|
|
||||||||
Department of Food Science and Technology Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331
Corresponding author: M. C. Qian; e-mail: michael.qian{at}oregonstate.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: sweet whey powder aroma Osme pyrazine
Abbreviation key: GCMS = gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry, GCO = gas chromatography/olfactometry, RI = retention index
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Flavor quality in liquid whey has been evaluated recently. Karagul-Yuceer et al. (2003) identified aroma compounds in liquid Cheddar whey and found that 2,3-butanedione, hexanal, 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, methional, (E,E)-2,4-nonadienal, (E,E)-2,4-decadienal, and various short-chain volatile acids could be important to the aroma of liquid whey. Whetstine et al. (2003) found that whey made from different types of cheeses has different flavors, and that flavor variability exists within the same cheese type. Tomaino et al. (2004) studied the flavor variability of liquid whey produced from laboratory-scale Cheddar cheese using individual strains of Lactococcus lactis spp. lactis. They confirmed that there were differences in liquid whey produced in a noncommercial setting from different starter culture strains.
Whey powder is expected to have a different flavor profile than liquid whey because of the further steps involved in its processing such as concentration and spray drying. These additional steps may reduce or generate flavor compounds, thus change the flavor profile of whey powder. Although Ferretti and Flanagan (1971) reported a wide variety of volatiles in whey powder, no direct information was provided about its flavor components. Livney and Bradley (1994) reported saltiness, brothiness, diacetyl, bitterness, and acidity as some of the flavor characteristics in acid whey. They suggested that whey flavor may be due to components traced to the original milk or developed during processing, but they did not identify those aroma compounds. Whitfield (1992) hypothesized that the Maillard reaction and lipid oxidation initiate flavor development in whey products but so far, there is no experimental data to support this hypothesis.
To date, no information is available on the aroma compounds present in sweet whey powder and hence this study is aimed at identification of flavor compounds in this dairy ingredient. In this research, flavor compounds in commercially produced sweet whey powder were analyzed using gas chromatography/olfactometry (GCO) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aroma Extraction
One kilogram of sweet whey powder was mixed with 500 mL of 2:1 freshly distilled pentane (Mallinckrodt Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ) and diethyl ether (Honeywell International, Muskegon, MI) for 4 hr during each extraction, in a tightly capped Erlenmeyer flask with intermittent shaking every 15 min. Extractions were repeated 3 times. All extracts were combined and concentrated to 500 mL under the hood. The extracts were distilled at 50°C by solvent-assisted flavor evaporation under vacuum (28 inch Hg) to separate volatiles from nonvolatiles. Liquid nitrogen was used for condensation of volatiles. The distillate was further concentrated to 50 mL by letting it evaporate in a fume hood, and was then subjected to fractionation.
Fractionation
The aroma concentrate was separated into acidic and nonacidic (neutral, basic) fractions. The concentrate (50 mL) was washed twice with 3 mL of 1 M sodium bicarbonate solution containing sodium chloride (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). The upper (ether) phase, containing the nonacidic volatiles, was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (EMP Chemicals, Gibbstown, NJ) and concentrated to 500 µL for sample A and to 50 µL for sample B under a stream of nitrogen. The pooled aqueous phase (bottom layer) was acidified to pH 2.5 with HCl (Reagent grade, USP, Integra Chemical Company, Renton, WA). The acidic volatiles were further extracted (3x) with 0.5 mL of freshly distilled diethyl ether. The diethyl ether extract was then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and was concentrated to 500 µL for sample A and to 50 µL for sample B with a stream of nitrogen.
Gas Chromatography
A Hewlett Packard 5890 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector and an olfactometer was used. Samples were analyzed on a DB-Wax column (30 m x 0.25 mm i.d. coated with crosslinked polyethylene glycol 20M, film thickness, 0.5 µm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA) and a DB-5 column (30 m x 0.32 mm i.d. coated with crosslinked 5% phenyl-methyl polysiloxane, film thickness, 1 µm; J&W Scientific). The column effluent was split 1:1 (by volume) into the flame ionization detector and a heated sniffing port with a splitter (Alltech Associates, Inc., Deerfield, IL). Gas chromatography operating parameters were: injection port temperature = 250°C, detector temperature = 250°C, oven temperature from 40 to 230°C at the rate of 5°C/min with initial and final hold times of 2 and 10 min for DB-Wax, and 4 and 10 min for DB-5 columns, respectively. The helium column flow rate was 2.0 mL/ min measured at 25°C. A sample (2 µL) of acidic fraction was injected onto the DB-Wax column and 2 µL of non-acidic fraction was injected onto both columns at a split ratio of 1:1.
GCO
Seven volunteers from Oregon State University performed GCO analysis on the whey samples. Panelists participated in 4 trial runs of each acidic and nonacidic fraction of the 2 samples to identify product attributes, clarify reference terminology, and verify or establish references for flavor and intensity values (Da Silva et al., 1994). Each fraction was used at the same concentration as required for analysis. At the end of 4 sessions, 4 subjects were chosen based upon their ability to consistently perceive and describe odors as the aroma compounds eluted from the sniff port. During actual analysis, sniffing was performed twice on each fraction by each panelist using the Osme technique (McDaniel et al., 1990) with minor modification. A 16-point intensity scale, with 0 = none, and 15 = extreme, was used to assign intensity to aromas detected (Miranda-Lopez et al., 1992; Roberts et al., 2003).
GCMS
Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis was performed using an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with a 5973 mass selective detector. System software control and data analysis were performed using enhanced ChemStation Software, G1707CA v. C.00.01.08 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE). Volatile separation was achieved with 2 fused silica capillary columns: DB-Wax (30 m x 0.25 mm i.d. coated with crosslinked polyethylene glycol 20M, film thickness, 0.5 µm, J&W Scientific) and DB-5 (30 m x 0.32 mm i.d. coated with crosslinked 5% phenyl-methyl polysiloxane, film thickness, 1 µm, J& W Scientific). The oven temperature was programmed as for the GCO analysis. Injector, detector transfer line, and ion source temperatures were 250, 280, and 230°C respectively. Helium was used as carrier gas with constant flow of 2 mL/min. A splitter was used at the end the column as described by Qian and Reineccius (2002). One milliliter of the flow was directed to mass spectrometry and the remainder was directed to an olfactometer. Standard electron impact mass spectroscopy was used, and the ionization voltage was set at 70 eV. An m/z range of 35 to 300 was collected at 5.27 scans/s. A sample (2 µL) of each fraction was injected in the splitless mode.
Retention Index
A sample containing series of hydrocarbons (C5 to C25) was injected on the DB-Wax and DB-5 columns using the same conditions mentioned as above for the 2 samples. Retention indices (RI) for the aroma compounds were calculated using the modified Kovats method (Van Den Dool and Kratz, 1963).
Identification of Odorants
Positive identifications were made by comparing calculated RI with standards, panelists aroma description, and individual mass spectra (Wiley 275.L mass spectral database; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Tentative identifications were based on retention indices and odor descriptors.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Two straight chain ketones were identified in the whey powder. Diacetyl was identified with its characteristic buttery note. It is a product of citrate metabolism, involving Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis biovar diacetylactis during cheese making (Kaneko et al., 1987; Bendall, 2001; Kieronczyk et al., 2003). It is believed that diacetyl undergoes reduction to form acetoin, an aromatic hydroxy ketone (Hugenholtz et al., 2000), which was also detected with its typical butter-like aroma in both samples. 1-octen-3-one was detected with a typical mushroom-like odor. Although the intensity for this compound was from moderate to small on DB-Wax (Table 2
) and moderate on DB-5 (Table 3
), it showed unique earthy aroma characteristics to the odor profile of whey powder.
Several sulfur-containing compounds were identified on the DB-Wax column (Table 2
). Both dimethyl disulfide and dimethyl trisulfide have an onion, cabbage note, while methional has a cooked potato aroma. Methional could be a very important flavor compound because of its high Osme value in sample A. It was detected very close to the elution of 2,6-dimethylpyrazine, but was differentiated by the panelists with a cooked potato note for methional and a cooked meaty note for 2,6-dimethylpyrazine. Dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl tri-sulfide, and methional have been identified in cheese (Aston and Dulley, 1982; Qian et al., 2002, Boscaini et al., 2003; Qian and Reineccius, 2003) and liquid whey (Karagul-Yuceer et al., 2003; Whetstine et al., 2003; Tomaino et al., 2004). Degradation of methionine can form dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol; and methanethiol can be further oxidized to form dimethyl disulfide and dimethyl trisulfide (Bendall, 2001). Dimethyl sulfide can be oxidized to dimethyl sulfone (Livney and Bradley, 1994). Although a peak was detected for di-methyl sulfone by mass spectroscopy, no aroma was sensed. Methional is thought to be generated from Strecker degradation of methionine (Aston and Dulley, 1982; Da Silva et al., 1993; Fu et al., 2002; Boscaini et al., 2003).
Pyrazines are nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds which are recognized for their characteristic baked and roasted potato, nut, and meat-like aromas. The most intense of these were 2,6-dimethylpyrazine, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, 2,3-dimethylpyrazine, 2,3,5-tri-methylpyrazine for sample A (Table 2
). Most of these pyrazines had moderate Osme values in sample B except 2,5-dimethylpyrazine (Osme value of 10). 2,6-Di-methylpyrazine was only identified in sample A, whereas 2-ethylpyrazine was only identified in sample B. Most of these pyrazines have been identified in Parmesan cheese as compounds responsible for the nutty aroma (Qian and Reineccius, 2002). 2-Methoxy-3-iso-propylpyrazine and 2-isobutyl-3-methoxypyrazine have been identified in liquid whey (Karagul-Yuceer et al., 2003), but were not identified in this study. Pyrazines are the products of Maillard reaction (Friedman, 1996; Alasalvar et al., 2003), possibly formed during concentration, spray drying, or other processes involved in the manufacturing of whey powder.
2-Acetylpyrrole with its characteristic medicinal odor was seen only in sample A (Table 2
). 2-Acetylthiazole, 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, and 2-propionyl-1-pyrroline were tentatively identified to have roasted nuts and fried kind of aromas. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline is believed to be formed by the interaction of pyruvaldehyde with 1-pyr-roline, which is formed from proline (Bendall, 2001; Karagul-Yuceer et al., 2001). 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline and 2-propionyl-1-pyrroline possess very low odor thresholds and are frequently cited as compounds that directly contribute to roasted or smoky flavors (Da Silva et al., 1993; Karagul-Yuceer et al., 2003).
Maltol and furaneol were identified in the whey powder that gave moderate to large intensity in both samples with a burnt sugar-like aroma for maltol and a sweet aroma for furaneol (Table 2
). Maltol and furaneol are believed to be products of sugar degradation (Da Silva et al., 1993; Wadodkar et al., 2002). Sotolon gave a spicy note, with high intensity on both samples on DB-Wax column (Table 2
). This compound is thought to be formed from
-ketobutyric acid and acetaldehyde (Takahashi et al., 1976). Maltol and sotolon have been identified in liquid whey (Karagul-Yuceer et al., 2003), and furaneol was found in stored nonfat dry milk (Karagul-Yuceer et al., 2001).
Most of the lactones were detected only by the DB-Wax column (Table 2
). Only a few compounds such as delta-decalactone and gamma-hexalactone were detected by both columns. Fruity, nutty, and dairy aromas were associated with lactones in both samples, and aroma intensities varied from very low to very high. Parlimnet et al. (1966) concluded that the precursors for lactones were triglycerides containing a hydroxyl acid moiety.
p-Cresol, a phenolic compound with a typical cattle-like odor contributed a high Osme value for sample A and a weak Osme value for sample B on the DB-Wax column (Table 2
). It has long been known as the factor responsible for the smell of cow urine. It imparts a barn/medicine-like flavor to milk upon liberation from conjugated precursors (Bendall, 2001; Kim et al., 2003).
Skatole was also identified in this study on both columns (Tables 2
and 3
). It strongly associated with an unpleasant smell of cow feces. It is produced from the amino acid L-tryptophan in the cows rumen from the diet. Skatole has been found in liquid whey and in non-fat dry milk (Bendall, 2001; Karagul-Yuceer et al., 2001).
Similar compounds were identified in samples A and B. Sample A showed 45 aroma compounds on DB-Wax and 21 on DB-5. In addition, sample A showed 5 unknowns on DB-Wax and 1 on DB-5. Sample B showed 39 aroma compounds on DB-wax and 15 on DB-5. Most of these compounds were identified in both samples. Some compounds, however, were only identified in one sample. For example, ethylpyrazine was identified on DB-Wax column in sample B but was absent in sample A, whereas 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine, (Z)-2-nonenal, phenylacetaldehyde, and 2-acetyl pyrrole were identified in sample A, but were absent in sample B. The Osme values also varied substantially. To perceive the aroma, sample B was evaluated at a concentration 10 times higher than sample A. The fewer aroma compounds identified in sample B and low aroma intensity suggested a bland, clean whey powder.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication April 19, 2004. Accepted for publication August 22, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-lactones in heated milk fat. J. Dairy Sci. 49:109112.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Prososki, M. R. Etzel, and S. A. Rankin Solvent Type Affects the Number, Distribution, and Relative Quantities of Volatile Compounds Found in Sweet Whey Powder J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 523 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. C. Whetstine, A. E. Croissant, and M. A. Drake Characterization of Dried Whey Protein Concentrate and Isolate Flavor J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3826 - 3839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Gallardo-Escamilla, A. L. Kelly, and C. M. Delahunty Sensory Characteristics and Related Volatile Flavor Compound Profiles of Different Types of Whey J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2689 - 2699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |