JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:3590-3595. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0015
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, I. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, I. R.

Prevalence of Mycobacterium avium Subspecies paratuberculosis in Swiss Raw Milk Cheeses Collected at the Retail Level

R. Stephan*,1, S. Schumacher*, T. Tasara* and I. R. Grant{dagger}

* Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 272, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
{dagger} Institute of Agri-Food and Land Use, School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5AG, United Kingdom

1 Corresponding author: stephanr{at}fsafety.unizh.ch


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A total of 143 raw milk cheese samples (soft cheese, n = 9; semihard cheese, n = 133; hard cheese, n = 1), collected at the retail level throughout Switzerland, were tested for Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) by immunomagnetic capture plus culture on 7H10-PANTA medium and in supplemented BAC-TEC 12B medium, as well as by an F57-based real-time PCR system. Furthermore, pH and water activity values were determined for each sample. Although no viable MAP cells could be cultured, 4.2% of the raw milk cheese samples tested positive with the F57-based real-time PCR system, providing evidence for the presence of MAP in the raw material. As long as the link between MAP and Crohn’s disease in humans remains unclear, measures designed to minimize public exposure should also include a focus on milk products.

Key Words: raw milk cheese • Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis • culture • real-time polymerase chain reaction


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is the etiological agent for ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease) as well as being a specific pathogen in several other animal species (reviews in Harris and Barletta, 2001; Collins, 2003; Chacon et al., 2004). There have also been numerous reports suggesting a potential association between MAP and human Crohn’s disease (for reviews, see Hermon-Taylor et al., 2000; Chacon et al., 2004). However, because of the complex nature of human Crohn’s disease as well as conflicting experimental evidence, a definitive link between MAP and Crohn’s disease can neither be confirmed nor discarded at present. The possible involvement of MAP in human disease obviously raises significant public health concerns, and measures to minimize public exposure are encouraged. Several opportunities for human exposure to MAP do exist, and the primary focus has mainly been on dairy products. Milk may be contaminated directly within the udder or indirectly as a result of fecal contamination. The direct shedding of MAP organisms into milk is lower than that with fecal shedding. Less than 100 cfu/mL was documented in symptomatic MAP-infected cows and 2 to 8 cfu/50 mL was found in MAP-infected but asymptomatic cows (Sweeney et al., 1992; Giese and Ahrens, 2000). Fecal shedding, on the other hand, can exceed 108 cfu/g and may thus be a significant contributor of MAP contamination in raw milk (Cocito et al., 1994). A recently published study on bulk tank raw milk performed using an F57 sequence-based PCR system estimated an average prevalence of 3.0% MAP in Swiss bovine bulk tank raw milk samples (Bosshard et al., 2006).

The fate of any viable MAP organisms found in raw milk is still not yet fully understood. Several experimental studies have shown that viable MAP organisms can survive the current standard pasteurization processes when high numbers are present (for reviews, see Grant et al., 2002; Grant, 2006). For cheese, so far very limited data are available on the prevalence of MAP and on its fate during the ripening process. In this study we used cultivation and a recently described real-time PCR protocol that targets the F57 sequence to investigate the presence of MAP in retail raw milk cheese sourced from various regions of Switzerland.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Sample Collection
The 143 raw milk cheese samples (soft cheese, n = 9; semihard cheese, n = 133; hard cheese, n = 1; all produced from cows’ milk) analyzed in this study were all manufactured from Swiss milk and collected within a national sampling plan at the retail level throughout Switzerland during the period of March to June 2006. Each sample consisted of approximately 50 g of cheese. The samples were split into subsamples of approximately 25 g (for culture), 10 g (for real-time PCR), and 10 g [for pH and water activity (aw) determinations] and stored in a cooler. For MAP culturing, 4 batches of cheese samples packed in insulated cooling boxes containing ice packs were transported by overnight courier from the University of Zurich to Queen’s University Belfast.

Culture of MAP
Immunomagnetic capture using Pathatrix (Matrix MicroScience Ltd., Newmarket, UK), a patented magnetic capture system, was used in place of chemical decontamination prior to culture to recover MAP from the cheese samples. This protocol requires a preprogrammed workstation, generic consumables (tubing assembly, stoppered tubes, and elution pipettes) and, for the purposes of this study, paramagnetic beads coated with anti-MAP antibody (all supplied by Matrix Micro-Science Ltd.). A general schematic overview of the operation of the Pathatrix system is shown in Figure 1Go. This system has recently been used for recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from raw ground beef (Wu et al., 2004) and Enterobacter sakazakii from dried infant milk formula (Mullane et al., 2006).


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the Pathatrix magnetic capture system (Matrix MicroScience Ltd., Newmarket, UK) showing the location of the inline connector where anti-Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis beads were added and the magnet where beads were captured from the sample during circulation for 20 min (used with permission of Matrix MicroScience Limited).

 
Upon receipt in the laboratory at Queen’s University Belfast, each preweighed cheese sample (20 to 25 g) was transferred to a Stomacher filter bag (Seward Medical, London, UK) and 225 mL of trisodium citrate buffer [consisting of 0.5% sodium chloride (Sigma Aldrich Ltd., Poole, UK), 1% casitone (Difco, Detroit, MI), and 2% sodium citrate (Sigma)], prewarmed to room temperature (~20°C), were added. The cheese sample was homogenized for 2 min in a Stomacher 400 laboratory blender (Seward Medical). The filter component of the Stomacher bag was then removed and discarded, and the bag and contents were transferred to the Pathatrix workstation operating at 37°C. The Pathatrix tubing assembly was put in place and 50 µL of anti-MAP Pathatrix beads (product code: PM50) was then introduced into each sample via the inline connector. Each sample was circulated for 20 min at 37°C, during which time the complete sample homogenate circulated approximately twice per minute over the anti-MAP beads captured at an inline magnet. When the circulation period was complete, the captured beads (plus any MAP attached) were flushed into a stoppered tube by means of a pastette attached to the inline connector. The tubes were then transferred to a magnetic rack, where the beads were captured again for 10 min. Residual cheese homogenate was withdrawn with a pastette (taking care not to dislodge the captured beads) and discarded. Beads were washed once with 5 mL of PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T20, Sigma Aldrich) by magnetic separation for 2 min before the PBS-T20 was withdrawn and discarded. Beads were finally resuspended in 800 µL of PBS-T20. The bead suspension was divided between 2 slopes of 7H10-PANTA medium (200 µL/slope) and one vial (400 µL/vial) of BACTEC 12B medium (Becton Dickinson UK Limited, Cowley, UK) supplemented with 0.5 mL of egg yolk emulsion (Difco), 2 µg/mL of mycobactin J (Synbiotics Europe SAS, Lyon, France), and 100 µL of PANTA Plus antibiotic supplement (Becton Dickinson). The 7H10-PANTA medium consisted of Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) Middlebrook OADC (oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, citrate) enrichment, 2% (vol/vol) reconstituted PANTA Plus antibiotic supplement (polymyxin B, amphotericin B, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, azlocillin, Becton Dickinson), 0.5% glycerol, and 2 µg/mL of mycobactin J. Both culture media were incubated at 37°C for up to 16 wk. For the first 60 cheese samples processed, a third culture medium, HEYM-VAN (Herrold’s egg yolk medium supplemented with 2 µg/mL of mycobactin J and the antibiotics vancomycin, amphotericin B, and nalidixic acid) was inoculated with the bead suspension. However, contamination rates on HEYM-VAN (i.e., overgrowth by non-acid-fast cheese bacteria nonspecifically bound to the beads after magnetic capture) proved to be very high, so its use was discontinued after batch 2. Slope cultures were examined periodically for evidence of acid-fast colonies. Vials of BACTEC were read every 2 wk on a BACTEC 460TB machine (Johnston Laboratories Inc., Towson, MD). When a positive growth index reading (>50) was recorded, an aliquot of the BACTEC culture was removed and stained by the Ziehl-Neelsen method to determine the presence or absence of acid-fast cells. When acid-fast cells were observed in any culture medium, the suspect colony or BACTEC culture was subcultured onto Herrold’s egg yolk medium containing 2 µg/mL of mycobactin J (HEYM) to verify typical colony morphology and slow growth. If these properties were observed upon subculture, then isolates were finally confirmed as MAP by IS900 PCR (Moss et al., 1992).

Preparation of Genomic DNA Templates from Cheese Samples
Ten-gram cheese samples were homogenized with 30 mL of buffer (25% sodium citrate, 4% polyethylene glycol 8000) for 2 min in a Stomacher 400 laboratory blender (Seward Medical). Ten milliliters of the homogenate was centrifuged for 15 min at 1,500 x g and pellets were obtained. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were resuspended in 500 µL of PBS and 100 µL was transferred into Eppendorf tubes. A second centrifugation step was performed (10 min at 13,000 x g), and the rest of the supernatant was removed. Thereafter, 240 µL of lysis buffer, 60 µL of proteinase K solution, and 300 µL of binding buffer provided in the MagNA Pure LC DNA Isolation kit I (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) were added, and the entire mixture was incubated overnight at 37°C. The mixtures were transferred onto the lysing bead matrix in the MagNA lyser tubes and the tubes were placed into the MagNA Lyser instrument (Roche Molecular Diagnostics). A mechanical lysis step consisting of 60 s at 6,500 rpm, followed by 60 s on a cooling block held at 4°C was performed 3 times on the samples. After the last mechanical lysis step, the samples were incubated for a further 15 min at 90°C and cooled to room temperature. Then 150 µL of isopropanol was added and the samples were mixed. The sample mixtures were transferred onto the DNA-binding columns of the High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany) and processed as outlined in the kit protocol. The DNA templates from the samples were eluted into a 100-µL volume of elution buffer supplied in the kit, prewarmed to 70°C. The DNA yields were calculated based on the optical density (OD) measurement at 260 nm with a nanodrop instrument (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE), and purity was assessed by inspection of the sample OD260:OD280 ratios.

Real-Time PCR Assays
Real-time PCR was used to coamplify and detect a 254-bp target region in the MAP F57 sequence and a 257-bp internal control (IC) template. The reactions were performed in a LightCycler 2.0 instrument (Roche Molecular Diagnostics) in a total reaction volume of 20 µL in glass capillary tubes. The optimal reaction mixture contained 1x concentration of LightCycler-Faststart DNA Master Plus hybridization probes mix (Roche Molecular Diagnostics), 1,000 nM of each primer (MAP f57p1, MAPf57p2; Tasara and Stephan, 2005), 200 nM of each LightCycler probe (MAP f57-3'Fluo, MAP f57-5'LC-Red640, PuC19-5'LC-Red 705; Bosshard et al., 2006), and 20 copies of IC template. The amplification consisted of an initial preincubation step at 95°C for 10 min to activate the DNA polymerase, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 56°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 18 s. The fluorescence signals corresponding to F57 sequence target and IC template amplification were monitored during the 56°C annealing step in the LC-Red 640 nm and LC-Red 705 nm detection channels of the LightCycler 2.0 instrument, respectively.

The PCR analysis was done in duplicate for each sample. In each case, a 5-µL aliquot of the undiluted template was used per PCR reaction. If inhibition was detected, as judged by the lack of both IC template and F57 target amplification in the PCR assay, then a template dilution (1:50) step was done, and the reaction was repeated.

Controls.
Standard steps were taken throughout this study to avoid potential sample cross-contamination and false-positive results. These included use of separate rooms for DNA extraction, PCR mixture preparation, and post-PCR analysis, as well as inclusion of DNA extraction process and PCR reaction-negative controls, and the use of filtered reaction tips.

pH and aw Values
The final 10-g subsample of each cheese sample was used to determine the pH value with an Orion 420A pH meter (Hügli, Zurich, Switzerland) and aw value using an aw Center Novasina 203 instrument (Axair, Pfäffikon, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
With the real-time PCR-based method, we found 6 semihard cheese samples (4.2%) that were positive for MAP F57 (Table 1Go), providing evidence for the presence of MAP in the raw material. The crossing-point values ranged from 32 to 37, indicating a moderate to low level of contamination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis DNA-positive cheese samples
 
With the culture-based method, only in one of the 143 cheese samples was acid-fast staining bacteria observed (Table 2Go). However, no acid-fast colonies were subsequently obtained by subculture of the suspect acid-fast colony from a HEYM-VAN slope, so the presence of viable MAP was not confirmed. All retail cheese samples were therefore negative for viable MAP. Immunomagnetic capture by the Pathatrix system, rather than chemical decontamination, was used prior to culture during this study. Previous studies have shown that only a small proportion of viable MAP present in a sample is recovered if chemical decontamination with hexadecylpyridinium chloride is used (26 to 28% recovery, Dundee et al., 2001; 16% recovery, Gao et al., 2005). In contrast, the Pathatrix system theoretically has the potential to recover all MAP (viable or dead) from 25 g of cheese without the need for harsh chemicals and with no detrimental effect on MAP viability, although 100% recovery of MAP from a sample by the Pathatrix system has not been confirmed. However, the minimum detection limit of the Pathatrix immunomagnetic capture method for MAP was determined by testing Cheddar cheese spiked with MAP at different levels, and it was estimated to be ~103 MAP/25 g of cheese or 40 MAP/g of cheese, which, if we assume a 10-fold concentration of MAP from milk to cheese curd (Donaghy et al., 2004), would be equivalent to detecting MAP in cheese made from milk containing 4 MAP/mL.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Culture results for 143 Swiss raw milk cheese samples
 
Although bovine paratuberculosis is a notifiable disease within Switzerland, the true prevalence of MAP within the country’s cattle herds remains unknown. Studies have already been done in view of the prevalence of MAP in Swiss dairy cattle herds and bovine bulk tank raw milk. A small-scale study comparing fecal culture and an IS900-based PCR system was used to analyze fecal samples from 310 dairy cattle located on 10 dairy farms in different regions of the country. The estimated prevalence of MAP infection in this dairy cattle population ranged from 6.5 to 10% (Bogli-Stuber et al., 2005). In a recently published study, 3% of 100 bovine bulk tank raw milk samples analyzed with F57 sequence-based PCR tested positive (Bosshard et al., 2006). Results from these 2 studies therefore indicate low levels of subclinical MAP infection within the Swiss dairy herds. The data from this study on raw milk cheese samples reconfirms the MAP contamination of Swiss bulk tank raw milk. The current prevalence of 4.2% in raw milk cheese samples is similar to the prevalence previously determined from a bulk tank raw milk survey with the F57-based real-time PCR system (Bosshard et al., 2006).

The presence and viability of MAP in cheese has been investigated so far in a very limited number of studies. Clark et al. (2006) performed a study on 98 retail cheese curd samples purchased in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Although no viable MAP were cultured from the retail cheese curd, which was produced from pasteurized milk, 5% of the samples were PCR-positive with an IS900 and a hspX-based PCR system. In a second study on the detection of MAP in cheeses, Ikonomopoulos et al. (2005) reported, for Feta cheese (Greece), a prevalence of 50 and 4.7% for an IS900-based PCR and a culture-based method, respectively. In the same study, a prevalence of 11.9% (IS900-based PCR) and 2.4% (culture-based method) was described for hard, semihard, and soft cheese collected from the Czech Republic.

In our study, as well as in the 2 studies mentioned above, significant differences were obtained between the prevalence results of the culture and the PCR-based methods. There are several potential explanations:

  1. Clark et al. (2006) tested cheese curd produced from pasteurized milk and concluded that viable MAP may not have survived the pasteurization process.
  2. In the same study, the authors also showed that, whereas MAP-positive control cheese samples spiked with ATCC 19698, ATCC 43545, and ATCC 43544 were positive by both culture and PCR, other positive controls spiked with ATCC 43015 were positive only by PCR and not by culture.
  3. Commonly used starter cultures and typical non-starter microflora present during the manufacture and ripening of cheese (Spahr and Schafroth 2001; Donaghy et al., 2003) as well as sample decontamination procedures (Dundee et al., 2001; Gao et al., 2005) may also hamper the cultural detection of low numbers of MAP.
  4. Bachmann and Spahr (1995) showed that a variety of potentially pathogenic bacteria are inactivated during the ripening process of hard and semihard cheeses made from raw milk. Three studies on the survival of MAP in model laboratory-produced cheeses have shown that certain changes in physicochemical characteristics during ripening and the time of ripening also influence the fate of MAP in different cheese types (Sung and Collins, 2000; Spahr and Schafroth, 2001; Donaghy et al., 2004). The most important factors responsible for the inactivation of MAP in cheese were the temperature applied during cheese manufacture, the pH value during cheese ripening, and the salt concentration, which can be indirectly measured by the aw value.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
No viable MAP were found in the retail cheese tested in our study. Nevertheless, the fact that MAP genetic elements were detected in raw milk cheese samples suggests that some of these organisms may find their way to the consumers. This means that as long as the link between MAP and Crohn’s disease in humans remain unclear, measures designed to minimize public exposure to MAP via food should also include a focus on milk products.

Received for publication January 9, 2007. Accepted for publication April 10, 2007.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 


Bachmann, H. P., and U. Spahr. 1995. The fate of potentially pathogenic bacteria in Swiss hard and semihard cheeses made from raw milk. J. Dairy Sci. 78:476–483.[Abstract]

Bogli-Stuber, K., C. Kohler, G. Seitert, B. Glanemann, M. C. Antognoli, M. D. Salman, M. M. Wittenbrink, M. Wittwer, T. Wassenaar, T. Jemmi, and B. Bissig-Choisat. 2005. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Swiss dairy cattle by real-time PCR and culture: A comparison of the two assays. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99:587–597.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bosshard, C., R. Stephan, and T. Tasara. 2006. Application of an F57 sequence-based real-time PCR assay for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis detection in bulk tank raw milk and slaughtered healthy dairy cows. J. Food Prot. 69:1662–1667.[Medline]

Chacon, O., L. E. Bermudez, and R. G. Barletta. 2004. Johne’s disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 58:329–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clark, D. L., J. L. Anderson, J. J. Koziczkowski, and J. L. E. Ellingson. 2006. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis genetic components in retail cheese curds purchased in Wisconsin and Minnesota by PCR. Mol. Cell. Prob. 20:197–202.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cocito, C., P. Gilot, M. Coene, M. De Kesel, P. Poupart, and P. Vannuffel. 1994. Paratuberculosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:328–345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collins, M. T. 2003. Paratuberculosis: Review of present knowledge. Acta Vet. Scand. 44:217–221.[Medline]

Donaghy, J. A., N. L. Totton, and M. T. Rowe. 2003. Evaluation of culture media for the recovery of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from Cheddar cheese. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37:285–291.[CrossRef][Medline]

Donaghy, J. A., N. L. Totton, and M. T. Rowe. 2004. Persistence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis during manufacture and ripening of Cheddar cheese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:4899–4905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dundee, L., I. R. Grant, H. J. Ball, and M. T. Rowe. 2001. Comparative evaluation of four decontamination protocols for the isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from milk. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 33:173–177.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gao, A. L., J. Odumeru, M. Raymond, and L. Mutharia. 2005. Development of improved method for isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from bulk tank milk: Effect of age of milk, centrifugation and decontamination. Can. J. Vet. Res. 69:81–87.[Medline]

Giese, S. B., and P. Ahrens. 2000. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk from clinically affected cows by PCR and culture. Vet. Microbiol. 77:291–297.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grant, I. R. 2006. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in foods: Current evidence and potential consequences. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 59:112–117.[CrossRef]

Grant, I. R., E. I. Hitchings, A. McCartney, F. Ferguson, and M. T. Rowe. 2002. Effect of commercial-scale high-temperature, short-time pasteurization on the viability of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in naturally infected cows’ milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:602–607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harris, N. B., and R. G. Barletta. 2001. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in veterinary medicine. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:489–512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hermon-Taylor, J., T. J. Bull, J. M. Sheridan, J. Cheng, M. L. Stellakis, and N. Sumar. 2000. Causation of Crohn’s disease by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 14:521–539.[Medline]

Ikonomopoulos, J., I. Pavlik, M. Bartos, P. Svastova, W. Y. Ayele, P. Roubal, J. Lukas, N. Cook, and M. Gazouli. 2005. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in retail cheeses from Greece and the Czech Republic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8934–8936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moss, M. T., J. Sanderson, M. Tizard, J. Hermon-Taylor, F. El-Zaatari, D. Markesich, and D. Graham. 1992. PCR detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in long-term cultures from Crohn’s disease tissues. Gut 33:1209–1213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mullane, N. R., J. Murray, D. Drudy, N. Prentice, P. Whyte, P. G. Wall, A. Parton, and S. Fanning. 2006. Detection of Enterobacter sakazakii in dried infant milk formula by cationic-magnetic-bead capture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6325–6330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parton, A., and M. Scott. 2002. PathatrixTM E. coli O157 Test AOAC-RI Validation Report. Matrix Microscience Limited, Newmarket, UK.

Spahr, U., and D. Schafroth. 2001. Fate of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Swiss hard and semihard cheeses manufactured from raw milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4199–4205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sung, N., and M. T. Collins. 2000. Effect of three factors in cheese production (pH, salt, and heat) on Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis viability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1334–1339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sweeney, R. W., R. H. Whitlock, and A. E. Rosenberger. 1992. Mycobacterium paratuberculosis cultured from milk and supramammary lymph nodes of infected asymptomatic cows. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:166–171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tasara, T., and R. Stephan. 2005. Development of f75 sequence based real-time PCR assay for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis detection in milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:5957–5968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wu, V. C. H., V. Gill, R. Oberst, R. Phebus, and D. Y. C. Fung. 2004. Rapid protocol (5.25 h) for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in raw ground beef by an immuno-capture system (Pathatrix) in combination with Colortrix and CT-SMAC. J. Rapid Meth. Automation Microbiol. 12:57–67.[CrossRef]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, I. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, I. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS