|
|
||||||||
1 Département des Sciences Animales, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, QC, Canada, G1K 7P4
2 Dairy & Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lennoxville, QC, Canada, J1M 1Z3
3 Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, UK, AB21 9SB
4 Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada, J2S 7C6
Corresponding author: H. Lapierre; e-mail: lapierreh{at}agr.gc.ca.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: amino acid splanchnic tissue mammary gland cow
Abbreviation key: BCAA = branched-chain AA, EAA = essential AA, MP = metabolizable protein, pAH = para-aminohippurate, PDV = portal-drained viscera.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increasing dietary protein supply usually results in higher portal absorption of AA in lactating cows (Bach et al., 2000; Blouin et al., 2002), although elevated CP intake may not lead to additional AA absorption if the energy supply is not adequate to support rumen microbial protein synthesis (Reynolds et al., 1992). Once absorbed, the AA flow to the liver. Although hepatic removal of AA was first proposed as a regulator of peripheral tissue anabolism (Reynolds et al., 1994), other evidence suggests that hepatic AA catabolism may instead respond to peripheral tissue requirements (Lobley and Lapierre, 2003; Ortigues-Marty et al., 2003). The question then is: To what extent can liver catabolism of AA be decreasedi.e., how much of the hepatic extraction of AA is obligatory (e.g., to support plasma protein synthesis or gluconeogenesis) and how much is nonobligate and susceptible to manipulation (e.g., can the amount removed be reduced)? This question can be answered by varying protein supply below and above requirements with examination of changes in the partition and efficiency of use of AA as the supply is altered. An additional consideration is that some AA are not exclusively, or even predominantly, catabolized by the liver.
Therefore, the current study investigates the impact of increasing metabolizable protein (MP) on hepatic removal of essential AA (EAA) and subsequent utilization of postsplanchnic supply by the mammary gland. Given that the efficiency of conversion of absorbed EAA into milk protein will be altered, these findings will lead to a better understanding of how splanchnic and postsplanchnic tissues coordinate to regulate AA metabolism.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three diets were formulated using the NRC (2001) to provide equal energy while increasing MP, averaging 1922 (low), 2264 (medium), or 2517 (high) g of MP/ d. Feeding different amounts of MP was achieved by substituting Megalac (Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Princeton, NJ) with Prolak (H. J. Baker & Bro. Inc., Westport, CT) (Tables 1
and 2
). The amount of feed offered provided similar energy intake (36.4 Mcal NEL per d) throughout the study. The quantity of wet feed offered was adjusted weekly, based on the DM content of the grass silage (determined by drying at 105°C for 48 h). Daily allowance was distributed in 12 equal meals every 2 h from automated feeders (Ankom, Fairport, NY), except long hay that was offered once a day. Orts, when present, were recorded daily. Cows had free access to water and were housed in a tie-stall barn, which was lit from 0600 to 2200 h. They were milked twice daily (0600 and 1800 h), and production was recorded at each milking. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Committee for Animal Care of the Lennoxville Research Center, and animals were cared for according to the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (1993).
|
|
On d 18, 19, or 20 (2 cows sampled per day), sodium p-aminohippurate (pAH; 100 g/L) was infused continuously (14.4 g/h) into one mesenteric vein catheter using a syringe pump, preceded by a 2-g priming dose. After at least 40 min of pAH infusion, simultaneous blood collections were taken hourly for 5 h (n = 6) from the arterial plus portal and hepatic vein catheters. Blood samples were collected from the mammary vein by venipuncture every other hour (n = 3). Immediately after sampling, blood was transferred from the syringes to heparinized tubes and kept on ice prior to centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 12 min at 4°C. The plasma was then subsampled for immediate analyses, and the remainder was stored at 20°C for later analyses.
Laboratory Analyses
Feed ingredients, feed refusals, and feces were freeze-dried and ground to pass through a 1-mm screen. Nitrogen content of feed ingredients, refusals, and milk samples collected at each milking was determined by combustion (Nitrogen Determinator, model FP-428 LECO, St. Joseph, MI). Crude protein contents of feed and milk were calculated as N x 6.25 and N x 6.38, respectively. Urine and feces samples were analyzed for total N using the micro-Kjeldahl method (Tecator 1030, Hoganas Sweden; AOAC, 1996). Milk fat was measured according to the Roese-Gottlieb method (AOAC, 1996).
Noncasein N and nonprotein N in milk were analyzed with the micro-Kjeldahl method on pooled samples from the collection period. Noncasein N was obtained by precipitation of the caseins at pH 4.6. Nonprotein N was obtained by precipitation with TCA, with a final concentration of 12%. Casein N is calculated by finding the difference between total N and noncasein N, whereas whey protein is estimated by finding the difference between noncasein nitrogen and nonprotein N. The N content was transposed into protein using the 6.38 factor. Casein profile was determined by inverse-phase HPLC on the pellet obtained when precipitating caseins at pH 4.6 (Jaubert et al., 1992).
Packed cell volume of each blood sample was determined by the microhematocrit method. Plasma concentrations of pAH, urea, and ammonia were measured with an automatic analyzer (Technicon Autoanalyser II, Technicon Instruments Corporation, Tarrytown, NY) as previously described (Huntington, 1984) on fresh samples on the day of sampling.
For AA determination, samples of feed were predigested with performic acid to stabilize Met and Cys, treated with hydrobromic acid to destroy the performic acid, and then acid-hydrolyzed with 6 N HCl (AOAC, 1996: method # 994 to 12), and AA were quantified by ion-exchange chromatography (Beckmann 6300, Palo Alto, CA). A separate acid hydrolysis (6 N HCl) digestion procedure was conducted for Phe and His, because those AA are destroyed during the oxidation process and by reaction with bromine.
Plasma concentrations of EAA plus tyrosine were measured by the isotope dilution method (Calder et al., 1999). On the day of sampling, 0.2 g of an internal standard solution was added to 1 g of plasma. The internal standard solution was prepared with labeled AA diluted in 0.1 N HCl with the following concentration (µM): DL-His-
-15N (182), L-Ile-15N (713), L-Leu-1-13C (877), DL-Lys-2-15N-2HCl (308), DL-Met-1-13C (98), L-Phe-1-13C (226), L-Thr-15N (45), L-Tyr-15N (469), and L-Val-15N (846). Labeled AA (95 to 99 atom %) were supplied by CDN isotopes (Montreal, QC, Canada) for His, Leu, Lys, Met, and Phe (Cambridge Isotope Laboratory, Andover, MA) for Ile, Thr, and Tyr (Isotec Inc., Mi-amisburg, OH) for Val. Plasma samples with the internal standard were kept frozen at 20°C until analyses. At the time of analysis, the plasma was deproteinized with sulfosalicylic acid (38% wt/vol), the N-(tert-butyl-dimethyl) AA derivative prepared (Calder and Smith, 1988), and AA concentration determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (model HP6890, S973 mass selective detector; Hewlett Packard, CA) based on the principles described by Calder et al. (1999).
Calculations and Statistical Analyses
Mean values for intake, production, and composition of milk, feces, and urine taken during the collection period were used for statistical analyses. Plasma flow across the splanchnic tissues was calculated from downstream dilution of pAH infusion (Katz and Bergman, 1969). If, within one sampling day, the CV of the mean plasma flow for an animal was greater than 15% due to only one sample, then this value was removed. Milk AA output was estimated using milk protein yield measured during the collection period, and AA composition was reported in the literature (Swaisgood, 1995). Mammary plasma flow was estimated according to the Fick principle using Phe and Tyr as internal markers (Mepham, 1982), with allowance for a 3.5% contribution from bloodborne proteins: mammary plasma flow = ([milk Phe + Tyr] x0.965) ÷ (AV difference Phe + Tyr) (Cant et al., 1993). Daily net fluxes of AA across the portal-drained viscera (PDV), liver, total splanchnic tissues, and mammary gland were calculated for each cow as the product of the average venous-arterial concentration difference and the average plasma flow measured for that day. Blood flow was calculated as plasma flow divided by (1 - packed cell volume). Net fluxes of ammonia were calculated using plasma concentrations and blood flow, whereas urea fluxes were calculated using plasma concentrations and blood water flows. Blood water flow was calculated as blood flow multiplied by the ratio of the (1 - DM) of blood on plasma (Milano et al., 2000). A negative flux indicates utilization or removal, whereas a positive flux indicates net production or release of the nutrient across the tissue. One cow did not have a patent hepatic catheter, and results obtained for portal vein absorption strongly suggested a misplacement of this catheter; all results for this cow were discarded. One cow could not be used for her third period (treatment was high MP), as she had severe mastitis. Therefore, n = 5 for low and medium MP and n = 4 for high MP.
Data were analyzed statistically according to a replicated Latin square design using the GLM procedure (SAS Institute Inc., 1996), with treatment, period, and cow as the main effects. Treatments were compared with linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts. A linear component indicates that the difference between the first and last levels is significant, whereas a quadratic component will indicate the lack of fit of the intermediary level for a linear relationship (Gill, 1978). Treatment differences were considered significant if P < 0.10 and as a trend for 0.10 < P < 0.20.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therefore, although most formulation schemes focus on estimating the supply of protein at the duodenum and use fixed factors to predict transfer from absorption to metabolic usage, metabolic events differ between cows receiving a low vs. a high supply of protein. Examination of the fate of AA between absorption, transit across the liver, and secretion in milk will help explain the mechanisms that result in higher transfer efficiency in cows receiving a lower MP supply.
Amino Acid Flux
As expected, increased MP supply resulted in elevated portal absorption of EAA, consistent with previous reports for dairy cows (Bach et al., 2000; Blouin et al., 2002). Indeed, the measured portal absorption matched prediction of digestible AA (NRC, 2001), corrected for endogenous contribution to the duodenal supply. The ratios between the NRC predictions and measured values were averaged for His (1.03), Lys (1.02), Ile (1.14), Leu (1.24), Val (1.13), and Thr (1.27). These ratios would conform to the concept of little or no catabolism of His and Lys across the gut in the ruminant, but substantial oxidation of the BCAA and loss of Thr through endogenous secretions into the digestive tract (Lobley and Lapierre, 2003). The ratios (NRC predicted/ observed) for Met (0.84) and Phe (0.79) were lower than unity, which was unexpected since limited oxidation by the ovine gut has been reported for Met (Lobley et al., 2003). Thus, one explanation would be an underestimation of the duodenal supply of these AA with the NRC (2001) model.
The increased absorption with increased MP was concomitantly associated with increased hepatic removal, both in absolute amount for His, Met, Phe, and Thr, and relative to portal absorption or total liver influx for His, Met, and Phe. On the other hand, hepatic removals of the BCAA and Lys were unaffected by diet. These data are consistent with the concept that the liver is a major site of catabolism for His, Met, Phe, and Thr and removes excess AA not used for peripheral anabolism. In contrast, for the BCAA and Lys, catabolism occurs to a greater extent in nonsplanchnic tissues. These observations agree with the localization of enzymes responsible for AA catabolism. Enzymes for His, Met, and Phe catabolism are almost exclusively restricted to hepatic tissues (see Lobley, 2002). In contrast, enzymes responsible for BCAA catabolism are spread across many tissues (Goodwin et al., 1987; DeSantiago et al., 1998), and recent studies have identified lysine ketoglutarate reductase and saccharopine dehydrogenase in the brain, kidney, and muscle of piglets (Pink et al., 2003).
Hepatic removal of EAA varied greatly between EAA, as previously observed in many species, including dairy cows (Bach et al., 2000; Blouin et al., 2002). Relative to net portal absorption, the highest fractional hepatic removal was for Phe (0.52) followed by His (0.42), Met (0.36), and Thr (0.34). At low MP supply, there was no net removal of Lys, but at high MP supply, hepatic removal averaged 12% of portal absorption. There was no net removal and even a positive numeric flux for the BCAA across the liver, as previously observed in dairy cows (Wray-Cahen et al., 1997; Bach et al., 2000; Blouin et al., 2002), but hepatic-portal differences were not different from zero. Although the magnitude of hepatic removal relative to portal absorption was lower in the current study, as would be expected due to increased metabolic demand for absorbed AA during lactation, the ranking among EAA agrees with previous observations in growing cattle (Lapierre et al., 2000), nonlactating cows (Wray-Cahen et al., 1997), and sheep (Lobley et al., 2001).
Only for His, and only at low MP, were mammary uptake and milk output higher than net splanchnic flux. This means that for all other measured AA, even at the low MP supply, postliver supply was sufficient to account for mammary uptake and milk protein output. This maintenance of lactation at a high level when supply was reduced was achieved by a substantial reduction of AA catabolism, sufficient to ensure no need for contribution of body protein "reserves." Such reductions in catabolism will have a finite limit, however, based on obligate needs for production of various metabolites, synthesis of hepatic export proteins (Raggio et al., 2002) and basal (cannot be manipulated) ureagenesis. For His, the limit in the reduction of hepatic removal (3.3% of total liver influx at low MP intake) might have been reached, as an additional endogenous source must have been necessary to cover mammary gland uptake. This was not from mobilized body protein reserves as N retention was not decreased at low MP intake. One alternative are the His dipeptides, particularly carnosine, present in millimolar quantities in muscle and known to become depleted when animals are fed a diet low in His (Amend et al., 1979). Such sources would provide only a medium-term store and such a situation could not be sustained for a whole lactation cycle. Such constraints are a feature of the AA composition of the MP supply and the current observation was not surprising considering that His has been found to be limiting when grass silage was fed to dairy cows (Vanhatalo et al., 1999). This emphasizes the need to consider the amount and composition of AA supplied, rather than simply MP, when attempting to predict dietary responses and efficiencies.
Postliver supply of the BCAA and Lys substantially exceeded both mammary gland uptake and milk output. Earlier studies have shown that the mammary gland catabolizes Leu (Bequette et al., 1996; Thivierge et al., 2002), with this oxidation decreasing when Leu supply was low (Bequette et al., 1996). This is supported by the current observation, as the ratio of milk output to mammary uptake for the 3 BCAA decreased with increasing MP supply. Excess EAA-N extracted by the mammary gland relative to milk output is needed to support synthesis of nonessential AA, for which the uptake by the mammary gland is insufficient to account for milk output. Recently, the incorporation of lysine-15N into nonessential AA within the mammary gland has been demonstrated in dairy cows (Lapierre et al., 2003).
Together, these metabolic events across the liver and the mammary gland explain why the ratios of transfer of absorbed AA into milk protein alter with MP supply (Table 7
). At low MP supply, improved efficiency is achieved through a decreased hepatic removal of His, Met, Phe, and Thr, and, probably, decreased oxidation of the BCAA, Lys, and Thr in peripheral tissues. As MP supply is decreased, the liver, peripheral tissue, and mammary gland events combine to increase the partial efficiency of transfer of absorbed AA into milk. The design of this study does not resolve whether the liver was responding to, or controlling use by, peripheral tissues (see Lobley and Lapierre, 2003), but it is obvious that liver catabolism of His, Met, and Phe was tightly related with mammary requirements. Nonetheless, prediction of milk output based on duodenal MP or AA supply cannot rely on a fixed ratio of transfer, but rather needs to account for the efficiency of utilization of individual AA, which decrease as supply approaches requirements. Moreover, use of a common factor of transfer of MP into milk protein also implies that all AA are used with similar efficiency. In practice, efficiency of conversion of absorbed EAA (excluding His) into milk varied widely (0.42 to 0.78; Table 7
) at the low MP supply, where efficiency was greatest. Phenylalanine always ranked the lowest, probably because supply was in excess of demand with these diets. This variation in efficiency among AA emphasizes the uniqueness of each AA and the importance of developing prediction equations for milk protein output based on the supply of individual AA rather than their total agglomeration as protein.
Urea and Ammonia
Net portal flux of ammonia increased with increasing MP supply and increased rumen degradable protein supply, as previously reported (Bach et al., 2000; Blouin et al., 2002), although urea recycled to the PDV decreased at high MP. All the extra ammonia absorbed was removed by the liver and, combined with increased hepatic removal of some AA, resulted in a numerically higher hepatic ureagenesis for the cows fed the high-MP diet. Lapierre and Lobley (2001) calculated the ratio between hepatic ureagenesis and digestible N; in growing cattle, this ranged from 0.49 to 1.78 (mean 0.93), and in lactating dairy cows, from 0.43 to 1.23 (mean 0.88). In the current experiment, the ratio of ureagenesis and digestible N averaged 1.17, again indicating the magnitude of the transit of N into the urea pool and the impact of recycling. Although arterial urea concentrations were higher with the high-MP diet, the recycling of urea into the PDV decreased with increasing MP, averaging 0.46, 0.28, and 0.14 of hepatic ureagenesis for low, med, and high MP, respectively. This suggests that entry of urea into the digestive tract is not simply a function of plasma concentration as previously suggested (Harmeyer and Martens, 1980). As a result of decreased net PDV flux and increased hepatic flux of urea, the splanchnic net urea flux increased, which impacted both arterial urea concentration and elimination of N through the urine.
Milk Production
Increasing the MP supply by raising the CP content of the diet from 12.7 to 16.6% increased both milk production and milk protein yield, in agreement with earlier reports by Metcalf et al. (1996; 11.3 to 20.1% CP), Wright et al. (1998; 10.2 to 24.5% CP) and Dinn et al. (1998; 15.3 to 18.3% CP). In contrast, Castillo et al. (2001) reported no difference in milk production and composition with variation in CP content (14.0 to 18.3% CP). On the other hand, Blouin et al. (2002) reported an increase in milk production and milk protein yield with fixed CP, and varied RUP. Nonetheless, changes in protein degradability and RUP supply alone do not explain variations in milk production responses (Santos et al., 1998). Together, these data clearly demonstrate that CP intake or RUP supply alone should no longer be used solely in dairy rations to evaluate the amount of protein delivered to the animal. Use of CP and RUP has now been superseded by the more informative use of MP, and now when earlier data are reevaluated by this approach, it is clear that changes in milk production related better to MP rather than to either CP or RUP. For example, increasing MP by 30% increased both milk production and milk protein yield (Metcalf et al., 1996; Wright et al, 1998; present study). In contrast, when MP supply was increased by 18%, only milk production was improved (Dinn et al., 1998). In the study of Blouin et al. (2002), despite a similar CP intake, the additional supply in MP (16%) generated by increasing RUP resulted in greater milk protein production. However, an increment in MP supply does not guarantee by itself an increment in milk production. In fact, Castillo et al. (2001), improved MP supply with increased CP or decreased protein degradability did not alter milk production because energy supply would have limited milk output to 22 kg (NRC, 2001).
Nitrogen Balance
The relatively small increase in fecal N compared with the additional N intake resulted in greater apparent N digestibility. Using a dynamic model based on 5 N balance studies with dairy cows, Kebreab et al. (2002) predicted that absolute metabolic fecal N would increase up to intakes of 420 g of N/d and remain near constant thereafter. Therefore, the increased apparent N digestibility with increasing protein intake observed in the current study, as in previous reports (Wright et al., 1998; Castillo et al., 2000), would result from a decreased proportion of metabolic fecal N to total fecal N as N intake increased. Thus, with higher MP, more N is apparently digested and, if not used for anabolic purposes, more should be lost via urine rather than feces.
This is exactly what was observed, with the ratio of urinary N excretion to N intake increasing from 0.16, 0.22, and 0.26 for the low-, medium- and high-MP diets, respectively, similar to the observations of Wright et al (1998) and Dinn et al (1998). How much N is excreted in urine relates to a number of factors, including MP (or CP) intake, variations in the degradability of the ration and the ability of the cow to retain N for anabolic purposes. Indeed, when the anabolic potential is approached or exceeded, much of the extra digested N is excreted via urine. Thus, in the current study, although the extra digested N represented increases in portal absorption of both AA and ammonia, much of these were converted to catabolic endproducts (notably urea), with urinary N excretion increasing by more than 100% between low to high MP. As a result, the marginal return of digested N to milk was only 0.16, compared with an apparent efficiency of 0.52 at the low MP supply. For other studies, where similar increases in digested N were achieved either by increased CP (Dinn et al., 1998) or protein degradability (Castillo et al., 2001), only 0.15 to 0.35 of the extra digested N was secreted as milk N. These various data again reflect the declining return of milk output as maximal requirements are approached (Doepel et al., 2004).
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication December 6, 2003. Accepted for publication April 26, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
pez, and H. Lapierre. 2004. Milk protein synthesis as a function of amino acid supply. J. Dairy Sci. 87:12791297.
s1 and
s2 genetic variants. Lait 72:235247.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Doepel, G. E. Lobley, J. F. Bernier, P. Dubreuil, and H. Lapierre Effect of Glutamine Supplementation on Splanchnic Metabolism in Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4325 - 4333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, J. X. Liu, Z. P. Yuan, Y. M. Wu, S. W. Zhai, and H. W. Ye Effect of Level of Metabolizable Protein on Milk Production and Nitrogen Utilization in Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2960 - 2965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Raggio, G. E. Lobley, R. Berthiaume, D. Pellerin, G. Allard, P. Dubreuil, and H. Lapierre Effect of Protein Supply on Hepatic Synthesis of Plasma and Constitutive Proteins in Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 352 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pacheco, C. G. Schwab, R. Berthiaume, G. Raggio, and H. Lapierre Comparison of Net Portal Absorption with Predicted Flow of Digestible Amino Acids: Scope for Improving Current Models? J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4747 - 4757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Raggio, S. Lemosquet, G. E. Lobley, H. Rulquin, and H. Lapierre Effect of casein and propionate supply on mammary protein metabolism in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4340 - 4351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Doepel, M. Lessard, N. Gagnon, G. E. Lobley, J. F. Bernier, P. Dubreuil, and H. Lapierre Effect of postruminal glutamine supplementation on immune response and milk production in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3107 - 3121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Weekes, P. H. Luimes, and J. P. Cant Responses to amino acid imbalances and deficiencies in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2177 - 2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Berthiaume, M. C. Thivierge, R. A. Patton, P. Dubreuil, M. Stevenson, B. W. McBride, and H. Lapierre Effect of Ruminally Protected Methionine on Splanchnic Metabolism of Amino Acids in Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1621 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lapierre, D. Pacheco, R. Berthiaume, D. R. Ouellet, C. G. Schwab, P. Dubreuil, G. Holtrop, and G. E. Lobley What is the True Supply of Amino Acids for a Dairy Cow? J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E1 - E14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS |