated with the dilution of all other AA when mucosa was used alone and was lower (P < 0.05) than with Ala, Asx, Ile, and Val with the combination of mucosa and export proteins. This may be due partly to differences in the proportions of these AA in the EN secretions and partly because the processes that contribute to the enrichments (e.g., inflow into the precursor pool from plasma and protein breakdown) combined with the rate of intracellular transamination may differ between the various sites that contribute to EN in the various samples. Nonetheless, only calculations based on either total N or Leu enrichments will be considered in the further discussion.
Contribution of Endogenous Secretions to Gut Flows.
Total CP flows (N x 6.25) at the duodenum and in the feces averaged (±SD) 2,523 ± 647 and 840 ± 198 g of CP/d, respectively (Table 5
). Contributions of total EN to N duodenal flow averaged 24 and 30% for total N and Leu, respectively, with mucosa as the representative pool. In sheep, Van Bruchem et al. (1997) reported that EN averaged 25% of duodenal N flow using labeled food, whereas Sandek et al. (2001) reported that EN contributed 3.4 and 12% of the NAN duodenal flow, using a combination of labeling and transferring digesta between animals.
Estimations obtained in this study correspond to 2.4 and 3.6 g of N per kg of DMI, for total N and Leu dilution, respectively, for the free portion of EN at the duodenum. If a mixture of mucosal plus export protein IE is used, then these values decline to 1.4 and 2.6 g of N per kg of DMI. If both free EN and that incorporated into bacteria are taken into account, then they would amount to 6.0 and 7.3 g of N/kg of DMI, using the dilution of total N and Leu with only the gut mucosa as the representative pool and to 3.4 and 5.3 g of N/kg of DMI using a combination of gut mucosa and export protein. This compares with a value of 1.9 g of N/kg of DMI adopted in the Nutrient Requirements for Dairy Cattle (NRC, 2001). Assuming a fractional synthesis rate of 29% for the fore-stomach (Lobley et al., 1980, 1994) and a CP mass of 3.5 kg (Gibb et al., 1992; Reynolds et al., 2004), total protein synthesis of the fore-stomach would amount to approximately 1.0 kg/d. With the total N dilution, total EN duodenal flow is estimated to be 350 or 614 g of CP/d using the combination of the gut mucosa plus export proteins or only the gut mucosa as representative of the IE of EN, respectively, and these would contribute 34 or 60% of the total protein synthesis. This proportion would probably decrease taking into account any export proteins (only partially included in the fractional synthesis rate but included in the EN flows), and the true values probably lie between the minimal and maximal estimates.
The proportion of fecal N originating from undigested EN present at the duodenum was the major contributor to total EN in the feces, based on the assumption that a similar digestibility can be applied to all N fractions across the intestine (Ouellet et al., 2002). Accurate determination of fecal EN flow should provide a close approximation of metabolic fecal protein losses (Lapierre et al., 2007) associated with AA losses. Based on work from Swanson (1977), NRC (2001) estimates metabolic fecal protein as 4.8 g of N per kg of DMI minus 0.5 x bacteria duodenal flow not digested in the small intestine. In the current study, that would represent 337 g of metabolic fecal protein. Requirement for MP to account for metabolic fecal loss should be the AA portion of CP EN (0.80) divided by an efficiency of utilization of MP into product; 0.67 is the value used by NRC (2001). Values therefore obtained for MP requirement to support EN fecal flows in the current study are lower (232 to 393 g of MP/d) based on dilution of Leu or total N, using combined pools or mucosa alone. In addition, this estimation includes any intestinal contribution from labeled urea to fecal 15N flow. Nonetheless, it must be recognized that to better assess true losses of AA and MP requires EN flows to be measured at the ileum and not the feces, because fermentation of EN may occur in the large intestine and reduce the fecal outflow of ileal EN. Unfortunately, only 2 cows in this study had patent ileal cannulae but these exhibited greater ileal than fecal EN flows (Table 8
). For the total N, ileal EN flow was 18% greater than in the feces. Higher values were obtained based on 15N-Leu but the same qualitative pattern of greater ileal than fecal EN flows was observed. This correction would increase estimations of metabolic fecal losses at 273 to 463 g of MP/d, depending on the dilution method and the pool chosen.
|
The second issue would be to label AA-N in a more uniform manner and thus reduce the reliance on the presence of a single AA in precursors and products. A mixture of labeled AA has been suggested (de Lange et al., 1992; Lien et al., 1997b), but cost is currently prohibitive for the larger species. Another option is to label rumen ammonia and then use the 15N-microbial protein as a precursor to label body tissue proteins. This is what happened indirectly during [15N2]urea infusion in the current study and where the enrichments of AA in duodenal bacteria averaged 0.96 to 1.18 that of Leu, compared with enrichments relative to Leu averaging 0.02 to 0.18 with the 15N-Leu administration (Table 3
). The notable exception during the [15N2]urea infusion was Pro with a lower IE, as previously reported from studies in vitro with rumen fluid (Atasoglu et al., 2004); this probably reflects preferential use of preformed Pro of either dietary or endogenous origin. One downside is that more isotope may need to be infused to ensure quantifiable enrichments in tissue proteins because of more loss of the label through urinary urea. Nonetheless, until these other options are tested, the 15N-Leu approach is probably the most suitable, but further information is needed to strengthen some of the interpretations made.
Clearly, the complex inflows and outflows associated with EN determinations present several daunting challenges at both the technical and biological levels. The current study illustrates some of these concerns and provides some possible solutions, while other problems remain unresolved and require further investigation. Nonetheless, the information provided by these and other data in dairy cows (Ouellet et al., 2002, 2007) have raised important questions relating to current prediction schemes and provided the basis for a reanalysis of some the underlying concepts (Lapierre et al., 2007; Ouellet et al., 2007).
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication November 16, 2007. Accepted for publication February 25, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ebrowska, H. Hagemeister, and J. Voigt. 2001. Studies on N-metabolism in different gastrointestinal sections of sheep using the digesta exchange technique. 2. Passage of endogenous nitrogen. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10:605–618.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |