|
|
||||||||
1 ADAS Bridgets Dairy Research Center, Martyr Worthy, Hants, UK
2 Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Weybridge, Surrey, UK
Corresponding author: R. A. Laven, e-mail: r.laven{at}ed.sac.ac.uk.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: housing methionine hoof horn hemorrhages
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hoof horn disease is a complex multifactorial disease in which nutritional and environmental factors play important roles (Vermunt, 2000). Previous research at ADAS Bridgets (Livesey et al., 1998) showed that primiparous cows in early lactation housed in straw yards had fewer and less severe, white line and sole hemorrhages than did primiparous cows housed in cubicles with butyl rubber mats and wood shavings bedding. In the same study, cows kept in cubicles and fed a higher forage diet had a lower incidence of sole hemorrhages than did those in the same housing fed a high starch diet.
Methionine is a limiting essential nutrient during early lactation, and commercial dairy cows frequently respond to methionine supplementation by increasing milk yield (Rulquin et al., 1993). Sulfur amino acids are probably also rate-limiting substrates in the production of hard keratins (Fraser et al., 1972; Clark and Rakes, 1982); therefore, a sub-optimal supply of methionine in early lactation might cause changes in the rate of keratin synthesis and the quality of hard keratin synthesized. Such results might affect hoof horn growth rate or quality and consequently affect susceptibility to the development of sole and white line hemorrhages.
This study was designed to investigate the effects of housing and nutrition on the development of hoof horn disease (as identified by the appearance of hoof horn hemorrhages) in postpartum, primiparous Holstein cows. The first objective was to investigate whether replacing butyl rubber cubicle mats with mattresses filled with chopped rubber would decrease the incidence and severity of sole and white line hemorrhages in early lactation. The second objective was to investigate the effect of methionine supplementation in early lactation on the development of these hemorrhages.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 3 primary treatments imposed were 3 different housing systems, all within the same single-span building, from 4 wk before predicted calving date until 26 wk after calving. Twenty cows were allocated to each of these housing treatments.
The secondary treatment was the level of dietary methionine. Ten of the 20 cows on each housing treatment received the control diet; the remaining 10 cows received an additional 15 g/d of protected methionine (Smartamine; Rhone-Poulenc, Antony, France) from calving until 13 wk later. Details of the diets are shown in Table 1
. The concentration of methionine present in the methionine-supplemented diet was estimated (applying the French PDI system) to be 115% of requirements (Rulquin et al., 1993), but no analyses were carried out to confirm the total amount of methionine present in both diets. As cows were individually fed within each housing treatment, those cows receiving methionine were housed in the same pens as cows on the control diet.
|
Treatment 2A cubicle (free stall) yard fitted with butyl rubber mats (Cow Comfort Ltd., Lancashire, UK).
There was an allowance of one cubicle per cow. Cubicle beds were 2.3 m long x 1.2 m clear between divisions, with a 75-mm fall from front to rear and 0.2-m rear step. The cubicle divisions were cantilevered, free-standing galvanized tubing. The cubicles were bedded daily with sawdust, and lime was applied weekly as a desiccant and disinfectant. The feed passage was of identical design to the equivalent passage in the straw yard.
Treatment 3A cubicle yard fitted with mattresses (Batchelor Farm Supplies, Dorset, UK).
The mattresses consisted of chopped rubber from recycled tires encased by a water-resistant hessian bag. There was an allowance of one cubicle per cow; the cubicle and feed passage design and management and space allocation were the same as for Treatment 2.
Concrete passages were cleaned by automatic slurry scrapers. These operated 4 times daily in the feed passages for both the cubicles and straw yards. An additional scraper in the passage between the cubicle rows operated 6 times daily.
All heifers calved in straw yards. They were moved into these straw yards from dry cow accommodation in a single cubicle yard approximately 2 d before calving and were allocated to the appropriate housing systems at 4 to 5 d after calving.
For the first 13 wk of lactation, all cattle were individually fed a TMR once daily through either Calan Broadbent individual feeders (straw yard) or Griffith Elder individual feeders (cubicle yards). For the remaining 13 wk of the study, all of the cows were group fed the same TMR, which was similar to the control diet.
Measurements and Records
The ADAS Bridgets dairy unit was an accredited facility for good laboratory practice. All studies were carried out under a formally documented quality system, including the use of standard operating procedures, appropriate training of personnel to use equipment and carry out examinations, calibration of equipment such as weighing machines, and auditable recording of all results.
Dry matter intakes were recorded for individual animals for the first 13 wk of lactation. This was achieved by supplying a weighed amount of TMR daily in individual feeder hoppers, collecting the residual TMR the following day, weighing it, and subtracting the residual amount from the amount supplied. These measurements were averaged to produce a mean daily individual cow intake for each week of the study.
Individual milk yields were recorded at each milking and averaged to produce a mean daily yield for each cow for each week. Milk fat and protein concentrations were measured at 4-wk intervals using the MilkoScan system (Foss, Hillerd, Denmark).
The locomotion score of each animal was determined weekly from 4 wk prepartum until the end of the study at 26 wk postpartum using the 0- to 5-point scale in 0.5-point increments devised by Manson and Leaver (1988). The cows were walked and turned on a level concrete surface to assess locomotion score. A single experienced operator carried out all of the assessments.
Live weight and body condition scores were determined monthly throughout the study. All-flex weigh beams were used to weigh the cattle. These were calibrated and serviced prior to the beginning of the study. Condition scoring was carried out using a 0- to 5-point scale in 0.5-point increments (Anon, 1986). Two trained operators carried out all measurements
Foot lesion assessments for both hind feet were made approximately 4 wk before predicted calving date and during wk 1, 6, 12, and 26 after calving. Lesions were recorded in the manner recommended by Greenough and Vermunt (1994). The type and sites of the lesions were indicated on a hoof map (Figure 1
).
|
|
Statistical Analyses
All continuous data were modeled using a repeat measures ANOVA with cow as the random factor and level of methionine supplementation, type of housing, and time in relation to calving as the fixed factors. The residuals were examined for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Residuals for lesion score data were not normally distributed; thus, the data were transformed. Square root transformation of this dataset produced the best fit; thus, the square-root transformed lesion data were analyzed using the same repeated measures ANOVA. The Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to analyze locomotion score data. Further analysis of significant effects was undertaken using Tukeys test where the ANOVA results indicated a significant effect. All analyses were undertaken using Statistica (StatSoft Ltd., Bedford, UK) except for the Tukeys test, which was undertaken using Minitab 13 (Minitab Inc.)
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Milk Yield and Composition
There was a significant effect of time on milk yield (P < 0.05). Milk yield increased in early lactation, peaking at approximately wk 12 of lactation. Methionine supplementation apparently consistently increased milk yield. Over the 26-wk period of the study, the mean additional milk yield of cows supplemented with methionine over cows fed the control diet was 250 kg, although methionine supplementation ceased at wk 13 of the study. This effect of methionine supplementation on milk yield is summarized in Figure 2
. However, this increase in milk yield was not statistically significant (P > 0.1). There was also no significant effect of housing on milk yield (P >0.1). Furthermore, there were no significant interactions between housing, diet, and time on milk yield (P > 0.1).
|
|
|
Live Weight and Body Condition Score
Mean live weight and body condition score were reduced immediately postpartum in all treatment groups. The nadir for live weight was reached between 4 and 8 wk postpartum, whereas the nadir for body condition score was not reached until 20 wk postpartum. There were no significant effects or interactions of diet or housing on live weight and body condition score (P > 0.1); however, methionine-fed cows had consistently lower live weights and body condition scores throughout the period between calving and 26 wk postpartum.
Hoof Horn Hemorrhages
White line hemorrhages.
The changes in white line hemorrhage score during the study period are summarized for each treatment group in Table 3
.
|
|
Primiparous cows kept on straw had significantly lower (P < 0.001) mean white line hemorrhage scores over the study period (1.6 ± 0.17) than did cows kept on mattresses (2.7 ± 0.2) or mats (3.0 ± 0.19). However, no significant differences were found between cows on mats or mattresses (P > 0.1). There was a similar effect on peak white line hemorrhage score. The mean peak white line hemorrhage score for cows on mats (5.2 ± 0.24) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the mean peak score for cows on straw yards (3.2 ± 0.3), but was not significantly different (P > 0.1) from the hemorrhage score of cows on mattresses (5.0 ± 0.24). There was no significant effect of methionine supplementation on white line hemorrhages (P > 0.1), nor were there any significant interactions between diet, housing, and time (P > 0.1).
Sole hemorrhages.
The changes in sole hemorrhage score during the study period are summarized for each treatment group in Table 4
.
|
|
The effect of housing on sole hemorrhages at specific times was significant only at wk 12 (P < 0.05), although the effect was almost significant at the 5% level at wk 26 (P = 0.06). Comparison of the mean hemorrhage score at wk 12 of cows on mats with those of cows on straw showed that cows on mats had significantly higher (P < 0.05) sole hemorrhage scores than those on straw (3.4 ± 0.3 vs. 2.3 ± 0.34). There was no significant difference between the mean sole lesion scores of cows on mattresses (3.7 ± 0.3) and those of cows on mats (P > 0.05). The effect on mean peak sole lesion score was similar to that observed for white line hemorrhages; the mean peak score for cows on mats (3.8 ± 0.21) was higher (P < 0.01) than that of cows in straw yards (2.9 ± 0.27), but not different from those on mattresses (4.2 ± 0.24).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The findings of this study are also in agreement with the evidence from Livesey et al. (1998) that the pathogeneses of white line and sole hemorrhages, although similar, are probably not identical. In this study, differences in white line hemorrhages recorded between cows on straw and those on mats were visible at wk 6, 12, and 26 for white line hemorrhages but only at wk 12 for sole hemorrhages. More research is required to increase our understanding of the difference in pathogenesis between white line and sole hemorrhages, as these differences may have a major impact on clinical disease and prevention regimes.
The trend in locomotion score is also in agreement with other studies that have shown a significant increase in locomotion score postpartum (Chaplin et al., 2000). No significant effect of housing or diet on locomotion score was recorded. However, group mean locomotion score is an insensitive measure of lameness unless there is a moderately high prevalence of high locomotion scores within the particular group. In this study, there was very little lameness recorded, only 12 of the 60 cows had locomotion scores greater then 2.5, of which only 4 were lame on more than 3 occasions.
Thus, these results cannot be used as firm evidence that none of the treatments predisposed cows to lameness. Types of foot lameness, such as excessive wear and penetrations, require harsh underfoot conditions such as sharp objects, rough concrete, or excessive walking on roads and tracks. The treatments imposed in this study might have predisposed cows to lameness (as suggested by the differences in hemorrhage score), but lameness might not have occurred in the absence of necessary risk factors. The husbandry conditions in this study were very benign. The concrete in the yards was in good condition, there was no exposure to flints or similar sharp objects, the cows had only a short walk to the milking parlor, there were adequate numbers of cubicles provided for all cows to lie down simultaneously, and there was no evidence of bullying or other behavioral abnormalities.
This study found no apparent benefit, in terms of reduction in hoof horn hemorrhages, of replacing butyl rubber mats with chopped rubber mattresses, although cows on mattresses spent more time lying down than cows on mats (J. Metcalf, unpublished observations) and suffered significantly less hock damage (Livesey et al., 2002). For sole hemorrhages, it is possible that the large temporal changes in hemorrhage scores obscured any effect of cubicle bedding, as there was an interaction between time and housing; however, for white line hemorrhage, there was no such interaction. It is also possible that the presence of additional risk factors, particularly harsh underfoot conditions, induced larger differences in hemorrhage scores to be expressed between treatments.
In this study, the changes in appetite, milk yield, live weight, and body condition score followed the expected pattern for a well-managed, TMR-fed group of primiparous Holstein cattle. The higher mean milk yield (250 kg) achieved by methionine-supplemented cows (Figure 2
) than control cows over the 26-wk study was biologically and economically significant. However, this did not attain statistical significance, probably because of the innate variation in milk production between individual animals, especially in first lactation. This study lacked the statistical power to detect such differences in milk yield. Nevertheless the results do suggest that the amount of methionine in the control diet was probably sub-optimal and that the methionine-supplemented group was not receiving excess methionine.
Methionine supplementation had no significant effect on hoof hemorrhage scores in this study. Furthermore, the differences in hemorrhage scores between methionine-supplemented and control animals were, unlike the response in milk yield, not consistent (either in favor of, or detrimental to, the cows fed methionine). The differences were also much smaller in magnitude than the significant differences observed in sole and white line hemorrhages in other studies at ADAS Bridgets and elsewhere in response to treatments that varied the proportions of forage to concentrates and types of fermentable carbohydrate (Livesey et al., 1998; Blowey et al., 2000). This result suggests that, in contrast to the effect on milk production, the control diet was not sub-optimal in regard to prevention of hoof horn hemorrhages. The results obtained do not preclude the possibility that methionine could have had a beneficial effect on hoof horn hemorrhages if the control diet in this study had contained a lower concentration of methionine. As methionine supplementation could also have an adverse effect if supplementation was excessive, a dose response study, using a larger group of animals, where the total amounts of methionine in the experimental diets were known, would be needed to investigate the benefits and limitations of methionine supplementation further.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication October 1, 2003. Accepted for publication November 4, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Hinterhofer, J. C. Ferguson, V. Apprich, H. Haider, and C. Stanek Slatted Floors and Solid Floors: Stress and Strain on the Bovine Hoof Capsule Analyzed in Finite Element Analysis J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |