|
|
||||||||
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, T1J 4B1, Canada
2 Corresponding author: beauchemink{at}agr.gc.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: physically effective neutral detergent fi-ber digestion microbial protein synthesis site of digestion
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The physical form of specific feeds can be quantitatively assessed by various sieving methods (Murphy and Zhu, 1997). However, the variety of methods used to measure particle length has made it difficult to compare results from different laboratories or compile such data into a form that is useful for diet formulation. It is, therefore, imperative that a validated unit or measure be established (Mertens, 1997).
Physically effective NDF (peNDF) is a measure that reflects the ability of physical characteristics of fiber, mainly particle size, to stimulate chewing and saliva buffering in the rumen (Mertens, 1997). The term peNDF is used as a means of formulating diets to provide fiber of adequate particle size to reduce subacute ruminal acidosis. The Penn State Particle Separator (PSPS) is a quick and cost-effective method to estimate particle size of forage and TMR, and is widely used on-farm to evaluate peNDF (Lammers et al., 1996). Based on measurements using the PSPS, several studies have recently shown that increased intake of peNDF increased chewing activity and ruminal pH (Krause et al., 2002b; Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003a; Beauchemin et Yang, 2005), improved total digestibility (Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003b; Yansari et al., 2004; Yang and Beauchemin, 2005), and increased milk fat content (Yang et al., 2001; Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003b). However, other studies have demonstrated either no effects of peNDF on digestibility and milk composition (Fernandez et al., 2004), or negative effects on digestibility (Krause et al., 2002b; Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003a). The optimum concentration of peNDF in dairy cow diets is uncertain, because there is a paucity of information on the effects of peNDF on digestibility and milk production for a range of forages and concentrates.
Whole crop barley silage (BS) is used extensively as forage for dairy cows in certain areas of Canada, Europe, and the United States. However, limited information is available on its peNDF content for dairy cows (Kononoff et al., 2000; Einarson et al., 2004; Leonardi et al., 2005). The objectives of the present study were to determine the effects of increasing the peNDF concentration of a diet containing BS and a rapidly fermentable concentrate source on feed intake, site and extent of digestion, microbial protein synthesis, and milk yield and composition of lactating dairy cows. The effects on chewing activity, ruminal pH, and fermentation were measured and reported separately (Yang and Beauchemin, 2006).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cows were offered 1 of 3 diets that contained approximately 53% concentrate and 47% BS (Table 2
) and differed in peNDF level: low, medium, and high. The 3 dietary peNDF levels were obtained using BS differing in particle length: 100% short silage (low), 50% short silage + 50% long silage (medium), and 100% long silage (high). The diets were formulated using the Cornell-Penn-Miner system (CPMDairy, Version 2.23, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA; and William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute, Chazy, NY) to supply adequate ME and MP for a 600-kg cow producing 30 kg/d of milk with 3.5% fat and 3.2% protein. For the purpose of diet formulation, a single chemical composition and peNDF value was used for BS thereby ensuring that diet composition, other than the BS, was the same in all 3 diets.
|
Rate of Passage
Passage rate of digesta from the rumen or the postruminal tract was measured during d 12 to 16 of the period using Cr-mordanted NDF and Co-EDTA as forage and liquid markers, respectively. Fiber from long- and short-chopped silage was separately prepared by washing in a washing machine twice with detergent and then boiling for 4 h in diluted detergent solution until the NDF content of the material exceeded 85%. Methods used to mordant Cr to plant cell walls and to prepare CoEDTA were those of Udén et al. (1980). Two hundred fifty grams of Cr-mordanted NDF and 300 mL of solution containing 15 g of CoEDTA were introduced in the rumen via the ruminal cannulas. Fecal samples were collected from the rectum at 0, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after dosing with the markers. A double compartmental model, represented by 2 exponential constants and a time delay (Grovum and Williams, 1973), was fitted using the nonlinear regression procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 1996).
Duodenal Flow and Apparent Digestion
Duodenal flow and apparent digestion of nutrients in the total tract or at the different sites of the digestive tract were determined using YbCl3 (Rhône-Poulenc Inc., Shelton, CT). Ammonia 15N ([15NH4]2SO4, 10.6% atom percent 15N; Isotec, Miamisburg, OH) was used as a ruminal microbial marker. Marker solution was continuously infused into the rumen via ruminal cannulas using an automatic pump (model 60 rpm/7524-10, Masterflex L/S Microprocessor pump drive, Vernon Hills, IL) during the last 11 d of the period. Daily amounts infused were 2.6 g of Yb and 140 mg of 15N dissolved in 800 mL of water for each cow. Six ruminal samples were collected from the 3 duodenal cannulated cows during 3 d of collection for ruminal bacterial pellet preparation. Duodenal and fecal samples were collected 4 times daily every 6 h, moving ahead 2 h each day for the last 3 d of infusion. This schedule provided 12 representative samples of duodenal and fecal contents taken at 2-h intervals. A ruminal and a duodenal sample taken before marker infusion from each cow during the first period were used to determine background concentration of 15N in samples.
Ruminal samples were processed immediately to separate ruminal bacteria. The samples were squeezed through 4 layers of cheesecloth and the particles obtained by squeezing were blended (400 g of particles plus 400 mL of 0.9% NaCl) in a Waring blender (Waring Products Division, New Hartford, CT) for 1 min and then squeezed through 4 layers of cheesecloth. Both filtrates from squeezed and strained homogenate were mixed, centrifuged (800 x g for 15 min at 4°C) to remove protozoa and feed particles, and the supernatant was centrifuged (27,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C) to obtain a mixed ruminal bacteria pellet. Bacterial pellets were accumulated by period, freeze-dried, ground using a mortar and pestle, and then further ground using a ball mill (Mixer Mill MM2000; Retsch, Haan, Germany) to a fine powder for determination of N content and 15N enrichment.
Duodenal samples were subdivided using an electric drill fitted with a shaft and propeller. Each sample was split into 3 fractions that were pooled by cow within period and retained for ammonia analysis, DM determination after oven drying at 55°C, or for chemical analysis after freeze-drying. For fecal samples, the sample from each sampling time was mixed and divided into 2 subsamples (about 100 g each). One was pooled by cow within period, then dried at 55°C and ground through a 1-mm screen (standard model 4) for chemical analysis. The other subsample was immediately used to measure pH with a pH meter by preparing of slurry of feces and distilled water.
Chemical Analyses
Feed DM was determined by oven drying at 55°C for 48 h. Analytical DM content of the samples was determined by drying at 135°C for 3 h (AOAC, 1990). The OM content was calculated as the difference between DM and ash contents, with ash determined by combustion at 550°C overnight. The NDF and ADF contents were determined using the methods described by Van Soest et al. (1991) with amylase and sodium sulfite used in the NDF procedure. Starch was determined by enzymatic hydrolysis of
-linked glucose polymers as described by Rode et al. (1999). Contents of digestive markers in the duodenal and fecal samples were determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy according to the AOAC method (1990) smodified such that no CaCl2 for Co and Cr or no KCl for Yb determination was used during sample digestion. Content of N in the samples was determined by flash combustion (model 1500; Carlo Erba Instruments, Milan, Italy) and enrichment of 15N in the rumen bacterial and duodenal samples was analyzed with isotope ratio mass spectrometry (VG Isotech, Middlewich, UK). Particle size distributions of BS, TMR, and orts were determined using the PSPS. Physical effectiveness factors (pef) for silage, TMR, and orts were calculated as the sum of the proportions of the materials retained on the 8- and 19-mm sieves of the PSPS. The peNDF content of the diets was determined by multiplying the pef of the TMR by the NDF content (DM basis) of the diet.
Calculations and Statistical Analyses
Flows of DM to the duodenum and DM excreted in feces were calculated by dividing Yb infused (grams of Yb per day) by Yb concentration (grams of Yb per kilogram of DM) in the duodenal digesta or feces, respectively. Flows of other nutrients to the duodenum or feces were calculated by multiplying DM flow by their concentration in duodenal or fecal DM. Ruminal microbial protein synthesis for each cow was estimated by the ratio of 15N flow at the duodenum to 15N concentration of mixed ruminal bacteria.
Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 1996) to account for effects of square, period within square, cow within square, and treatment. The treatment was considered a fixed effect; square, period within square, and cow within square were considered random effects. For variables of site of digestion and microbial protein synthesis, data from a single square were analyzed. In that case, the mixed model accounted for effects of period, cow, and treatment. The treatment was considered a fixed effect; period and cow were considered random effects. Data for particle distribution, pef, and peNDF of forages and diets were averaged by period and analyzed by including particle length as a fixed effect and period as a random effect. The estimation method was the restrictive maximum likelihood (REML) and the degrees of freedom method was Kenward-Rogers. All variables were tested for linear and quadratic effects in relation to the peNDF content of the diets. Effects of the treatments were declared significant at P < 0.05 unless otherwise noted and trends were discussed at P < 0.15.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diets were similar in chemical composition because the same formulation and ingredients were used, with the exception of BS differing in TCL (Table 2
). Dietary particle size distribution reflected the proportion of long-cut BS in the diets. Increased proportion of long-cut BS in the diets increased the DM retained on 8- and 19-mm sieves but decreased the DM on the pan of the PSPS. As such, pef and peNDF linearly increased with increasing proportion of long-cut BS in the diets.
Intake, BW, and Apparent Digestion in the Total Tract
Body weight averaged 682 kg across the treatments although it was numerically higher (P < 0.15) for cows fed the medium peNDF diet than for the other 2 treatments (Table 3
). Intakes of DM, OM, starch, and N tended to be higher (P < 0.08) for cows fed the medium peNDF diets than for cows fed the low or high peNDF diets. However, correcting DMI for differences in BW eliminated the effects of diet on intake. Intakes of digestible OM tended (P < 0.08) to decrease with increasing dietary peNDF. Furthermore, intakes of NDF and ADF were not different across the treatments but intake of digestible NDF tended (P < 0.11) to be lower for the medium peNDF diet than for the other diets.
|
Site and Extent of Digestion
Data for site and extent of nutrient digestion were obtained from a single 3 x 3 Latin square using 3 primiparous lactating dairy cows fitted with ruminal and duodenal cannulas. Thus, results must be cautiously interpreted because of the limited replication. Intakes of DM (range of 16.9 to 17.6 kg/d) as well as of other nutrients (Table 4
) were lower than the averages for all cows (Table 3
) because primiparous cows of smaller frame size were used in this group. In contrast to the observation from all 6 cows, there were no effects of dietary peNDF on intakes of DM, OM, fiber, and starch. Similarly, no differences in duodenal nutrient flows were detected across the treatments. Microbial OM flow at the duodenum represented about 22% of the total duodenal OM flow and was not statistically different between the treatments.
|
N Metabolism
Intake and duodenal flows of total, NAN, and rumen undegradable N (measured as the feed plus endogenous fraction) were not affected by dietary peNDF (Table 5
). However, the flow of microbial N to the duodenum tended to linearly decrease with increasing dietary peNDF when expressed as percentage of N intake (P < 0.08) or as grams per kilogram of rumen-fermentable OM (P < 0.15). Furthermore, although statistically not significant, it is notable that the amount of microbial N arriving at the duodenum for the low peNDF diet was increased by 13 or 9% compared with the medium or high peNDF diets, respectively. Digestibility of feed N either in the rumen or in the intestine was not affected by the treatments, but the digestibility in the total tract was 2 percentage units lower for cows fed the medium peNDF diet.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, the peNDF content of the diet had only small effects on feed intake. The trend for higher (P < 0.08) starch intake with the medium peNDF diet primarily reflected its higher (P < 0.08) DMI rather than a particle-selecting effect (Yang and Beauchemin, 2005). Effects of sorting by cows in favor of coarse particles is less pronounced for BS-based diets (Yang and Beauchemin, 2006) than for corn silage-based diets (Yang and Beauchemin, 2005).
The present results for intake are in agreement with some studies that reported no effect of FPL on DMI (Soita et al., 2000; Yang et al., 2001), but are in contrast to other studies in which DMI was decreased with increasing peNDF content (Soita et al., 2002; Einarson et al., 2004). In the studies in which increasing peNDF lowered DMI, either a high-forage diet (100% BS; Soita et al., 2002) or a forage with long FPL (TCL = 19 mm; Einarson et al., 2004) was used.
Whether peNDF affects DMI may depend upon which factors limit intake. In a review of the effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle, Allen (2000) concluded that, at the high concentrate inclusion level (>50%), metabolic, rather than physical constraints, are typically rate-limiting. The lack of effect of peNDF on intake observed in the present study may signify that metabolic, rather than physical effects, limited intake. Consequently, despite higher passage rate of particles from the rumen of cows fed the high peNDF diet, DMI was not increased.
The effects of FPL on digestibility in the total tract of dairy cows are inconclusive and somewhat contradictory in the literature. The linear decrease in total digestibility of OM and fiber with increasing dietary peNDF are consistent with several reports (Soita et al., 2002; Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003a), but in contrast to other findings (Le Liboux and Peyraud, 1998; Yang et Beauchemin, 2005). Higher total digestibility of the low peNDF diet was likely due to increased surface area available for microbial attack combined with slower particulate passage rate from the rumen. Kononoff and Heinrichs (2003a) observed that highest NDF digestibility occurred for the shortest diet even though mean ruminal pH was lowest. Krause et al. (2002a) also reported that diets resulting in the lowest ruminal pH had numerically the highest fiber digestion. It appears that the effect of low rumen pH on fiber digestion is less drastic for mixed rumen microorganisms than for pure cultures. Furthermore, ruminal pH was not increased with increasing dietary peNDF in the present study (Yang and Beauchemin, 2006).
The negative effect of increased dietary peNDF on digestibility in the total tract was more pronounced for fiber digestion, especially for ADF digestion, than for starch digestion (Table 3
). Although starch digestibility was about 10% lower (P < 0.11) in the rumen for the medium and high peNDF diets than for the low peNDF diets, starch was 19% more digestible in the intestine. Thus, compensatory digestion in the intestine lessened the negative effects of increasing peNDF content of the diet on total tract starch digestion. The present result confirms the previous finding that low starch digestion in the rumen can be partly or wholly compensated for by high intestinal digestion (Beauchemin et al., 2001; Yang et al., 2002). A shift of starch digestion from the rumen to the intestine is beneficial for alleviating ruminal acidosis, especially for diets containing barley grain, which is rapidly digested in the rumen following ingestion.
It is not clear whether the effects of peNDF on site of starch digestion are consistent among forages other than BS. In support of the observations of the present study, Fernandez et al. (2004) reported that increased FPL of corn silage reduced starch digestion in the rumen, but increased postruminal digestion such that starch digestion in the total tract was not affected. However, when the corn silage was subjected to rolling before ensiling, starch digestibility in the rumen was not affected by FPL (Yang and Beauchemin, 2005). For BS, it was reported that reduced FPL increased ruminal molar proportion of propionate (Soita et al., 2002; Einarson et al., 2004) but there is a paucity of data on the effects of chop length of BS on site and extent of starch digestion. In the present study, numerically higher starch digestion in the rumen for the low peNDF diet mostly likely resulted from increased retention time of feed in the rumen, because retention time increased as FPL decreased. It is also possible that ruminal starch digestion increased because of more extensive breakage of kernels with more extensive particle size reduction of forage during harvesting; however, there was no evidence of increased kernel damage upon visual inspection of the silage.
In contrast to starch, the proportion of ingested fiber that can be digested in the intestine is limited. The proportion digested in the intestine ranged from 11 to 25% of the total digestible NDF compared with an average of 32% for starch (Table 4
). Similarly, Overton et al. (1995) reported that the proportion of total NDF digestion that occurred as intestinal NDF digestion ranged from 6 to 26% for diets based on corn, barley, or a mix of the 2 grains.
Higher fiber digestibility of low peNDF diets was also reported in other studies using BS (Soita et al., 2002) or alfalfa silage (Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003a). Increased total fiber digestion with reduced dietary peNDF (Table 3
) resulted from numerically increased intestinal digestion because ruminal digestion was generally similar across treatments (Table 4
). Intestinal NDF digestibility was 140% higher for the low peNDF than for the high and medium peNDF diets although it was not statistically significant due to high variation when sampling at the duodenum combined with the limited power of a single 3 x 3 Latin square. Lack of significant differences in ruminal digestion of OM, fiber, and starch across treatments was supported by the ruminal fermentation results in which molar proportions of acetate and propionate were not affected by the treatments (Yang and Beauchemin, 2006). Ruminal NDF digestibility is normally depressed when ruminal pH is decreased or feed intake and passage rate are increased due to reduced FPL (Shaver et al., 1988). In the current study, ruminal pH including mean, area between the curve and a horizontal line drawn at pH 5.8 or 5.5, and time that pH was below 5.8 or 5.5 were not affected by peNDF content of diets (Yang and Beauchemin, 2006). In addition, the coarse particles in the high and medium peNDF diets might have been efficiently reduced in size due to increased mastication as a result of increased chewing time (Yang and Beauchemin, 2006). Faster particulate passage rate (Table 6
) apparently had minimal effects on ruminal digestion of fiber.
The mechanism whereby reducing peNDF intake numerically increased intestinal NDF digestibility is not clear, but most likely can be attributed to increased surface area for microbial attachment. In agreement with the present results, Le Liboux and Peyraud (1999) reported higher digestibility of NDF and ADF in the intestine for ground than for chopped alfalfa hay, but ruminal fiber digestibility was lower for ground hay.
The supply of NAN to the duodenum depends upon the flow of dietary N (feed + endogenous) and ruminal microbial N. Similar flows of NAN to the duodenum across the treatments were attributed to the combined trend of increased (P > 0.15) dietary N flow and decreased (P > 0.08) microbial N (% of N intake) flow with increasing dietary peNDF (Table 5
). The numerical increase in dietary N flow to the duodenum was likely due to the small decrease in CP degradation in the rumen with increasing dietary peNDF (Table 5
). The present results are consistent with other observations that feeding short FPL rather than long FPL to dairy cows increased the rate of degradation of forage protein in the rumen and thus, increased its RDP content and reduced its RUP content (Yang and Beauchemin, 2004). The numerically increased microbial N synthesis with reducing dietary peNDF in the present study was consistent with the results of Le Liboux and Peyraud (1999) who explained that the effect was from less recycling of microbial N in the rumen because there was a significant reduction of protozoal biomass in the rumen when chopped alfalfa hay was replaced with ground alfalfa. Krause et al. (2002a) reported that microbial N supply depended on starch intake, which in turn was affected by dietary FPL. In another study, we found that the highest microbial N production occurred on a high-forage diet formulated with short FPL (Yang and Beauchemin, 2004). It can be concluded that FPL, and consequently, dietary peNDF, can be a crucial factor influencing the supply of feed N or microbial N, and thus the supply of NAN, to the duodenum. Lower total digestibility of N with the medium peNDF diet was consistent with the higher ammonia concentration reported by Yang and Beauchemin (2006), indicating low microbial efficiency.
Dietary peNDF did not affect milk yield, which is not surprising considering the lack of DMI (% of BW) response and the fact that the cows were either in mid or late lactation. Similarly, milk production did not respond to FPL in other metabolism studies that used BS (Kononoff et al., 2000; Soita et al., 2000; Einarson et al., 2004), corn silage (Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003b; Yang and Beauchemin, 2005) or alfalfa silage (Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003a). Responses in milk production primarily reflect changes in DMI or starch intake (Krause et al., 2002a) when FPL is altered. Low milk efficiency (milk/DMI <1.4) was expected because half of the cows were in late lactation during which cows divert more DMI to BW gain, fetal growth, and growth in young cows than to milk production.
Lack of effect of dietary peNDF on milk fat content suggests that the diets contained adequate fiber to maintain milk fat percentage above 3.5%. Kononoff et al. (2000) suggested that diets based on BS and barley grain with a dietary peNDF of 13.7% are adequate to maintain milk fat level above 3.5% for cows in early to midlactation. That peNDF level (13.7%) is greater than the values for the medium and low peNDF diets in the present study. However, the peNDF values in the Kononoff et al. (2000) study are higher than those in the present study because peNDF values were determined based on particles retained on a 1.18-mm sieve rather than on an 8-mm sieve as in the present study. For barley grain-based diets, the diets used in the present study closely met the recommendation of NDF and starch for lactating dairy cows by Beauchemin and Yang (2003). Although NDF from forage sources (Table 2
) was 1 percentage unit lower than the minimum recommendation (21 to 23% NDF from forage), starch content (31%) was also lower than the recommended maximum (33%).
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication August 11, 2005. Accepted for publication January 26, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K.-L. Chen, W.-L. Kho, S.-H. You, R.-H. Yeh, S.-W. Tang, and C.-W. Hsieh Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermented feed on the enhanced growth performance of broilers Poult. Sci., February 1, 2009; 88(2): 309 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zebeli, M. Tafaj, B. Junck, V. Olschlager, B. N. Ametaj, and W. Drochner Evaluation of the Response of Ruminal Fermentation and Activities of Nonstarch Polysaccharide-Degrading Enzymes to Particle Length of Corn Silage in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2388 - 2398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Bhandari, S. Li, K. H. Ominski, K. M. Wittenberg, and J. C. Plaizier Effects of the Chop Lengths of Alfalfa Silage and Oat Silage on Feed Intake, Milk Production, Feeding Behavior, and Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1942 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zebeli, J. Dijkstra, M. Tafaj, H. Steingass, B. N. Ametaj, and W. Drochner Modeling the Adequacy of Dietary Fiber in Dairy Cows Based on the Responses of Ruminal pH and Milk Fat Production to Composition of the Diet J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2046 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Z. Yang, C. Benchaar, B. N. Ametaj, A. V. Chaves, M. L. He, and T. A. McAllister Effects of Garlic and Juniper Berry Essential Oils on Ruminal Fermentation and on the Site and Extent of Digestion in Lactating Cows J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5671 - 5681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Z. Yang and K. A. Beauchemin Altering Physically Effective Fiber Intake Through Forage Proportion and Particle Length: Digestion and Milk Production J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3410 - 3421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |