JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M. G.
J. Dairy Sci. 90:47-56
© American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Lipolysis in Cheddar Cheese Made from Raw, Thermized, and Pasteurized Milks

D. K. Hickey*, K. N. Kilcawley*,1, T. P. Beresford* and M. G. Wilkinson{dagger}

* Moorepark Food Research Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
{dagger} Department of Life Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland

1 Corresponding author: kieran.kilcawley{at}teagasc.ie


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The evolution of free fatty acids (FFA) was monitored over 168 d of ripening in Cheddar cheeses manufactured from good quality raw milk (RM), thermized milk (TM; 65°C x 15 s), and pasteurized milk (PM; 72°C x 15 s). Heat treatment of the milk reduced the level and diversity of raw milk microflora and extensively or wholly inactivated lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity. Indigenous milk enzymes or proteases from RM microflora influenced secondary proteolysis in TM and RM cheeses. Differences in FFA in the RM, TM, and PM influenced the levels of FFA in the subsequent cheeses at 1 d, despite significant losses of FFA to the whey during manufacture. Starter esterases appear to be the main contributors of lipolysis in all cheeses, with LPL contributing during production and ripening in RM and, to a lesser extent, in TM cheeses. Indigenous milk microflora and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria appear to have a minor contribution to lipolysis particularly in PM cheeses. Lipolytic activity of starter esterases, LPL, and indigenous raw milk microflora appeared to be limited by substrate accessibility or environmental conditions over ripening.

Key Words: Cheddar cheese • lipolysis • heat treatment


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
It is generally accepted that Cheddar cheeses made from pasteurized milk tend to develop a less intense flavor and ripen more slowly than cheeses made from raw milk (McSweeney et al., 1993; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000a,b). This outcome is thought to result from inactivation of indigenous milk enzymes and destruction of the thermolabile microflora by pasteurization.

The agents responsible for lipolysis in raw milk Cheddar cheese are indigenous milk lipoprotein lipase (LPL; EC 3.1.1.3.4), raw milk microflora, starter lactic acid bacteria, and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB; Collins et al., 2003; Beuvier and Buchin, 2004). In the northeastern United States and Canada, most Cheddar cheese is manufactured from high quality Grade A milk that has been thermized (Lau et al., 1991; Roy et al., 1997). Thermization is a generic description of a range of subpasteurization heat treatments (57 to 68°C x 10 to 20 s) that markedly reduce the number of spoilage bacteria in milk with minimal heat damage (Stepaniak and Rukke, 2003).

Studies comparing Cheddar cheeses made from raw, pasteurized, and microfiltered milk (McSweeney et al., 1993), blends of raw and pasteurized milks (Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000a), and raw and pasteurized cheese ripened at different temperatures (Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000b) indicate that higher levels of lipolysis in raw milk Cheddar cheeses may be due to differing growth rates of NSLAB. In cheeses made from raw milk, NSLAB populations increase and generally reach a plateau more rapidly compared with pasteurized milk cheeses. The NSLAB species in the resulting cheeses also appear to differ with severity of heat treatment of the milk (McSweeney et al., 1993; Roy et al., 1997; Beuvier and Buchin, 2004). The microflora of Cheddar cheese has been shown to comprise species other than NSLAB, including enterococci and psychrotrophic bacteria, which may also contribute to lipolysis in Cheddar cheese (Dovat et al., 1970; Ouattara et al., 2004).

Despite the numerous studies comparing lipolysis in raw and pasteurized Cheddar cheese, most studies report the extent of total lipolysis without supplying quantitative data on the profiles and levels of individual FFA generated during ripening. Moreover, there are no reports in the literature on the effect of thermization on lipolysis in Cheddar cheese. This study was therefore undertaken to provide quantitative data on lipolysis during ripening in Cheddar cheeses made from raw, thermized, and pasteurized milks.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Cheese Manufacture
Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis 303 obtained from Chr. Hansen Ireland Ltd. (Little Island, Co. Cork, Ireland) was grown overnight at 23°C in heat-treated (95°C for 30 min) 10% (wt/vol) reconstituted skim milk powder (Golden Vale Food Products Ltd., Co. Cork, Ireland). This strain was used as starter culture at a level of 1.5% (wt/wt).

Cheddar cheeses were manufactured in 500-L vats on 3 separate occasions using milk obtained from the Friesian herd at the Dairy Production Centre, Moorepark, Ireland. For each cheese trial, approximately 1,500 L of milk was collected from the farm the day before manufacturing and held overnight at 4°C. On the day of cheese manufacture the milk was heated to ~30°C, approximately 500 L was then passed through the pasteurizer and heated to 72°C x 15 s, and then pumped into the first vat for pasteurized milk (PM) cheeses. For thermized milk (TM) cheeses, ~500 L of the raw milk was passed through the pasteurizer, heated to 65°C x 15 s, and pumped into the second vat. For the raw milk (RM) cheeses, the milk was pumped through the pasteurizer at ambient temperature and into the third vat. Before cheese manufacture, milk from the herd was analyzed to ensure the absence of Escherichia coli, fecal streptococci, Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes. Milks were not standardized for cheese making. Cheeses were manufactured using conventional cheese-making methods; curd was cooked to 38.5°C, pitched at pH 6.15, milled at pH 5.35, and salted at 2.7% (wt/wt). All practical precautions were undertaken during manufacturing to prevent cross-contamination between vats. Cheeses were ripened at 8°C for 168 d and sampled at 14 d of ripening for compositional analysis; all other analyses were carried out at d 1, 14, 28, 56, 112, and 168.

Chemical Composition of Milk
Milks of all types were analyzed for fat (IDF, 1996), protein (IDF, 2001), and casein (IDF, 2004). Lactose was measured on a Milkoscan 605 (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark). All analyses were conducted in duplicate.

Microbiological Quality of Milk
Coliforms in RM, TM, and PM were enumerated on violet red bile agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), incubated at 30°C for 24 h; total bacterial count (TBC) was evaluated on milk plate count agar (Oxoid) incubated at 30°C for 72 h. Psychrotrophic bacterial count (PBC) was enumerated on milk plate count agar (Oxoid) incubated at 8°C for 10 d, enterococci were enumerated on kanamycin esculin azide agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and NSLAB were incubated anaerobically on LBS agar (Rogosa et al., 1951) at 30°C for 5 d. Staphylococci were enumerated on Baird Parker agar (Merck) with egg yolk tellurite supplement (Merck) and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Staphylococcus aureus were identified on Baird Parker agar as black colonies surrounded by a clear zone and that tested positive for coagulase using the staphylase test (Oxoid). Lipolytic bacteria were estimated on tributyrin, triolein, and butterfat agars (Merck) incubated at 8 and 30°C for 10 and 3 d, respectively. Lipolytic colonies were identified as colonies surrounded by clear zones in an otherwise turbid culture medium. Somatic cell count of RM was measured on a Bentley Somacount 300 (Bentley Instrument Inc., Chaska, MN). All analyses were carried out in duplicate.

Enzyme Activity of Milks
Commercially available API-ZYM kits (BioMérieux, Marcy-L’Etoile, France) for semiquantitative assay of 19 enzyme activities were used to monitor the effect of the milk heat treatments on a range of enzyme activities. Raw milk, TM, and PM (65 µL) were inoculated into API-ZYM strips according to the manufacturer’s instructions and incubated at 37°C for 5 h before color was developed using ZYM A and ZYM B reagents. The intensity of color developed within 5 min was compared with the API-ZYM color reaction chart and the enzyme activity was graded from 0 to 5. A value of 0 corresponded to negative reaction and 5 to a reaction of maximum intensity. All analysis was conducted in duplicate.

Lipolytic Activity of Cheese Milks
Aseptically drawn RM, TM, and PM samples with 0.05% added sodium azide, were incubated at 37°C for 15 h with agitation (100 rpm). Individual FFA (C4:0 to C18:1) in milk samples were quantified before and after incubation by gas chromatograph flame-ionized detection according to the method described by Hickey et al. (2006). All analyses were conducted in duplicate.

Cheese Composition
Grated cheese samples were analyzed in duplicate for pH, moisture, fat, salt, and total nitrogen as described by Hickey et al. (2006).

Microbiological Analysis of Cheese
Microbiological analysis of the cheese was carried out in duplicate at each sampling point. Starter lactic acid bacteria were enumerated on LM17 agar after 3 d at 30°C over the first 56 d of ripening (Terzaghi and Sandine, 1975). Nonstarter lactic acid bacteria, coliforms, enterococci, staphylococci, TBC, psychrotrophic bacteria, and lipolytic bacteria were enumerated periodically over the 168-d ripening period.

Starter Autolysis in Cheese
Autolysis of starter culture in cheese during ripening was monitored periodically over the first 56 d by assaying the juice for the activity of the intracellular enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, EC 1.1.1.27). Cheese juice was extracted from cheeses as described by Wilkinson et al. (1994) and assayed immediately for LDH activity by a modification of the method of Wittenberger and Angelo (1970) by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm (Spectronic Genesys 5 spectrophotometer, Milton Roy Company, Rochester, NY) resulting from the pyruvate-dependent oxidation of NADH in the presence of fructose-1,6 bis-phosphate. Results were expressed in LDH units, where one unit was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of one micromole of NADH per minute per milliliter of cheese juice.

Assessment of Proteolysis in Cheese During Ripening
Proteolysis in cheeses was monitored by measuring the percentage of total N soluble at pH 4.6 (pH 4.6-SN) and in 5% phosphotungstic acid (PTA-SN) and individual free amino acids (FAA) as described by Hickey et al. (2006). All analyses were conducted in triplicate.

Assessment of Lipolysis in Cheese During Ripening
Individual FFA (C4:0 to C18:1) in cheese samples were quantified by gas chromatograph flame-ionized detection according to Hickey et al. (2006). All analysis was conducted in triplicate.

Statistical Analysis
A randomized complete block design, which incorporated the 3 treatments (heat treatments) and 3 blocks (replicate trials), was used for analysis of the response variables relating to milk (chemical and FFA) and cheese composition. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS (version 9.1.3, SAS Institute Inc., 2003) in which the effect of treatment and replicates were estimated for all response variables. Duncan’s multiple-comparison test was used as a guide for pair comparison of the treatment means. The level of significance was determined at P < 0.05.

A split-plot design was used to monitor the effect of treatment, ripening time, and their interaction on the response variables measured at regular intervals during ripening; that is, LDH activity, pH4.6-SN, 5% PTA-SN, FAA, and FFA. The ANOVA for the split plot was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Statistically significant differences (P <0.05) between the different treatments were determined by Fisher’s least significant difference test.

Data relating to enzyme activities monitored by API-ZYM assay were not statistically analyzed but are included as observations.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Composition of Milks
Heat treatment had no significant effect on the composition of RM, TM, and PM. The mean protein, fat, lactose concentrations, and casein number (casein N x 100/total N) were 3.6, 3.9, 4.5, and 79%, respectively (data not shown).

Bacteriological Quality of Cheese Milks
Raw milk was of good microbial quality: TBC and SCC were within normal ranges for Cheddar cheese manufacture (European Union, 1992; Table 1Go). In agreement with Gilmour et al. (1981), thermization reduced TBC, PBC, coliforms, enterococci, NSLAB, and staphylococci and eliminated coagulase-positive staphylococci. Similar to the findings of Driessen and Stadhouders (1975), lipolytic bacteria were not detected in TM (Table 1Go). In agreement with Beuvier et al. (1997) and Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (2000a, b), pasteurization further reduced TBC, PBC, and NSLAB and eliminated coliforms, enterococci, and staphylococci. Very low numbers (<1 log cfu/mL) of lipolytic bacteria were detected in PM, which was probably due to postpasteurization contamination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Bacterial count (log cfu/mL) and SCC of raw (RM), thermized (TM), and pasteurized (PM) milks1,2
 
Enzymatic Activity of Milk
Enzymatic activities of RM, TM, and PM are shown in Table 2Go. Similar to the results of Griffiths (1986), leucine arylamidase was completely inactivated by thermization, which also inactivated esterase activity. As expected, pasteurization completely inactivated alkaline phosphatase, an indictor of pasteurization (Stepaniak and Rukke, 2003), and also inactivated most enzyme activities that could be detected using the API-ZYM kit.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Enzyme activity after heat treatment of raw (RM), thermized (TM), and pasteurized (PM) milks detected using the API-ZYM system1
 
Cheese Composition
Heat treatment of the milks had no significant effect on gross cheese composition, which was within the ranges recommended by Gilles and Lawrence (1973) for good quality Cheddar (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. Composition of Cheddar cheeses (% wt/wt) made from raw (RM), thermized (TM), and pasteurized (PM) milks1
 
Bacteriological Quality of Cheeses
Microbial counts in RM, TM, and PM cheeses during ripening are shown in Table 4Go. In agreement with previous studies (O’Donovan et al., 1996; Hickey et al., 2006; Sheehan et al., 2006), the viability of starter L. lactis 303 remained at ~9 log cfu/g during the early stages of ripening and was similar in all cheeses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4. Starter, adventitious, and lipolytic bacterial counts (log cfu/g) present in Cheddar cheeses made from raw (RM), thermized (TM), and pasteurized (PM) milk during ripening1,2
 
At 1 d of ripening, NSLAB numbers were 1.1, 1.9, and 4.2 log cfu/g and increased rapidly over the first 56 d reaching 5.7, 6.0, and 7.6 log cfu/g in PM, TM, and RM cheeses, respectively. After 56 d, NSLAB reached a plateau in RM cheeses, whereas NSLAB continued to increase (albeit at a slower rate) in TM and PM cheeses. At 168 d of ripening, NSLAB populations had reached 7.2, 7.6, and 7.6 log cfu/g in PM, TM, and RM cheeses, respectively.

Low numbers of coliforms were present in all cheeses at d 1 and declined during ripening. Enterococcal populations remained relatively stable during ripening in all cheeses and at 168 d were present at 5.5, 4.0, and 1.0 log cfu/g in RM, TM, and PM cheeses, respectively. Staphylococci were absent from PM cheeses but were present at 5.0 and 2.8 log cfu/g at 1 d, and at 4.2 and 1.5 log cfu/g at 168 d in RM and TM cheeses, respectively. Throughout ripening coagulase-positive staphylococci accounted for between 60 and 95% of the staphylococci detected in RM cheeses, indicative of the presence of Staphylococcus aureus.

Tributyrin-hydrolyzing bacteria capable of growth at 30°C were detected at 4.6, 1.5, and 0.2 log cfu/g at 1 d and at 3.0, 2.7, and 0.2 log cfu/g at 168 d in RM, TM, and PM cheeses, respectively. However, when plates were incubated at 8°C, tributyrin-hydrolyzing bacteria were not detected in any of the cheeses. Triolein- or butterfat-hydrolyzing bacteria were not detected in any of the cheeses during ripening when agar plates were incubated at 8 or 30°C. The majority of lipolytic colonies randomly isolated from RM, TM, and PM tributryin agar plates at 28 d were identified as gram-positive, catalase-positive cocci in RM and TM cheeses, and gram-positive rods in PM cheeses. Lipolytic bacteria previously isolated from Cheddar cheese belong predominantly to the genus Staphylococcus (Franklin and Sharpe, 1963; Gillies, 1971). In this study no correlation was observed between numbers of tributyrin-hydrolyzing bacteria detected and staphylococcal populations.

In agreement with Martley and Crow (1993), it is likely that NSLAB and other adventitious microflora in PM cheeses entered the cheese from the environment, cheese-making equipment, or personnel during manufacture, whereas the more diverse adventitious bacteria in RM and TM cheeses would likely have originated from the milk (McSweeney et al., 1993).

Starter Autolysis
Increases in autolysis as detected by released LDH activity in cheese juice were monitored during the first 56 d of ripening (data not shown) when the starter lactic acid bacteria were the predominant population. No significant differences were observed in the LDH activity between the cheeses, but in agreement with O’Donovan et al. (1996), Hickey et al. (2006), and Sheehan et al. (2006), LDH activity increased significantly (P < 0.001) over ripening.

Proteolysis
In all cheeses, pH 4.6-SN, 5% PTA-SN, and FAA increased significantly (P < 0.001) during ripening. Similar to results of previous studies (McSweeney et al., 1993; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 1999, 2000a, Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., b), pasteurization of milk did not significantly affect the levels of primary proteolysis (pH 4.6-SN) during ripening (data not shown). Significant differences were not observed between TM and RM cheeses for primary proteolysis as indicated by pH 4.6-SN. Similar to the results of Roy et al. (1997), levels of primary proteolysis were similar in TM and PM cheeses. In agreement with O’Keeffe et al. (1978), rennet appeared to be the principal agent responsible for primary proteolysis in all cheeses. Similar to trends noted for pH 4.6-SN, levels of 5% PTA-SN were not significantly affected by severity of milk heat treatment (Figure 1Go). Therefore, it appears that in this study starter peptidases were the main contributors to formation of 5% PTA-SN; however, at the latter stages of ripening, levels of 5% PTA-SN were numerically higher in TM and RM cheeses, which may be due to the contribution of peptidases originating from the indigenous milk microflora or residual activity of indigenous milk proteinases.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Proteolytic indices: A) 5% phosphotungstic acid-soluble N (PTA-SN) as a percentage of total N (TN), and B) total FAA in Cheddar cheeses made from raw ({blacksquare}), thermized (•), and pasteurized ({blacktriangleup}) milks. Error bars indicate ± 1 SD (n = 3).

 
Mean levels of FAA increased significantly (P < 0.001) in the order PM < TM < RM (Figure 1Go) and are in agreement with trends noted by Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (1999, 2000a,b), who reported higher levels of FAA in RM compared with PM cheeses. Levels of FAA were similar in all cheeses up to 28 d; thereafter, levels of FAA were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in RM cheeses compared with PM and TM cheeses. Thermized milk and PM cheeses had similar levels of FAA up to 56 d; thereafter, levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in TM cheeses. The greater accumulation of FAA in TM and RM cheeses (TM < RM) may reflect the contribution of peptidases from indigenous microflora (Jensen et al., 1975; McSweeney et al., 1993). McSweeney et al. (1993) and Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (1999, 2000a,b) suggested that peptidases from NSLAB might be responsible for higher levels of FAA in RM cheeses. Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (2000a) suggested that, in addition to the numbers of NSLAB present in RM cheeses, the particular NSLAB strains might also influence FAA formation. The higher level of FAA in TM and RM cheeses might also be due to numerically higher levels of 5% PTA-SN, which may reflect slight differences in levels of substrate for starter peptidases.

During ripening, mean levels of most individual FAA were significantly influenced by heat treatment except for Arg, Cys, Pro, and Ser (data not shown). Mean levels of Ala, Asp, Leu, Phe, and Thr were similar but significantly (P < 0.05) lower in TM and PM cheeses compared with RM cheeses. Mean levels of Glu, Gly, His, Ile, Lys, Met, and Val were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in RM compared with TM cheeses, which in turn were significantly higher than those in PM cheeses.

FFA Profile and Lipolytic Activity in Cheese Milks
The FFA profiles of the milks before and after incubation are shown in Table 5Go. Thermized milk and PM had similar and significantly lower (P < 0.05) levels of short-chain FFA (SCFFA, C4:0 to C8:0) and medium-chain FFA (MCFFA, C10:0 to C14:0) compared with RM. Significant differences were not observed between milks for long-chain FFA (LCFFA, C16:0 to C18:1). Overall, FFA were 43 and 50% higher in RM than in TM and PM, respectively. The higher levels FFA in RM were most likely due to lipolysis by LPL during the pumping of the RM through the pasteurizer and into the vat because such conditions are known to enhance the action of LPL (Downey, 1980) by causing damage to the milk fat globule membrane and exposing the fat substrate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 5. Concentrations of FFA (mg/kg of milk) in raw (RM), thermized (TM), and pasteurized (PM) milks before and after 15 h of incubation1
 
Incubation of RM, TM, and PM to ascertain indigenous lipolytic activity resulted in a 6-, 5-, and 1.5-fold increase in the levels of total FFA (TFFA; Table 5Go). Increases in the levels of FFA in RM and TM during incubation was most likely due to LPL activity, with lower levels observed in TM as a result of partial inactivation of LPL. Although a significant increase in the levels of FFA was observed for PM after incubation, it was much lower than in TM and RM and may have arisen from physical agitation of the milks during incubation (Hadland and Hoye, 1974). Indeed it is well recognized that pasteurization extensively inactivates LPL: Andrews et al. (1987) found that heating milk for 15 s at 70 and 75°C resulted in residual LPL activities of 2 and 0%, respectively. It is unlikely that heat-resistant bacterial lipases contributed to the production of FFA in RM, TM, or PM because psychrotrophic bacteria need to reach populations of ~106 to 107 cfu/mL before significant lipolytic activity occurs (Ouattara et al., 2004). Psychrotrophic bacteria were at 104 cfu/mL in RM before incubation and sodium azide was included to inhibit bacterial growth (Table 1Go).

Lipolysis
Comparison of samples of RM, TM, and PM with their equivalent cheeses at d 1 indicated that approximately 50, 26, and 22% of TFFA present in the RM, TM, and PM, respectively, were lost during the Cheddar cheese manufacturing process (data not shown). During manufacture of RM, TM, and PM cheeses, approximately 91, 78, and 77% of the SCFFA, 47, 7, and 3% of the MCFFA, and 47, 24, and 27% of the LCFFA were lost to the whey, respectively. Loss of SCFFA and MCFFA to the whey was probably related to their water solubility. Higher losses of SCFFA, MCFFA, and LCFFA in the RM cheeses may be due to the higher level of these FFA in RM.

At d 1, levels of FFA in PM and TM cheeses were similar and significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in RM cheeses (Table 6Go); no significant differences were observed between TM and PM cheeses. The higher levels of FFA in RM cheeses at d 1 probably originated from higher levels of FFA in the milk and possibly LPL activity in the vat. It is unlikely that RM microflora contributed to lipolysis during cheese manufacture in the vat because their numbers were thought to be low. In addition, esterases from psychrotrophic bacteria were not detected on tributyrin, triolein, or butterfat agar incubated at 8°C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 6. Free fatty acid (mg/kg of cheese) composition (C4:0 to C18:1) and ANOVA of raw (RM), thermized (TM), and pasteurized (PM) milk Cheddar cheeses during ripening1
 
Mean levels of FFA increased significantly over ripening in all cheeses (Table 6Go). Mean levels of TFFA were significantly higher in RM cheeses compared with PM cheeses; however, no significant differences in TFFA were observed between TM and RM cheeses or between TM and PM cheeses. The higher levels of TFFA in RM Cheddar cheeses are in agreement with trends noted in previous studies (McSweeney et al., 1993; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000a,b). The rate of increase of SCFFA, MCFFA, and LCFFA were compared during ripening and no significant differences were observed for the rate of increase of MCFFA or LCFFA; however, the mean rate of increase of SCFFA increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the order RM < TM < PM.

Some interesting differences were noted between SCFFA, MCFFA, and LCFFA in PM, TM, and RM cheeses over ripening. The percentage increase of SCFFA and MCFFA was in the order of PM < TM < RM, with the LCFFA in the order of RM < TM < PM. However, SCFFA, MCFFA, and LCFFA numerically increased in the order of RM < TM < PM. This suggests that esterase activity predominated in PM cheeses and was most likely due to the starter bacteria (L. lactis. 303) because levels of NSLAB and other indigenous microflora did not reach sufficient numbers at all or until late in ripening, and LPL activity appeared to be essentially inactivated by pasteurization at 72°C x 15 s. However, the influence of other sources of lipolytic activity appears to increase in TM and in particular RM cheeses, due to increases in FFA content and to differences in the ratio of SCFFA, MCFFA, and LCFFA. The increase in MCFFA and LCFFA in TM and RM cheeses is most likely due to LPL activity because LPL is active toward tri- and diacylglycerols and has sn-1 and sn-3 specificity and will therefore cleave longer chain FFA (Reiter et al., 1969; Olivecrona and Bengtsson-Olivecrona, 1991). However, NSLAB (McSweeney et al., 1993; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 1999, 2000a, Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., b) and indigenous microflora (Dovat et al., 1970; Gillies, 1971) might also contribute to lipolysis due to their high numbers, but because they have only esterase activity, they are unlikely to be responsible for the increase in MCFFA and LCFFA over ripening. Changes to the milk fat substrate induced by heat treatment (Dalgleish and Banks, 1991; Lopez et al., accepted) might also have influenced the accessibility of fat substrate to lipases and esterases during ripening of PM and TM cheeses.

In relation to individual FFA, mean levels of C4:0 were similar in all cheeses during ripening indicating that the starter (L. lactis 303) was the most likely source for its production because it was the only lipolytic source that was similar in all cheeses. Mean levels of C8:0, C10:0, C14:0, C18:0, and C18:1 were similar in TM and PM cheeses but significantly lower compared with RM cheeses. Raw milk cheeses had significantly higher mean levels of C6:0, C12:0, and C16:0 compared with PM cheeses but no significant differences were observed between RM and TM cheeses for these FFA (Table 6Go). It is interesting to note that significant decreases (P < 0.001) in mean levels of C6:0, C8:0, C14:0, and C18:0 were observed in all cheeses during the first 28 d of ripening. This may have been due to catabolism of FFA (Collins et al., 2003).

The overall increase in FFA during ripening was modest in all cheeses compared with the increase in FAA, despite the potential lipolytic sources. The modest extent of lipolysis may be due to 1) immobilization of LPL in the casein network during cheese manufacture (Fox and Stepaniak, 1993); 2) a reduction in LPL activity during cheese manufacturing as a result of pH decrease or removal of LPL or LPL activators in the whey (Geurts et al., 2003; Choisy et al., 2000); 3) a lack of suitable mono- and diacylglycerols substrates for starter and NSLAB esterases (Holland et al., 2005); 4) the physical state of the milkfat substrate during ripening (Carunchia Whetstine et al., 2006); or 5) absorption of caseins and whey proteins onto the surface of fat globules during cheese production (Michalski et al., 2001; Lopez et al., accepted) thereby limiting access of lipolytic enzymes to the fat substrate.


   CONCLUSIONS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Heat treatment of RM had a significant impact on the diversity and numbers of microflora in the resultant Cheddar cheeses. Milk heat treatment had no effect on pH 4.6-SN or 5% PTA-SN formation; however, heat treatment reduced the levels of FAA during ripening, indicating that the indigenous proteolytic enzymes or proteases from the RM microflora influenced FAA production. Lipoprotein lipase activity in the RM was partially inactivated by thermization and extensively or wholly inactivated by pasteurization. Lipoprotein lipase was active in the vat and over the ripening period in RM and, to a lesser extent, in TM cheeses. Starter esterases were the major agents of lipolysis in PM cheeses and possibly in TM and RM cheeses. Indigenous milk microflora and NSLAB may have also contributed to lipolysis in TM and RM cheeses due to their presence at high levels from the start of ripening. The results of the study indicate that lipolytic activity of the starter esterases, indigenous microflora, and LPL appears limited due to impaired access to substrate or the physicochemical environment in cheese.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
 
This work was funded by the Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, Ireland, under the Food Industry Sub-Programme of EU Structural Funds.

Received for publication July 4, 2006. Accepted for publication August 17, 2006.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Andrews, A. T., M. Anderson, and P. W. Goodenough. 1987. A study of the heat stabilities of a number of indigenous milk enzymes. J. Dairy Res. 54:237–246.

Beuvier, E., K. Berthaud, S. Cegarra, A. Dasen, S. Pochet, S. Buchin, and G. Duboz. 1997. Ripening and quality of Swiss type cheese made from raw, pasteurized or microfiltered milk. Int. Dairy J. 7:311–323.

Beuvier, E., and S. Buchin. 2004. Raw milk cheeses. Pages 319–345 in Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology. 3rd ed. General Aspects. Vol. 1. P. F. Fox, P. L. H. McSweeney, T. M. Cogan, and T. P. Guinee, ed. Elsevier, Academic Press, London, UK.

Carunchia Whetstine, M. E., M. A. Drake, B. K. Nelson, and D. M. Barbano. 2006. Flavour profiles of full-fat and reduced-fat cheese and cheese fat made from aged Cheddar with the fat removed a using novel process. J. Dairy Sci. 89:505–517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Choisy, C., M. Desmazeaud, J. C. Gripon, G. Lamberet, and J. Lenoir. 2000. The Biochemistry of ripening. Pages 83–151 in Cheesemaking from Science to Quality Assurance. 2nd ed. A. Eck and J.-C. Gillis, ed. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris, France.

Collins, Y. F., P. L. H. McSweeney, and M. G. Wilkinson. 2003. Lipolysis and free fatty acid catabolism in cheese: A review of current knowledge. Int. Dairy J. 13:841–866.

Dalgleish, D. G., and J. M. Banks. 1991. The formation of complexes between serum proteins and fat globules during heating of whole milk. Milchwissenschaft 46:75–78.

Dovat, A. M., G. W. Reinbold, E. G. Hammond, and E. R. Vedamuthu. 1970. Lipolytic and proteolytic activity of enterococci and lactic group streptococci isolated from young Cheddar cheese. J. Milk Food Technol. 33:365–372.

Downey, W. K. 1980. Review of the progress of dairy science: Flavour impairment from pre- and post-manufacture lipolysis in milk and dairy products. J. Dairy Res. 47:237–252.

Driessen, F. M., and J. Stadhouders. 1975. Lipolysis in hard cheese made from pasteurized milk. IDF. Bull. No. 86. Int. Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium.

European Union. 1992. Directive 92/46ECC Council. Diario oficial de las Comunidades Europeas. Off. J. L 268:1–34.

Fox, P. F., and L. Stepaniak. 1993. Enzymes in cheese technology. Int. Dairy J. 3:509–530.

Franklin, J. G., and M. E. Sharpe. 1963. The incidence of bacteria in cheese milk and Cheddar cheese and their association with flavour. J. Dairy Res. 30:87–99.

Geurts, T. J., F. J. Lettink, and J. T. M. Wouters. 2003. Lipase in milk, curd and cheese. Milchwissenschaft 58:61–65.

Gilles, J., and R. C. Lawrence. 1973. The assessment of Cheddar cheese quality by compositional analysis. N.Z. J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 8:148–151.

Gillies, A. J. 1971. Significance of thermoduric organisms in Queensland Cheddar cheese. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 26:145–149.

Gilmour, A., R. S. MacElhinney, D. E. Johnson, and R. J. Murphy. 1981. Thermisation of milk. Some microbiological aspects. Milchwissenschaft 36:457–461.

Griffiths, M. W. 1986. Use of milk enzymes as indices of heat treatment. J. Food Prot. 49:696–705.

Hadland, G., and T. Hoye. 1974. Bacterial activity and lipolysis in raw bulk milk during storage, as related to the keeping quality of the pasteurized milk. Pages 368–369 in Proc. XIX International Dairy Congress. Vol. 1 E. Int. Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium.

Hickey, D. K., K. N. Kilcawley, T. P. Beresford, E. M. Sheehan, and M. G. Wilkinson. 2006. Starter strain related effects on the biochemical and sensory properties of Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J. 16:679–690.

Holland, R., S.-Q. Liu, V. L. Crow, M.-L. Delabre, M. Lubbers, M. Bennett, and G. Norris. 2005. Esterase of lactic acid bacteria and cheese flavour: Milk fat hydrolysis, alcoholysis and esterification. Int. Dairy J. 15:711–718.

IDF. 1996. Milk. Determination of fat content (Röse-Gottlieb gravimetric method). IDF Standard 1D. Int. Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium.

IDF. 2001. Milk. Determination of nitrogen content - Part 2: Block digestion method. IDF Standard 20-2. Int. Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium.

IDF. 2004. Milk. Determination of casein-nitrogen content - Part 1: Indirect method. IDF Standard 29-1. Int. Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium.

Jensen, J. P., G. W. Reinbold, C. J. Washam, and E. R. Vedamuthu. 1975. Role of enterococci in Cheddar cheese: Proteolytic activity and lactic acid development. J. Milk Food Technol. 38:3–7.

Lau, K. Y., D. M. Barbano, and R. R. Rasmussen. 1991. Influence of pasteurization of milk on protein breakdown in Cheddar during aging. J. Dairy Sci. 74:727–740.[Abstract]

Lopez, C., B. Camier, and J. Y. Gassi. Developments of the milk fat microstructure during the manufacture and ripening of Emmental cheese observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Int. Dairy J. (accepted)

Martley, F. G., and V. L. Crow. 1993. Interactions between non-starter micro-organisms during cheese manufacture and ripening. Int. Dairy J. 3:461–484.

McSweeney, P. L. H., P. F. Fox, J. A. Lucey, K. N. Jordan, and T. M. Cogan. 1993. Contribution of the indigenous microflora to the maturation of Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J. 3:613–634.

Michalski, M. C., F. Michel, D. Sainmont, and V. Briard. 2001. Apparent {zeta}-potential as a tool to assess mechanical damages to the milk fat globule membrane. Colloids Surf. B Biointerf.23:23–30.

O’Donovan, C. M., M. G. Wilkinson, T. P. Guinee, and P. F. Fox. 1996. An investigation of the autolytic properties of three lactococcal strains during cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 6:1149–1165.

O’Keeffe, A. M., P. F. Fox, and C. Daly. 1978. Proteolysis in Cheddar cheese: Role of coagulant and starter bacteria. J. Dairy Res. 45:465–477.[Medline]

Olivecrona, T., and G. Bengtsson-Olivecrona. 1991. Indigenous enzymes in milk. Pages 62–78 in Food Enzymology. Vol. 1. Fox, P.F. ed. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK.

Ouattara, G. C., I. J. Joen, R. A. Hart-Thakur, and K. A. Schmidt. 2004. Fatty acids released from milk fat by lipoprotein lipase and lipolytic psychrotrophs. J. Food Sci. 69:659–664.

Reiter, B., Y. Sorokin, A. Pickering, and A. J. Hall. 1969. Hydrolysis of fat and protein in small cheeses made under aseptic conditions. J. Dairy Res. 36:65–76.

Rogosa, M., J. A. Mitchell, and R. F. Wiseman. 1951. A selective medium for isolation and enumeration of oral and fecal lactobacilli. J. Bacteriol. 62:132–133.[Free Full Text]

Roy, D., M. Pitre, L. Blanchette, L. Savoie, G. Bélanger, P. Ward, and J. L. Maubois. 1997. Monitoring proteolysis and cheese juice composition during ripening of Cheddar cheese made from microfiltered milk. Lait 77:521–541.

SAS Institute. 2003. User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 9.1.3 ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.

Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, J. M. Banks, P. L. H. McSweeney, and P. F. Fox. 2000a. Effect of ripening temperature on the growth and significance of non-starter lactic acid bacteria in Cheddar cheese made from raw or pasteurised milks. Int. Dairy J. 10:45–53.

Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, P. L. H. McSweeney, J. M. Banks, E. Y. Brechany, D. D. Muir, and P. F. Fox. 2000b. Ripening of Cheddar cheese made from blends of raw and pasteurised milk. Int. Dairy J. 10:33–44.

Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, P. L. H. McSweeney, and P. F. Fox. 1999. A study on the role of the indigenous microflora of raw milk on the ripening of Cheddar cheese. Milchwissenschaft 54:388–393.

Sheehan, A., G. O’Cuinn, R. J. FitzGerald, and M. G. Wilkinson. 2006. Proteolytic enzyme activities in Cheddar cheese juice made using lactococcal starters of differing autolytic properties. J. Appl. Micro. 100:893–901.

Stepaniak, L., and E. O. Rukke. 2003. Thermization of milk. Pages 2619–2623 in Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. Vol. 4. H. Roginski, J. W. Fuquay, and P. F. Fox, ed. Academic Press, London, UK.

Terzaghi, B. E., and W. E. Sandine. 1975. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 29:807–813.[Medline]

Wilkinson, M. G., T. P. Guinee, D. M. O’Callaghan, and P. F. Fox. 1994. Autolysis and proteolysis in different strains of starter bacteria during Cheddar cheese ripening. J. Dairy Res. 61:249–262.[Medline]

Wittenberger, C. L., and N. Angelo. 1970. Purification and properties of a fructose-1, 6-diphosphate-activated lactate dehydrogenase from Streptococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 101:717–724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M. G.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS