|
|
||||||||
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061
Corresponding author: K. F. Knowlton; e-mail: Knowlton{at}vt.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: steam flaked corn ammonia emission nitrogen excretion
Abbreviation key: DG = dry ground corn, L = low P, PA = phytic acid, SF = steam flaked corn
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitrogen contamination of surface water may cause algae blooms, which shade aquatic vegetation, reducing photosynthetic activity. Also, decomposition of algae consumes dissolved oxygen in the water (eutrophication), which impairs survival and productivity of fish, clams, oysters, crabs, and other aquatic animal life. When N in manure or commercial fertilizer is applied to land in excess of crop uptake, contamination of ground water via nitrate leaching may occur. Nitrate in drinking water is converted to nitrite (NO2) in the human digestive tract, which can replace oxygen in hemoglobin, resulting in cyanosis, or oxygen starvation, especially in infants.
Concentrated animal agriculture may affect air quality as well as water quality. After excretion, the organic substrate in solid and liquid animal waste is subject to microbial conversion to microbial biomass and gases, including ammonia. Ammonia volatilization from livestock waste may increase air concentrations of ammonia in animal facilities, which is detrimental to the health of farm workers and animals. Current Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards limit exposure of farm workers to ammonia to an 8-h time-weighted average ambient concentration of 50 ppm. Ammonia is classified as a hazardous substance in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (a.k.a. Superfund), which requires monitoring and reporting of ammonia releases from point sources exceeding 45.4 kg/d (National Research Council, 2003).
Ammonia volatilization also increases atmospheric N fallout, contributing to eutrophication. Although ammonia is a highly soluble gas with a short atmospheric residence time, its accumulation in the atmosphere is of concern because ammonia reacts with acidic gases such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the atmosphere to form ammonium salts. These salts return to soil in rainfall and release nitric and sulfuric acid when oxidized in soil (Apsimon et al., 1987; Likens et al., 1996). The fine particles created by the reaction of ammonia with acidic gases are also classified as PM2.5, a criteria pollutant listed in the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 71% of national ammonia emissions are from animal agriculture (EPA, 1998).
Refining diets fed to dairy cows can reduce N excretion and N losses from dairy farms. Kohn et al. (1997) developed a model of N management on dairy farms and conducted sensitivity analyses to determine the relative importance of herd nutrition, manure management, and crop selection on N losses. Improvements in herd nutrition to increase conversion of feed N to product resulted in the greatest reduction in potential N losses from farms (Kohn et al., 1997). Altering dietary protein content may also affect ammonia emission from manure. James et al. (1999) found that decreasing N intake of Holstein heifers by 14% resulted in a 28.1% reduction in ammonia loss from manure (mixed feces and urine). Significant decreases in concentrations of urinary urea N and total N and in proportions of N excreted in the urine were also observed (James et al., 1999). Frank and Swensson (2002) found that manure from dairy cows fed low protein diets emitted significantly less ammonia than manure from cows fed high protein diets. Finally, Marini and Van Amburgh (2003) observed linear decreases in excretion of both urea N and total urinary N in heifers fed diets with reduced N content.
Although the dietary content of nutrients other than protein do affect N excretion, little published research exists on the effect of other dietary factors on ammonia volatilization from manure. Starch availability affects N retention and excretion in lactating cows by altering ruminal microbial N metabolism (Clark et al., 1992) and also by changing the amount of starch fermented in the large intestine. Increased large intestinal starch fermentation increases the recycling of blood urea N into microbial N, causing an increase in fecal N excretion (Orskov et al., 1970; Wilkerson et al., 1997; Knowlton et al., 1998). The effect of starch availability on ammonia volatilization from manure is unknown. Dietary P content affects ruminal fermentation, but little work has been done to assess its effect on N digestion and metabolism in cows. The overall objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of starch source, dietary phytate P content, and their interaction on nutrient partitioning and excretion in lactating dairy cows. In this manuscript, the effects of treatment on N digestion, partitioning, and excretion and ammonia loss from manure are reported.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatment diets contained 61% forage. The low P diets (L) (DG-L, SF-L) were formulated to contain 0.34% P. Purified phytic acid (PA) was added to the basal diets to create the high P diets (DG-PA, SF-PA). Flake density of the SF was 386 g/L. Ingredient composition of the diets is listed in Table 1
.
|
Experimental Design and Sampling
Total collection study.
Experimental design, treatment rations, feeding protocol, and collection and sampling of feed refusals, feces, urine, and milk were described by Guyton et al. (2003). Briefly, 8 cows were grouped by calving date and previous milk yield and assigned to one of 2, 4 x 4 Latin squares. Each experimental period lasted 18 d. Cows were fed in Calan doors for the first 14 d of each period and were moved to individual stalls on d 15 for total collection of feces, urine, and milk. On d 15, a sterile Foley urine catheter (22 French, 75 cc; C.R. Bard, Inc., Covington, GA) was inserted into the urethra for total collection of urine. All excreted urine, feces, and milk were collected on d 16, 17, and 18. Urine was weighed at 4-h intervals. Except for subsamples collected for the ammonia volatilization study (detailed below), urine was acidified (22 mL of 6 N HCI/kg of urine), thoroughly mixed and subsampled daily. All excreted feces were collected at 4-h intervals and stored in a sealed container then weighed, thoroughly mixed, and subsampled daily.
Ammonia volatilization study.
Samples of feces and unacidified urine were collected on d 18 of each collection period by subsampling the total excreta produced that day. Fecal samples (wet) and unacidified urine (in sterile containers) from each cow were immediately transported to the laboratory for use in the ammonia volatilization study. Total feces and urine excretion data from d 18 of each period were used to determine the urine:feces excretion ratio (wet basis) for each animal. Feces and urine from each cow were mixed in the proportions excreted in a 400-mL sealed chamber, forming a slurry to characterize potential ammonia volatilization. Duplicate chambers were prepared for each animal. Chambers were prepared within 30 min of feces and urine sampling.
Chamber lids were fitted with 3 airtight junctions to Teflon tubing (0.32 cm i.d.). Inlet air to the samples (25 psi) was filtered through 3 anhydrous CaSO4 columns (W. A. Hammond Drierite Co., Xenia, OH) to remove water and impurities and through an acid trap containing 3.6 N H2SO4 to absorb ammonia. A manifold was used to divert the air stream into sample chambers containing the slurries. Exhaust air from each sample container was delivered through Teflon tubing to 2 consecutive 250-mL acid traps, each containing 125 mL 3.6 N H2SO4 (Figure 1
). Samples were collected on a planned time course at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, and 36 h following mixing of urine and feces. Samples from the acid traps were sealed and refrigerated until analysis.
|
|
Statistical Analysis
All data were statistically analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS (SAS, 1999) with the model
![]() |
where
| µ | = | overall mean,
| Gi | = | random effect of square (i = 1 to 2),
| Cj(G)i | = | random effect of cow within square (j = 1 to 4),
| Dk | = | fixed effect of period (k = 1 to 4),
| Sl | = | fixed effect of starch source (l = 1 to 2),
| Pm | = | fixed effect of P source (m = 1 to 2),
| (S * P)lm | = | effect of interaction of Sl and Pm, and
| eijklm | = | residual error.
|
Residual error was used to test main effects and interactions. Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05, and trends were declared at P < 0.10. Results are reported as least square means.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Manure Production and Composition
Effect of starch source.
Cows fed SF had reduced excretion of feces DM and urine when compared with cows fed DG (Table 3
). Cows fed SF had wetter feces (Table 4
), so feces production on a wet basis was not affected by treatment. Cows fed SF tended to have lower total water excretion (fecal water + urine; P < 0.07) than did cows fed DG, and cows fed SF also excreted less total manure (urine + feces, wet basis). The concentration of N in feces was higher in cows fed SF (Table 4
) because the diet DM was more digestible than the DG diet.
|
|
There are no other published data on the effect of starch source on urine excretion in lactating cows. The observed change in urine output and total water excretion may be related to the effect of starch source on DMI (Guyton et al., 2003), which might have affected water intake. No measurements of water consumption were obtained in this experiment, but Woodford et al. (1984) observed a significant increase in water consumption (35.6 to 65.2 L/d) when DMI increased in Holstein cows (9.6 to 16.2 kg/d). Murphy et al. (1983) also reported a positive relationship between DMI and water consumption.
Effect of PA supplementation.
Supplementation with PA did not affect excretion of feces, but cows fed PA excreted more urine (+1.9 kg/d) than did cows fed the L diet (Table 3
). No other experiments have reported an effect of dietary P source or content on urine excretion. The effect of PA supplementation on urine excretion is likely an indirect effect, but the biological mechanism is unclear. Diets were formulated to contain the same Na and K content with the same quantities of salt and other mineral supplements provided.
Cows fed PA tended to excrete drier feces (Table 4
), which may be related to the observation of increased urine excretion, as total water excretion (urine + fecal water) was similar in cows fed the L and PA diets.
N Intake, Digestion, and Excretion
Effect of starch source.
Because of the increase in DMI, N intake was higher in cows fed DG than in cows fed SF (Table 5
; 709.4 vs. 656.1 g/d). Zinn et al. (1995) and Theurer et al. (1999) reported no change in N intake when steers were fed diets containing SF instead of dry rolled corn. Plascencia and Zinn (1996), however, observed an increase in DMI and N intake when cows were fed SF compared with dry rolled corn.
|
Fecal, urinary, and total excretion of N was higher in cows fed DG than in cows fed SF (Table 5
). The increased fecal N excretion in cows fed DG was due to the increase in N intake and decreased N digestibility. This change in fecal N excretion with starch source appears contradictory to the decreased fecal N concentration observed with DG (Table 4
). The contradiction is explained by the offsetting changes in digestibility and fecal water content. Feces were drier in cows fed DG, DM digestibility lower, and fecal DM excretion higher. Therefore, total fecal N excretion (g/d) was higher in cows fed the DG diet than in cows fed SF despite reduced fecal N concentration (% of DM).
The decreased urinary N excretion observed when cows were fed SF was likely due both to decreased N intake and increased availability of nutrients to ruminal microorganisms in steam flaked grain. Urinary N is made up of unused absorbed N from all sources (ammonia N, microbial N, or feed N). Steam flaking disrupts the protein matrix surrounding starch granules, increasing their susceptibility to rumen fermentation (Kotarski et al., 1992). Increased ruminal availability of dietary starch would increase microbial N efficiency in cows fed SF compared with those fed DG, reducing absorption and excretion of urea N. Our observations agree with those of Prigge et al. (1976), who reported decreased urinary N excretion when lambs were fed high moisture corn compared with DG.
Cows fed SF had lower MUN concentrations than did cows fed DG, again indicating a greater efficiency of N utilization with the SF diet (Table 5
). Kohn et al. (2002) calculated a target range of MUN concentrations in Holstein cows of 8 to 12 mg/dL. The values reported in the current study are within this normal range. Milk urea N reflects efficiency of protein utilization and can be used as a predictor of urinary N excretion in dairy cattle (Jonker et al., 1998; Kauffman and St-Pierre, 2001). Jonker et al. (1998) and Kauffman and St-Pierre (2001) reported a positive, linear relationship between MUN concentration and urinary N excretion in lactating Holsteins and Jerseys. Dhiman et al. (2002) reported that cows fed SF had lower MUN concentrations than did cows fed DG. Prigge et al. (1976) observed that steers fed DG had higher levels of plasma urea N 2 h after feeding compared with steers fed high moisture corn and concluded that steers fed high moisture corn used N more efficiently.
Effect of PA supplementation.
Supplementation with PA had no effect on N intake, fecal N, apparent N digestibility, urinary N, milk N, total N excretion, and N balance (Table 5
). No effects of the interaction of the starch source and phytic acid supplementation on any of these measurements were observed.
Although no other studies have reported the effect of dietary P content on N metabolism, several researchers have reported that dietary P affects ruminal fermentation. Hall et al. (1961) observed increased in vitro cellulose digestion with increasing P concentration. The increased cellulose digestion was most marked with the initial addition of 20 (g P/mL of medium, and the response reached a plateau with concentrations >60 µg P/mL (1.94 mM). These concentrations are below normal concentrations of P in ruminal fluid. In sheep, ruminal P concentrations ranged from 2 to 15 mmol/L as dietary P increased from insufficient to adequate (Shirazi-Beechey et al., 1991). Beardsworth et al. (1989) observed ruminal P concentrations of 26 mmol/L in sheep fed a commercial pellet and chopped hay, and Tomas (1973) observed ruminal P concentrations of 23 to 30 mmol/L in sheep. Together, these studies indicate that ruminal fermentation is inhibited only in animals fed diets severely deficient in P. The positive P balance observed in the current study (Guyton et al., 2003) indicate that the L diet was not deficient in P, so no effect on ruminal microbial protein production would be expected with the addition of supplemental P.
Ammonia Emission
Effect of starch source.
Rate of ammonia loss from slurry (mixed feces and urine) was lower in cows fed SF than in cows fed DG, but cumulative N loss was highly variable and not affected by treatment (Table 6
). Although there is no published research reporting rates of ammonia emission from dairy manure, others have observed that reducing N excretion reduces total ammonia emission. James et al. (1999) found that decreasing N intake of Holstein heifers by 14% reduced urinary concentrations of N and urea N and reduced the proportion of N excreted in urine. Total N lost during incubation of manure samples was not affected by diet in the heifer study of James et al. (1999), but estimated ammonia N loss per head, calculated from ammonia volatilization, the ratio of urine N in the sample, and urinary N excretion by the animal, was reduced by 28% in the heifers fed the low protein diet (James et al., 1999). In another study with growing heifers fed diets varying in N content, excess N was excreted in the urine as urea N rather than in the feces (Marini and Van Amburgh, 2003). Frank and Swensson (2002) found that manure from dairy cows fed low protein diets contained less N and less ammonia. When they incubated manure in a ventilated chamber, ammonia concentration in the exhaust air was significantly lower for manure from cows fed the low protein diets.
|
Alternatively, starch source might have affected the proportion of ammonia and urea N in manure, affecting the susceptibility of excreted N to volatilization. Nitrogen in manure is in the form of ammonia N, urea N, and larger organic N compounds (undigested feed N, endogenous N, and microbial N residues). The first 2 forms of N are rapidly lost as ammonia; the latter is more slowly converted to ammonia. Reducing the proportion of slurry N that is in the form of ammonia or urea would be expected to reduce N volatilization. Urea N content of excreta and slurry was not analyzed, but the proportion of total N excreted that was from urine (and therefore the proportion placed in the chambers) was not affected by dietary starch source (Table 6
). This result suggests that the first explanation offered (reduced ammonia emission as a result of reduced N in the chambers) is more relevant. These observations are, however, specific to the experimental conditions. On the farm, actual ammonia emission is also a function of moisture and pH of manure, ambient temperature, and wind conditions.
Effect of PA supplementation.
Supplementation with PA did not affect rate of ammonia loss from manure (Table 6
). The interaction of starch source and PA affected rate of ammonia emission from manure (0.14, 0.17, 0.15, and 0.12 mg/h for DG-L, DG-PA, SF-L, and SF-PA). The biological explanation for this interaction was not readily apparent. The lowest rates of ammonia emission were observed in the diets highest in both P and ruminally available starch, and the interaction did not affect other relevant measures of manure N.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication July 24, 2003. Accepted for publication April 27, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Rezamand, S. M. Andrew, and T. A. Hoagland The Feeding Value of Extruded Corn Grain in a Corn Silage-Based Ration for High-Producing Holstein Cows and Heifers During Mid Lactation J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3475 - 3481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Miller, E. D. Berry, J. E. Wells, C. L. Ferrell, S. L. Archibeque, and H. C. Freetly Influence of genotype and diet on steer performance, manure odor, and carriage of pathogenic and other fecal bacteria. III. Odorous compound production J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2533 - 2545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Wu Utilization of Phosphorus in Lactating Cows Fed Varying Amounts of Phosphorus and Sources of Fiber J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2850 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |