|
|
||||||||

* Department of Farm Animals, and
Equine Clinic, Vetsuisse-Faculty, Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
1 Corresponding author: knuss{at}vetclinics.unizh.ch
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: dairy cattle lameness claw kinematics
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Functional trimming according to Toussaint Raven (1989) should promote natural weight bearing by increasing the contact area of the claws and by improving the balance between the medial and the lateral claw. However, only slight improvement was achieved after claw trimming when using pressure distribution measurements (van der Tol et al., 2004; Carvalho et al., 2005), and improvement was only transient (Kehler and Gerwing, 2004).
Treadmills have been used for gait evaluation in horses. The gait on a treadmill differs from that on other surfaces. The relative stance duration is slightly longer and the displacement of the withers as well as the maximal hoof heights were decreased on a treadmill compared with rubber ground (Buchner et al., 1994). However, on concrete, stride duration was shortened and the vertical displacement of the withers was even more decreased. The differences in kinematics did not disqualify the treadmill as an instrument of locomotion research (van Ingen-Schenau, 1980; Buchner et al., 1994). Trotting on the rubber belt of a treadmill was comparable to trotting on a rubber surface (Buchner et al., 1994). Concrete floors did not provide enough friction to allow unrestrained locomotion in cattle and contact pressures were very high compared with rubber flooring (van der Tol et al., 2004). In horses trotted by hand over a pressure measurement system, the preferred way of landing was lateral, asymmetrical landing in both front and hind feet (van Heel et al., 2004). These horses showed a fixed hoof-unrollment pattern, and hoof trimming did not have much influence on the way of landing. Lateral landing was regarded as the physiological standard in these horses.
According to Leach (1993), the stride is a full cycle of motion of a limb, which may be divided into different phases, beginning arbitrarily at any easily identifiable point, and is completed when the leg has returned to this initial position. The stance phase begins with heel-first, flat-foot, or toe-first placement and ends with either heel-off or toe-off (Leach, 1993). Midstance has been defined as the time when the metacarpus is in the vertical position in the front limb stance phase and when the hip joint is vertical to the hoof in the hind limbs. The stance phase can be further divided into heel strike, maximum braking, midstance, maximum propulsion, and push off (Leach, 1993; van der Tol et al., 2003).
The detailed events during contact of the bovine claws with the ground have been documented by GRF and pressure measurements (Alsleben et al., 2003; van der Tol et al., 2003). High-speed cinematography was carried out for the first time in cattle by Herlin and Drevemo (1997) to evaluate various limb joint angles during locomotion. Using high-speed cinematography, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the ground contact patterns of the claws of heifers walking on a treadmill with specific reference to 1) order of claw contact with the treadmill surface, 2) initial claw contact area, and 3) effect of trimming on claw contact patterns.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A digital high-speed camera (Motion Scope PCI 1000S, Redlake Imaging Corporation, San Diego, CA), with a frame rate of 500 pictures/s and a resolution of 320 x 280 pixels, connected to a personal computer was used. Three spotlights (220 V, 1,000 W, 300 Hz) were focused on the foot being studied. A film sequence lasting 4 s included 4 complete stride cycles. Considering the frame rate of 500 frames/s, this amounted to 2,000 frames per sequence. Each of the 4 limbs of an animal was filmed separately from 2 different views. Instead of simultaneous multiple cameras, subsequent film sequences were made from the different positions (Figure 1
). A limb was filmed from one view in all animals of a group, and then the camera was repositioned for the next view or limb. The claws of the forelimbs, where the feet were placed on the ground in a plane sagittal to the shoulders, were filmed from the front and from the side but not from the back because they were blocked from view by the pelvic limbs. Likewise, the hind feet could not be filmed from behind because they usually touched the ground close to the median plane in front of the contralateral limb. Instead, the pattern of ground contact by the hind feet was filmed from the side and obliquely from the front at a 45° angle representing the "frontal view" (Figure 1
). The film sequences were visually assessed using a software program (MIDAS Player, Redlake Imaging Corp.). In the frontal views, the swing phase, the pattern of ground contact, and the widening of the interdigital space could be seen. In the side views, the subsequent ground contact of the different parts of the lateral and medial clawsheel, wall, and toe areaduring the stance phase of the limb could be evaluated.
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The digits of the forelimb were lifted and protracted with a slight inward rotation so that during the swing phase, they almost touched the contralateral fetlock. They contacted the ground with a slight outward rotation, which started to become apparent when the foot was still a few centimeters above the ground and the digits of the distal limb started to extend. In most fore-limbs, the lateral claw contacted the ground before the medial claw (see below for details). At ground contact, the interdigital cleft pointed slightly outward. There was a marked passive widening of the interdigital cleft during which the medial claw was pushed medially, once the lateral claw had contacted the ground. The widening of the interdigital cleft remained unchanged throughout the rest of the stance phase. During the heel strike and maximum braking phases, pronounced oscillating movements along and perpendicular to the limb axis, of the claws and of the soft tissues of the foot, were observed.
The hind limbs were lifted with a slight inward rotation and protracted with a closed interdigital cleft. As in the forelimbs, active widening of the interdigital cleft and outward rotation of the claws were observed at ground contact. In almost all hind limbs, the lateral claw contacted the ground before the medial claw. The medial claw contacted the ground 0.014 s (SD = 0.012; Figure 2a
) after the lateral claw in the forelimbs and 0.024 s (SD = 0.008) in the hind limbs. During the braking phase, the lateral claws slid only a few millimeters, if at all, on the rubber belt of the treadmill. There was no sliding of the medial claw. Active weight bearing by the medial claw became visibly apparent only during the transition to the midstance position (Figure 2b
) and push-off phase.
|
Ground Contact Before and After Functional Claw Trimming
Before foot trimming, the lateral claw contacted the ground first in the majority of forelimbs (83%). In the remainder of the forelimbs (17%), the lateral and medial claws contacted the ground simultaneously. After functional claw trimming, there was an increase in the number of lateral claws (92%) that contacted the ground first in the forelimbs; in the remaining 8%, both claws contacted the ground simultaneously.
Before foot trimming, the lateral claw contacted the ground before the medial claw in all the hind limbs. After trimming, the lateral claw of the hind limbs contacted the ground first in almost all cases (97%); in 1 case, both claws contacted the ground simultaneously.
Claw Regions of Initial Ground Contact Before and After Functional Claw Trimming
Before trimming, the heel of the lateral claw of fore-limbs made initial contact with the ground in 47% and the abaxial wall of the lateral claw in another 47% of the limbs. In one heifer (6% of the limbs), the toe region of the lateral claw of both forelimbs contacted the ground first. After trimming, the heels of the lateral forelimb claws contacted the ground first in 64% of the limbs and the abaxial wall contacted the ground first in 36% of the limbs.
Before trimming, the heels of 50% of the lateral claws of the hind limbs contacted the ground first (Figure 3
) and in 44% the abaxial wall made initial contact. In 1 heifer (6%), the toes of the lateral claws of both hind limbs contacted the ground first. There was a marked change after trimming; the heel of the lateral claws became the region of initial contact with the ground in 78% of cases, and the abaxial wall became the region of initial contact in the remaining 22% of the hind feet.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High-speed cinematography allowed a detailed visual assessment of the different phases of a stride cycle. The way in which the forelimb was advanced in the terminal part of the swing phase corresponds to its anatomical properties. The extensor tendons, running dorsolaterally, and the anatomical shape of the distal aspect of the radius (Schraml, 1925) result in outward rotation of the claws as they contact the ground. The outward rotation of the digits immediately before ground contact was also observed in the hind limbs. Immediately before landing, the claws spread slightly apart but, in contrast to the results of another study (Fessl, 1974), the widening of the interdigital cleft occurred mainly after the lateral claw had contacted the ground. The medial claw then briefly moved away from the lateral claw before it contacted the ground in a sudden movement. This sequence gave the impression that the lateral claw was placed on the treadmill surface consciously and the medial claw in an involuntary fashion. The marked widening of the interdigital cleft may lead to irritation of the interdigital skin and subsequent interdigital hyperplasia. The passive widening of the interdigital cleft did not progress any further during the midstance and propulsion phases.
It was clearly evident that the lateral claw contacted the ground before the medial claw in both the forelimbs and hind limbs. The time difference in ground contact between the lateral and the medial claw was less in the front limbs (0.014 s) compared with the hind limbs (0.024 s). Thus, the lateral claw in cattle received the majority of the initial GRF at heel strike and during maximum braking. With respect to the hind limb, but not the forelimb, these findings are in agreement with those of van der Tol et al. (2003). Possibly, the subtle differences between the ground contact of the claws in the forelimbs could not be detected in the latter study because the measuring frequency was 250 Hz compared with 500 Hz. In addition, because the feet were placed on the ground in a plane sagittal to the shoulders, the vertical GRF may be distributed more evenly between the front claws during the entire stance phase. Also, the musculotendinous attachment of the forelimbs to the trunk may influence GRF. However, in support of our findings, Carvalho et al. (2005) found that in 32 Holstein cows, the peak pressures in the braking and deceleration phases were concentrated on the lateral sole and heel for all 4 limbs.
On hard surfaces such as slatted concrete floors, the lateral claw is considerably more stressed than the medial claw, especially in the hind limbs. van der Tol et al. (2003) reported that about 75% of the vertical GRF was exerted on the lateral hind claws of dairy cows at a walk. In addition, on hard surfaces, frictional forces on the soft horn of the heel could be detrimental for the lateral claw (van der Tol et al., 2003). The observed ground contact pattern may help to explain why the lateral claws of the hind limbs are predisposed to sole ulcers and more severe laminitic changes. Also, interdigital hyperplasia, which is usually more pronounced in the lateral part of the interdigital space, may result from contusion of the soft tissue caused by the upward pressure of the axial wall of the lateral claw.
Using a frequency of 500 frames/s, it was evident that the medial claw contacted the ground after the lateral claw and seemed to sustain a lesser load during the transition to the midstance position. The weight distribution between the lateral and medial claws could not be differentiated by force plate measurements in our study. The physiological purpose of greater loading of the lateral claw compared with the medial is not known. On soft surfaces such as grass, this may have little impact on the lateral claw because it can sink into the ground, followed by the medial claw. In doing this, it may contribute to the static and dynamic stabilization of the center of gravity of the animal while standing, walking, or running. Likewise, trotting horses showed a fixed hoof-unrollment pattern, and hoof trimming did not have much influence on the way of landing. In these horses, lateral landing was regarded as the physiological standard (van Heel et al., 2004). Lateral asymmetric landing might also be regarded as standard in walking cattle.
A number of researchers have measured the forces acting upon the claws of the forelimbs and hind limbs of standing cattle and reported that the medial claw of the forelimb receives more weight load than the lateral claw (van der Tol et al., 2002, 2003; Alsleben et al., 2003; Huth et al., 2005). This indicates that the pressure distribution in standing and walking cattle may be different. Age also plays a role with overload of the lateral claw of the hind limbs being more obvious in older animals (Alsleben et al., 2003; Huth et al., 2005). The position of the limbs during the pressure measurement, however, is also important. The exact position of the limbs was not defined in the studies by Alsleben et al. (2003) and van der Tol et al. (2003) and the level of foot care was described only by the latter authors. Most likely, standing animals assume a position during pressure measurements in which load distribution is as even as possible between the claws of a foot. When the hind limbs of animals were manually forced into a position perpendicular to the ground, the forces acting on the lateral claws were considerably greater than those acting on the medial claws (Kehler and Gerwing, 2004).
It was clearly evident from our cinematographic analysis of the walk on the treadmill that in the forelimb, as in the hind limb, the outside claw generally touched the ground before the medial claw. A difference in the length of the medial and lateral digits may contribute to this (Nuss and Paulus, 2006). Nacambo et al. (2004) found that in the metacarpal and metatarsal bones of calves and cows, the lateral condyle of the metacarpal and metatarsal bone was slightly longer than the medial, and Schwarzmann (2004) showed that the difference in length was increased to the pedal joint. This anatomical difference was smaller in the front limbs and greater and regularly present in the hind limbs. It is not clear whether an anatomical difference alone could explain the greater relative weight bearing by the lateral claws. We suspect that another contributing factor is the gait pattern in which the hind foot contacts the ground close to the median.
Claw trimming had no effect on which claw contacted the treadmill surface first. However, it did increase the frequency with which the heel of the lateral claw became the region of initial contact with the ground (50 vs. 78%), presumably because the dorsal wall had been cut to the normal length. Therefore, with regard to gait patterns, our observations indicate that claw trimming mainly affects the area of first contact of the claws. Furthermore, gait patterns are not easily changed but remain fairly uniform after trimming. This may explain why the effects of preventive claw trimming are only slight and short-lived (Kehler and Gerwing, 2004). Claw trimming cannot be the only answer to claw health problems in cattle kept on concrete floors. However, claw trimming reduces points of maximal pressure in the lateral claws to some extent and aids in redistributing the pressure to the medial claws (Alsleben et al., 2003; Kehler and Gerwing, 2004; van der Tol et al., 2004; Carvalho et al., 2005). Because the effect is relatively short-lived, more frequent claw trimming, possibly 3 to 4 times a year, may be necessary to achieve and maintain optimal claw health.
In conclusion, the results of the present study showed that the heel of the lateral claws, especially at the hind limbs, was the region that sustained the impact force at heel strike and maximum braking. The landing of the bovine foot at the walk on a treadmill can be described as a tipping movement, which starts at the heel of the lateral claw and progresses from the abaxial and axial walls of the lateral claw toward the medial claw. "Heel first" lateral asymmetric landing may be the normal gait pattern in cattle at the walk, which therefore may lead to overload and disease of the lateral claw on hard surfaces.
Received for publication March 31, 2006. Accepted for publication September 13, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |