JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gressley, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Armentano, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gressley, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Armentano, L. E.
J. Dairy Sci. 90:1340-1353
© American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Effects of Low Rumen-Degradable Protein or Abomasal Fructan Infusion on Diet Digestibility and Urinary Nitrogen Excretion in Lactating Dairy Cows

T. F. Gressley and L. E. Armentano1

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

1 Corresponding author: learment{at}facstaff.wisc.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Post-ileal carbohydrate fermentation in dairy cows converts blood urea nitrogen (BUN) into fecal microbial protein. This should reduce urinary N, increase fecal N, and reduce manure NH3 volatilization. However, if intestinal BUN recycling competes with ruminal BUN recycling, hindgut fermentation may reduce NH3 for rumen microbial protein synthesis. Eight lactating Holstein cows were used in a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design with 14-d periods. Treatments were arranged as a 2 x 2 factorial. Diets contained either adequate rumen-degradable protein (RDP; high RDP) or were 28% below predicted RDP requirements (low RDP). Cows received abomasal infusions of either 10 L/d of saline or 10 L/d of saline containing 1 kg/d of inulin. We hypothesized that reducing ruminal NH3, either by restricting RDP intake or by diverting BUN to feces with inulin, would reduce rumen microbial protein synthesis, as would be evidenced by significant main effects of treatments on rumen NH3, milk production, and urinary purine derivative excretion. Furthermore, we thought it likely that effects of inulin might be greater when rumen NH3 was already low, as would be indicated by significant interactions between inulin infusion and dietary RDP level on rumen NH3, milk production, and urinary purine derivative excretion. Rumen NH3 was reduced by the low-RDP diet, but urinary purine derivative excretion and milk production were unaffected. However, the low-RDP diet reduced apparent total tract digestibility of OM and starch and reduced in situ rumen NDF digestibility. Abomasal inulin reduced the BUN concentration but did not affect milk yield or rumen NH3, suggesting that RDP requirements are not affected by hindgut fermentation. Inulin shifted 23 g/d of N from urine to feces. However, based on fecal purine excretion, we estimated that only 8 g/d of the increased fecal N was due to increased fecal microbial output. Inulin reduced true digestibility of dietary protein or increased nonmicrobial as well as microbial endogenous losses. This latter effect may be an artifact of our experimental model that delivers easily fermented, soluble fiber to the small intestine. Normal dietary alterations to similarly increase large intestinal fermentation would probably arise from larger quantities of less rapidly digested carbohydrates. Increasing hindgut fermentation in practical diets should reduce manure NH3 volatilization without impairing rumen fermentation, but the reduction is likely to be small.

Key Words: fecal nitrogen • fructan • urea • urinary nitrogen


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Ammonia emissions from dairy manure reduce air quality (James et al., 1999). Urinary N is rapidly converted to NH3 during manure collection and storage, whereas fecal N is converted to NH3 at a much slower rate (Varel et al., 1999). As a consequence, the rate of NH3 volatilization from urine-rich manure is greater than the rate of NH3 volatilization from feces-rich manure. Developing nutritional strategies to shift some N excretion from the urine to the feces should reduce NH3 volatilization from dairy manure.

Diets that increase large intestinal carbohydrate fermentation appear to shift some N from urine to feces. Supplying fermentable substrates to the large intestine increased bacterial conversion of BUN into fecal microbial protein in sheep (Ørskov et al., 1970; Thornton et al., 1970; Mason et al., 1981), and abomasal infusions of 1 kg/d of pectin were shown to reduce urinary N by approximately 10% in lactating dairy cows (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). However, rumen ammonia and urinary excretion of purine derivatives tended to decrease with pectin infusion (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). These results suggest that fermentation in the large intestine may have reduced urea recycling to the rumen, consequently reducing rumen microbial protein production.

Additionally, pectin is a viscous fiber and studies in monogastrics have shown that feeding viscous fibers increases fecal losses of feed and endogenous protein compared with feeding nonviscous fibers (Larsen et al., 1993; Souffrant, 2001). The negative effects of pectin on protein nutrition observed by Gressley and Armentano (2005) may have been due both to direct effects of pectin on reducing N recycling to the rumen and to indirect effects of pectin because of its viscosity, decreasing protein digestibility.

An experiment was conducted to determine whether increasing the fermentable substrate supply to the large intestine of dairy cows would increase the requirement for RDP. Cows were fed a diet balanced to meet protein requirements or a diet balanced to contain 28% less RDP than required (NRC, 2001). Additionally, cows were infused abomasally with either 0 or 1 kg/d of inulin, a source of fructans, which are a type of soluble fiber. Unlike pectin, inulin is a nonviscous fiber and the effects of inulin on protein nutrition should be due only to direct effects on microbial activity of the large intestine. We hypothesized that if hindgut fermentation decreases N recycling to the rumen, then rumen ammonia and urinary purine derivative excretion should be decreased with abomasal inulin, and that these effects should be more pronounced on the low-RDP diet.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Treatments
Eight multiparous lactating Holstein cows were fed the same diet (high RDP; Table 1Go) for a 2-wk preexperimental period to determine ad libitum intake. Cows were fed to obtain approximately 10% feed refusals. Each cow’s ad libitum DMI was calculated as DMI during the final 4 d of the preexperimental period after correcting for 100°C DM content of the refusals. Following the preexperimental period, cows were blocked by milk production and assigned to two 4 x 4 Latin squares with 14-d periods. Each cow was fed at 90% of her predicted ad libitum DMI for the remainder of the experiment. Cows ranged from 76 to 187 DIM at the start of period 1. At least 1 mo prior to the start of period 1, cows were fitted with 10-cm rumen cannulas (Bar Diamond, Parma, ID). Cows were milked twice daily at 0330 and 1530 h, and milk weight was recorded at each milking. Bovine somatotropin (500 mg of Posilac, Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO) was injected every 2 wk. The Animal Care and Use Committee for the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison approved all animal procedures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Ingredient composition of the experimental diets and analyzed nutrient contents of the experimental diets and inulin
 
Treatments were arranged as a 2 x 2 factorial, with 2 dietary treatments and 2 abomasal infusion treatments. Cows were fed either a ration balanced according to NRC (2001) to provide adequate nutrients to support 36 kg/d of milk with 3.5% fat (high RDP) or a ration formulated to contain 72% of RDP supplied by the adequate diet (low RDP). The high-RDP diet contained 1% urea, and urea was replaced with cracked corn grain to create the low-RDP diet (Table 1Go). Abomasal infusion treatments were 10 L/d of saline (9 g of NaCl/L of tap water) containing either 0 or 1 kg/d of chicory inulin (Raftiline, Orafti Active Food Ingredients, Oreye, Belgium). Treatment combinations were 1) the low-RDP diet with abomasal saline infusion, 2) the low-RDP diet with 1 kg/d of abomasal inulin, 3) the high-RDP diet with abomasal saline infusion, and 4) the high-RDP diet with 1 kg/d of abomasal inulin. Abomasal infusions were performed from d 4 to 14 of each period (11 total days of infusion) and were continuous throughout the day except for about 1.5 h during milking. Infusion lines were inserted through the ruminal cannula, through the omasum, and into the abomasum. Plastisol (Bar Diamond) discs (12 cm in diameter and 9 mm in height) were used to anchor the infusion line in the abomasum, and placement of infusion lines in the abomasum was monitored daily. Infusion solutions were prepared using an electric mixer (Talboys laboratory stirrer, model #107, Troemner LLC, Thorofare, NJ). Variable-speed peristaltic pumps (Mec-o-matic VSP-20, W. W. Grainger, Inc., Lincolnshire, IL) were used to deliver the infusion mixtures at a rate of 10 ± 0.5 L/d.

Sampling
Feed samples were taken weekly, dried for 48 h in a 60°C forced-air oven, and composited by period. Samples of any refusals were taken during the last 3 d of each period. To calculate DMI, samples of offered and refused feed were dried for 48 h at 100°C, then weighed and discarded. During abomasal infusions (d 4 to 14 of each period), a bolus containing La2O3 dissolved in HCl and carried on soyhulls was pulse-dosed into the rumen twice daily at 0300 and 1500 h. A total of 1.46 g of La/ d was supplied to predict fecal output and nutrient digestibility.

Rumen fluid samples were taken on d 12 of each period, beginning just prior to the 0800-h feeding and at every 2 h thereafter for a total of 12 samples per period. Samples were comprised of equal volumes of rumen fluid taken from the caudal ventral sac, cranial ventral sac, caudo-dorsal blind sac, and dorsal sac of the rumen using a stainless-steel filter probe (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). Rumen fluid pH was measured (twin pH-meter, model B-213, Spectrum Technologies Inc., Plainfield, IL). One milliliter of rumen fluid was added to each of two 1.5-mL microfuge tubes containing 0.02 mL of 50% H2SO4. Tubes were frozen at –20°C for later VFA analysis. The same process was used to preserve rumen fluid for NH3 analysis, except that the tubes contained 0.02 mL of 50% TCA as the preservative.

In situ rumen measurements were also performed on d 12. Quadruplicate Dacron polyester bags (9 x 15 cm, 52 ± 5 µm pore size) containing 5 g of soyhulls were incubated in each cow for 12 h to determine disappearance of NDF. Bags were placed in a nylon laundry bag, soaked in warm water for 5 min prior to incubation, and inserted in the ventral sac of the rumen. After incubation, bags were rinsed in cold water and washed in a commercial washing machine for 2 rinse cycles of 15 min each. Disappearance of DM and NDF after 12 h was corrected for DM and NDF losses in bags that were soaked and laundered without ruminal incubation.

Fecal, urine, and blood samples were taken 3 times each on d 13 and 14 of each period. Samples were taken every 8 h, beginning at 0830 h on d 13 and at 1230 h on d 14. Feces were sampled rectally and midstream urine samples were taken following manual vulval stimulation. One cow was unresponsive to manual stimulation used to collect urine samples, and urine data therefore represent results from 7 of the 8 cows. A portion (approximately 100 g) of each fecal grab sample was dried for 48 h at 60°C and composited by cow within period for later component analysis. Composites contained equal dry weights of feces from each sampling point. A second portion of feces (approximately 20 g) was immediately frozen at –20°C for later N analysis. Prior to N analysis, samples were thawed and composited by cow within period, with an equal weight from each sampling time. Composite fecal samples were homogenized for 2 min in a Waring blender. Urine samples were acidified with 50% H2SO4 (0.02 mL/1 mL of urine) and frozen at –20°C for later N analysis. An additional acidified sample was diluted 1:5 with distilled water for later purine derivative and creatinine analysis. Prior to N analysis, urine samples were composited by cow within period with an equal volume for each sampling time. Blood samples (10 mL) were taken from the coccygeal vein or artery into evacuated tubes (BD Vacutainer clot activator, Becton Dickinson Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ). Blood was centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 30 min and serum aliquots were refrigerated (4°C) for a maximum of 48 h until urea analysis.

Cows were weighed at 1100 h on d 7 and 8 of each period. Duplicate milk samples from both a.m. and p.m. milkings were taken during the final 3 d of each period. One set of duplicate samples was analyzed for fat, true protein, and MUN by infrared analysis (Foss 605 for fat and protein, and Foss 6000 for MUN, AgSource Milk Analysis Laboratory, Menomonie, WI). The second set of samples was refrigerated until the end of each sampling period, composited by cow within period according to milk production, and frozen at –20°C until N analysis.

Sample Analyses
Dried feed and fecal samples were ground through a 1-mm screen (Wiley mill, Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA). Dry matter was determined by drying overnight in a 100°C forced-air oven. Organic matter was determined by oven combustion at 550°C for 12 h. Neutral detergent-soluble organic matter (NDSOM) was calculated as 100% – NDF – ash. Nitrogen was analyzed by Kjeldahl (AOAC, 2000; section 4.2.09, method 984.13). Neutral detergent fiber was determined using {alpha}-amylase (Sigma no. A3306, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) with sodium sulfite and was corrected for ash concentration according to Van Soest et al. (1991), adapted for the Ankom200 fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY). Acid detergent fiber was determined on separate samples using the method of Goering and Van Soest (1970), adapted for the Ankom200. Feed fatty acids were analyzed according to Sukhija and Palmquist (1988) and represented the sum of C8 to C22. Starch was determined according to Bal et al. (2000), except that glucose hydrolyzed from starch was analyzed according to Karkalas (1985). Starch content was corrected for free glucose measured in samples not treated with amylase and amyloglucosidase.

Rumen fluid samples were analyzed for VFA concentrations by gas chromatography (Clarus 500, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) using a GP 10% SP-1200/1% H3PO4 on 80/100 Chromasorb WAW packed glass column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). Rumen NH3 was analyzed as described by Bal et al. (2000). The concentration of La in fecal samples was determined by direct current plasma emission spectroscopy (Spectra Metrics, Inc., subsidiary of Beckman Instruments, Inc., Andover, MA) according to Combs and Satter (1992). Samples were corrected for background La concentration found in a pooled fecal sample taken from cows on the final day of the preexperimental feeding period. Fecal output was predicted based on fecal La concentration as


Formula

Digestibility calculations included infused inulin as a component of intake.

The fructan content of inulin and fecal samples was determined using a commercial kit (fructan assay kit, Megazyme International, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland). Fecal purines were analyzed according to Pereira and Armentano (2000); however, an equimolar ratio of guanine and adenine was used for the standard to better reflect rumen microbial purine composition.

Urinary creatinine was measured using a colorimetric assay (Teco no. C515-480, Teco Diagnostics, Anaheim, CA). Daily urine output (L/d) was estimated from urinary creatinine and BW as 28.1 (mg/kg) x BW (kg) x [1/urinary creatinine (mg/L)] (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). The concentration of allantoin was determined by the methods of Chen and Gomes (1992), except that 1 M HCl was used instead of 0.5 M HCl to maintain a pH below 3. The uric acid concentration was determined colorimetrically (Teco no. U580-240, Teco Diagnostics). Blood urea N was also determined using a commercial kit (Teco no. B551-132, Teco Diagnostics).

After the experiment ended and data were analyzed, a significant decrease in milk fat yield was observed for the inulin infusion. Milk sample composites were made for milk N determination as described above. However, only a portion of the composite samples was required for N analysis. The remaining frozen milk samples were used to determine milk fatty acid composition. Milk fatty acids were analyzed according to Leonardi et al. (2003), except that the gas chromatograph was a PerkinElmer Clarus 500.

Statistical Analyses
Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 1999). Most variables had only one value per cow per period and were analyzed using the model


Formula

where µ is the overall mean; R is the fixed effect of dietary RDP level; I is the fixed effect of abomasal infusion treatment; S is the fixed effect of square; P is the fixed effect of period; C is the random effect of cow within square; and e is the random residual error.

Repeated measurements of BUN and rumen VFA, NH3, and pH were analyzed as


Formula

where H is the fixed effect of hour after the initial 0800-h feeding and other terms are as described above. All interactions were considered fixed effects except R x I x P x C, which was considered random. The autoregressive covariate structure was used and the subject was R x I x P x C. Significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and a trend was declared at P ≤ 0.10.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Nitrogen Balance
Inulin increased fecal N by 23 g/d (P < 0.001) and decreased urinary N by 24 g/d (P = 0.02; Table 2Go). The effects on urinary and fecal N were nearly identical to those observed when cows were infused abomasally with pectin (Gressley and Armentano, 2005), indicating that different rapidly fermentable substrates led to similar shifts in N excretion. The effects of inulin infusion on N excretion were similar to those observed in monogastrics (Younes et al., 1997; Propst et al., 2003).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Effect of dietary RDP and abomasal inulin infusion on nitrogen intake and excretion
 
Increasing dietary RDP by adding urea increased N intake (P < 0.001) and urinary N excretion (P < 0.001) without affecting outputs of milk N or fecal N. These results are in accordance with those of others who have found that increasing dietary protein primarily increases urinary N, causing an increase in the fraction of excreted N coming from urine (Wright et al., 1998; Broderick, 2003).

Although cows were limit fed, there were feed refusals, averaging 1.8% for higher producing cows fed the high-RDP diet, 3.4% for higher producing cows fed the low-RDP diet, 10.0% for lower producing cows fed the high-RDP diet, and 5.6% for lower producing cows fed the low-RDP diet. This led to a tendency for a square by diet interaction on DMI (P = 0.07), and a significant interaction on N intake (P = 0.02). Increasing dietary RDP increased N intake from 462 to 559 g/d for the high-producing cows but only from 410 to 468 g/d for the low-producing cows. There were additional interactions between square and diet on N balance measures that may have been consequences of this interaction. Increasing dietary RDP increased milk N from 152 to 163 g/d for the higher producing square but decreased milk N from 145 to 135 g/d for the lower producing square (P = 0.001). Increasing RDP increased fecal N from 161 to 173 g/d in the higher producing cows but decreased fecal N from 156 to 143 g/d in the lower producing cows (P = 0.04). Increasing RDP numerically reduced DMI from 19.0 to 18.2 kg/d for low-producing cows, which may have led to decreased milk N from reduced energy availability and decreased fecal N from endogenous and undigested feed sources. Finally, the significant effect of dietary RDP on calculated N balance (P = 0.02) was due exclusively to effects observed in higher producing cows. The calculated N balance decreased in those cows from +3 to –45 g/d with increasing RDP, whereas the N balance changed only from –13 to –17 g/d for the lower producing cows (P = 0.04).

The restricted feeding protocol did not lead to complete consumption of the diet, as described above. The diets were mixed at 0700 h and fed in 3 equal portions at 0800, 1600, and 2100 h. Cows were observed to consume feed rapidly at 0800 and 1600 h but were more reluctant to consume the feed provided at 2100 h. Additionally, ambient temperatures increased to well above average for period 3 (April of 2005), and refusals averaged 10% during period 3 compared with 4, 2, and 5% for periods 1, 2, and 4, respectively, suggesting that feed heating may have increased refusals. Finally, it is possible that urea reduced palatability of the diet, but this reduced intakes only for cows in the low-producing group.

Based on studies using ileally cannulated lactating dairy cows (Knowlton et al., 1998; Younker et al., 1998; Callison et al., 2001), an average of 1 kg/d of OM is digested in the large intestine. Therefore, the inulin infusion in the present experiment should have approximately doubled the amount of large intestinal fermentation, and it resulted in a 24 g/d decrease in urinary N excretion. In the current study, decreasing dietary RDP by 2.7 percentage units caused a 97 g/d decrease in urinary N excretion. This suggests that increasing intestinally fermentable carbohydrate by 1 kg/d and decreasing dietary RDP by 0.7 percentage units should cause a roughly equivalent drop in urinary N.

Intake and Digestion
Feed offered was restricted to 90% of ad libitum intake, and although there were some feed refusals, oral DMI was not affected by treatment (Table 3Go). When cows were abomasally infused with 1 kg/d of inulin, oral plus infused DM (P = 0.009), OM (P = 0.006), and NDSOM (P < 0.001) all increased predictably. Fecal excretion of inulin was low compared with infused amounts, indicating that about 99% of infused inulin was digested, presumably in the hindgut. This is in agreement with data from ruminants and monogastrics (Biggs and Hancock, 1998; Roberfroid and Delzenne, 1998).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Effect of dietary RDP and abomasal inulin infusion on intake and digestion
 
Apparent digestibility of DM and OM tended to be reduced with abomasal inulin (P = 0.10), and digestibilities of starch (P = 0.01) and NDSOM (P = 0.007) were significantly reduced. Abomasal infusion of pectin was similarly found to decrease starch digestibility (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). Because inulin was completely digested, the inulin infusions appear to have decreased ruminal or postruminal digestibility of dietary nutrients, including starch. Reduced digestibility may have been due to the infused fiber interfering with small intestinal nutrient digestion, the infused fiber competing with other nutrients for large intestinal digestion, or perhaps fiber infusion increasing carbohydrate storage in large intestinal microbes.

Decreasing RDP reduced apparent digestibility of OM (P = 0.05), starch (P = 0.008), NDSOM (P = 0.008), and fatty acids (P = 0.007) and tended to reduce DM digestibility (P = 0.06). These results suggest that the reduced-RDP diet was deficient in N to support ruminal or postruminal carbohydrate and fat digestion compared with the high-RDP diet. Others have similarly found that a predicted protein deficiency reduced diet digestibility in dairy heifers (Marini and Van Amburgh, 2005) and in lactating dairy cows (Cameron et al., 1991; Ruiz et al., 2002).

Fecal Purines
Fecal DM output significantly increased by 0.80 kg/ d for the inulin infusion (P = 0.002; Table 4Go). Fecal purines were used to predict how much of the increase in fecal DM output with inulin infusion was due to increased fecal microbial DM excretion and how much was due to reduced true digestibility of dietary DM. Inulin increased the fecal purine output by 0.41 and 2.34 g/d for cows receiving the low- and high-RDP diets, respectively. The purine content of ruminal microbes averages 1.2% of microbial DM, ranging from 0.7 to 2.1% (Obispo and Dehority, 1999; Rodríguez et al., 2000; Carro and Miller, 2002; Reynal et al., 2003; Vicente et al., 2004). Assuming that fecal bacteria have the same mean (and range) in purine content, the average fecal purine excretion measured in these cows was used to estimate the increase in fecal microbial DM output attributable to the inulin infusion. Inulin increased the fecal microbial DM output by 34 g/d (range 20 to 59 g/ d) for cows fed the low-RDP diet and 195 g/d (111 to 334) for cows fed the high-RDP diet. These calculations indicate that increased fecal microbial output accounted for only 12% (range 7 to 20%) and 31% (range 18 to 53%) of the decrease in DM digestibility with inulin infusion for cows fed the low- and high-RDP diets, respectively. The majority of the increase in fecal DM output with inulin infusion was apparently due to inulin reducing true digestibility of dietary components, including starch.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Effect of dietary RDP and abomasal inulin infusion on fecal characteristics
 
Similar calculations were performed to predict the extent of the increase in fecal N with inulin infusion that was due to increased fecal microbial N. Based on a summary of 7 reports of rumen bacteria purine and N contents (Gressley and Armentano, 2005), the average increase in fecal bacteria N with inulin infusion was 13 g/d (range 8 to 22 g/d) for the high-RDP diet but only 2 g/d (range 1 to 4 g/d) for the low-RDP diet. This suggests that increased fecal microbial N accounted for only 11% of the 18 g/d increase in fecal N with inulin infusion for the low-RDP diet, but accounted for 44% of the 29 g/d increase in fecal N with inulin infusion for the high-RDP diet. Because infused inulin was >99% degraded for both diets, the efficiency of conversion of inulin to fecal microbial N was apparently reduced with the low-RDP diet. Perhaps urea recycling to the large intestine was reduced with the low-RDP diet, and lower NH3 concentrations available to intestinal microbes may have contributed to the reduced efficiency. When cows were infused abomasally with pectin, fecal microbial N (as calculated from fecal purines) was responsible for approximately 77% of the observed increase in fecal N (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). The authors suggested that the remaining 23% was because the high viscosity of pectin reduced the digestibility of dietary or endogenous proteins. In the current experiment, bacterial N was responsible for even less of the increase in fecal N with infused inulin, a nonviscous fiber source. Both abomasal pectin and inulin appear to have negatively influenced protein nutrition by increasing fecal endogenous protein output, decreasing endogenous protein resorption, or reducing true protein digestibility.

Fecal microbial DM and microbial N outputs were calculated from fecal purines as outlined above. Isolation of cecal or large intestinal microbes in the current requirement would have required additional cannulation surgeries. To our knowledge, there are no published measurements of purine content of microbes isolated from the cecum, colon, or feces of ruminant animals. Therefore, we assumed that the purine content of ruminal microbes is similar to that of microbes produced in the large intestine. Because the reported purine content of ruminal microbes varies, we estimated fecal microbial DM and microbial N outputs based on the mean and range of published data. The rumen microbial purine:N (g/mmol) content in 7 published studies ranged from 0.74 to 1.85, with an average of 1.25 (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). A microbe-rich fraction isolated from dog feces had a purine:N ratio of 1.52 (Karr-Lilienthal et al., 2004), demonstrating that fecal and ruminal microbes have similar purine:N ratios. Only a fraction of the increase in fecal N and DM outputs with the inulin infusion appeared to be due to increased fecal microbial output. However, the precise magnitude of the increase in fecal microbial output with inulin infusion could not be determined from our data.

Ruminal Characteristics
There were no significant effects of treatments on rumen pH or on rumen VFA, except that increasing RDP reduced the molar percentage of isovalerate (P = 0.05; Table 5Go). There was also a significant interaction of diet by hour after feeding for isovalerate (P < 0.001) because of the low-RDP diet having a lower molar percentage than the high-RDP diet 0 and 2 h after feeding but a higher percentage for the remainder of the day (data not shown). Across treatments, the rumen VFA concentration averaged 83 mM. These values are low compared with an average of 102 mM found in experiments using cows with similar DMI and milk production (Kalscheur et al., 1997; Kennelly et al., 1999; Ruiz et al., 2001). The predominant carbohydrate sources in their dietary concentrates consisted of ground corn, cornmeal, and an equal mix of rolled barley and rolled corn, respectively. The present study used cracked corn grain as opposed to ground or rolled corn in an effort to reduce large intestinal fermentability of the corn grain. However, the cracked corn grain also may have caused ruminal carbohydrate digestion to be low for this experiment compared with other experiments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Effect of dietary RDP and abomasal inulin infusion on urinary purine derivatives and ruminal characteristics
 
Rumen NH3 data were not normally distributed (data not shown). Forty-three percent of the data points were between 0 and 2 mM, 23% were 2 to 4 mM, 13% were 4 to 6 mM, 7% were 6 to 8 mM, and the remaining 14% ranged from 8 to 23 mM. Rumen NH3 values were log transformed prior to statistical analyses, and data reported in Table 5Go and Figure 1Go are geometric means back-transformed from the log data. Arithmetic means were 2.56, 2.06, 5.39, and 5.94 mM for the low-RDP diet with abomasal saline infusion, the low-RDP diet with 1 kg/d of abomasal inulin, the high-RDP diet with abomasal saline infusion, and the high-RDP diet with 1 kg/d of abomasal inulin, respectively.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Rumen NH3 and BUN. Treatments were an NRC (2001)-adequate RDP diet with abomasal saline (HP, {diamond}), NRC-adequate RDP diet with 1 kg/d of abomasal inulin (HPI, {diamondsuit}), 28% less RDP than predicted requirements with abomasal saline (LP, {square}), and 28% less RDP with 1 kg/d of abomasal inulin (LPI, {blacksquare}). Rumen ammonia data were log transformed prior to statistical analysis, and results presented are geometric means. Main effects of diet (P < 0.001), period (P < 0.001), and hour after initial feeding (P < 0.001) and interactions of diet x infusion (P = 0.02) and diet x hour after initial feeding (P < 0.001) were significant for rumen ammonia, and pooled SED = 1.38 mM. Main effects of diet (P < 0.001), infusion (P = 0.03), and hour (P = 0.001) and the interaction of diet x hour (P = 0.02) were significant for BUN, and pooled SED = 0.85 mg/dL.

 
Abomasal pectin infusion tended to decrease rumen NH3 and urinary purine derivative excretion in cows fed adequate protein diets (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). In the current experiment we hypothesized that inulin would reduce rumen NH3 and urinary purine derivatives, and that this decrease would be most severe with the low-RDP diet. However, there were no main effects of inulin on rumen NH3 or urinary purine derivatives. The interaction between diet and inulin on rumen NH3 indicated that inulin decreased rumen NH3 with the low-RDP diet, but inulin actually increased rumen NH3 with the high-RDP diet. Overall, urea recycling to the rumen was apparently unaffected by increasing intestinal fermentation. The abomasal inulin infusion was designed to approximately double the amount of hindgut fermentation compared with that of cows that did not receive inulin. The infused amount was selected to approximate a maximum increase in hindgut fermentation that could be expected by practical dietary manipulations. These results suggest that manipulating dairy diets to increase hindgut fermentation and reduce manure ammonia volatilization should not reduce N recycling to the rumen for microbial protein production.

As expected, decreasing the RDP reduced rumen NH3 (P < 0.001), by 1.74 mM for saline-infused cows, and by 2.68 mM for inulin-infused cows. There was a significant diet x hour interaction after feeding for rumen NH3 (P = 0.03) because of wider daily fluctuations for cows fed the high-RDP diet compared with the low-RDP diet (Figure 1Go). The geometric mean NH3 concentration for the high-RDP diet was 3.7 mM, similar to the requirement of 3.6 mM found by Satter and Slyter (1974). Therefore, the high-RDP diet was successful at providing adequate, but not excessive, NH3. Geometric mean rumen NH3 for the low-RDP diet was 1.5 mM, which is substantially below the 3.6 mM recommendation. Despite this, there was no main effect of dietary RDP on urinary purine derivative excretion or on the yield of milk or milk protein, suggesting that ruminal NH3 was adequate to support rumen microbial CP production even with the low-RDP diet. Satter and Slyter (1974) indicated that the rumen NH3 required for maximum microbial CP production may be closer to 1.4 mM, and our data would support this view. However, the additional RDP for the high-RDP diet was supplied by urea. If the RDP source contained peptides and proteins, the microbial responses may have been different.

Although there was no effect of diet on urinary purine derivatives, the low-RDP diet may not have provided adequate NH3 to support ruminal digestion, as evidenced by decreased in situ rumen NDF digestibility (P = 0.02). Similarly, increasing dietary urea in protein-deficient diets increased in situ NDF digestibility in prepartum (Dorshorst and Grummer, 2002) and post-partum (Ruiz et al., 2002) cows. In addition, the low-RDP diet reduced total tract apparent digestibility of OM, starch, and NDSOM, and part of the decrease may have been due to low rumen NH3 reducing ruminal digestibility. In his review of in vivo and in vitro studies, Hoover (1986) found that the requirement for rumen NH3 averaged 2.4 mM for microbial growth, but it was 5.7 mM for nutrient digestion. The low-RDP diet apparently contained adequate RDP to support rumen microbial protein production but was deficient in RDP to support ruminal carbohydrate digestion.

Milk Production and Composition
Decreasing RDP and infusing inulin each significantly decreased MUN concentration, MUN output, and BUN concentration (Table 6Go; Figure 1Go). The increased BUN and MUN with increasing RDP reflect the increased rumen NH3. However, the decreased BUN and MUN with inulin infusion were independent of effects on rumen NH3. Reductions in BUN attributable to increased fecal microbial protein production were observed when rats were fed up to 15% inulin (Younes et al., 1997) or when sheep were given up to 90 g/d of cecal glucose infusions (Thornton et al., 1970).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6. Effect of dietary RDP and abomasal inulin infusion on milk production and composition and blood urea N
 
Despite RDP effects on nutrient digestibility, there were no significant main effects of RDP on milk production or composition. Rumen-degradable protein was predicted to be 28% below requirements for the low-RDP diet; however, the predicted RDP deficiency did not reduce milk yield. When urea was used to adjust diets from well below predicted protein requirements to up to 14% CP, milk yield significantly increased in several studies (Polan et al., 1976; Wohlt and Clark, 1978; Ruiz et al., 2002). However, in the current experiment, urea was used to increase dietary CP from 13.5 to 16.1%, and no effects on production were observed. This agrees with other studies that have found that addition of RDP to diets containing at least 13% CP does not increase milk production (Holter et al., 1982; Armentano et al., 1993).

Milk fat yield significantly decreased with abomasal inulin (P = 0.05). The same effect was also observed when pectin was infused abomasally (Gressley and Armentano, 2005), indicating that abomasal fiber infusion appears to elicit a decrease in milk fat. The milk fatty acid composition is reported in Table 7Go. Milk fat depression in cows is typically associated with a decrease in the secretion of short-chain fatty acids (C4 to C14) into milk due at least in part to the biological activity of specific conjugated linoleic acids absorbed from the rumen (Bauman and Griinari, 2003). As a consequence, milk proportions of short-chain fatty acids decrease while conjugated linoleic acids and long-chain fatty acids (≥C18) increase. However, the inulin infusion significantly increased the proportion of short-chain fatty acids (P = 0.02 for C4 to C13, and P = 0.03 for <C16) and tended to decrease the proportion of 18:2 (P = 0.06). Also, there was no indication of an increase in either trans-10 18:1 or trans-10, cis-12 18:2 attributable to inulin infusion. The reduction in milk fat yield with inulin infusion was apparently due to a decrease in the secretion of 18-carbon fatty acids. Milk fatty acids with 18 or more carbons typically arise from circulating lipids that are derived from dietary and microbial fatty acids (Bauman and Griinari, 2003). However, inulin did not affect fatty acid digestibility (Table 2Go), indicating that the reduction in milk fat was apparently not due to a decrease in fat digestibility.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 7. Effect of dietary RDP and abomasal inulin on milk fatty acids
 
The model used in this experiment, as well as in the experiments of Gressley and Armentano (2005), was developed to quantify effects of hindgut fermentation. However, this model exposed the small intestine to soluble and highly fermentable fiber. In typical production situations, a cow’s small intestine would never be exposed to similar amounts of highly digestible fiber. Some of the unexpected effects of the inulin infusion on digestion and milk fat may have been artifacts of the model.

Predicted Protein Requirements
During the 2-wk preexperimental period, cows were fed the high-RDP ration ad libitum. Milk production averaged 37.9 kg/d and DMI averaged 23.5 kg/d, about 8% less than the 25.6 kg/d estimated by NRC (2001). Using these values and the milk composition determined for cows fed the high-RDP diet and infused with saline (Table 6Go), the predicted RDP balance (NRC, 2001) was –48 g/d, the RUP balance was –64 g/d, the MP balance was –54 g/d, NEL-allowable milk was 38.0 kg/d, and MP-allowable milk was 36.8 kg/d. Following this period, each cow was restricted to 90% of her predicted ad libitum intake, and feed offered averaged 21.2 kg/ d. At the restricted feeding level, the predicted MP balance was reduced to –248 g/d, NEL-allowable milk was 33.6 kg/d, and MP-allowable milk was 32.7 kg/d. The high-RDP diet was therefore predicted to be equally limiting in both energy and protein. When using the same intake and production values, the low-RDP diet should have been severely limiting in protein, with –577 g/d of MP, 33.9 kg/d of NEL-allowable milk, and 25.9 kg/d of MP-allowable milk.

Table 8Go reports NRC-predicted protein requirements and supplies (NRC, 2001) using treatment means for intake, milk production, and milk composition from Tables 3Go and 6Go. The predictions include only nutrients supplied by the rations, and abomasal inulin was not considered in the predictions. For both high-RDP treatments, RDP supply was just below requirements and RUP supply was just above requirements, resulting in an estimated MP balance that averaged +38 g/d. Energy-allowable milk was predicted to be 31.5 kg/d and MP-allowable milk was 30.7 kg/d, and these were similar to actual production, which averaged 29.9 kg/d. For the low-RDP treatments, the predicted RDP supply was 72% of requirements, with the RDP balance averaging –593 g/d. Although RUP supply was not different from that of the high-RDP treatments, the NRC (2001) guidelines increased the RUP requirement because of the predicted RDP deficiency, resulting in a negative RUP balance and a calculated MP balance of –287 g/d. Average milk production for the low-RDP treatments was 30.5 kg/d, 24% more than the NRC-predicted MP-allowable milk. Cows were able to maintain milk production despite this predicted deficiency in RDP. Periods were only 2 wk long, and it is possible that cows could have been drawing on body N, but this explanation is not attractive because cows on the low-RDP diet were in less of a negative N balance than cows on the high-RDP diet.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 8. Predicted protein requirements and milk production (NRC, 2001)
 
The NRC (2001) model appears to have overestimated RDP requirements for these cows. As described above, rumen VFA were low compared with other published data, and ruminal carbohydrate digestibility may have been lower than predicted by the NRC (2001). Additionally, the NRC (2001) does not differentiate between RDP provided as NH3, peptides, and AA, and microbial requirements for NH3 may be lower than requirements for peptides and AA.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Abomasal inulin infusion increased fecal N and decreased urinary N, MUN, and BUN as expected, in agreement with similar experiments using pectin. We had hypothesized that these changes would be due to large intestinal bacteria utilizing energy from inulin to convert BUN into fecal microbial protein. As determined by fecal purine excretion, increased fecal microbial N excretion was responsible for only 11 to 44% of the increase in fecal N with abomasal inulin, suggesting that inulin reduced true digestibility of dietary protein or increased nonmicrobial endogenous protein losses. Inulin did not affect ruminal NH3 or urinary purine derivative excretion, which indicates that recycling of urea to the rumen and production of rumen microbial CP were relatively unaffected by hindgut fermentation. Increasing hindgut fermentation appears to shift some N excretion from the urine to the feces, and this should increase the environmental stability of manure N. However, the reduction in manure ammonia losses is likely to be small. Inulin infusion was associated with negative responses such as reduced diet digestibility and milk fat yield, but those responses may have been an artifact of the model.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors would like to thank the staff of the University of Wisconsin Dairy Cattle Center for their assistance. Financial support for this project was provided by USDA formula funding as part of Regional Project NC-1009.

Received for publication March 24, 2006. Accepted for publication November 7, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Armentano, L. E., S. J. Bertics, and J. Riesterer. 1993. Lack of response to addition of degradable protein to a low protein diet fed to midlactation dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3755–3762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD.

Bal, M. A., R. D. Shaver, A. G. Jirovec, K. J. Shinners, and J. G. Coors. 2000. Crop processing and chop length of corn silage: Effects on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1264–1273.[Abstract]

Bauman, D. E., and J. M. Griinari. 2003. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 23:203–227.[Medline]

Biggs, D. R., and K. R. Hancock. 1998. In vitro digestion of bacterial and plant fructans and effects on ammonia accumulation in cow and sheep rumen fluids. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 44:167–171.

Broderick, G. A. 2003. Effects of varying dietary protein and energy levels on the production of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1370–1381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Callison, S. L., J. L. Firkins, M. L. Eastridge, and B. L. Hull. 2001. Site of nutrient digestion by dairy cows fed corn of different particle sizes or steam-rolled. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1458–1467.[Abstract]

Cameron, M. R., T. H. Klusmeyer, G. L. Lynch, J. H. Clark, and D. R. Nelson. 1991. Effects of urea and starch on rumen fermentation, nutrient passage to the duodenum, and performance of cows. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1321–1336.[Abstract]

Carro, M. D., and E. L. Miller. 2002. Comparison of microbial markers (15N and purine bases) and bacterial isolates for the estimation of rumen microbial protein synthesis. Anim. Sci. 75:315–321.

Chen, X. B., and M. J. Gomes. 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives—An overview of the technical details. Occasional Publication. International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, UK.

Combs, D. K., and L. D. Satter. 1992. Determination of markers in digesta and feces by direct current plasma emission spectroscopy. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2176–2183.[Abstract]

Dorshorst, M. E., and R. R. Grummer. 2002. Effects of day relative to parturition and dietary crude protein on rumen fermentation in prepartum transition cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2290–2298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis. (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC.

Gressley, T. F., and L. E. Armentano. 2005. Effect of abomasal pectin infusion on digestion and nitrogen balance in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:4028–4044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Holter, J. B., J. A. Byrne, and C. G. Schwab. 1982. Crude protein for high milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 65:1175–1188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoover, W. H. 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2755–2766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

James, T., D. Meyer, E. Esparza, E. J. DePeters, and H. Perez-Monti. 1999. Effects of dietary nitrogen manipulation on ammonia volatilization from manure from Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2430–2439.[Abstract]

Kalscheur, K. F., B. B. Teter, L. S. Piperova, and R. A. Erdman. 1997. Effect of dietary forage concentration and buffer addition on duodenal flow of trans-C18:1 fatty acids and milk fat production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2104–2114.[Abstract]

Karkalas, J. 1985. An improved enzymatic method for the determination of native and modified starch. J. Sci. Food Agric. 36:1019–1027.

Karr-Lilienthal, L. K., C. M. Grieshop, J. K. Spears, A. R. Patil, G. L. Czarnecki-Maulden, N. R. Merchen, and G. C. Fahey, Jr. 2004. Estimation of the proportion of bacterial nitrogen in canine feces using diaminopimelic acid as an internal bacterial marker. J. Anim. Sci. 82:1707–1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kennelly, J. J., B. Robinson, and G. R. Khorasani. 1999. Influence of carbohydrate source and buffer on rumen fermentation characteristics, milk yield, and milk composition in early-lactation Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2486–2496.[Abstract]

Knowlton, K. F., B. P. Glenn, and R. A. Erdman. 1998. Performance, ruminal fermentation, and site of starch digestion in early lactation cows fed corn grain harvested and processed differently. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1972–1984.[Abstract]

Larsen, F. M., P. J. Moughan, and M. N. Wilson. 1993. Dietary fiber viscosity and endogenous protein excretion at the terminal ileum of growing rats. J. Nutr. 123:1898–1904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leonardi, C., M. Stevenson, and L. E. Armentano. 2003. Effect of two levels of crude protein and methionine supplementation on performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:4033–4042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marini, J. C., and M. E. Van Amburgh. 2005. Partition of nitrogen excretion in urine and the feces of Holstein replacement heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1778–1784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mason, V. C., P. Kessank, J. C. Ononiwu, and M. P. Narang. 1981. Factors influencing faecal nitrogen excretion in sheep. 2. Carbohydrate fermentation in the caecum and large intestine. Z. Tierphysiol., Tierernähr. Futtermittelkde. 45:174–184.

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.

Obispo, N. E., and B. A. Dehority. 1999. Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria. J. Anim. Sci. 77:3084–3095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ørskov, E. R., C. Fraser, V. C. Mason, and S. O. Mann. 1970. Influence of starch digestion in the large intestine of sheep on caecal fermentation, caecal microflora and faecal nitrogen excretion. Br. J. Nutr. 24:671–682.[Medline]

Pereira, M. N., and L. E. Armentano. 2000. Partial replacement of forage with nonforage fiber sources in lactating cow diets. II. Digestion and rumen function. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2876–2887.[Abstract]

Polan, C. E., C. N. Miller, and M. L. McGilliard. 1976. Variable dietary protein and urea for intake and production in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 59:1910–1914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Propst, E. L., E. A. Flickinger, L. L. Bauer, N. R. Merchen, and G. C. Fahey, Jr. 2003. A dose-response experiment evaluating the effects of oligofructose and inulin on nutrient digestibility, stool quality, and fecal protein catabolites in healthy adult dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 81:3057–3066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reynal, S. M., G. A. Broderick, S. Ahvenjärvi, and P. Huhtanen. 2003. Effect of feeding protein supplements of differing degradability on omasal flow of microbial and undegraded protein. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1292–1305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Roberfroid, M. B., and N. M. Delzenne. 1998. Dietary fructans. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 18:117–143.[Medline]

Rodríguez, C. A., J. González, M. R. Alvir, J. L. Repetto, C. Centeno, and F. Lamrani. 2000. Composition of bacteria harvested from the liquid and solid fractions of the rumen of sheep as influenced by feed intake. Br. J. Nutr. 84:369–376.[Medline]

Ruiz, R., G. L. Albrecht, L. O. Tedeschi, G. Jarvis, J. B. Russell, and D. G. Fox. 2001. Effect of monensin on the performance and nitrogen utilization of lactating dairy cows consuming fresh forage. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1717–1727.[Abstract]

Ruiz, R., L. O. Tedeschi, J. C. Marini, D. G. Fox, A. N. Pell, G. Jarvis, and J. B. Russell. 2002. The effect of a ruminal nitrogen (N) deficiency in dairy cows: Evaluation of the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System ruminal N deficiency adjustment. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2986–2999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SAS Institute. 1999. SAS OnlineDoc, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Satter, L. D., and L. L. Slyter. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 32:199–208.[Medline]

Souffrant, W. B. 2001. Effect of dietary fibre on ileal digestibility and endogenous nitrogen losses in the pig. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 90:93–102.

Sukhija, P. S., and D. L. Palmquist. 1988. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:1202–1206.

Thornton, R. F., P. R. Bird, M. Somers, and R. J. Moir. 1970. Urea excretion in ruminants. III. The role of the hind-gut (caecum and colon). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 21:345–354.

Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lew. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 77:3583–3597.

Varel, V. H., J. A. Nienaber, and H. C. Freetly. 1999. Conservation of nitrogen in cattle feedlot waste with urease inhibitors. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1162–1168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vicente, F., J. A. Guada, J. Surra, J. Balcells, and C. Castrillo. 2004. Microbial contribution to duodenal purine flow in fattening cattle given concentrate diets, estimated by purine N labeling (15N) of different microbial fractions. Anim. Sci. 78:159–167.

Wohlt, J. E., and J. H. Clark. 1978. Nutritional value of urea versus preformed protein for ruminants. I. Lactation of dairy cows fed corn based diets containing supplemental nitrogen from urea and/ or soybean meal. J. Dairy Sci. 61:902–915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wright, T. C., S. Moscardini, P. H. Luimes, P. Susmel, and B. W. McBride. 1998. Effects of rumen-undegradable protein and feed intake on nitrogen balance and milk protein production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81:784–793.[Abstract]

Younes, H., C. Rémésy, S. Behr, and C. Demigné. 1997. Fermentable carbohydrate exerts a urea-lowering effect in normal and nephrectomized rats. Am. J. Physiol. 272:G515–G521.

Younker, R. S., S. D. Winland, J. L. Firkins, and B. L. Hull. 1998. Effects of replacing forage fiber or nonfiber carbohydrates with dried brewers grains. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2645–2656.[Abstract]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. P. Weiss, L. B. Willett, N. R. St-Pierre, D. C. Borger, T. R. McKelvey, and D. J. Wyatt
Varying forage type, metabolizable protein concentration, and carbohydrate source affects manure excretion, manure ammonia, and nitrogen metabolism of dairy cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2009; 92(11): 5607 - 5619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. Li, J. Cyriac, K. F. Knowlton, L. C. Marr, S. W. Gay, M. D. Hanigan, and J. A. Ogejo
Effects of Reducing Dietary Nitrogen on Ammonia Emissions from Manure on the Floor of a Naturally Ventilated Free Stall Dairy Barn at Low (0-20{degrees}C) Temperatures
J. Environ. Qual., October 29, 2009; 38(6): 2172 - 2181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Cyriac, A. G. Rius, M. L. McGilliard, R. E. Pearson, B. J. Bequette, and M. D. Hanigan
Lactation Performance of Mid-Lactation Dairy Cows Fed Ruminally Degradable Protein at Concentrations Lower Than National Research Council Recommendations
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4704 - 4713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gressley, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Armentano, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gressley, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Armentano, L. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS