|
|
||||||||
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada
1 Corresponding author: vosborne{at}uoguelph.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: histidine drinking water milk composition dairy cow
Histidine is an essential amino acid for which improvements in duodenal flow in lactating dairy cows have affected milk synthesis. Postruminal infusion of 0, 2, 4, or 6 g/d of His into cows fed a grass silage-based diet caused linear increases in milk, protein, and lactose yields and a linear decrease in milk fat (Korhonen et al., 2000). Infusion of 0, 7, 15, or 30 g/d of His i.v. into cows consuming a corn/alfalfa silage-based diet quadratically increased milk yield, linearly decreased fat yield and percentage, and had no effect on protein yield or content (Moon et al., 2004). Subtraction of 24 g/d of His from an abomasal infusion of all amino acids decreased milk protein yield by 186 g/d and increased milk fat yield by 181 g/d (Weekes et al., 2006).
Water has been used as a vehicle to carry nutrients into the lactating cow (Osborne et al., 2002, 2008). Ruminal bypass of water has been estimated to be 5 to 25% of total water intake (Woodford et al., 1984; Café and Poppi, 1994) with variation attributed to rumen fill (Woodford et al., 1984) and to postnatal retention of the esophageal groove reflex (Ørskov and Benzin, 1969; Huber et al., 1982). The following experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that a sufficient proportion of His included in the drinking water of lactating cows will bypass the rumen to have an effect on milk production and composition. If bypass is sufficiently high, water supplementation could be an alternative to chemical protection of amino acids to increase postruminal delivery.
The University of Guelph Animal Care Committee approved all experimental procedures and ensured that the trial was conducted in accordance with guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (1993). Eight early-lactation (45 ± 15 DIM) Holstein dairy cows at 720 ± 125 kg of BW were housed in individual tie stalls at the Elora Dairy Research Station (University of Guelph). Twice daily, cows were offered a corn silage- and haylage-based TMR ad libitum to provide a calculated NEL of 1.56 Mcal/kg and an estimated MP balance of 55 g/d (NRC, 2001). As a percentage of total DM, the ration was composed of 33.6% corn silage, 22.4% haylage, 19.4% high-moisture corn, 19.1% dairy supplement, and 5.5% mixed hay. The dairy supplement (on a DM basis) contained 1.47 Mcal/kg of NEL, 38.56% CP, 2.55% Ca, 1.34% P, 0.77% Mg, 0.82% S, 136 mg/kg of Cu, 1.37 mg/kg of Se, 57.33 kIU/kg of vitamin A, 14.32 kIU/kg of vitamin D, and 217.32 IU/kg of vitamin E. Chemical composition of the diet was 42.3% DM, 17.6% CP, 20.2% ADF, and 33.5% NDF.
Cows were randomly assigned to a treatment of 0 or 2.5 g of His/L of drinking water in a crossover design of two 7-d periods. The His concentration was calculated to deliver 35 g/d of His postruminally, slightly greater than the 30 g/d of His given i.v. by Moon et al. (2004), assuming an average rumen bypass of 17% (Woodford et al., 1984; Café and Poppi, 1994) and a drinking water intake of 81.5 L/d (Meyer et al., 2004). A concentrated solution of 200 g/L of His was delivered by a liquid injector system (Model DI 150, Dosatron International Ltd., Clearwater, FL) at a rate of 12.5 mL/L into water lines supplying automatic drinking bowls of the 4 cows on 2.5 g/L of His. On both treatments, drinking water was provided ad libitum over the duration of the trial, and intakes were recorded continuously by flow meters according to Thomas et al. (2007).
Cows were milked in their stalls at 0500 and 1500 h daily. Milk volume was recorded and milk samples were collected for compositional analysis at each milking for the last 3 d of each period. Milk samples were refrigerated at 4°C until analyzed for protein, fat, and lactose content by infrared spectroscopy (AOAC, 1996). Samples of the TMR were collected daily and pooled into weekly composite samples for chemical analysis at a commercial feed laboratory (Agri-Food Laboratories, Guelph, Ontario, Canada). Blood samples were collected by tail venipuncture on the last day of each period before the evening milking. Plasma was separated by centrifugation and stored at –20°C before amino acid analysis by reversed-phase HPLC (Waters Chromatography Division, 1986).
Variance in each observation (Yijk) was analyzed by the GLM procedure of SAS version 9 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), according to:
![]() |
where µ... = mean, cowi = ith cow effect (i = 1 to 8); perj = jth period effect (j = 1 to 2); trtk = kth His inclusion effect (k = 1 to 2); and
ijk = random variation, assumed to be N(0,
2). Significance was declared at P
0.05 and a tendency at 0.05 < P < 0.15. When P < 0.15, the presence of carryover from period 1 to period 2 was investigated with a t-test applied to the treatment differences observed when the first treatment was 0 g/L of His compared with 2.5 g/L as the first treatment. Carryover was not significant (P > 0.15).
There was a tendency (P = 0.06) for water intake to increase from 85.1 to 92.1 L/d with His treatment (Table 1
). Actual His intakes from the drinking water averaged 0 and 230 g/d for the 2 treatments, respectively.
|
|
By monitoring plasma glucose concentrations in 2-yr-old heifers given glucose in the drinking water, Huber et al. (1982) noted that training the animals to suckle by nipple pail through prolonged withdrawal of water significantly increased the proportion bypassing the rumen. The musculature forming the esophageal groove that is responsible for rumen bypass in the milk-fed preruminant can be induced to contract in the adult by the posture of the animal while drinking, site of delivery into the esophagus, and chemical composition of the fluid consumed (Ørskov, 1972). Woodford et al. (1984) conclude that the greater volume of rumen bypass water in cows withheld water for 4.5 vs. 9 h may have been due to greater fill of the rumen before drinking. Restricting water availability to short intervals within a day induces greater drinking volumes without affecting total daily intake (Thomas et al., 2007) and may improve the bypass percentage. Therefore, although the estimated efficiency of transfer of imbibed His to plasma was low, there may be strategies that encourage closure of the esophageal groove and a greater bypass of imbibed nutrients.
Despite the low rumen bypass estimate, plasma His concentration increased enough to elicit a change in milk production and composition. The increases in milk, protein, and lactose yields observed were noted previously with 6.5 g/d of abomasal His (Vanhatalo et al., 1999) and with 4 levels of postruminal His between 0 and 6 g/d (Korhonen et al., 2000). The increase in milk yield of 1.7 L/d for a 7 µM increase in plasma His was 7.5 times greater than the increase of 0.23 L/d expected from the regression of milk yield on plasma His concentration from the dose-response experiment of Korhonen et al. (2000), for which slope = 0.032 kg/d per µM. Similarly, the 90 g/d increase in lactose yield was 6.3 times greater than that expected from the slope of 2.04 g/d per µM calculated from Korhonen et al. (2000). These discrepancies might indicate that the previous estimate of 0.4% His bypass could be magnified 6- or 7-fold to between 2 and 3% bypass.
In addition to effects on milk component yields, the decrease in fat percentage and an increased protein:fat ratio have also been reported previously (Vanhatalo et al., 1999; Korhonen et al., 2000; Cant et al., 2001; Moon et al., 2004; Weekes et al., 2006). All the effects on milk components have been noted on diets based on a variety of forages including grass, legume, and corn silages. We conclude that His appears to induce a general increase in the protein to fat ratio of milk. The proportion of imbibed water that bypasses the rumen must be improved to take advantage of drinking water as a vehicle to carry His past the rumen.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication February 27, 2008. Accepted for publication June 6, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |