|
|
||||||||


,1
* Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO 63167
Oord Dairy, Sunnyside, WA 98944
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721
1 Corresponding author: rcollier{at}ag.arizona.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: continuous milking apoptosis bovine somatotropin increased milking frequency
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although bovine prolactin and placental lactogen are known to increase mammary growth in late lactation, these molecules are not commercially available for use. Bovine somatotropin was found to increase mammary growth in late-gestation heifers (Collier, 2002), and bST slightly increased milk yield in early lactation (Bauman and Vernon, 1993). In addition, Hale and coworkers (2003) demonstrated that IMF increased milk yield and tended to increase mammary growth during early lactation. Although often inconsistent (VanBaale et al., 2005), others have reported marked increases in early-lactation milk yield while implementing IMF (Bar-Peled et al., 1995). In established lactation, both bST and IMF have known effects on 1) MEC synthetic activity, 2) the number of alveoli in a secretory and resting state, and 3) MEC numbers (Bauman and Vernon, 1993; Hale et al., 2003). During established lactation, the galactopoietic effects of bST and IMF are additive (Knight et al., 1992), and we hypothesize that these management practices may aid in minimizing or alleviating reduced milk yield in CM primiparous cows during early lactation.
The study objectives were to evaluate the effects of IMF and bST (Posilac, Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO) on production and MEC proliferation and apoptotic variables in CM glands from primiparous cows. The study used a half-udder model to examine treatment effects in CM and 60-d dry (control) udder halves. The specific study objectives were to examine CM, bST, and IMF on 1) MEC proliferation, 2) MEC apoptosis, and 3) milk yield and composition.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prepartum Milking Procedures and Treatment Assignments
A total of 8 primiparous cows (second gestation, first dry period) were assigned to a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial study, using an ipsilateral, half-udder design. The half-udder treatments were either a 60-d DP or CM during the last 60 d of gestation. Ipsilateral udder halves of each cow were randomly assigned to either a 60-d DP (control) or 0-d DP (CM). The whole-animal treatment was no bST (–bST; 0 mg/14 d; n = 4) or continuous bST (+bST; 500 mg/14 d; n = 4) during the DP and early postpartum period. The half-udder treatment (milking frequency) was 2x/d (n = 4) or 4x/d (n = 4) postpartum. Before parturition all CM half-udders were milked 2x/d, and milk from each udder half was collected into separate buckets by using a unit designed to collect from all 4 quarters individually, but modified to collect milk from unilateral udder halves. Animals were milked for 7 d before treatment implementation to obtain a milk yield covariate and to confirm that udder halves produced equal amounts of milk. Any animal displaying more than a 10% difference in milk yield between udder halves was removed from the trial and replaced by an animal producing similarly (within a 10% difference) for both udder halves. The control udder half was dried after the morning milking –60 d relative to the calculated parturition date and infused with a long-acting intramammary antibiotic (Quartermaster, West Agro Inc., Kansas City, MO).
Spontaneous Dry-Off Protocol
The CM udder half was milked throughout late gestation unless milk yield was below 5 kg/d for 7 consecutive days. At this time, the udder half was considered to have spontaneously dried off. Average days dry for control udder halves were 59.5 and 49.3 d for the +bST and –bST treatment, respectively. In CM udder halves, a total of 3 dried off spontaneously (1 +bST, 2 d, and 2 –bST, 4 and 26 d). The dried-off udder half was then treated with a long-acting intramammary antibiotic, and milk removal ceased until parturition. Any cow that spontaneously dried off was fed the close-up diet (Table 1
) until parturition.
|
Pre- and Postpartum Milking Protocols
All cows on the 2x/d protocol (prepartum and postpartum) were milked at 0400 and 1600 h and cows on the 4x/d regimen (postpartum) were milked at 0400, 0800, 1600, and 2000 h for the first 30 DIM. Milk yield from each udder half was weighed and recorded after each milking, and weekly milk samples were obtained from each cow at the 0400 and 1600 h milking times. Each sample was component analyzed by Arizona DHIA (Tempe, AZ) by using AOAC (2000)-approved infrared analysis equipment and procedures.
Mammary Biopsies
Mammary biopsies were planned for d –20, –7, 2, 7, and 20 relative to expected parturition. Because of the variability in calving dates, actual mammary biopsy time points were –19 ± 13, –8 ± 6, +2, +7, and +20 d relative to parturition. For each time point, tissue was obtained from both CM and control udder halves (either both front quarters or both rear quarters; alternating fore and rear between biopsy time points). Mammary gland biopsies were performed approximately 1 h after the morning milking, as previously described by Farr et al. (1996) and modified by Baumgard et al. (2002).
Ki-67 Proliferation Assay
Immunohistochemical localization of Ki-67 cell proliferation antigen, which determines the percentage of proliferating cells, was performed as described in Annen et al. (2007). Tissue sections for Ki67 were viewed by light microscopy and proliferating cells were quantified. By using an 8 x 8 ocular grid, 10 fields or 3,000 cells were quantified per slide for each biopsy time point, which included a control and a CM quarter slide (2 slides per time point per cow).
Terminal Deoxynucleotide Transferase-Mediated 2'-Deoxyuridine 5'-Triphosphate Nick-End Labeling Assay
Cells undergoing apoptosis were identified using terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated 2'-deoxyuridine 5'-triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL; ApoTag, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) as previously described by Annen et al. (2007).
Tissue sections for TUNEL were viewed by light microscopy, and apoptotic cells were quantified. By using an 8 x 8 ocular grid, 10 fields or 3,000 cells were quantified per slide for each biopsy time point, which included a control and a CM quarter slide (2 slides per time point per cow).
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed with PROC MIXED in SAS (v. 8.2; SAS Institute, 1999). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 for main effects and interactions. For milk yield and composition analyses, data collected from both udder halves from d 67 to 61 prior to the expected parturition date were used as a covariate. The covariate was used because of yield and composition differences between udder halves within a cow before any treatments were applied. Time was fitted as a repeated measure by using a spatial power covariance structure. The variability among udder halves (nested within cow) within experiment cells was used to test the whole-plot effects of bST, milking frequency, dry period length, and their interactions. The variability among data for dependent variables within udder half (nested within cow) was used to test for the effects of time and interactions involving time.
Weekly milk means were obtained by averaging daily weights for each week and included milk yield from 10 wk prepartum until 4 wk postpartum. Milk composition was analyzed by using IMF, bST, DP length, week relative to parturition, and their possible interactions in the model. Milk composition from wk 2 postpartum was discarded from analyses because of blood contamination resulting from the +2- and +7-d mammary biopsies. Mammary epithelial cell data for percentage of cells expressing the Ki67 antigen and percentage of MEC that had labeled free 3'-OH DNA termini were tested by using DP length, milking frequency, bST, day, and their potential interactions in the model. A covariate was not used for DMI, Ki67, and TUNEL data. Data from Ki67 and TUNEL assays were transformed (square root) to meet statistical assumptions for normal data distribution. Nontransformed data are presented in tables and figures because the outcome of statistical tests with transformed, and nontransformed data were equal. Additionally, linear SCS was calculated from SCC to achieve normal distribution of the data. The SCS values were used for all statistical comparisons. Statistical analyses for prepartum parameters (milk yield and composition, MEC proliferation, apoptosis, and DMI) included 8 cows, whereas 7 cows were used in the postpartum parameter analyses (milk yield and composition, MEC proliferation and apoptosis, and DMI). One cow was removed because of a damaged vagal nerve, which ultimately resulted in her removal from the study on d 15 postpartum. Postpartum milk yield and DMI were not used (because of an excessive amount of missing data from her illness). The biopsy dates were deemed unaffected by this illness and biopsies were also taken before the onset of illness, except for the d-20 biopsy, so MEC proliferation and apoptosis indices were not used in the analyses for this cow on d 20.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Milk Composition
Lactation status (CM or control), bST supplementation, and IMF (2x vs. 4x) did not affect average milk protein (3.0 ± 0.1%), fat (3.6 ± 0.3%), lactose (4.78 ± 0.1%), or SCS (2.5 ± 1.0) for the first 30 d postpartum (data not shown).
DMI
Prepartum (wk –9 to –1) and postpartum (wk 1 to 4) DMI were not affected by bST supplementation (data not shown). Average postpartum DMI was 26.3 and 20.2 ± 2.0 kg/d for +bST- and –bST-treated cows, respectively (data not shown).
Mammary Proliferation (Ki67 Assay)
Mean proliferation for all groups was higher on d –8 (4.14 ± 0.56%) compared with d –20 (2.35 ± 0.56%; Table 3
). There was a tendency (P = 0.11) for greater MEC proliferation on d 8 and 20 prepartum in control tissue compared with CM tissue (Table 3
). Mammary epithelial cell proliferation declined steadily in both groups from –8 d prepartum to 20 d postpartum (Table 3
). Overall, prepartum MEC proliferation was greater than postpartum MEC proliferation (P < 0.05; Table 3
). During the postpartum period, MEC proliferation was greater in 2x milked glands (Annen et al., 2007) than in 4x milked glands (P < 0.05; Table 3
).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We hypothesized that galactopoietics would stimulate MEC growth in CM tissue to compensate for reductions in MEC growth caused by CM during late gestation and would result in production levels equal or similar to the control halves. When data were compared with the 2x results in our companion study (Annen et al., 2007), IMF may have alleviated a small part of the production losses (numerically) in the CM halves (35 vs. 53%). Nonetheless, production losses were dramatic and lend support to other data demonstrating that CM is not a viable management practice for primiparous cows (Remond et al., 1992, 1997; Annen et al., 2004b). In addition, 4x milking did not increase milk yield (1 through 30 DIM) in control halves when compared with the 2x milking control data of Annen et al. (2007; 44.4 vs. 65.9 kg). Hale et al. (2003) reported that early-lactation IMF increased milk yield by 8.8 kg/d, whereas in the current study 4x milking did not influence milk yield (33.9 vs. 35.4 kg/d). Others have failed to detect an effect of IMF during early lactation in dairy cattle (VanBaale et al., 2005). Reasons for the lack of IMF effects are not apparent. The CM glands milked 4x and supplemented with bST seemed to have less severe production losses than the CM glands milked 2x and supplemented with bST (–34 vs. –56%).
Milk Composition
Milk composition was not affected by bST or DP length. Regardless of bST treatment or DP length, both the control and CM udder halves maintained normal fat and protein production. Additionally, udder health (as indicated by low SCS) was maintained in CM and control halves throughout the study.
Mammary Proliferation and Apoptosis
Apoptosis.
Apoptosis rates across all treatments were higher in the early postpartum period (d 2 and 7) compared with late gestation and d 20 postpartum (P < 0.05). This suggests that older senescent cells that are carried over from the previous lactation may be vulnerable to removal early in the next lactation. It has been suggested that apoptosis may be equally as responsible as MEC proliferation in regulating mammary growth and mediating the effects of IMF on milk yield (Bar-Peled et al., 1995; Capuco et al., 2003; Hale et al., 2003). Therefore, we expected that IMF would lower the apoptotic index across treatments. Contrary to this hypothesis, data from the current study and our earlier work (Annen et al., 2007) indicated a trend for greater apoptotic rates (0.72%) in control halves milked 4x compared with control halves milked 2x (0.54%), and a similar trend in CM halves (0.60 vs. 0.22%, respectively). Additionally, IMF prevented the premature decrease in early lactation of MEC removal, which was previously observed at d 7 postpartum by Annen et al. (2007). It may be that IMF stimulates increased removal of resting MEC, which has been shown in ultra-structure data in cows milked 2x (Annen et al., 2007) to be greater in CM tissue at 20 d postpartum. Increased shedding may enable atrophy of older, resting MEC and potentially increase the synthetic capacity of newer cell populations (Sorensen et al., 2006). Increased MEC shedding in the current study did not result in milk yields greater than those of 2x glands in our companion study.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication April 16, 2007. Accepted for publication August 24, 2007.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Loor and W. S. Cohick ASAS Centennial Paper: Lactation biology for the twenty-first century J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 813 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Annen, C. M. Stiening, B. A. Crooker, A. C. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Collier Effect of continuous milking and prostaglandin E2 on milk production and mammary epithelial cell turnover, ultrastructure, and gene expression J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1132 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |