|
|
||||||||




,1
,2

,3
,4
,5
,6
,7
* Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel 76100
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 24061
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Arizona
|| University Animal Care, University of Arizona
Corresponding author: H. Tagari; e-mail: tagari{at}agri.huji.il.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: amino acid peptide dairy cow flaked corn
Abbreviation key: EAA = essential AA, FAA = free AA, GIT = gastrointestinal tract, MEE = mammary extraction efficiency, MU = mammary upake, NEAA = non-essential AA, PAH = p-aminohippuric acid, PB = peptide-bound, PDV = portal-drained viscera, PBAA = peptide bound AA, SFC = steam-flaked corn, SRC = steam-rolled corn
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There has been controversy, however, regarding methods employed to quantify PBAA and PBAA fluxes across tissues. At issue was the completeness of plasma protein removal by various precipitation methods and the ability to accurately quantify small arteriovenous differences. Variable contributions of PBAA to the total concentration of FAA plus PBAA in arterial plasma have been reported (65%, Koeln et al., 1993; 26 to 28%, Seal and Parker, 1996; 38%, Remond et al., 2000). Likewise, variable contributions of PBAA to the total portal-drained visceral (PDV) flux of FAA and PBAA have been reported (89%, Koeln et al., 1993; 57 to 63%, Seal and Parker, 1996; 36 to 47%, Remond et al., 2000). That positive fluxes of PBAA across nonmesenteric-drained viscera have been reported suggests the possibility that there is preintestinal absorption of PBAA (Webb et al., 1993; Seal and Parker, 1996; Remond et al., 2000).
Less controversial is the evidence for the contributions of PBAA for milk protein synthesis and mammary metabolism. Results from in vivo studies indicate that the caprine mammary gland uses PBAA for milk protein synthesis (Backwell et al., 1996; Bequette et al., 1999). Met-containing peptides were reported to be used as Met sources for synthesis of secreted proteins by mammary tissue explants from mice (Wang et al., 1996) and for protein accretion in cultured MAC-T cells (Pan et al., 1996).
That diet can influence PDV flux of PBAA became known when lambs that were infused ruminally with CN had nearly twice the PDV flux of PBAA as did lambs not infused with CN (Remond et al., 2000). Therefore, it may well be that diets differing in RUP, ruminal microbial CP outflow, or composition of proteins may influence PBAA flux across the GIT and, consequently, PBAA availability for tissue utilization.
We hypothesize that PBAA are absorbed and are sources of AA for the mammary gland. The present study was conducted with lactating dairy cows fed regular dairy diets containing either steam-rolled (SRC) or steam-flaked corn (SFC) grain. The objective was to quantify the PDV, splanchnic, and hepatic fluxes of FAA and PBAA. In addition, mammary uptake (MU) from FAA and PBAA pools were compared with milk AA output.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
During sampling, cows were infused with a sterile aqueous solution (pH 7.4) of p-aminohippurric acid (PAH; 10%, wt/vol), which began 40 min prior to blood collection. Blood samples were drawn simultaneously from the artery, portal, hepatic, and mammary veins into heparinized syringes, 5 to 7 min before completion of PAH infusion. Six sets of each of the 4 samples were collected at 2-h intervals, starting before the first milking at 0600 h. Syringes containing the samples were immersed in an ice slurry (0 to 1°C). Then plasma was harvested from the individual blood samples, and a methanol filtrate was prepared (Delgado-Alorduy et al., 2002a). The individual filtrates were pooled into one sample/cow per day as previously described for FAA (Delgado-Alorduy et al., 2002a). Concentrations of PAH in blood samples were determined as described by Eisenman et al. (1987).
Feed and Milk Collection and Analysis
Feed and ort samples were obtained for 5 to 7 d prior to and on the day of sampling and were pooled for each cow and diet. Milk production was recorded daily and milk samples were collected twice daily for 4 d before and on the day of blood sampling. To enable the study of the relationship between PDV net appearance and MU of FAA and PBAA compared with AA secretion in milk, an extra milk sample was collected from the p.m. milking on the day of sampling.
Diets and orts were analyzed for DM, N, CP, total starch, NDF, and ADF. Daily milk samples were analyzed for protein using infrared procedures. Analytical protocols for all of these analyses were as described previously (Delgado-Elorduy et al., 2002a).
FAA and PBAA Determination in Plasma and AA in Milk
The AA composition of milk proteins and the FAA composition of milk and plasma were determined by protocols described previously (Delgado-Elorduy et al., 2002a). Briefly, methanol supernatants were filtered through passivated, Amicon Centricon YM-3 filter devices (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA) that had a cut-off of 3000 MW. Filtrates were collected in microcentrifuge tubes (catalog no. 05-664-34, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), purged with N2, and stored refrigerated (2°C) until analyzed. Filtered samples were analyzed for FAA and PBAA by HPLC using the Waters Pico-Tag method (Bidlingmeyer et al., 1984). Samples for PBAA were hydrolyzed in a HCl vapor at 112°C for 24 h prior to analysis. The HCl (constant boiling, catalog no. 24309, Pierce, Rockford, IL) contained sodium sulfite (0.1%, wt/vol) and phenol (1.1 mg/mL). Replicate analyses for FAA and PBAA from a particular sample were performed consecutively. The AA content of hydrolyzed samples was corrected for losses occurring during hydrolysis (Delgado-Elorduy et al., 2002a). The PBAA content of samples was calculated as the difference between the corrected AA content of hydrolyzed filtrates and the FAA content of filtrates. Recoveries for PB-Tyr following hydrolysis were very poor, hence, data for this PBAA are not presented.
Calculations of Blood Flow
Blood flow in portal and hepatic veins was calculated by downstream dilution of PAH as described by Katz and Bergman (1969), and was as follows:
![]() |
where BF is blood flow (L/h), PAHIR is infusion rate of PAH (15,000 mg/h), and PAH[V-A] is venoarterial concentration differences of PAH (mg/L). Hepatic artery blood flow (HABF) was calculated as the difference between hepatic and portal vein flows. Mammary blood flow was determined and calculated by Ficks principle as previously described (Delgado-Elorduy et al., 2002a).
To determine the proportion of plasma in whole blood, calculations were corrected for plasma contained in the packed cell portion of the hematocrit based on the assumption that 20% of the packed cell volume was plasma (Elwyn, 1966). Hematocrits of blood samples collected from different vessels were remarkably constant and varied only minimally (28.4 ± 0.04%) among animals. Therefore, an average corrected hematocrit value was used to calculate plasma flow by multiplying the blood flow by 0.7728 (proportion of corrected plasma in blood).
Calculation of Net Fluxes of FAA and PBAA
Calculations of net fluxes of FAA and PBAA (g/12 h) across PDV, liver, and splanchnic tissues, were as follows:
![]() |
where XFPDV, XFLiver, and XFSplanchnic are net fluxes of FAA or PBAA (g/12 h) of PDV, liver, and splanchnic tissues, respectively, PPF, HAPF, and HPF are portal vein, hepatic artery, and hepatic vein plasma flows, respectively, and X[P-A], X[H-A], and X[H-P] are portal-arterial, hepatic-arterial, and hepatic-portal differences (mg/L) for X (FAA or PBAA), respectively.
Calculations of liver extraction efficiency (LEE) were as follows:
![]() |
where LEE denotes liver extraction efficiency (%) and XA and XP denotes the concentrations (mg/L) of FAA or PBAA in plasma of the artery and portal veins, respectively. X[P-H] and X[A-H] are portal-hepatic and arterial-hepatic differences for FAA or PBAA (mg/L), respectively.
Mammary uptake or mammary flux (XFM, g/12 h) of FAA or PBAA and mammary extraction efficiency, % (MEE) were calculated according to Brockman and Bergman (1975) as:
![]() |
where FAA[A-M] and PBAA[A-M] = concentration differences between arterial plasma and mammary vein plasma for FAA and PBAA, respectively. MPF = mammary plasma flow and A and M are artery and mammary vein concentrations (mg/L), respectively of FAA or PBAA.
Concentration of PB Glu + Gln and PB Asp + Asn were calculated assuming that all free or PB-Gln and PB-Asn were converted quantitatively during hydrolysis to Glu and Asp and were determined as such, hence the equation was as follows:
![]() |
where TH-Glu = total Glu in the hydrolyzate, PB-Glu or PB-Gln = peptide-bound Glu or Gln and Glu or Gln = free Glu or Gln.
Statistical Analysis
Plasma concentrations, nutrient fluxes, and lactational performance data were analyzed by ANOVA using the general linear model procedure previously outlined (Delgado-Elorduy et al., 2002a). Significance of difference from zero was examined by t-test. Associations between variables were expressed by Pearson correlation coefficients. Significance for performance data and for plasma nutrient concentrations were declared at P < 0.05 and tendencies at P < 0.10, whereas for FAA and PBAA fluxes, ratios, or efficiencies, significance was declared at P < 0.10 and tendencies at P > 0.10 to to P < 0.2.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Feed Intake and Lactational Performance of Cows
Dry matter intake (kg/d) for the whole experimental period was similar for cows fed SRC compared with SFC (Table 2
). Milk yield (kg/12 h) was 14.2 and 13.5 kg/12 h (P < 0.05), for cows fed SFC and SRC, respectively. Milk CP yield was greater (P < 0.069) for cows fed the SFC diet than for cows fed the SRC (0.43 and 0.39 kg/12 h, respectively).
|
|
|
|
Portal concentrations of FAA and PBAA were similar in cows fed SFC and SRC (Table 4
). Hepatic concentrations of FAA and PBAA were slightly lower than those observed in the portal vein (NS) and were similar between treatments (Table 5
). Only levels of Asp and Thr were lower (P < 0.07 and 0.06, respectively) in cows fed SFC. Regarding concentrations of PBAA in the hepatic vein in comparison to the portal vein, fewer differed significantly from zero, which may be attributed to processing by the liver. However, concentrations of PB-His, PB-Lys, PB-Met, and PB-Thr of the EAA differed from zero (P < 0.001 to 0.1), and PB-Arg tended to be so. Concentrations of all PB branched chain AA and PB-Phe did not differ from zero.
Mammary vein concentrations of both FAA and PBAA (Table 6
) were affected by diet for more AA than was observed for concentrations in arterial (Table 3
) or hepatic (Table 5
) plasma. This could be expected in view of the differences in milk and protein output (Table 2
). Accordingly, concentrations of Arg, Ile, Leu, Orn, Pro, Thr, Val, and total EAA were lower (P < 0.025 to 0.09) when the cows were fed the SFC diet compared with the SRC diet. Concentrations of Asp, Lys, Phe, and total AA tended (P < 0.12 to 0.18) to be lower when cows were fed SFC. The same trend was observed for PBAA in the mammary vein, where concentrations were lower in cows fed SFC. Concentrations of PB-Arg, PB-Orn, PB-Ser, PB-Thr, and total PB-EAA were lower (P < 0.04 to 0.1), and there was a tendency towards lower concentrations of PB-Ala, PB-Gly, PB-Leu, PB-Lys, total PB-nonessential AA (NEAA), and total PBAA (P < 0.12 to 0.19) in cows that were fed SFC. Of the PBAA, only the concentrations of PB-Phe and PB-Ile in cows fed SFC and PB-Val in cows fed SRC did not differ significantly from zero. The proportion of total PBAA to total FAA (mg/L) in the plasma of the mammary vein was 26.5 and 30.1% for cows fed SFC and SRC, respectively. These were greater than in the other three blood vessels (average 21.5%). The ratio of total PB-EAA to total EAA was only 12.4 and 14.7% for SFC and SRC, respectively.
|
|
Liver flux (uptake).
The flux of more than half of the FAA in cows fed SFC diet differed from zero, but only a few differed from zero in the SRC diet (Table 8
). Among the EAA, it is interesting to note that liver uptake of BCAA, Arg, Lys, and Trp in both diets was relatively small and did not differ from zero in both treatments and His in cows fed SRC. Of the NEAA, relatively large quantities of Ala, Gly, Cit, Pro, Tyr, and Ser were extracted (P < 0.01 to 0.1) by the liver of cows fed SFC. On the other hand, large (P < 0.01 to 0.03) quantities of Glu, were delivered into the hepatic vein in cows fed both diets. Flux of Gln across the liver was not different from zero in cows fed SFC, whereas in cows fed SRC diets there was a tendency for it to be extracted by the liver. Nevertheless, in both types of corn, the FAA balance of Glu-Gln was positive, pointing at a supply by the liver of this FAA. The flux of many of the NEAA was observed to be significantly different from zero; however, differences observed between treatments were not significant.
|
Liver extraction efficiency, %.
In several instances, in both types of corn, extraction ratios of FAA or PBAA differed (P < 0.001 to 0.10) from zero even though the efficiencies were relatively low (Table 9
). Among the EAA, extraction of Met and Phe in both treatments, and for Thr in cows fed SFC, was relatively high. Of the NEAA in both treatments, high proportions of Ala, Gly, Ser, and Tyr in both treatments and Asn in cows fed SFC were extracted. Extraction in both treatments of total EAA averaged 2.9% and was not significant, whereas extraction of NEAA was 5.7% and, though small, differed from zero (P < 0.065). The extraction ratio of Glu was negative (P < 0.01; i.e., it was delivered from the liver into the hepatic vein), whereas the extraction ratio was high and positive for PB-Glu, indicating that large amounts of PB-Glu were extracted by the liver in cows fed SFC (P < 0.06). The same was not true for cows fed SRC. It is worth mentioning that large quantities of PB-Glu were withdrawn from PDVF in cows fed SRC (Table 7
), which might have caused a shortage in the liver and thus, be the reason for the very small quantities of PB-Glu withdrawn by the liver in that treatment.
|
|
|
The importance of the contribution of the PBAA pool to the total amounts of individual AA extracted by the mammary gland was illustrated by the relative frequency with which MU differed from zero (Table 11
). Indeed, in both treatments, MU of PB-Arg, PB-Lys, and PB-Met differed (P < 0.001 to 0.07) from zero. The MU of PB-Leu and PB-Thr differed (P < 0.004 and 0.007, respectively) from zero in cows fed SFC, whereas MU of PB-Ile differed (P < 0.07) from zero in the SRC-fed cows, thus pointing at a different dietary effect on the availability of certain AA for extraction from the PBAA pool as mentioned above. Of the PB-NEAA, only PB-Ser was extracted by the mammary gland in amounts differing (P < 0.009 to 0.06) from zero in both treatments. The MU of PB-Asp differed from zero in cows fed SFC only.
Extraction of PBAA, as a percentage of FAA extraction, varied from 67% for PB-Met in cows fed SFC, down to 13.5% for PB-Arg in cows fed SRC. The MU of PBAA represents a substantial addition to the extraction from the FAA pool. Of all PB-EAA, PB-Lys, and PB-Met were extracted in the largest quantities, and the difference between the treatments regarding their MU and secretion in milk was always significant.
Secretion of AA in milk.
Secretion of individual AA in milk was generally greater in cows fed SFC compared with cows fed SRC (Table 11
). Quantities of Ala and Lys secreted in milk were greater (P < 0.08 and 0.09, respectively) and all other AA, except Thr, tended (P < 0.11 to 0.18) to be greater in cows fed SFC. Differences between treatments correspond well with the greater (P < 0.069) amounts of total CP secreted in milk of cows fed SFC (Table 2
).
Mammary extraction efficiency.
The MEE of Tyr was greater (P < 0.067) in cows fed SFC and tended (P < 0.17) to be so for His and Phe (Table 12
). The MEE of all FAA, except for Gln, Gly, Met, and Trp, was numerically greater when the cows were fed the SFC diet. The MEE differed (P < 0.001 to 0.10) from zero in both treatments for the majority of FAA. The MEE for PBAA differed (P < 0.001 to 0.063) from zero for half (PB-Arg, PB-Asp, PB-Leu, PB-Lys, PB-Met, PB-Orn, PB-Phe, PB-Ser, and PB-Thr) of the AA quantified in cows fed SFC. Fewer differences from zero (PB-Arg, PB-Lys, PB-Met, PB-Orn, and PB-Ser) were noted when SRC was fed. There were more instances of differences from zero in the case of EAA compared with NEAA. The MEE was greater (P < 0.07, 0.08) for PB-Cit and PB-Lys and tended (P < 0.19) to be greater for PB-Met and PB-Pro and total EAA (P < 0.15) when SFC was fed.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whereas N and calculated energy intakes were similar between treatments (Table 2
), PDVF of FAA and PBAA were approximately 56% greater in cows fed SFC. Also, considering that protein sources were similar for both diets, it is reasonable to believe that the substantial increase in the PDVF of FAA and PBAA originates from a greater intestinal flow and absorption of microbial protein in cows fed SFC caused by the steam flaking of the corn grain. Al-Dehneh et al. (1997) reported that endogenous urea contributed 19.1 and 37.5% of N in duodenal digesta and flow, respectively, in diets containing 57% corn grain or 60% concentrate compared with 7.4 and 12.7%, respectively, in diets containing 30% corn grain or 40% concentrate. This suggests that additional dietary starch will enhance urea recycling into the rumen. The effect of steam flaking may be considered as adding dietary starch. Indeed, Oliviera et al. (1995) reported that steam flaking sorghum resulted in more starch digestion in the rumen compared with dry rolling sorghum. Further, Plascenica and Zinn (1996) compared feeding dry-rolled corn (39% of the diet) with feeding corn grain steam-flaked at densities of 390, 320, or 280 g/L and observed an increase in ruminal starch digestion accompanied by an average increase of 26.6% in microbial N flow into the duodenum and an increase in the microbial N efficiency. A greater recycling of urea into the rumen, accompanied by a greater duodenal flow of total and bacterial N, was observed when high-grain compared with high-forage diets, were fed to lactating cows (Al-Dehneh et al., 1997). The PDV recycling of urea was about 2.5 times greater in steam-flaked corn or sorghum diets compared with dry-rolled or steam-rolled sorghum or corn diets, respectively (Delgado-Alorduy et al., 2002a, 2002b). We, therefore, suggest that the larger PDVF of FAA and PBAA in the SFC diet may be the result of the SFC enhancing urea recycling and microbial synthesis. The PDVF of essential FAA and PBAA was approximately 50% greater in SFC- than in SRC-fed cows but was not uniform across all EAA. Differences ranged from highs of 74 ± 14% for FAA-Val and 101 ± 15% for PB-Val to lows of 37 ± 22% for FAA-Phe and 29 ± 27% for PB-Phe.
In light of the considerable increase in PDVF of FAA and PBAA observed in cows fed SFC, one would expect that this advantage might be expressed proportionally in the performance of those cows (i.e., in milk and milk protein yields). The more limited advantage observed in cows fed SFC may have arisen for several reasons. One possibility is that there was an imbalance in the biological value of the mixture of AA from the PDV caused by shortage of some AA, as mentioned above with respect to Phe. Another could be that the cows were in midlactation during the experimental period. It has been shown that, at midlactation, cows start to divert large quantities of absorbed nutrients for rebuilding body tissues (Flatt et al., 1969). Further, Moe and Tyrrell (1979) reported that cows at midlactation may divert as much as 59% of absorbed energy to body tissues when fed quasi-concentrate diets and up to 67% when corn grain-based diets are fed. Even though the PDVF of FAA and PBAA was about 55% higher in SFC cows, the increase in Phe (FAA + PBAA) was only 25%. Thus, in comparison to the average increase of 56%, Phe was limiting in PDVF of cows fed SFC compared with DRC. If according to Moe and Tyrrel (1979), at midlactation, 67% of the absorbed nutrients are diverted to body building and only 33% to milk yield, then only 4.125 g/12 h (12.5 x 33%) of the increase in PDVF in SFC cows over dry-rolled corn will be diverted to milk production. According to NRC (2001), the efficiency of conversion of absorbed AA into milk protein is 0.67. That would mean 4.125 x 0.67 = 2.674 g/12 h of Phe available for milk CP synthesis. Therefore, with Phe comprising 4.7% of milk CP, the absorbed Phe would enable increased production of 58.8 g of milk CP in SFC cows compared with SRC cows. The actual increase in total milk AA output was 24 g/12 h for the milk AA and 40 g/12 h of milk CP as determined by DHI (Table 2
).
The role of PBAA.
It is well accepted that, unless specific marking compounds are used, it is impossible to decide whether the addition or the removal of FAA or PBAA from their blood pools is the result of absorption from, or secretion into the GIT lumen, or of the metabolism by the GIT (Remond et al., 2000). Koeln et al. (1993) observed a greater PDVF of PBAA in fed vs. fasted calves and attributed this flux, in part at least, to absorption of peptides from the GIT lumen. Remond et al. (2000) injected casein hydrolysate into the rumen, in addition to a control meal, and observed an increase in PDVF of PB-Ile, PB-Leu, and PB-Pro and in total PB-EAA. These authors concluded that this increase in the flux of PBAA could be attributed, in part at least, to absorption of peptides from the GIT. In the present study, the large increase in PDVF of FAA in cows fed SFC compared with cows fed SRC was accompanied by an increase in the PDVF of 4 PBAA and a trend for an increase for another 2. This may indicate that these increases might be attributable to dietary and not metabolic effects.
It has been recently suggested that the PBAA pool in blood may serve as a reserve pool of AA. Koeln et al. (1993) observed, in both unfed and fed calves, negative PDVF of Gln and Glu either as FAA or as PBAA. Lapierre et al. (2000) studied the effect of level of feed intake on splanchnic metabolism in steers and also reported a negative flux of Gln but observed a positive flux of Glu at all 3 levels of feed intake. In the present study with lactating dairy cows, the results regarding PDVF of Gln were not unequivocal, but those of Glu differed from zero (Table 7
) and were lower (NS) in cows fed SRC. However, the peptide pool exhibited a different pattern. The PDVF of PB-Glu was negative and the removal of PB-Glu by PDV tissues was greater than the positive PDVF of Glu in the FAA pool in cows fed SRC. It is also worth mentioning that the negative flux of PB-Glu differed from zero and was greater in cows fed SRC compared with SFC-fed cows, which seems in accordance with the smaller flux of FAA Glu in SRC-fed cows. Tagari and Bergman (1978) reported that only 2.87% of the 14C-Glu that was infused in the abomasum of sheep appeared in the portal vein as 14C-Glu. In addition, 1.18% of that infused 14C-Glu appeared as 14C-Gln. They reported the portal appearance of nonlabeled Glu bo be 6.3 and -9.7% for high- and low-protein diets, respectively. Glutamine appearance was negative and much more so in the low-protein diet. The fact that most of the Glu in that experiment disappeared from the intestine after 12 m (where basically no microbial activity takes place), and the fact that almost all of the arterial inflow of Glu did not show in the portal blood, indicates that the absorbed Glu, together with plasma Glu, were utilized by the GIT wall (intestine as well as rumen). As Glu is a glucogenic AA, it could be deaminated to ketoglutarate and enter the TCA cycle and serve as a source of energy for the GIT or could be incorporated into enzymes or tissue. This metabolic pattern indicates a great need for Glu that is not furnished to the GIT solely from absorption and has to come from other sources (i.e., from degraded plasma proteins or peptides). In the present experiment, Glu flux was positive in both groups of cows, and one could assume that the high corn starch content in both diets and especially with the higher starch digestion of the SFC starch (Delgado-Alorduy et. al., 2002b), contributed to a higher PDVF of energy or glucogenic compounds, hence saving on the energy supply from Glu sources. This was not the case in the present experiment, and the PDVF of glucogenic molecules and their energy (i.e., glucose, lactate, and propionate or total energy contributing compounds) was similar in SFC and SRC cows. (Sadik, 1997). As very little Glu is being absorbed from the GIT (Tagari and Bergman, 1978), it is concluded that the negative PDVF of PB-Glu in both groups of cows is accountable for the positive PDVF of Glu, after being subjected to peptidase activity either in blood or in the intestinal wall. The same phenomenon regarding the interrelations between the FAA and PBAA pools of Glu was recorded in the liver flux (Table 8
), with a clearer trend observed in the splanchnic flux (Table 10
). Glutamic acid seems to be degraded from its PB pool and added to the FAA pool.
The opposite may be true for other AA including Gly. Its flux as a FAA was relatively large, but its flux as a PBAA was 3.5 to 6 times larger and was much greater in the cows fed SFC. It may well be that the impact of Gly as a ketogenic AA with a relative high osmolarity is reduced when it is a component of the PBAA pool. Nevertheless, the dietary effect is apparently clear. Large quantities of Gly are later removed from both plasma pools by the liver (Table 8
), and very little appears in the FAA pool of the splanchnic flux; the splanchnic flux of PB-Gly is much smaller than the PDVF of PB-Gly.
Splanchnic flux (Table 10
) of Arg and Val in SRC-fed cows is much smaller than in SFC-fed cows. This is despite the fact that large quantities of both PB-Arg and PB-Val were drawn from the peptides pool, presumably to provide these AA in support of the FAA pool. The same could be said about His in cows fed SRC, and despite the fact that the quantities of these AA drawn from the PBAA pool did not differ from zero, the phenomenon is noteworthy. The uptake of Arg could be explained by the need to support the urea cycle, and the PDVF of FAA Val was very small compared with cows fed SFC, and PDVF of PB-Val was negligible. It is assumed that uptake of this AA from the PBAA pool supplemented a shortage of this AA in the FAA pool. The PDVF of Arg (Table 7
) in both treatments considerably surpasses the need for Arg excreted in milk, which is also true for its mammary flux (Table 11
). Along with the positive flux of Arg as a FAA, there was a negative flux of PB-Arg. The pattern was similar for Cit. Both Arg and Cit play major roles in the urea cycle, whereby Cit is a precursor to Arg. Arginase present in the intestinal mucosal cells has the potential to degrade Arg to urea and Orn. Urea may be secreted back into the intestinal lumen (Tagari and Bergman, 1978) and Orn, which is absent from GIT content, appears in the PDVF in significant amounts in the FAA or PBAA pools. Arginine, together with Orn, can be used for the production of Pro. Verbeke et al. (1968) and Bruckental et al. (1991) reported that abomasal infusion of Pro in lactating dairy cows considerably reduced the MU of Arg. In the present experiment, Orn was extracted in significant amounts as the FAA and as PB-Arg. The uptake of PB-Arg was about 10% of its mammary flux as a FAA, but that of PB-Orn amounted to about 33% of its flux as FAA.
Relationship between PBAA and MU and milk secretion of AA.
The MU of most FAA, especially EAA generally exceed the quantities excreted in the milk. Nevertheless, some will be extracted in quantities that only marginally exceed tissue needs or even in quantities that are short of tissue needs, and these are believed to be stochiometrically incorporated into milk proteins (Mepham, 1982). To examine the role of PBAA in meeting the requirement of AA, correlation coefficients between MU of FAA or FAA + PBAA were examined and are presented in Table 13
. It is apparent that there were correlations between MU of FAA and AA incorporation in milk for all AA except Gln, Gly, and Ser, with only a trend for Lys. Correlation coefficients and probability level improved when amounts of PBAA that were extracted by the mammary gland were included for Arg, His, Lys, and Met for both diets and for Thr for the SFC diet only. Correlation coefficients decreased when PBAA were included for the EAA, Ile, Leu, Phe, Thr, and Val and for NEAA Pro, Ser, Gly, Asp, and Ala. Two of the 5 EAA whose correlation coefficients were improved by including PBAA, namely Arg and Met, are known to be used by the mammary gland not only for milk AA synthesis, but for other purposes too. That many of the multiple methylation reactions involving Met occur extensively in the mammary gland is common knowledge.
|
It is well accepted that the first limiting AA in the diet of lactating cows for milk protein synthesis are Lys and Met, and recently His was suggested as well (Vanhatalo et al., 1999). Indeed, the largest relative amounts that were extracted from the PBAA pool in BOTH treatments were those of Lys and Met, whereas those of His in both treatments and Lys in the SRC diet were still in marginal or short supply. These shortages might be satisfied from 2 additional sources: degradation of peptides (or proteins) larger than included in the PBAA pool (3 kDa) and from blood cells. That plasma proteins might be a source of AA for tissues was reported previously (Danilson et al., 1987b; McCormick and Webb, 1987). Results from several studies indicate that blood cells pose the ability for interorgan transfer of FAA (McCormick and Webb, 1982; Danilson et al., 1987a; Hanigan et al., 1991), whereas others do not (Mackle et al., 2000). The extent to which blood cells play a role in the interorgan transfer of FAA might be variable and dependent on the physiological status of the animal. Hanigan et al. (1991) reported that blood cells contributed sizable amounts of His, and to a lesser extent, Lys and Met to the total pool of AA extracted by the mammary gland of lactating cows. The fact that such large proportions and quantities of Lys and much larger proportions of Met were extracted from the plasma PBAA pool in the present study, despite the quoted potential contribution of Lys and Met from blood cells, further emphasizes the role of the plasma PBAA pool as a source for meeting mammary requirements of EAA or even total AA.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Present address: Elanco of Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brasil 07180-140. ![]()
3 Present address: Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Escuela de Medicina Veterinariay Zootecnia, Apartado 1057, Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico, CP 80000. ![]()
4 Present address: Dairy Nutrition Services of Mexico, S. A., de Cv, Piedras Negras No. 364, PIL, Gomez Palacio, Durango, CP 35078 Mexico. ![]()
5 Present address: USP/ESALQDept. Animal Science, Av. Padua Dias, 77, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, 73418-900. ![]()
6 Present address: Southeast Embrapa Cattle, PO Box 339, São Carlos, SP, Brasil, 13560-970. ![]()
7 Present address: E. S. A. "Luiz De Queiroz"USP, Av. Padua Dias #11, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, 13418-900. ![]()
Received for publication December 9, 2002. Accepted for publication June 2, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Tagari, K. Webb Jr, B. Theurer, T. Huber, D. DeYoung, P. Cuneo, J. E. P. Santos, J. Simas, M. Sadik, A. Alio, et al. Mammary Uptake, Portal-Drained Visceral Flux, and Hepatic Metabolism of Free and Peptide-Bound Amino Acids in Cows Fed Steam-Flaked or Dry-Rolled Sorghum Grain Diets J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 679 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell, P. M. VanRaden, F. Miglior, and G. de Jong Consistency of Maturity Rate for Milk Yield Across Countries and Generations J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3937 - 3944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||