JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lueking, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lueking, D.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:882-885
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Hot Topic: Effects of Frequent Milking in Early Lactation on Milk Yield and Udder Health

G. E. Dahl1, R. L. Wallace2, R. D. Shanks1 and D. Lueking3

1 Department of Animal Sciences and
2 College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
3 Lueking Dairy Farm, Centralia, IL 62250

Corresponding author: G. Dahl; E-mail: gdahl{at}uiuc.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 REFERENCES
 
A field study was conducted to evaluate the influence of milking frequency (3 or 6 times/d [3x or 6x, respectively]) during the initial 21 d of lactation on milk and milk component yield and mammary gland health as indicated by somatic cell count. During 2 seasons, spring and fall, multiparous cows were milked 6 times/d until d 21 of lactation and then returned to the 3 times/d frequency for the remainder of lactation (6x; n = 9). Multiparous cows milked 3 times/d from the beginning of lactation served as a control group (3x; n = 17). With the exception of milking frequency, all other aspects of management, including housing, milk harvesting, and feeding, were identical between the groups and were consistent with industry norms. Retrospective analysis of Dairy Herd Improvement Association records was used to evaluate milk yield, milk component yield, and somatic cell scores. As expected, 6x cows produced more milk on the first test day than 3x cows. Compared with 3x cows, higher milk yields persisted for 6x cows from test day 2 through 6, indicating a persistent effect of early lactation milking frequency on milk yield potential for that lactation. Milk component yield followed a similar pattern: 6x cows produced significantly more protein, fat, and total solids than did control cows throughout the study. With regard to udder health, 6x cows had lower somatic cell counts at the first test day relative to 3x cows and had reduced somatic cell scores for the first 3 mo of lactation, which suggests that early lactation milking frequency influences the mammary gland capacity to resist infection in addition to improving milk production efficiency.

Key Words: early lactation • frequent milking • somatic cell score

Abbreviation key: 3x = milking 3 times/d, 6x = milking 6 times/d, PRL = prolactin

Increasing the frequency of milk removal increases milk production in cattle as it does in many species (Stelwagen, 2001). Indeed, this is a common management approach to maximize production per cow and to fully optimize capital investment in machinery and facilities. One obvious drawback is the increase in variable costs, mainly labor, required to reap the higher milk yield. Traditionally, this technique has been employed throughout lactation, but recent evidence suggests that frequent milking, appropriately timed within the lactation cycle, can have persistent effects, eliminating some of the higher costs while maintaining higher yields. Bar-Peled et al. (1995) observed higher production in cows milked 6 times/d (6x) relative to 3 times/d (3x) during the initial 42 d of lactation. More importantly, the production response was strikingly persistent following a return to 3x from 6x at d 42. That is, cows milked 6x continued to yield more milk even after milking frequency was reduced to 3x. A preliminary report by Henshaw et al. (2000) confirmed, under field conditions, that milking cows 6x in early lactation produces persistent improvements in milk yield even after cows returned to 3x. For the first 42 d of lactation, cows were milked 3x at 8-h intervals or 6x at approximately 4- to 5-h intervals. After d 42, all cows were milked 3x for the rest of the study, which lasted through 38 wk of lactation. Relative to those milked 3x, multiparous cows milked 6x produced more milk throughout the study.

Milk yield, however, may not be the only benefit of increased milking frequency in early lactation. Frequent milk removal is associated with reductions in somatic cells (Kelly et al., 1998; Smith et al., 2002), a general indicator of mammary gland health. Yet no previous studies have reported the effect of frequent milking in early lactation on any aspect of udder health. Further, the lower limit of number of days that cows need to be milked at higher frequency to observe a persistency response, particularly under management conditions observed in the field, has not been identified. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of milking 6x vs. 3x for the initial 21 d of lactation on milk yield and udder health as indicated by SCS.

During Spring and Fall 2001, 9 cows were assigned at calving to 6x milking for 21 d after parturition. All remaining multiparous cows in the herd (n = 17) that calved within 2 mo of the 6x cows were used as controls to test for main effects of 6x milking on milk and milk component yield and udder health. All work was completed at Lueking Dairy, a commercial farm located in Centralia, Illinois. Milking times were 0600, 1400, and 2200 h for all cows, and 6x cows were milked an additional 3 times at 0800, 1600, and 2400 h. Cows were housed together and managed according to common commercial techniques, including ad libitum TMR feeding (31.1% corn silage, 31.1% ground corn, 16.6% alfalfa hay, 10.4% corn gluten, 8.3% cottonseed, 1.5% urea, and 1% vitamin-mineral premix), bST according to label directions, and DHIA testing of fluid milk and component production. Fresh feed was offered 3 times/d after milking.

Data was collected from Dairy Herd Improvement for test day and lactation totals. Lactation totals included DHI variables of summit milk, peak milk, days in milk at peak, 305-d milk yield, mature equivalent 305-d milk yield, actual corrected 305-d milk, and lactation average SCS. Because cows were assigned to treatments in groups based on sequence of freshening, covariates were included in the model for PTA for milk and inbreeding (Young et al., 1969). Therefore, model for lactation totals included main effect of treatment (i.e., 3x vs. 6x for 21 d) and covariates for PTA milk and inbreeding. Least squares means for 3x and 6x milking were adjusted for differences in PTA and inbreeding of the cows in the study. Some caution must be used in interpreting the results of the lactation totals because variables were not independent. Test day data included milk per day and SCS on test day for 10 test d per cow. As a part of a repeated measures analysis, each test day was analyzed separately with a model that included main effect of treatment (3x vs. 6x for 21 d) and covariates for PTA milk and inbreeding. All cows were milked an equal number of times per day during the 2nd through 10th test days. Cows milked 3x averaged 103 ± 125 for PTA milk with a range of -811 to 974. Cows milked 6x averaged 185 ± 178 for PTA milk with a range of -674 to 983. Inbreeding of cows milked 3x averaged 4.5 ± 0.4% with a range of 2 to 8%, whereas 6x cows averaged 4.1 ± 0.6% with a range of 2 to 9%.

Relative to a 3x milking frequency, cows milked at 6x produced more milk from the first DHIA test day, and greater milk yields persisted through the 6th test day (Figure 1Go). Overall, 6x cows produced 1,118 kg more milk over the 305-d lactation than did cows milked 3x (Table 1Go). Similar increases were observed for mature equivalent milk and milk production corrected for components in the 6x cows relative to those milked 3x (Table 1Go). Compared with 3x cows, 6x cows had higher summit and peak milk yield and achieved peak at fewer days in milk (Table 1Go).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Test day average (least squares mean) milk yield of cows milked 6 times/d (6x; {blacksquare}; n = 9) for the initial 21 d of lactation or milked 3 times/d (3x; {square}; n = 17) for the initial 21 d of lactation. All cows were milked 3x for the remainder of lactation. Standard error of the mean ranged from 2.04 to 3.11 kg/d. Test day average milk yields past test day 5 were not significantly different between 3x and 6x treatments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Analysis of variance, including mean squares (MS) and mean comparisons of various production traits of cows milked 3 times/d (3x) or 6 times/d (6x) for the initial 21 d of lactation.
 
Results of the present study are consistent with previous reports that a "window" in early lactation exists when 6x milking frequency causes milk yield responses that persist for the entire lactation, even after milking frequency is reduced to 3x (Bar-Peled et al., 1995; Henshaw et al., 2000). In addition, our results extend those studies by indicating that the window is not 42 d, but as little as 21 d, which is in agreement with a report by Hale et al. (2003) that 21 d of milking at a frequency of 4 times/d was sufficient to produce persistent, positive effects on milk yield for that lactation relative to control cows milked 2 times/d. Further, results of the present study support the concept that as little as a 2-h interval between milkings is sufficient to induce the persistent response. Hale et al. (2003) had previously identified this interval as 3 h when cows were milked 4 vs. 2 times/d in early lactation.

In addition to the production responses, 6x cows also had lower SCS relative to 3x cows. This reduction in SCS was most apparent during the 21 d when milking frequency was increased, but a tendency (P = 0.138) for this decrease in SCS persisted for the entire lactation (Table 1Go). Examination by Chi-square analysis using a 200,000-cell/mL cutoff provided further evidence of improved udder health with more frequent milking (Table 2Go). Previous reports indicate that milking frequency is inversely related to indices of udder health such as SCS (Kelly et al., 1998; Smith et al., 2002); however, those studies examined SCS while the cows were milked at higher frequency and did not note effects after milking frequency was reduced. Our data support the concept of an inverse relationship between milking frequency and SCS while cows are milked more frequently, but also suggest that there may be a persistent effect of early lactation milking frequency on SCS.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Chi-square analysis of SCC (1000/mL) of cows milked 3 times/d (3x; n = 17) or 6 times/d (6x; n = 9) for the initial 21 d of lactation. Columns represent the number of cows within each treatment that had SCC > or <200,000 cells/mL of milk on that test day. Both {chi}2 and continuity adjusted {chi}2 significance levels are presented.
 
A potential mechanistic explanation for the responses of milk yield and udder health is the impact of milking frequency on prolactin (PRL) release, particularly in early lactation. Prolactin promotes differentiation of mammary epithelial cells, and an increase in the number of fully differentiated mammary cells would be expected to be associated with greater milk yield (Akers et al., 1981; Capuco et al., 2001). Circulating PRL increases in response to milking (Tucker, 1971); thus, cows milked 6x would have double the number of daily PRL release events that 3x cows experience. We observed that increased milking frequency from 1 to 21 d in milk is associated with an increase not only in PRL but in the expression of PRL receptor as well (Dahl et al., 2002), which suggests that cows milked more frequently are more sensitive to PRL and might have greater numbers of mammary cells that differentiate and produce milk during that lactation. Evidence from our laboratory supports the concept that alteration of PRL sensitivity, particularly increases in PRL receptor expression, enhances immune function both in vitro and in vivo (Auchtung et al., 2003a,b). Therefore, shifts in PRL sensitivity may underlie the observed improvements in milk yield and udder health observed when cows are milked at higher frequencies in the initial 21 d of lactation

Received for publication July 18, 2003. Accepted for publication December 19, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 REFERENCES
 


Akers, R. M., D. E. Bauman, A. V. Capuco, G. T. Goodman, and H. A. Tucker. 1981. Prolactin regulation of milk secretion and biochemical differentiation of mammary epithelial cells in periparturient cows. Endocrinology 109:23–30.[Medline]

Auchtung, T. L., P. E. Kendall, J. L. Salak-Johnson, T. B. McFadden, and G. E. Dahl. 2003a. Photoperiod and bromocriptine treatment effects on expression of prolactin receptor mRNA in bovine liver, mammary gland, and peripheral blood lymphocytes. J. Endocrinol. 179:347–356.[Abstract]

Auchtung, T. L., D. E. Morin, C. Mallard, and G. E. Dahl. 2003b. Photoperiod manipulation during the dry period: Effects on general health and mastitis occurrence. Pages 278–279 in Proc. Natl. Mast. Counc. 42nd Mtg., Fort Worth, TX. National Mastitis Council, Madison, WI.

Bar-Peled, U., E. Maltz, I. Bruckental, Y. Folman, Y. Kali, H. Gacitua, A. R. Lehrer, C. H. Knight, B. Robinzon, H. Voet, and H. Tagari. 1995. Relationship between frequent milking or suckling in early lactation and milk production of high producing dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 78:2726–2736.[Abstract]

Capuco, A. V., D. L. Wood, R. Baldwin, K. Mcleod, and M. J. Paape. 2001. Mammary cell number, proliferation, and apoptosis during a bovine lactation: Relation to milk production and effect of bST. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2177–2187.[Abstract]

Dahl, G. E., T. L. Auchtung, J. P. Underwood, and J. K. Drackley. 2002. Frequent milking in early lactation that increases milk yield also increases prolactin receptor mRNA expression. J. Anim. Sci. 80(Suppl. 1):53. (Abstr.)

Hale, S. A., A. V. Capuco, and R. A. Erdman. 2003. Milk yield and mammary growth effects due to increased milking frequency during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2061–2070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Henshaw, A. H., M. Varner, and R. A. Erdman. 2000. The effects of six times a day milking in early lactation on milk yield, milk composition, body condition and reproduction. J. Dairy Sci. 83(Suppl. 1):242. (Abstr.)

Kelly, A. L., S. Reid, P. Joyce, W. J. Meaney, and J. Foley. 1998. Effect of decreased milking frequency of cows in late lactation on milk somatic cell count, polymorphonuclear leucocyte numbers, composition and proteolytic activity. J. Dairy Res. 65:365–373.[Medline]

Smith, J. W., L. O. Ely, W. M. Graves, and W. D. Gilson. 2002. Effect of milking frequency on DHI performance measures. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3526–3533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stelwagen, K. 2001. Effect of milking frequency on mammary function and shape of the lactation curve. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E204–E211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tucker, H. A. 1971. Hormonal response to milking. J. Anim. Sci. 32(Suppl 1):137–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Young, C. W., W. J. Tyler, A. E. Freeman, H. H. Voelker, L. D. McGilliard, and T. M. Ludwick. 1969. Inbreeding investigations with dairy cattle in the north central United States. Tech. Bull. 266, North Central Reg. Res. Publ. 191. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. H. Wall and T. B. McFadden
Use it or lose it: Enhancing milk production efficiency by frequent milking of dairy cows
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 27 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. O'Dowd, J. C. Kent, J. M. Moseley, and M. E. Wlodek
Effects of uteroplacental insufficiency and reducing litter size on maternal mammary function and postnatal offspring growth
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R539 - R548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. H. Wall and T. B. McFadden
Optimal Timing and Duration of Unilateral Frequent Milking During Early Lactation of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5042 - 5048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. R. Rastani, N. S. Del Rio, T. F. Gressley, G. E. Dahl, and R. R. Grummer
Effects of Increasing Milking Frequency During the Last 28 Days of Gestation on Milk Production, Dry Matter Intake, and Energy Balance in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1729 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. H. Wall and T. B. McFadden
The Milk Yield Response to Frequent Milking in Early Lactation of Dairy Cows Is Locally Regulated
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 716 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. Ouweltjes, B. Beerda, J. J. Windig, M. P. L. Calus, and R. F. Veerkamp
Effects of Management and Genetics on Udder Health and Milk Composition in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 229 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. H. Wall, H. M. Crawford, S. E. Ellis, G. E. Dahl, and T. B. McFadden
Mammary Response to Exogenous Prolactin or Frequent Milking During Early Lactation in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4640 - 4648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. J. VanBaale, D. R. Ledwith, J. M. Thompson, R. Burgos, R. J. Collier, and L. H. Baumgard
Effect of Increased Milking Frequency in Early Lactation With or Without Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3905 - 3912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lueking, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lueking, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS