JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:3278-3285. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-798
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vissers, M. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lankveld, J. M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vissers, M. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lankveld, J. M. G.

Minimizing the Level of Butyric Acid Bacteria Spores in Farm Tank Milk

M. M. M. Vissers*,1, F. Driehuis*, M. C. Te Giffel*, P. De Jong{dagger} and J. M. G. Lankveld{ddagger}

* Department of Health and Safety, and
{dagger} Department of Processing, NIZO Food Research, PO Box 20, 6710 BA Ede, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Chair of Dairy Science, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, the Netherlands

1 Corresponding author: marc.vissers{at}nizo.nl


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A year-long survey of 24 dairy farms was conducted to determine the effects of farm management on the concentrations of butyric acid bacteria (BAB) spores in farm tank milk (FTM). The results were used to validate a control strategy derived from model simulations. The BAB spore concentrations were measured in samples of FTM, feces, bedding material, mixed corn and grass silage fed to cows in the barn, and soil. In addition, a questionnaire was used to gather farm management information such as bedding material used and teat cleaning method applied. The average BAB spore concentration in FTM was 2.7 log10 spores/L, and 33% of the FTM samples exceeded a concentration of 3 log10 spores/L. Control of the average spore concentration in mixed silage fed was the only aspect of farm management that was significantly related to the concentration of BAB spores in FTM. Farms that fed mixed silage with the lowest average BAB spore concentrations (3.4 log10 spores/g) produced FTM with the lowest average concentration (2.1 log10 spores/L). The efficiency of farm management in controlling the BAB spore concentration in FTM depended to a large extent on the ability of farmers to prevent incidents with elevated BAB spore concentrations in mixed silage (>5 log10 spores/g) and not on the average BAB spore concentration in mixed silage across the year. The survey showed that farmers should aim for a concentration in mixed silage of less than 3 log10 spores/g and should prevent the concentration from exceeding 5 log10 spores/g to ensure a concentration in FTM of less than 3 log10 spores/L. These results correspond with the previously reported model simulations.

Key Words: butyric acid bacteria • bulk tank milk • silage • late-blowing


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
In semihard cheeses such as Gouda and Emmental, growth of spore-forming anaerobic bacteria, called butyric acid bacteria (BAB), can lead to off-flavors and excessive gas formation, a defect known as late-blowing (Klijn et al., 1995). The BAB are able to convert lactic acid into butyric acid, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide at relatively low pH. In particular, Clostridium tyrobutyricum is associated with the late-blowing defect. Without preventive measures, concentrations in pasteurized cheese milk of more than 1 log10 BAB spores/L can already lead to late-blowing of Gouda-type cheeses (Stadhouders, 1990). Vegetative BAB in farm tank milk (FTM) do not impose risks for Gouda type cheeses, because vegetative cells are inactivated during pasteurization.

To prevent late-blowing, cheese manufacturers have 3 main options: 1) minimizing BAB spore concentrations in raw milk; 2) removing BAB spores from raw milk via bactofugation; and 3) preventing the growth of BAB in cheese by adding inhibitory agents, such as nitrate and lysozyme, to cheese milk (Stadhouders 1990; Waes et al., 1990). In the Netherlands, farmers are encouraged to produce FTM with low concentrations of BAB spores via the milk quality payment systems. Two 0.1-mL tubes of FTM are tested monthly for the presence of BAB spores. If both tubes test positive, the farmer receives a deduction from the milk price. The Dutch dairy industry wants farmers to produce FTM with a maximum spore limit (MSL) of 3 log10 spores/L to obtain (after bactofugation) fewer than 1 log10 spores/L in pasteurized cheese milk.

The BAB spores in FTM originate from the farm environment. Grass and corn silage are the most important sources of BAB spores. Grass and corn silage are fed to cows together (referred to as mixed silage). The BAB spores in the mixed silage accumulate in feces (Te Giffel, 2002). Via the exterior of the cow’s teats, feces and BAB spores are transmitted to milk during milking (Bergère et al., 1968).

Using model simulations, we defined a strategy to achieve a BAB spore concentration in FTM below the MSL. Control of the spore concentration in the mixed silage offered to the cows was shown to be the most important control strategy (Vissers et al., 2006). The model showed that the BAB spore concentration in mixed silage should ideally be less than 3 log10 spores/g and should not exceed 5 log10 spores/g. If the mixed silage contains more than 5 log10 spores/g, it is not possible to ensure an FTM concentration of less than 3 log10 spores/L.

The aim of this study of Dutch farms was to determine the effect of different aspects of farm management on BAB spore concentrations in FTM using a year-long survey. In addition, the results of the survey were used to validate the control strategy derived from model simulations.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Selection of Farms
In total, 24 farms spread across the Netherlands were selected for the survey. The farms were selected using historical data from the Netherlands Milk Control Station (Zutphen, the Netherlands). The Milk Control Station performs monthly tests for the presence of BAB spores in FTM. To select the 24 survey farms, 270 farms spread across the Netherlands were divided into 3 groups. The first group (group A) consisted of farms where none of the 12 measurements, performed in the framework of the milk quality payment system in 2004, resulted in a double-positive test result for the presence of BAB spores in FTM (i.e., two 0.1-mL tubes of FTM tested positive for spores of BAB). The second group (group B) consisted of farms with 1 or 2 double-positive test results in 2004. The third group (group C) consisted of farms with more than 2 double-positive test results in 2004. Out of groups A, B, and C, respectively, 10, 9, and 5 farms were selected randomly for the survey. In the total population of Dutch farms, 92.1% of the farms belonged to group A, 7.5% of the farms belonged to group B, and 0.3% of the farms belonged to group C.

Sample Collection
Samples were collected between January and December 2005. Each farm was visited 6 times at intervals of 8 wk. At each visit, in addition to sample collection, a questionnaire was answered to collect actual farm management data. The questionnaire contained questions related to the feed ration fed to the cows, housing conditions, and milking practices. The questionnaire was completed by the researcher visiting the farm.

The following sample types were collected: FTM (every visit), feces from the barn (when cows were housed half a day or all day), feces from the pasture (when cows were grazing all day), bedding material from the barn (when cows were housed half a day or all day), soil (when cows were at pasture half a day or all day), and mixed silage in the barn (every visit when appropriate). No samples of individual grass and corn silage were taken because earlier studies had shown that a sample of the mixed silage offered to the cows is a better indicator of the microbial quality of the silage fed (Vissers et al., 2007). All but the FTM sample were composite samples. Each composite sample consisted of 10 randomly collected subsamples that were mixed on location. Samples were stored at 4 to 6°C until microbial analysis within 24 h after sampling.

Microbial Analyses
The concentrations of BAB spores in FTM, feces, bedding material, mixed silage, and soil were determined by a most probable number method according to the Dutch Standard (NEN-ISO-6877, 1994). Feces, bedding, soil, silage, and feed extracts were prepared by adding 90 mL of peptone physiological salt solution (PPS; 1 g of bacteriological peptone and 8.5 g of sodium chloride/L) to 10 g of sample and homogenizing for 2 min in a laboratory blender (Stomacher, Seward Medical, London, UK). Decimal dilution series of extracts were prepared in PPS. A 0.1-mL volume of diluted extract was added to tubes containing 10 mL of sterilized milk supplemented with glucose (0.5%) and lactic acid (0.18%). The tubes were heated for 5 min at 80°C to inactivate vegetative cells and to trigger the germination of spores, then sealed with paraffin and incubated for 4 d at 37°C. A tube scored positive if, after incubation, gas formation was visible. The detection limit was 30 spores/L for FTM and 300 spores/g for feces, bedding, mixed silage, and soil.

Statistical Analyses
Statistical calculations were performed using Statistica (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). To perform statistical analyses, samples containing BAB spore concentrations below the detection limit were assigned a concentration equaling half the detection limit. All statistical analyses were performed on log10 transformed data.

Student’s t-tests were used to determine significant differences between farms and spore concentrations in different carriers (i.e., feces, bedding material, mixed silage, and soil) and to detect possible effects of farm management practices on BAB spore concentrations in FTM. The Fisher exact test was used to determine whether high concentrations occurred more frequently in a specific carrier or group.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
BAB Spore Concentration in FTM and the Farm Environment
Table 1Go gives an overview of BAB spore concentrations measured in FTM and carriers of BAB spores in the farm environment (environmental carriers) on all 24 farms during the survey. The average BAB spore concentration in FTM was close to the MSL (3 log10 spores/L). In 33% of the FTM, the MSL was exceeded. Also in feces, bedding material, and mixed silage, high concentrations (above 5 log10 spores/g) were frequently detected. Spore concentrations in feces and bedding material did not statistically differ (P > 0.2). Spore concentrations in feces were higher than those in the mixed silage (P < 0.01), most likely because of a concentration effect (Te Giffel, 2002). The BAB spore concentrations in soil varied much less than the concentrations in the other environmental carriers and never exceeded 5 log10 spores/g. No relationship between soil type (e.g., clay, sand, and peat) and BAB spore concentration was found (P > 0.2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Butyric acid bacteria (BAB) spore concentrations measured in farm tank milk and in environmental carriers
 
Comparison of Farms
The results were evaluated in 2 ways. First, the farms were grouped based on the results of the BAB test in the milk payment system of 2004 (historical grouping, Table 2Go). Second, farms were grouped based on the average BAB spore concentration detected in FTM per farm in the survey (survey grouping, Table 2Go). Based on the historical grouping, group A farms had lower spore concentrations in FTM than group B farms, and group B farms had lower spore concentrations than group C farms. In the survey grouping (Table 2Go) the low group represents the 6 farms with the lowest average BAB spore concentrations in FTM, the high group represents the 6 farms with the highest average BAB spore concentration in FTM, and the medium group represents the remaining 12 farms. Average BAB spore concentrations in FTM per farm ranged from 1.8 to 3.4 log10 spores/L.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Butyric acid bacteria spore concentrations of measured in farm tank milk (FTM) and environmental carriers after grouping based on historical data1 2004 and BAB spore concentration observed in FTM during the survey (2005)2
 
There was no distinct relationship between the historical grouping and the grouping based on survey data. Of the 6 farms with the lowest average BAB spore concentrations in FTM in the survey, 5 farms originated from group A and one from group C of the historical grouping. The farms with the highest average FTM concentrations in the survey originated from groups A (1 farm), B (3 farms), and C (2 farms) of the historical grouping.

Clear relationships were found after grouping based on the survey data (Table 2Go). The 6 farms that fed mixed silage with the lowest average spore concentration (3.4 log10 spores/g) also produced FTM with the lowest average concentrations (2.1 log10 spores/g). Conversely, the 6 farms with the highest FTM concentration (3.2 log10 spores/g) also fed silage with the highest average concentration (4.7 log10 spores/g). These concentrations were around the critical levels defined for FTM and silage by Vissers et al. (2006). Survey data in Table 2Go also indicated that the relationship between average concentrations in mixed silage, feces, and FTM was almost linear on a log10 scale because the absolute differences observed at the low, medium, and high farms were similar for these 3 carriers (i.e., ~1.1 log10 difference between low and high and 0.7 log10 difference between low and medium). Historical grouping (Table 2Go) gave less clear relations than grouping based on the survey data. However, the farms that performed best based on the historical data (group A) also had the lowest average BAB spore concentrations in mixed silage and FTM.

On all farms in the survey, substantial fluctuations were observed in BAB spore concentrations in FTM and environmental carriers. On only 4 farms (3 from the low group and 1 from the medium group) was the BAB spore concentration in FTM consistently below the MSL. Also in feces, bedding material, and mixed silage, critically high concentrations (>5 log10 spores/g) were occasionally found on farms with the lowest spore concentration in FTM. For example, the highest BAB spore concentration in feces (7 log10 spores/g) was observed on the farm with the third lowest average BAB spore concentration in FTM. At the visit to this farm, the feces sample contained 7 log10 spores/g and the BAB spore concentration in FTM was 4.1 log10 spores/L. However, critically high BAB spore concentrations in feces, bedding material, and mixed silage were more frequently observed on the farms with the highest average concentrations in FTM. Nevertheless, all farms except one were able to meet the MLS on at least 2 of the visits. On all farms, the concentration was above the MSL at least once.

Effects of Farm Management
In addition to the determination of BAB spore concentrations, data about farm management practices at the participating farms were collected by using a questionnaire. Table 3Go gives an overview of farm management practices related to the housing of cows, milking hygiene, and type of silage fed. Statistically significant relationships among the BAB spore concentrations in FTM were found only for the location of the cows during the summer period and for the presence in the herd of cows preferring to lie down on dirty patches. Therefore, these aspects were analyzed in more detail.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Farm management practices at the farms in the survey
 
Table 4Go shows the BAB spore concentration measured in the winter period and for the different housing situations observed during the summer period. During the winter period, cows were housed 24 h of the day at 96% of the farm visits. Table 4Go shows that keeping cows 24 h a day at pasture leads to a reduction of the level of FTM with BAB spores. The observed lower BAB spore concentration in FTM for this situation seems to be related to the lower concentration in feces. The BAB spore concentration in mixed silage did not differ (P > 0.2). Further analysis suggested, however, that it was probably not the location of the cows that was important but whether the cows were fed silage or not. The questionnaire revealed that in 66% of the cases in which cows were grazing all day, the diet of fresh grass was supplemented with silage. In these cases, cows were offered silage in the barn before milking. When the diet of grazing cows was not supplemented with silage, the BAB spore concentration in FTM never exceeded 1.6 log10 spores/L (5 samples), whereas when silage was fed to cows grazing all day, the BAB spore concentration in FTM ranged from <1.5 to 3.7 log10 spores/L (9 samples).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Concentration of butyric acid bacteria (BAB) spores in farm tank milk and environmental carriers during summer period (May to October) for different housing conditions and the winter period (November to April)
 
Another farm management factor that was studied in detail was the presence in the herd of cows preferring to lie down on dirty patches. Teats of these cows are generally more heavily contaminated with feces and thus more spores are transmitted to milk. Indeed, statistical analysis of the data indicated that when cows preferring to lie down on dirty patches were absent from the herd, BAB spore concentrations in milk were lower (0.5 log10 spores/L). However, further analysis of the data demonstrated that spore concentrations in feces and mixed silage at the farms with cows preferring to lie down on dirty patches were also 0.5 log10 spores/g higher. It is therefore more likely that the observed difference in FTM was due to differences in spore concentration in the mixed silage offered to the cows and not to the absence or presence of cows preferring to lie down in dirty patches in the herd.

Critical Concentrations in Feces, Bedding, and Mixed Silage
Figures 1Go and 2Go show the fraction of FTM samples with a BAB spore concentration below and above the MSL in relation to BAB spore concentrations in feces and mixed silage. Figure 1Go shows that BAB spore concentrations in feces above 5 log10 spores/g were critical with respect to the production of FTM with fewer spores than the MSL. When feces contained more than 5 log10 spores/g, almost 60% of the FTM exceed the MSL. On the other hand, when feces contained less than 4 log10 spores/g, none of the FTM exceeded the criterion. These results suggest that farmers should try to take measures that result in a BAB spore concentration in feces of less than 4 log10 spores/g.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Fraction of farm tank milk samples with concentrations above (solid bars) and below (hatched bars) the maximum spore limit of 3 log10 spores/L as a function of the butyric acid bacteria spore concentration in feces.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Fraction of farm tank milk samples with concentrations above (solid bars) and below (hatched bars) the maximum spore limit of 3 log10 spores/L as a function of the butyric acid bacteria spore concentration in mixed silage.

 
The BAB spore concentration in feces relates to the BAB spore concentration in mixed silage. Figure 2Go shows that also in mixed silage a critical concentration can be distinguished. A BAB spore concentration of greater than 5 log10 spores/g in mixed silage should be prevented. When mixed silage contained more than 5 log10 spores, almost 70% of the FTM samples contained more spores than the MSL. Conversely, when the silage contained less than 3 log10 spores/g, only about 13% of the FTM contained more spores than the MSL of 3 log10 spores/L.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A Control Strategy
The data presented in this paper confirm conclusions drawn in a modeling study concerning control of BAB spore concentrations in FTM (Vissers et al., 2006). In that study, a model was developed that described the transmission of BAB spores from mixed silage, other feeds, and soil via feces to FTM as a function of farm management factors. In the modeling study, we concluded that to control the level of BAB spores in FTM, it was by far the most important to control the concentration of BAB spores in the silage fed to the cows. Other control measures were considered to have only a marginal impact.

The survey in this study confirmed that control of the BAB spore concentration in silage was by far the most important option to control the BAB spore concentration in FTM. Other measures that were presumed important, such as teat cleaning (Stadhouders and Jörgenson, 1990), were much less important. In line with the model of Vissers et al. (2006), a more or less linear relation was found among BAB spore concentrations in mixed silage offered to the cows, feces, and FTM (Table 2Go). On the rare occasions (5 of the 144 visits) when no grass silage or corn silage was fed to the cows, the spore concentration in FTM never exceeded 1.6 log10 spores/L.

The most efficient way to control the BAB spore concentration in FTM was shown to be by controlling the BAB spore concentration in mixed silage. Farmers that produced milk with the lowest average BAB spore concentrations in FTM (2.1 log10 spores/L) also fed mixed silage to the cows with the lowest average spore concentrations (3.4 log10 spores/g). Conversely, farmers with the highest average BAB spore concentrations in FTM (3.2 log10 spores/L) fed mixed silage with the highest average concentrations (4.7 log10 spores/g). Apart from silage feed and silage quality, no relevant relations with other aspects of farm management were detected.

In the modeling study by Vissers et al. (2006), it was postulated that to consistently produce FTM meeting the MSL, farmers should aim for a concentration of BAB spores in the silage fed of below 3 log10 spores/g (in combination with a moderate level of teat hygiene) and should prevent concentrations of more than 5 log10 spores/g (Vissers et al., 2006). Figures 1Go and 2Go confirm that these concentrations are critical for control. When the mixed silage offered to the cows contained more than 5 log10 spores/g, the majority of the FTM samples exceeded the MSL. On the other hand, when the silage fed contained fewer than 3 log10 spores/g of FTM, only a minority of the samples (13%) exceeded the MSL. At concentrations in mixed silage between 3 and 5 log10, the number of FTM samples with a BAB spore concentration above and below the MSL was similar. At these concentrations in mixed silage, presumably the level of fecal contamination of the teat exterior plays a role, as also stated in the modeling study. The agreement between the survey results and results obtained in a modeling study emphasizes the usefulness of the modeling approach for identifying measures to control the microbial contamination of FTM.

Incident Management
In achieving and maintaining BAB spore concentrations of less than 3 log10 spores/g in silage fed to cows, the heterogeneous distribution of BAB spores in grass and corn silage is a difficulty. A number of studies have shown that BAB spore concentrations in grass and corn silage can be highly elevated locally (up to >7 log10 spores/g), whereas the concentration in the bulk of the silage is low (less than 3 log10 spores/g; Jonsson, 1991; Driehuis and Te Giffel, 2005; Vissers et al., 2007). When such local spots with high BAB spore concentrations are mixed with the bulk of the silage and other silage, the average BAB spore concentration in the mixed silage fed to cows increases significantly, as was confirmed in a recent study (Vissers et al., 2007). The heterogeneous distribution of BAB spores in silage may explain why even farms with a low average BAB spore concentration in FTM occasionally produce FTM with a BAB spore concentration above the MSL (Table 2Go). As such, efficient farm management with respect to control of the contamination of FTM with BAB spores probably depends on the ability of farmers to minimize the incidence of elevated BAB spore concentrations (>5 log10 spores/g) in the mixed silage fed to cows in the barn.

Control of BAB Spores in Mixed Silage
To ensure that the mixed silage fed contains fewer than 3 log10 spores/g, it is important to limit the initial contamination of silage with BAB spores and to prevent the growth of BAB during ensilage, storage, and feed-out. Silage is initially contaminated with BAB spores as soil is enclosed during harvesting (Pahlow et al., 2003). The BAB spore concentrations measured in soil (Table 1Go) indicate that an initial contamination level of less than 3 spores/g of silage can be secured when less than 1% of soil is enclosed. To prevent the growth of BAB, it is first important to produce an anaerobically stable silage by ensuring a fast and sufficiently deep decline of the pH by lactic acid fermentation (Weissbach, 1996; Pahlow et al., 2003). Second, penetration of oxygen into the silage during storage and feed-out should be prevented. Penetration of oxygen is the most likely cause of locally increased BAB spore concentrations in silage (Jonsson, 1991; Vissers et al., 2007). The presence of oxygen in silage enables yeasts to grow and consume the organic acids. As a consequence, pH rises locally and BAB may start to proliferate, resulting in small pockets with a very high BAB spore concentration. Adequate sealing of silage and a high silage density limit the penetration of oxygen (Parsons, 1991; McGechan and Williams, 1994).

Late-Blowing in Summer
Traditionally, late-blowing of cheeses was exclusively associated with milk produced in the winter period. In the Dutch milk quality payment system, FTM was therefore initially tested for BAB spores during the winter period only. In recent years, however, incidents of late-blowing in cheese have occurred more often during the summer, suggesting that also during the summer period the FTM has contained significant concentrations of BAB spores. As a reaction, since 2004 FTM has been tested for BAB spores all year round. The results shown in Table 4Go concerning the BAB spore concentrations in FTM in summer and winter confirm that this change in the milk payment system was justified. The survey presented in this paper clearly demonstrates that the increased frequency of late-blowing during summer is most likely due to changed feeding and housing patterns in the summer. In the past in the Netherlands, cows were fed silage and housed all day only during the winter period. In summertime, cows were grazing all day and no silage was fed. Nowadays in the summer period, cows are generally in the barn for at least half of the day (Table 3Go), but more importantly, silage is fed all year round, even when cows graze all day.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
To ensure BAB spore concentrations in FTM of less than the MSL of 3 log10 spores/L, farmers should aim for an average BAB spore concentration in the mixed silage fed of less than 3 log10 spores/g and prevent concentrations of more than 5 log10 spores/g. Other aspects of farm management did not affect the observed spore concentrations in FTM. Efficient control of the BAB spore concentrations in FTM of less than 3 log10 spores/L mainly depends on the ability of farmers to prevent incidents with elevated concentrations in mixed silage fed (>5 log10 spores/g). The results of the survey were in agreement with a previous modeling study of the contamination of FTM by BAB spores, emphasizing the usefulness of a modeling approach to identify measures to control the microbial contamination of FTM.

Received for publication November 30, 2006. Accepted for publication March 12, 2007.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 


Bergère, J. L., P. Gouet, J. Hermier, and G. Mocquot. 1968. Les Clostridium du groupe butyrique dans les produit laitiers. Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris) 19:41–54.

Driehuis, F., and M. C. Te Giffel. 2005. Butyric acid bacteria spores in whole crop maize silage. Page 271 in Silage Production and Utilisation, 14th Int. Silage Conf., Belfast, UK. D. I. H. Jones, R. Dewhurst, R. Merry, and P. M. Haigh, ed.

Jonsson, A. 1991. Growth of Clostridium tyrobutyricum during fermentation and aerobic deterioration of grass silage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 54:557–568.[CrossRef]

Klijn, N., F. F. J. Nieuwenhof, J. D. Hoolwerf, C. B. v. d. Waals, and A. H. Weerkamp. 1995. Identification of Clostridium tyrobutyricum as the causative agent of late blowing in cheese by species-specific PCR amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:2919–2924.[Abstract]

McGechan, M. B., and A. G. Williams. 1994. A model of air infiltration losses during silage storage. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 57:237–249.[CrossRef]

NEN-ISO. 1994. Milk and milk products—Detection of spores of butyric acid bacteria and determination of the content of spores of butyric acid bacteria. Vol. 6877:1–12. Netherlands Normalisation Institute (NEN-ISO), Delft, the Netherlands.

Pahlow, G., R. E. Muck, F. Driehuis, S. J. W. H. Oude Elferink, and S. F. Spoelstra. 2003. Microbiology of ensiling. Pages 31–93 in Silage Science and Technology. L. Al-Amoodi, ed. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.

Parsons, D. J. 1991. Modelling gas flow in a silage clamp after opening. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 50:209–218.[CrossRef]

Stadhouders, J. 1990. Prevention of butyric acid fermentation by the use of nitrate. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 251:40–46.

Stadhouders, J., and K. Jørgensen. 1990. Prevention of the contamination of raw milk by a hygienic milk production. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 251:32–36.

Te Giffel, M. C., A. Wagendorp, A. Herrewegh, and F. Driehuis. 2002. Bacterial spores in silage and raw milk. Antonie van Leewenhoek 81:625–630.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vissers, M. M. M., F. Driehuis, M. C. Te Giffel, P. De Jong, and J. M. G. Lankveld. 2006. Improving farm management by modeling the contamination of farm tank milk with butyric acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 89:850–858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vissers, M. M. M., F. Driehuis, M. C. Te Giffel, P. De Jong, and J. M. G. Lankveld. 2007. Concentrations of butyric acid bacteria spores in silage and relationships with aerobic deterioration. J. Dairy Sci. 90:928–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Waes, G., A. v. Heddeghem, and A. Van Heddeghem. 1990. Prevention of butyric acid fermentation by bacterial centrifugation of the cheese milk. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 251:47–50.

Weissbach, F. 1996. New developments in crop conservation. Pages 11–25 in XIth Int. Silage Conf., Aberystwyth, UK. R. S. Park and M. D. Stronge, ed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. M. M. Vissers, F. Driehuis, M. C. Te Giffel, P. De Jong, and J. M. G. Lankveld
Short Communication: Quantification of the Transmission of Microorganisms to Milk via Dirt Attached to the Exterior of Teats
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3579 - 3582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. M. M. Vissers, M. C. Te Giffel, F. Driehuis, P. De Jong, and J. M. G. Lankveld
Minimizing the Level of Bacillus cereus Spores in Farm Tank Milk
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3286 - 3293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vissers, M. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lankveld, J. M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vissers, M. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lankveld, J. M. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS