JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. J.
J. Dairy Sci. 89:1478-1487
© American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Effect of Milking Frequency and Diet on Milk Production, Energy Balance, and Reproduction in Dairy Cows

J. Patton*,{dagger}, D. A. Kenny{dagger}, J. F. Mee*, F. P. O’Mara{dagger}, D. C. Wathes{ddagger}, M. Cook{ddagger} and J. J. Murphy*,1

* Teagasc Moorepark, Dairy Production Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
{dagger} School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University College Dublin, Ireland
{ddagger} Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, United Kingdom

1 Corresponding author: jmurphy{at}moorepark.teagasc.ie


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of reduced milking frequency and increased dietary energy density in early lactation on milk production, energy balance, and subsequent fertility. Sixty-six spring-calving, multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: once-daily milking on a standard diet (1xST); 3-times daily milking on a standard diet (3xST); and 3-times daily milking on a high-energy diet. Treatments were imposed for the first 28 d of lactation, after which all groups were milked twice daily and fed the standard diet. During the treatment period, the 1xST cows had 19.6% lower milk yield and higher milk fat and milk protein concentrations (15.7 and 10.2%, respectively) compared with 3xST. Dry matter (DM) intake was similar between 1xST and 3xST during the treatment period (12.64 vs. 13.25 kg/ d; SED = 0.82). Daily energy balance was less negative for 1xST compared with 3xST during wk 1 to 3 of lactation [–3.92 vs. –5.30 unité fourragère lait (UFL)/d; SED = 0.65; 1 UFL is equal to the net energy for lactation of 1 kg of standard air-dry barley]. During the treatment period, the cows on the high-energy diet had 17% higher milk yield, higher DM intake (15.5 vs. 13.9 kg/d; SED = 0.71), and similar energy balance (–4.45 vs. –4.35 UFL/d; SED = 0.65) compared to 3xST. Diet had no significant effect on any of the fertility variables measured. The interval to first ovulation was shorter for 1xST than 3xST (18.3d vs. 28.6d; SED = 1.76). In conclusion, once-daily milking in early lactation may promote earlier resumption of ovarian cyclicity, mediated through improved nutritional status.

Key Words: energy balance • milking frequency • reproduction


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The optimal use of grazed grass is a key component of profitability in Irish dairy production systems (Dillon et al., 1995). Compact seasonal calving in spring (late January to early April) is practiced to maximize the contribution of grazed grass to the feed requirements of the herd. This is achieved by restricting the breeding season to approximately 13 wk. The principal goal is to obtain the highest pregnancy rate in the shortest time to ensure a compact calving season and a 365-d calving interval. The nutrient demands of lactation typically exceed dietary intake potential in the early postpartum period. This results in a state of negative energy balance (NEB), during which body tissue reserves are mobilized to provide additional substrate for milk production. Genetic selection for increased milk yield has amplified the difference between feed intake potential and milk yield potential in early lactation, resulting in cows that are genetically predisposed to a greater risk of NEB (Veerkamp and Koenen, 1999). It has been documented that the severity and duration of NEB are positively associated with the interval to first postpartum ovulation (Beam and Butler, 1999). In addition, it has been hypothesized that severe NEB in early lactation exerts latent negative effects on the quality of oocytes ovulated 80 to 100 d later, reducing conception rates in the first weeks of the breeding season (Britt, 1994). Minimizing the extent and duration of NEB in early lactation is an important factor for achieving optimum reproductive performance.

Increasing the proportion of dietary concentrate in early lactation has been shown to increase energy intake and improve energy balance (EB; Reist et al., 2003; Coffey et al., 2004). However, the proportion of concentrate in the diet is limited by the requirement for inclusion of structural fiber to maintain proper rumen function. In addition, cows of high genetic merit tend to partition additional ingested energy toward milk production, rather than reducing the extent of NEB (Veerkamp and Koenen, 1999). Given the difficulties associated with nutritional manipulation of EB in early lactation, interest in employing once-daily milking (1x) to restrict milk energy output and moderate NEB has emerged. The imposition of temporary 1x in early lactation reduces milk yield, and exerts a negative residual effect upon resumption of twice-daily milking, the extent of which becomes greater as the duration of the reduced milking frequency increases (Remond et al., 1999). Temporary 1x in early lactation does not affect DMI (McNamara, 2002; Remond et al., 2002). These studies reported that 1x cows had lower BCS and BW loss and a more positive EB than cows milked twice or 3 times daily. Pomies and Remond (2002) found that cows returned to positive EB much earlier, lost less BCS in early lactation, and maintained a higher BCS throughout lactation when milked once daily for the entire lactation compared with twice daily. The effects of 1x in early lactation on EB appear conducive to improved fertility. However, the direct effects on fertility have not been widely reported (McNamara, 2002). Increasing the energy density of the early lactation diet has produced variable responses regarding both EB and fertility. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of 1x and increased dietary energy density in early lactation on milk production, DMI, EB, BCS change, plasma metabolite concentrations, and subsequent reproductive function.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Experimental Design
A cohort of 66 spring-calving, multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows was assembled 3 wk before expected calving date and trained to use the Griffith Elder feeding system (Griffith Elder Ltd., Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, UK). Cows were assigned to groups by 2-wk expected calving intervals and allocated from within groups into blocks of 3 according to previous lactation milk yield and BCS. Cows were assigned at random from within blocks to 1 of 3 treatments in a randomized block design: 1) 1x milking at 0700 h for the first 4 wk of lactation, standard diet (ST), and twice-daily milking for the rest of the lactation; 2) 3-times daily milking (3x) at 0700, 1500, and 2200 h for the first 4 wk of lactation, on diet ST, and twice-daily milking for the rest of lactation; and 3) 3x milking at 0700, 1500, and 2200 h for the first 4 wk of lactation, high-energy diet (HE), and twice-daily milking for the rest of the lactation.

The chemical composition of the silage and concentrates used over the duration of the trial is presented in Tables 1Go and 2Go, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Chemical composition (mean ± SD) of grass silage and corn silage
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Ingredient and chemical composition (mean ± SD) of post-calving concentrate supplement
 
The cows were housed in a freestall barn, with the treatment groups sharing accommodation space throughout. Forage mangers were mounted on electronic load cells and automatic feeders dispensed concentrate. The prepartum diet comprised ad libitum access to grass silage with 2 kg/d of citrus pulp introduced 2 wk before expected calving date. Treatments began on the morning after the second or third milking post-calving. Diet ST consisted of grass silage and 8 kg/d of concentrate. Diet HE consisted of grass and corn silage (1:2), plus 12 kg/d of concentrate. Forage and concentrate allocations were fed separately. Cows had ad libitum access to forage, which was offered to allow for feed refusals of 5%. Refusals were removed every second day. On d 29 postpartum, all cows were placed on a twice-daily milking schedule and allocated diet ST until turnout. Cows were provided access to pasture on d 42 postcalving and were offered high quality grass (Lolium perenne spp.) plus 4 kg/d of concentrate, which was decreased to 2 kg/d on d 21 after first service.

A voluntary waiting period of 65 d was observed before first service. An estrus induction program began on d 65 postpartum in cows not previously detected in estrus using a controlled internal drug-releasing insert (CIDR; InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand) containing 1.94 g of progesterone, and an injection of 2 mg of estradiol benzoate, (5 mg/mL; Intervet, Dublin, Ireland). The CIDR were removed on d 8 and an injection of PGF2{alpha} (2 mL of Estrumate; BP (Vet) Coopers, Berkhamsted, UK) was administered i.m. Cows received 1 mg of estradiol benzoate 24 h after CIDR removal. Semen from a single ejaculate was used to breed all cows. One AI technician performed all inseminations. The duration of the breeding season was 13 wk.

Samples and Animal Measurements
Milk yield (kg) was recorded daily at morning, evening, and night milkings using electronic milk meters (Dairy Master, Causeway, Co. Kerry, Ireland). Milk composition (fat, protein, and lactose) was determined twice weekly from successive morning, evening, and night milk samples during the treatment period and weekly thereafter by automated infrared absorption analysis using a Milkoscan 605 (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark). Somatic cell count was determined once weekly by flow cytometry using a Bentley Somacount 300 (Bentley Instruments Inc., Chaska, MN).

Forage and concentrate intakes were recorded using the Griffith Elder feeding system. Samples of grass silage and corn silage offered were taken on Tuesdays and Fridays. Concentrate samples were taken once weekly. The DMI was calculated daily.

Cow BW (kg) was recorded once weekly before calving, immediately postcalving, and once weekly thereafter. The preparturient cows were weighed before feeding in the morning, and the lactating cows were weighed after morning milking, before feeding. The BCS (Lowman et al., 1976) of the cows was determined approximately 2 wk before calving to facilitate blocking, within 4 d after calving, and then once weekly until the end of the breeding season. Subcutaneous adipose tissue was recovered by biopsy (Robelin et al., 1986) on d 1 and 29 postpartum.

Blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture 2 wk before expected calving date, twice weekly until d 28 postpartum, and once weekly from d 28 to d 70 postpartum. Sampling took place after morning milking and before feeding. Samples were collected into vials containing lithium heparin as an anticoagulant. The samples were immediately placed on ice packs, and were centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 10 min immediately after sampling. The plasma was decanted and stored at –20°C until analysis.

Follicular dynamics and the diameter of the ovulatory dominant follicle were determined for each cow via daily transrectal ovarian ultrasonography (7.5-MHz transducer; Aloka SSD-500, Aloka Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) from d 7 postpartum until first ovulation. The interval from calving to first ovulation was determined based on ultrasound examination. Pregnancy examinations were conducted using ultrasonography at 30 and 60 d after AI and 60 d after the end of the breeding season. Estrus detection was carried out using the Heatwatch system (DDx Inc., Denver, CO) in conjunction with 3 daily visual observations at 0700, 1500, and 1900 h, during and after the voluntary waiting period. Heatwatch transmitters were first applied 14 d postpartum. Milk samples for progesterone analysis were collected 3 times/wk during the morning milking from parturition until the start of the breeding season.

Laboratory Procedures and Analysis
The DM, NDF, crude fiber, and CP of the forage and concentrate samples were analyzed as described by McNamara et al. (2003). Determination of in vitro DM digestibility was carried out by near-infrared spectroscopy using a near infrared system 6500 spectrophotometer (Perstorp Analytical Inc., Silver Spring, MD). Silage pH on the juice pressed from the silage was measured using a glass electrode and a pH meter (pHM2 standard pH meter-radiometer, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Blood plasma was analyzed for glucose, triglycerides, NEFA, BHBA, urea, and cholesterol concentrations using appropriate kits and an ABX Mira auto analyzer (ABX Mira, Cedex 4, France). Insulin in plasma was assayed using a solid-phase radioimmunoassay (Coat-a-Count, Diagnostics Products Corp, Los Angeles, CA). The interassay coefficients of variation were 14.2 and 9.81% for samples with mean insulin concentrations of 6.4 and 13.1 µIU/mL, respectively, and the corresponding intraassay coefficients of variation were 9.85 and 3.88%. The minimum detectable concentration was 1.61 ± 0.03 µIU/mL.

The concentration of progesterone in milk was measured by enzyme immunoassay from representative un-extracted aliquots of whole milk as described by Sauer et al. (1986). The interassay coefficients of variation were 17.9, 12.0, and 12.2% for samples with mean progesterone concentrations of 2.34, 4.06, and 16.83 ng/ mL, respectively, and the corresponding intraassay coefficients of variation were 8.89, 3.27, and 5.11%. The minimum detectable concentration of the assay was 1.7 ± 0.52 ng/mL.

Plasma samples (100 µL without extraction) were assayed for growth hormone using a modified form of the double-antibody radioimmunoassay of Hart et al. (1975). The inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 12.2 and 7.6%, respectively. The minimum detectable concentration of the assay was 2.6 ng/mL.

Plasma IGF-I was measured using human OCTEIA IGF-I kits (IDS, Tyne and Wear, UK). Releasing reagent was added to dissociate IGF-I from binding proteins. The inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 8.7 and 2.1%, respectively, and the sensitivity was 1.9 ng/mL.

Subcutaneous adipose samples were processed as described by Robelin et al. (1986). Processed samples were photographed at 4x magnification using a standard light microscope and camera fitted with a C-mount adapter. Mean cell diameter was determined using Adobe Photoshop.

Energy Balance
Energy balance was estimated as the difference between energy intake and the sum of energy for maintenance and milk production, as described by McNamara et al. (2003). The French NEL system was used, in which 1 unité fourragère lait (UFL) is the net energy for lactation equivalent of 1 kg of standard air-dry barley (Jarrige, 1989).

Statistical Analyses
Five cows from 3xST [displaced abomasum (2), retained placenta (2), physical injury] and 2 cows from 3xHE (displaced abomasum, retained placenta) were removed from the experiment. A smoothing spline was fit in Genstat 5 (1997; Lawes Agricultural Trust, IACR-Rothamstead, Harpenden, UK), to facilitate the estimation of daily BW records before analysis. Similarly, a smoothing spline was fit to calculate daily milk fat, protein, and lactose yields from which daily percentages were calculated. Somatic cell counts were transformed to logs before analysis.

Repeated measures of treatment effects on DMI, milk yield, milk constituent yield, milk composition, SCC, plasma analytes, and EB were carried out using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 1991) with cow as a random effect nested within treatment. Treatment effects on BCS, adipocyte diameter, and BW change were analyzed using the GLM procedure. Treatment, time, and treatment x time interactions were tested. The reproduction data were analyzed using GLM (intervals to ovulation, service, and conception) and {chi}2 procedures (pregnancy rate to first and second services). Correlation coefficients between EB and some of the blood variables were obtained using the CORR procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 1991).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Milk Production and Composition
Daily milk yield during the treatment period was reduced (P < 0.01) by 19.6% with 1xST compared with 3xST (Table 3Go and Figure 1Go). Milk yield on 1xST increased with commencement of twice-daily milking in wk 5, but remained approximately 2 kg/d lower than for 3xST throughout the first 20 wk of the lactation. This resulted in an 11.7% lower (P < 0.03) mean cumulative milk yield at wk 10 for 1xST. The cumulative reduction due to 1x was 11.3% (P < 0.05) at wk 20 of lactation compared with 3xST. Milk yield was increased by 17.0% (P < 0.01) with 3xHE compared with 3xST during the treatment period. The change to twice-daily milking and allocation of the ST diet in wk 5 resulted in a reduction in milk yield for 3xHE, and the milk yields of 3xST and 3xHE converged by wk 10 of lactation. The cumulative 10-wk milk yield was 10.2% greater (P < 0.05) for 3xHE compared with 3xST, but this had decreased to 5.9% (P > 0.05) by wk 20 of lactation. Total lactation yields were 6,198, 6,813, and 7,132 kg on treatments 1xST, 3xST, and 3xHE, respectively. This equated to a 615-kg (P < 0.05) difference due to milking frequency treatment, and a 319-kg (P > 0.05) difference due to dietary treatment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effect of milking frequency and diet on milk and constituent yields, milk composition, and SCC
 

Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of milking frequency and diet on milk production for wk 1 to 20 of lactation; 1xST ({square}) = once a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xST ({blacksquare}) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xHE (•) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on a high-energy diet.

 
Milk fat concentration was greatest (P < 0.01) with 1x. This offset the reduced milk volume of the 1xST group, resulting in no difference (P > 0.05) in daily fat yield between the 1xST and 3xST. Diet did not significantly affect milk fat concentration over the treatment period. However, 3xHE increased (P < 0.01) daily fat yield by 21% compared with 3xST.

Milk protein concentration was increased both by 1 xST (P < 0.01) and 3xHE (P < 0.05) compared with 3xST. Daily protein yield was higher (P < 0.01) for 3xHE than 3xST, but reduced milk volume on 1xST resulted in lower (P < 0.05) daily protein yield compared with 3xST. Milk protein concentration declined across all treatments in the 2 wk posttreatment. However, protein concentration remained higher (P < 0.01) on 1xST compared with 3xST, and diet had no effect (P > 0.05).

Milk lactose concentration was not affected by milking frequency or diet (P > 0.05). Hence, the significant differences observed for daily lactose yield during the treatment period were largely due to milk volume differences.

Daily milk energy output was lower (P < 0.05) for 1 xST compared with 3xST, and higher (P < 0.01) for 3xHE compared with 3xST during the treatment period.

Somatic cell count was not affected by milking frequency, either during the trial period or in the post-treatment period (P > 0.05).

DMI, Net Energy Intake, and EB
Feeding the HE diet increased (P < 0.05) DMI during the treatment period, whereas milking frequency had no effect (P > 0.05; Figure 2Go). However, DMI was lower (P < 0.05) for 1xST than 3xST in wk 4. The DMI of the milking frequency groups converged upon commencement of twice-daily milking. There were no residual milking frequency or diet effects (P > 0.05) in the 2 wk posttreatment.


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of milking frequency and diet on DMI and energy balance (EB); 1xST ({square}) = once a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xST ({blacksquare}) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xHE (•) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on a high-energy diet. UFL = Unité fourragère lait.

 
Daily EB for 1xST was less negative (P < 0.05) than for 3xST during the first 3 wk of lactation, though this difference was not apparent in wk 4 (P > 0.05). There were no differences in EB observed due to dietary treatment (P > 0.05) during the treatment period.

BW, BCS, and Adipocyte Diameter
Neither milking frequency (P > 0.05) nor dietary treatment (P > 0.05) affected the degree of BW change during the treatment period (Table 4Go). However, cows on 1xST began to gain weight earlier postpartum. Consequently, they lost less (P < 0.01) weight than cows on 3xST by d 60 of lactation. There was no residual dietary treatment effect on BW loss.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Effect of milking frequency and diet on BW, BCS, and adipocyte diameter
 
Neither milking frequency nor dietary treatment altered BCS loss during the treatment period (P > 0.05; Table 4Go). The BCS loss for all groups during the treatment period was approximately 0.25 units. By the start of the breeding season the mean BCS loss was approximately 0.5 units for all groups (P > 0.05). Change in mean adipocyte diameter over the treatment period tended to be lower (P = 0.07) for 1xST compared with 3 xST. Change in mean adipocyte diameter over the treatment period was not different (P > 0.05) between the 3xHE and 3xST groups (Table 4Go).

Plasma Analytes
Plasma glucose concentration was higher (P < 0.01) during wk 2 for 1xST compared with 3xST (Figure 3Go). Plasma NEFA was lower (P < 0.05) for 1xST compared with 3xST over the treatment period. Similarly, plasma BHBA was lower (P < 0.05) for 1xST compared with 3xST at this time. Daily EB was positively correlated with plasma concentrations of cholesterol (r = 0.34; P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with plasma concentrations of BHBA (r = –0.18; P < 0.01) and NEFA (r = –0.45; P < 0.01). Plasma concentrations of urea and triglyceride were not affected by milking frequency treatment (P > 0.05; Table 5Go). Dietary treatment had no effects on any of the plasma metabolites measured (P > 0.05). Plasma insulin concentration during the treatment period was higher (P < 0.05, Figure 4Go) for 1 xST than 3xST (2.25 vs. 1.27 µIU/mL; SED = 0.48). No differences in plasma insulin were evident in the first week of lactation (P > 0.05), but 1x increased (P < 0.01) plasma insulin during wk 2 to 4. No residual effects of milking frequency on plasma insulin were apparent after wk 5 of lactation (P > 0.05). Plasma insulin concentration was not affected by diet over the treatment period or in the posttreatment period (P > 0.05).


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of milking frequency and diet on plasma NEFA, glucose and BHBA concentration; 1xST ({square}) = once a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xST ({blacksquare}) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xHE (•) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on a high-energy diet.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Effect of milking frequency and diet on mean plasma concentration of cholesterol, triglyceride, and urea during the first 4 wk of lactation
 

Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of milking frequency and diet on plasma growth hormone (GH), IGF-I and insulin concentration; 1xST ({square}) = once a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xST ({blacksquare}) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on standard diet; 3xHE (•) = 3 times a day milking for the first 4 wk of lactation on a high-energy diet.

 
Plasma IGF-I tended (P = 0.08) to be greater on 1xST compared with 3xST over the treatment period. Feeding the HE diet did not affect plasma IGF-I concentrations (P > 0.05; Figure 4Go). There were no posttreatment effects on IGF-I. No difference in growth hormone concentration was observed between the milking frequency treatments (P > 0.05).

Fertility Measurements
The interval to first ovulation, as measured by ultrasound scanning, was shorter (P < 0.01) for 1xST compared with 3xST (Table 6Go), with a higher proportion (P < 0.05) of 1xST cows ovulating the first postpartum dominant follicle. Dietary treatment did not affect interval to first ovulation or the proportion of cows ovulating the first postpartum dominant follicle (P > 0.05). The onset of luteal activity, as measured by milk progesterone, was earliest for 1xST (P < 0.05) compared with 3xST, with no difference (P > 0.05) due to dietary treatment. There were no treatment effects on interovulatory interval (P > 0.05) or the duration of the luteal phase (P > 0.05). Neither milking frequency nor diet had any effects on intervals to conception, conception rates to first or second service, or overall pregnancy rate (P > 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Effect of milking frequency and diet on reproductive performance
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In general, 1x did not create difficulties for routine management of the cows. Somatic cell counts and the incidence of clinical mastitis were not affected. The degree of reduction in milk yield was generally similar to previous studies (Remond et al., 1999; McNamara, 2002). The effects of feeding the HE diet on milk yield and milk protein concentrations are consistent with the well-documented responses to a reduction of the forage-to-concentrate ratio (Ferris et al., 2001), and inclusion of corn silage in grass silage-based diets (Phipps et al., 1995). The negative residual effects on milk yield of 1x may be attributable to impaired mammary epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. There is a strong relationship between milk yield and number of mammary epithelial cells (Tucker, 1981). Increasing milking frequency in early lactation was shown to increase mammary cell proliferation (Hale et al., 2003).

As expected, increasing the proportion of concentrate and including corn silage in the diet increased DMI (Phipps et al., 1995; Ferris et al., 2001). However, daily DMI over the treatment period was not affected by milking frequency. The lower DMI of 1xST in wk 4 suggests that an effect was beginning to emerge, but commencement of twice daily milking for both groups in wk 5 resulted in the convergence of DMI. The results indicate that continuation of 1x over a more prolonged period would lead to lower daily DMI, as has been observed where cows were milked once daily over a full lactation (Pomies and Remond, 2002).

Once-daily milking resulted in a more positive EB during the first 3 wk of lactation. This difference was not apparent in wk 4, presumably due to the lower DMI of 1xST at that time. The improvement in EB of approximately 1 UFL/d over the treatment period was less marked than previously documented (Remond et al., 1999, 2002; McNamara, 2002). These authors reported that cows milked once daily were approaching positive EB by the third week of lactation. In contrast, the mean daily EB of the 1x cows in the current study did not become positive at any time during the first 6 wk of lactation.

Variation in EB is largely explained by variation in energy intake, and to a lesser extent by milk yield (Villa-Godoy et al., 1988). Where improvements in EB due to 1x have been observed (McNamara, 2002; Remond et al., 2002), the quality of diet offered and DMI achieved were higher than in the current study. The effect of 1x on EB may therefore be dependent on plane of nutrition.

Increasing the energy density of the diet in early lactation did not improve EB, as milk energy output of cows offered the HE diet increased by a similar magnitude to net energy intake. Other studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between proportion of concentrate in the lactating diet and EB (Reist et al., 2003; Coffey et al., 2004). The 4-wk duration of the HE diet was shorter than for the studies cited above, and it coincided with the stage of lactation when maximal partitioning of available energy to milk production was occurring (Bell, 1995).

Cows milked once daily began to gain BW sooner than 3x cows, resulting in lower cumulative BW loss at d 60 of lactation. The earlier resumption of weight gain in 1xST cows may be due to an improved EB, brought about by the negative residual effect on daily milk yield.

Subcutaneous adipocyte diameter is positively related to body fat content (Robelin et al., 1986). Despite the similarity in BCS profiles of the treatment groups, the 1xST cows had a smaller reduction in subcutaneous adipocyte diameter compared with that of the 3xST and 3xHE cows. This indicates that the improvement in EB due to 1x was sufficient to reduce body fat mobilization, despite being undetected by body condition scoring. Furthermore, the lower plasma NEFA concentration of the 1xST cows compared with the 3xST and 3xHE groups is consistent with a lesser degree of body fat mobilization.

Plasma insulin increases in response to elevated blood glucose concentration, and is positively associated with EB in the early postpartum period (Diskin et al., 2003). Numerous studies have shown that cows in a more positive EB have greater circulating concentrations of IGF-I (Spicer et al., 1990; Beam and Butler, 1999), contrary to the current study. Once-daily milking reduced plasma NEFA concentration, indicating a positive effect on EB (Diskin et al., 2003). In addition, 1xST increased plasma insulin concentrations in line with the positive effects observed on energy status and metabolite profiles.

Daily ultrasound scanning and milk progesterone profiling showed that 1xST cows resumed cyclicity 10 d earlier than 3xST and 3xHE cows, due to a higher proportion of cows having ovulated the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave. Daily EB during wk 2 and 3 was less negative for the 1xST group, coincident with the mean day of first postpartum ovulation. Beam and Butler (1999) reported that cows with a shorter interval to EB nadir and a more positive EB during the first 3 wk of lactation had a reduced interval to first ovulation.

Plasma insulin and glucose concentrations were higher for 1xST around the time of first ovulation. Glucose is an important metabolic factor regulating the onset of cyclicity; increased plasma glucose promotes LH release through its effects on GnRH secretion (Diskin et al., 2003). Insulin has been identified as having stimulatory effects on granulosa cell proliferation, estradiol production by granulosa cells, as well as androgen production by thecal cells (Spicer and Echternkamp, 1995). In summary, the effects of once daily milking on early postpartum metabolic status were conducive to enhanced follicular development and earlier onset of cyclicity.

Early reestablishment of ovarian activity allows for the completion of multiple ovulatory cycles preceding insemination, which has been linked to improved conception rates (Darwash et al., 1997). However, this factor becomes important only when intervals to first ovulation exceed about 40 d. In this study the majority (87%) of cows had resumed cyclicity by 40 d, and conception rate and final pregnancy rate did not differ due to milking frequency, despite the earlier onset of cyclicity for the 1xST group.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Increasing the energy density of the early lactation diet resulted in higher DMI. However, EB was not improved, as additional ingested nutrients were partitioned toward milk production. Temporary 1x in early lactation reduced milk yield and increased milk fat and protein concentrations. There was a residual negative effect on milk yield, which persisted through the first half of lactation for 1xST compared with 3xST cows. Milking frequency did not affect DMI, and calculated EB tended to be less negative for 1xST cows for the first 3 wk. Improvement in metabolic status was further evidenced by increased plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin and reduced concentrations of plasma NEFA. The findings of this study demonstrate that once-daily milking may be an effective strategy for reducing the incidence of delayed resumption of cyclicity associated with nutritional stress in early lactation at the cost of reduced milk yield.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors would like to thank J. P. Murphy, J. Keneally, and the Moorepark farm staff for management and care of the animals. The technical assistance of T. Condon, J. Dwyer, N. Galvin, N. Hynes, J. Haugh, and S. Llewellyn is also appreciated. Wellcome Trust and National Development Plan funding is gratefully acknowledged.

Received for publication September 13, 2005. Accepted for publication November 14, 2005.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Beam, S. W., and W. R. Butler. 1999. Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 54:411–424.[Medline]

Bell, A. W. 1995. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2804–2819.[Abstract]

Britt, J. H. 1994. Impacts of early postpartum metabolism on follicular development and fertility. Bovine Pract. 24:39–43.

Coffey, M. P., G. Simm, J. D. Oldham, W. G. Hill, and S. Brotherstone. 2004. Genotype and diet effects on energy balance in the first three lactations of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87:4318–4326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Darwash, A. O., J. A. Wooliams, and G. E. Lamming. 1997. The phenotypic association between the interval to postpartum ovulation and traditional measures of fertility in dairy cattle. Anim. Sci. 65:9–16.

Dillon, P. G., S. Crosse, G. Stakelum, and F. Flynn. 1995. The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows. Grass Forage Sci. 50:286–299.

Diskin, M. G., D. R. Mackey, J. F. Roche, and J. M. Sreenan. 2003. Effects of nutrition and metabolic status on circulating hormones and ovarian follicle development in cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 78:345–370.[Medline]

Ferris, C. P., F. J. Gordon, D. C. Patterson, D. J. Kilpatrick, C. S. Mayne, and M. A. McCoy. 2001. The response of dairy cows of high genetic merit to increasing proportion of concentrate in the diet with a high and medium feed value silage. J. Agric. Sci. 136:319–329.

Hale, S. A., A. V. Capuco, and R. A. Erdman. 2003. Milk yield and mammary growth effects due to increased milking frequency during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2061–2071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hart, I., D. S. Flux, P. Andrews, and A. S. McNeilly. 1975. Radioimmunoassay for ovine and caprine growth hormone: Its application to the measurement of basal circulating levels of growth hormone in the goat. Horm. Metab. Res. 7:35–40.

Jarrige, J. 1989. INRAtion V2.7.: Microsoft computer program of ration formulation for ruminant livestock. J. Agabriel, P. Champciaux, and C. Espinasse, ed. CNERTA, Dijon, France.

Lowman, B. G., N. Scott, and S. Somerville. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Rev. ed. Bull. East Scotland College Agric. No. 6. Edinburgh, UK.

McNamara, S. 2002. Effect of nutrition in the transition and early post partum period on some aspects of production and reproduction in dairy cows. Ph.D. Thesis, Natl. Univ. Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

McNamara, S., F. P. O’Mara, M. Rath, and J. J. Murphy. 2003. Effects of different transition diets on dry matter intake, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2397–2408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

O’Mara, F. P., P. J. Caffrey, and M. J. Drennan. 1997. The net energy value of grass silage determined from comparative feeding trials. Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 36:110. (Abstr.)

Phipps, R. H., J. D. Sutton, and B. A. Jones. 1995. Forage mixtures for dairy cows: The effect on dry matter intake and milk production of incorporating either fermented or urea-treated whole-crop wheat, brewers grain, fodder beet or maize silage with diets based on grass silage. Anim. Sci. 61:491–496.

Pomies, D., and B. Remond. 2002. Once a day milking of dairy cows during the whole lactation: Consequences on performance and milk quality. Pages 195–198 in 9emes Rencontres autour des recherches sur les ruminants. INRA, Paris, France.

Reist, M., D. Erdin, D. von Euw, K. Tschuemperlin, H. Leuenberger, C. Delavaud, Y. Chilliard, H. M. Hammon, N. Kuenzi, and J. W. Blum. 2003. Concentrate feeding strategy in lactating dairy cows: Metabolic and endocrine changes with emphasis on leptin. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1690–1706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Remond, B., S. Aubailly, Y. Chilliard, D. Dupont, D. Pomies, and M. Petit. 2002. Combined effects of once-daily milking and feeding level in the first three weeks of lactation on milk production and enzyme activities, and nutritional status, Holstein cows. Anim. Res. 51:101–117.

Remond, B., J. B. Coulon, M. Nicloux, and D. Levieux. 1999. Effect of temporary once daily milking in early lactation on milk production and nutritional status of dairy cows. Ann. Zootech. (Paris) 48:341–352.

Robelin, J., J. Agabriel, C. Barboiron, R. Jailler, G. Cuylle, and G. Moins. 1986. Estimation de l’etat d’engraissement des bovins vivants a partir de la taille des cellules adipeuses. Bull. Tech. C.R.Z.V Theix, INRA 66:37–41.

SAS Institute. 1991. SAS User’s Guide. Statistics,. Version 8.1. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

Sauer, M. J., J. A. Foulkes, A. Worsfold, and B. A. Morris. 1986. Use of progesterone 11-glucuronide-alkine phosphatase conjugate in a sensitive microtitre-plate enzyme immunoassay of progesterone in milk and its application to pregnancy testing in dairy cattle. J. Reprod. Fertil. 76:375–391.[Abstract]

Spicer, L. J., and S. E. Echternkamp. 1995. The ovarian insulin and insulin-like growth factor system with emphasis on domestic animals. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 12:223–245.[Medline]

Spicer, L. J., W. B. Tucker, and G. D. Adams. 1990. Insulin-like growth factor in dairy cows: Relationships among energy balance, body condition, ovarian activity, and estrous behavior. J. Dairy Sci. 73:929–937.[Abstract]

Tucker, H. A. 1981. Physiological control of mammary growth, lactogenesis and lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 64:1403–1421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Veerkamp, R. F., and E. P. C. Koenen. 1999. Genetics of food intake, live weight, condition score and energy balance. Occ. Pub. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. no. 24, Br. Soc. Anim. Sci., Edinburgh, UK.

Vermorel, M. 1989. Energy: The feed unit system. Pages 23–32 in Ruminant Nutrition—Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables. R. Jarrige, ed. John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, France.

Villa-Godoy, A., T. L. Hughes, R. S. Emery, L. T. Chapin, and R. L. Fogwell. 1988. Association between energy balance and luteal function in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1063–1072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. H. Wall and T. B. McFadden
Use it or lose it: Enhancing milk production efficiency by frequent milking of dairy cows
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 27 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. L. Moya, M. A. Gomez, L. A. Boyle, J. F. Mee, B. O'Brien, and S. Arkins
Effects of Milking Frequency on Phagocytosis and Oxidative Burst Activity of Phagocytes from Primiparous and Multiparous Dairy Cows During Early Lactation
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 587 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M A Fenwick, S Llewellyn, R Fitzpatrick, D A Kenny, J J Murphy, J Patton, and D C Wathes
Negative energy balance in dairy cows is associated with specific changes in IGF-binding protein expression in the oviduct
Reproduction, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 63 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. H. Wall and T. B. McFadden
Optimal Timing and Duration of Unilateral Frequent Milking During Early Lactation of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5042 - 5048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S Llewellyn, R Fitzpatrick, D A Kenny, J J Murphy, R J Scaramuzzi, and D C Wathes
Effect of negative energy balance on the insulin-like growth factor system in pre-recruitment ovarian follicles of post partum dairy cows
Reproduction, March 1, 2007; 133(3): 627 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Patton, D. A. Kenny, S. McNamara, J. F. Mee, F. P. O'Mara, M. G. Diskin, and J. J. Murphy
Relationships Among Milk Production, Energy Balance, Plasma Analytes, and Reproduction in Holstein-Friesian Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 649 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS