|
|
||||||||




* Dipartimento di Agronomia, Selvicoltura e Gestione del Territorio, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy
Istituto di Zootecnia Generale, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Istituto di Scienze delle Produzioni Alimentari, CNR, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy
1 Corresponding author: giorgio.borreani{at}unito.it
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: alfalfa lab-scale and bale silage chestnut tannin rumen protein degradability silage proteolysis
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The reversible protein-binding properties of tannins suggest their employment as silage additives to reduce the severe proteolysis that occurs during the ensiling of forage. Commercially available tannins can be divided into 2 main groups: condensed and hydrolyzable tannins, with several uses ranging from the wine to the tanning industry. Chestnut (Castanea sativa L.) tannins are the most common hydrolyzable tannins extracted from temperate plants, and quebracho and mimosa are condensed tannins extracted from tropical plants. Condensed tannins added to grasses (Salawu et al., 1999) and hydrolyzable tannins added to legumes (Cavallarin et al., 2002) at ensiling have recently been shown to reduce protein degradation during conservation. The effects of condensed tannins on protein digestion are usually more negative than the effects of hydrolyzable tannins because they hydrolyze in gastric acidity beyond the rumen, releasing protein, AA, and small units of phenolics that likely pass to the urine (Van Soest, 1994).
The following study was carried out to evaluate the effect of commercial chestnut tannin in 2 different experiments on 1) silage fermentation quality of alfalfa in lab-scale silos and on protein degradation in the rumen, and 2) silage fermentation quality and proteolysis at field scale in alfalfa bale silages.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 1
A fourth regrowth of alfalfa (cv. Equipe) was cut at early bloom on August 20, 2001, with yield of 2.8 t of DM/ha, 23.5% DM, 42.1% NDF (DM basis), and 22.5% CP (DM basis). The herbage was cut with a mower and field-wilted with one tedding and harvested the following day at a DM content of around 35%. The approximate moisture level was checked at regular intervals using a microwave oven. About 30 kg of wilted herbage was harvested and chopped with an experimental mechanical chopper to a length of 20 to 30 mm. The chopped herbage was ensiled in sterile, 5-L, laboratory glass silos equipped with a lid that only enables gas release. The tannins utilized were extracted from chestnut wood by heat and low-pressure treatment, and only the water-soluble fraction was kept and dehydrated. The chestnut tannin is commercially available as very fine powder (92 to 95% DM) with a pure tannin content of 77% on a DM basis. Four levels of pure chestnut tannin (Tannino C, Silva Chimica, s.r.l., Italy) addition were studied: without any additive (T0), tannin added at 2% DM (T1), 4% DM (T2), and 6% DM (T3). The tannins were dissolved in water and dispensed with a hand sprayer in aliquots of 50 mL/kg of fresh herbage during mixing in a concrete mixer. Four replications were performed for each treatment, for a total of 16 silos. The silos were weighed immediately before and after being filled and were then stored at 25°C for 120 d. During conservation, the silos were consecutively weighed at 1, 4, 7, 14, 20, 27, 48, and 70 d and at the end of the conservation period to estimate the fermentation losses.
Experiment 2
A third regrowth of alfalfa (cv. Equipe) was cut on July 3, 2002, at full bloom with yield of 5.4 t of DM/ha, 23.6% DM, and 17% CP (DM basis). The herbage was cut with a mower and wilted in the field for 2 d. Two different wilting levels (40 and 50%) were compared and are subsequently referred to in the text as wilting levels I and II, respectively. Forage DM content in the field was determined with a microwave oven to assess the planned level for baling. The herbage was tedded twice during wilting. The planned DM contents were reached after 5 h and 28 h, respectively, for the I and II wilting levels. The weather was favorable for field drying during the first day, but 3.5 mm of rain fell before the II wilting level was reached. The wilted herbage was raked before baling and treated in alternate windrows without any additive (T0) and with the addition of 4% DM of chestnut tannin (T2). The chestnut tannin was dissolved in water and dispensed in aliquots of 1.2 L per 12 kg of fresh herbage (about 6 m of windrow) with a 10-L knapsack sprayer. Herbage samples of 10 kg were taken at cutting and before ensiling, then chopped and subsampled for chemical analyses, with 4 replications. The herbage was baled (Columbia R500/Z, Wolagri, Suzzara, Italy) in 600-mm diameter round bales. Round bales were wrapped individually (FW 500/Z, Wolagri) within 3 h after baling using a stretch film (4 layers, 250 mm wide x 25 µm thick). Four replications were performed at each DM level for the 2 treatments (T0 and T2) for a total of 16 bales. The bales were safely stored on their ends indoors at 25°C for 78 d. During conservation, the bales were consecutively weighed at 1, 3, 7, and 32 d and at the end of the conservation period to estimate the fermentation losses. The bales were opened and sampled at the end of conservation. Sampling was performed by coring the bale from its side to a depth of about 450 mm with a corer (50 mm diameter).
Sample Preparation and Chemical Analysis
The herbage and silage samples were divided into 3 subsamples. The first subsample was immediately analyzed to determine the DM content at 80°C in a forced-draft oven until constant weight and ash (ASH) by ignition to 550°C. The second subsample was freeze-dried in a lyophilizer (5Pascal, Trezzano sul Naviglio, Italy) for 2 d. The vacuum level was 1 x 101 mBa, and the temperature was 40°C. The lyophilized sample was ground in a Cyclotec 1093 sample mill (Foss, Hillerød, Denmark) to pass a 1-mm screen and used for determination of total N, Met, Lys, total amino acids (TAA), and ether extract (EE). Total nitrogen was determined according to the Dumas method (Buckee, 1994) using a Nitrogen Analyser MicroN (Elementar, Hanau, Germany). Ether extract was determined following the AOAC method (1990). The third wet sample was homogenized and extracted for 4 min in a Stomacher blender (Seward Ltd, UK) in water or in 0.1 N H2SO4. The buffering capacity, pH, and water-soluble carbohydrates were determined in the water extract as described in Cavallarin et al. (2005). Nonprotein N was determined according to the Kjeldahl method (AOAC, 1990) in the water extract after precipitation with TCA (final concentration 50 g/L) and phosphotungstic acid (final concentration 2 g/L), and centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 15 min at 4°C. The ammonia N (NH3-N) contents, determined using a specific electrode (Orion Research Inc., Boston, MA), were quantified in the water extract. The lactic and monocarboxylic acids (acetic, propionic, and butyric acids) were determined by HPLC (Canale et al., 1984). Ethanol was determined by HPLC, coupled to a refractive index detector, on an Aminex HPX-87H column (BioRad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). Analyses were performed isocratically under the following conditions: mobile phase, 0.0025M H2SO4; flow rate, 0.5 mL/min; column temperature, 37°C; and injection volume, 100 µL. Duplicate analyses were performed for all the determined parameters. Duplicates were averaged and the 4 means were considered as 4 observations in statistical analysis.
The N fractions were studied in detail in Experiment 2 to characterize the proteolysis during ensiling. Free AA-N was determined according to Winters et al. (2002) on water extracts. The TAA, Met, and Lys were determined according to Cavallarin et al. (2005) on freeze-dried samples.
Protein Rumen Degradability
In Experiment 1 silages were analyzed in situ to determine N rumen degradability. For this purpose, 3 rumen-fistulated Italian Friesian dry cows (BW = 650 kg) were fed at maintenance a diet with a 75:25 forage to concentrate ratio and 13% CP (DM basis). The forage was a first cut of permanent meadow hay (12% CP on DM basis) and the concentrate contained (% on a DM basis) the following: corn meal, 21; wheat middlings, 20; dried beet pulp, 18; soybean meal, 14; wheat bran, 12; barley, 10; sugarcane molasses, 3; and mineral and vitamin supplement, 2. For rumen incubation, 100- x 150-mm nylon bags with a porosity of 53 µm were used. Silage samples were dried at 55°C until constant weight and then milled in a 2-mm sieve mill. Each nylon bag was filled with approximately 3.5 g of silage (11.6 mg of DM/cm2 bag surface area). The incubation times were 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, and 72 h. Six replications (2/cow) were obtained for each forage and incubation time. Non-incubated samples (degradability at time 0) and all the bags after rumen incubation were first washed with tap water and then in a washing machine for 15 min (cold water cycle). Bags were then dried at 55°C and the DM and CP losses were determined for each sample.
The kinetics of rumen degradability were calculated from the Ørskov and McDonald (1979) equation:
![]() |
where p = potential degradability at time t, a = soluble protein fraction, b = potentially rumen degradable protein fraction, c = degradation rate of fraction b per hour, t = incubation time (h). The parameters of the equations were determined using the Marquardt nonlinear regression procedure (SAS Institute, 2000).
Effective degradability (P) was determined using the following equations, considering rumen outflow rates of 3 and 6%/h (Ørskov and McDonald, 1979):
![]() |
where a, b, and c are the same potential degradability parameters and k is the rumen outflow rate (%/h).
In Vitro Gas Production
In Experiment 1 in vitro gas production (GP) was determined according to the Menke and Steingass (1988) gas production procedure. Approximately 200 mg of forage was weighed, placed into a graduated glass syringe provided with a piston, and filled with 30 mL of buffered rumen fluid. Each incubation was completed in triplicate. The glass syringes containing samples and rumen fluid and buffer mixtures were incubated in a water bath at 39°C and the gas production was subsequently measured before incubation (0 h) and at 8, 24, and 48 h after incubation. Total gas values were corrected for blank incubation and hay and concentrate standards with known gas values provided by the Institute for Animal Nutrition, Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany. One replicate taken from each of the 4 laboratory glass silos was used for each treatment: 16 silage samples were tested for the gas production analysis. The OM digestibility (OMD), ME, and NEL were calculated according to Menke and Steingass (1988):
![]() |
where GP is net production in 24 hr in mL/200 mg of DM, CP is in g/kg of DM, EE is in g/kg DM, and ASH is in g/kg of DM.
A comparison was also made with the OMD and the NEL predicted by the NRC (2001) system from only the chemical analysis of the forage. In this case we assumed a discount factor of 0.918 corresponding to a feed intake level of 3 times the maintenance with a hypothetical TDN1X of a diet equal to 74%.
In Vitro Protein Intestinal Digestibility
In vitro protein intestinal digestibility was determined on silage samples previously incubated in the rumen for 16 h, following the procedure reported by Calsamiglia and Stern (1995). Pepsinpancreatin digestion of protein was calculated as TCA-soluble N divided by the total amount of sample N used in the assay, after rumen incubation.
Statistical Analysis
The chemical compositional data were analyzed for their statistical significance via an ANOVA, with their significance reported at a 0.05 probability level using a GLM procedure (SAS Institute, 2000). When the calculated values of F were significant, the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch range test was used to interpret any significant differences among the mean values.
The effects of tannin addition and wilting on the N fractions and AA composition of the silage were determined in Experiment 2 using the split-plot ANOVA, with wilting as the main factor. To discuss effects of ensiling on the N fractions and AA composition of silages compared with the original wilted herbage, mean values were compared by computing the 95% confidence intervals.
The NPN values of the silages of the 2 experiments were regressed on the DM content. The MANOVA analysis of covariance was used to verify the equivalence of the equations for the 2 treatments. This procedure allowed for the verification of the hypothesis of parallelism of the regression equations and, when this was not rejected, the analysis of covariance was used to evaluate the differences between the adjusted means.
Potential rumen degradability parameters and effective rumen degradability data were analyzed by AN-OVA using a GLM procedure according to the following model:
![]() |
where Yij = dependent variable; µ = general mean; Ti = tannin treatment effect (j=1,4); Cj = cow effect (k=1,3); and eij = residual error.
The applied model for the GP, OMD, ME, and NEL was as follows:
![]() |
where Yi = dependent variable; µ = general mean; Ti = tannin treatment effect (i = 1,4); and ei = residual error.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the NPN values of the silage from treatments T0 and T2 of the 2 experiments were regressed on the DM content, 2 regression equations with high coefficients of determination were obtained (r2 = 0.90 and 0.81, respectively; Figure 4
). The slopes of the 2 regression lines were not significantly different, whereas the constants differed significantly (P < 0.001), which means that the 2 lines are parallel.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Silage Fermentation Characteristics and DM Losses
Tannins are generally regarded as inhibitory to the growth of microorganisms and they could have some chemical or biological effects or both on the bacterial flora during ensiling. In the present experiments, the DM content of silages was compatible with good lactic acid fermentation, and no butyric acid was found in any of the silages. The tannin addition slightly influenced the pattern of fermentation products, and it had some effect on the DM losses in Experiment 1. Cavallarin et al. (2002) found that in alfalfa silages with a DM content ranging from 20 to 42% and with chestnut tannin added at 2.5% of DM, the butyric acid production was almost completely inhibited at all wilting levels. Kondo et al. (2004) found that the addition of green tea leaf waste (which is rich in tannins) to sudangrass silages promoted lactic acid production and did not affect acetate production. Salawu et al. (1999) found that the butyric acid concentration in perennial ryegrass silages with a DM content of 18.5% was reduced in silages treated with 0.5 and 5.0% (on a DM basis) of condensed tannin in comparison to the control. On the other hand, Salawu et al. (2001) found that the addition of 0.57% (on a DM basis) quebracho tannin did not have any effect on fermentation products of pea and wheat bi-crop silage. In Experiment 2 the wilting treatment did not affect the silage fermentation in contrast to reports in several experiments (Muck et al., 2003). In Experiment 1 of the present work, the reduction in DM losses ranged from 19 to 29%, with a tannin content that increased from 2.0 to 4.0% (on a DM basis), whereas a tannin concentration up to 6.0% did not further decrease the DM losses. Probably the 6% rate did not give a larger effect than the 4% rate because the complete inhibition of some microorganisms, such as enterobacteria, was already achieved at the 4% rate, as highlighted by similar levels of ammonia N in the 2 treatments. In Experiment 2, the DM losses were not affected by 4.0% (on a DM basis) of tannin. Increasing the wilting level from I to II reduced the losses by 33% due to the reduction of water activity and to the corresponding inhibition of fermentative microorganisms (McDonald et al., 1991) In a review on grass silage losses, McGechan (1990) reported that for gas-tight silos dominated by lactic acid bacteria fermentation, DM losses ranged from 2 to 4%; Buckmaster et al. (1989) indicated that a typical alfalfa silage at a DM content of 35% will have about 1% fermentation loss.
Nitrogen Fractions
The second main characteristic of tannins is their capability of protecting protein by forming stable complexes in a pH range of 3.5 to 7.5 (Barry and McNabb, 1999). This is of particular interest for those plant species whose protein content is relevant for the formulation of ruminant ration, such as legumes. Alfalfa proteins undergo severe degradation due to both plant pro-teases during ensiling and to microbial proteases in the rumen (Broderick and Albrecht, 1997; Winters et al., 2000). The ensiling process caused an intensive proteolysis process in Experiment 2, with large increases in NPN, ammonia, and free AA values compared with the original herbage. Several factors have been shown to affect the level of proteolysis in the silo: the species of the forage (Albrecht and Muck, 1991), the stage of maturity of the crop (Kohn and Allen, 1995), the wilting level (Muck et al., 2003), and the rate of silage pH decline (McDonald et al., 1991). The increase in NPN was higher in the lowest wilting level silages, as previously reported for alfalfa (Muck et al., 2003). The NPN values found in the present experiments in the untreated silages for both laboratory and bale silages are consistent with those reported in literature from laboratory and farm alfalfa silos (Muck et al., 2003). The different stages of maturity influenced CP content 22.5% (Experiment 1) vs. 17% (Experiment 2). The higher NPN in Experiment 1 compared with Experiment 2 should be due to the lower DM content at ensiling and to the earlier stage of development of the crop. Cavallarin et al. (2000) in the same environment observed that the earlier stage of development (late vegetative vs. late bud) increased NPN by 6.4 to 7.4% (on a DM basis) in silages with DM content from 35 to 50%. The same effect was observed by Kohn and Allen (1995) for alfalfa. Muck et al. (2003) reported a decrease of about 5.0% NPN (on a DM basis) for an increase of 10 units of DM, and Cavallarin et al. (2000) observed differences from 7.7 to 8.4% NPN (on a DM basis) in butyric-acid-free silages of alfalfa. The relationships between NPN values and DM content of silages of the pooled data of the 2 experiments (treatments T0 and T2) showed a linear relationship with the same trend (no significantly different slopes). The 4% tannin treatment reduced the NPN mean value by 9.5 units, corresponding to a decrease of 15% compared with the control. This means that the tannin reduced proteolysis over the investigated DM range without the DM content having any influence on the binding reaction. The data obtained in the alfalfa silages with the addition of 4% chestnut tannin showed levels of NPN close to those found in silage made from condensed tannin containing legumes, such as sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.; Valente et al., 1999) and sainfoin (Cavallarin et al., 2005). The condensed tannin contents of sulla and sainfoin ranged from 1.6 to 2.7% and 2.1 to 3.2% DM, respectively.
OM Digestibility and Protein Degradability
The data obtained in Experiment 1 indicate that tannins effectively reduce rumen protein degradation, with a reduction in the soluble fraction and an increase in the fraction degraded with time. This is consistent with the other results using several forages (Broderick and Albrecht, 1997; Salawu et al., 1999) and mixed diets for dairy cows (Sliwinski et al., 2002). Sliwinski et al. (2002) found that adding chestnut wood extract containing hydrolyzable tannins (0.25% DM) to a basal diet for dairy cows reduced the level of rumen ammonia in comparison to the control. In Experiment 1 the reduction in rumen protein degradation of tannin-treated silages lead to a tannin dose dependent increase in the fraction of alimentary protein digestible in the intestine. On the other hand, the reduction in rumen OMD due to tannins determined a corresponding reduction in the fraction of microbial protein digestible in the intestine, considering N as the limiting factor. The trend of a higher intestinal protein digestibility in alfalfa treated with 4 and 6% tannins on DM might be due to the fact that tannins reduce proteolysis in the rumen as they make protein complexes (McSweeney et al., 2001) that are resistant in the neutral pH of the forestomach, but become unstable in the acid ambient of the abomasum; thus, more digestible proteins are available for intestinal utilization in the gut.
The concept of using tannins to protect protein from degradation in the rumen is sound only as long as the tannin does not interfere with other ruminal activities. In the present experiment, the influence of tannins was positive in terms of a reduction of the extremely high N rumen degradability of the alfalfa silage and in terms of a shift of its digestible protein from the rumen to the intestine. However, the tannin reduced OM digestibility by about 3.7 units, corresponding to a reduction of 5.1% for all the tannin addition levels considered. Tannins significantly depressed GP, probably hampering rumen microorganisms. Cope and Burns (1971) observed negative effects of tannins on in vitro DM digestibility (25%) of high-tannin strains of sericea (Lespedeza cuneata) compared with low-tannin strains. McMahon et al. (2000) concluded that tannins do not simply inhibit cellulose digestion by ruminal fluid in vitro and in vivo, but that the inhibitory effects of tannins involved the bacterial cells themselves. Reductions in DM digestibility have been observed in vivo only when forages containing over 5% DM condensed tannin are fed (Waghorn et al., 1990). In the present experiment, using the syringe method, an even lower level (2% DM) of tannins inhibited rumen fermentation, with no possibility of recovery by the microbial population. The utilized in vitro system is a static system in comparison to the highly dynamic system of the rumen where a tannin-treated forage combines with other tannin-free feeds and a huge population of microorganisms. In the in vitro procedure, a sample of rumen fluid was in contact with alfalfa silage as the only alimentary substrate and the rumen microorganisms were able to utilize only alfalfa as energy source. McMahon et al. (2000) reported that the inhibitory effect of lower concentrations of condensed tannins in pure culture could reflect limited substrate availability for binding by condensed tannin in vitro. In vivo, the wider range and greater availability of substances in the rumen likely lowered the degree to which the condensed tannins inhibited the individual population of microorganisms. The positive effect of feeding alfalfa silage with the addition of 4% hydrolyzable chestnut tannin to dairy cows has been described by Colombari et al. (2005). The tannin affected the 4% FCM yield by increasing it by 1.5%, and the milk protein daily yield by increasing it by 2% (with alfalfa accounting for 29% DM of the diet).
The OMD and NEL values calculated from the combined biological and chemical analysis (GP) are similar to those predicted from the NRC equations for T0 but differed substantially for the tannin treated silages. The values of OMD and NEL are in fact 6 to 9% lower for T1, T2, and T3 if compared with the corresponding NRC values. The data show that the chemical analysis alone is not predictive, due to the depressing influence of tannins on rumen fermentations, whereas Makkar et al. (1995) showed that the in vitro GP is a suitable method to evaluate the effects of antinutritional factors.
The results show that low levels of hydrolyzable chestnut tannin (4% on a DM basis) applied prior to ensiling alfalfa are useful to reduce proteolysis in silages and could improve protein utilization, with a slight depression in OM digestibility. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal tannin levels for properly formulating rations for dairy cows, to investigate methods of applying tannin before ensiling in the field, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the treatment to minimize out-farm protein purchase.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication March 9, 2006. Accepted for publication June 27, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Schiavone, K. Guo, S. Tassone, L. Gasco, E. Hernandez, R. Denti, and I. Zoccarato Effects of a Natural Extract of Chestnut Wood on Digestibility, Performance Traits, and Nitrogen Balance of Broiler Chicks Poult. Sci., March 1, 2008; 87(3): 521 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |