|
|
||||||||
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0910
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: vitamin E selenium fertility embryo
Abbreviation key: COC = cumulus-oocyte complexes, IVF = in vitro fertilization, KSOM = potassium simplex optimized medium, Sp = sperm, TALP = Hepes-Tyrodes albumin lactate pyruvate solution
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherol), a strong reducing agent that can give electrons to lipids undergoing peroxidation, is a major antioxidant present in plasma membranes (Wang and Quinn, 2000). Reproductive consequences of free radical damage include disruption in function of spermatozoa (Griveau et al., 1995) and preimplantation embryos (Fujitani et al., 1997). Antioxidant status may be one determinant of reproductive function in dairy cattle. Administration of vitamin E or the combination of vitamin E and selenium has been reported to reduce the incidence of postpartum reproductive disorders such as retained fetal membranes, metritis, and cystic ovaries (Trinder et al., 1969; Harrison et al., 1984; Aréchiga et al., 1994b) and to improve fertility (Aréchiga et al., 1994b; Aréchiga et al., 1998b; Baldi et al., 2000). In other studies, however, there was no beneficial effect of administration of supplemental vitamin E alone or in combination with selenium on reproductive function (Schingoethe et al., 1982; Kappel et al., 1984; Ealy et al., 1994).
Effects of antioxidants on reproductive function may be more pronounced during heat stress because of the increased metabolic rates associated with cellular hyperthermia. Elevated temperature increases liver peroxidation (Ando et al., 1997) and activity of enzymes involved in free radical production such as xanthine oxidase (Skibba et al., 1989). Exposure of dairy cows to heat stress decreased total antioxidant activity in blood (Harmon et al., 1997). Like most cells, preimplantation embryos can produce free radicals (Yang et al., 1998). The deleterious effects of heat shock on viability of preimplantation mouse embryos can be reduced by antioxidants including vitamin E and glutathione (Aréchiga et al., 1994a).
The objectives of this series of studies were 1) to determine whether sequential injections of vitamin E and selenium at approximately 21 d before expected calving and 30 and 80 d postpartum improves reproductive function and milk yield of lactating Holstein cows under cool and hot conditions and 2) to test whether vitamin E improves development of in vitro-produced bovine embryos exposed to heat shock.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A combination of vitamin E and selenium (MU-SE; Schering-Plough Corp., Kenilworth, NJ) was used for in vivo experiments and vitamin E [(±)-
-tocopherol; Sigma] was used for in vitro studies. Other reagents were purchased from Fisher (Pittsburgh, PA) or Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Experiments 1 to 3: Effect of Multiple Vitamin E and Selenium Injections on Fertility of Holstein Cows
For each experiment, cows were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Cows with odd-numbered tags received three intramuscular injections of 10 ml of MU-SE, while cows with even-numbered tags received injections of placebo [0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl] at the same times. Each week for experiments 1 and 2, cows that were ± 3 d of 21 d before expected calving received Mu-Se or placebo. For experiment 3, cows received the first injection when they were moved to the dry cow lot by the cooperating dairy; the average interval from first injection until calving in this experiment was 16.8 d (standard deviation = 9.7 d). For all three experiments, the other two injections were given at ~30 d postpartum (range 27 to 33 d) and 80 d postpartum (range 77 to 83 d). The amount of MU-SE administered was equivalent to 500 mg vitamin E as D-
tocopheryl acetate (680 IU) and 109.5 mg of sodium selenite (equivalent to 50 mg of selenium). For all three experiments, birth difficulty was classified at the time of calving based on the severity of the clinical signs and the need of delivery assistance from 0 to 5 (0 = not observed, 1 = no calving difficulty, 2 = minor problem, 3 = needed assistance, 4 = considerable force and 5 = very difficult).
Experiment 1 was conducted on a commercial dairy farm in Anthony, Florida (29°17'N 82°07'W), using 249 Holstein cows. Estrous detection was performed based on visual observation of mounting behavior performed throughout the day and cow locomotor activity using pedometers (AFIMILK SystemUSA Inc., Visalia, CA). All cows were artificially inseminated after a voluntary waiting period of 90 to 120 d postpartum. A proportion of the cows were bred upon standing estrus, while others were bred following timed AI (Pursley et al., 1997). Cows were milked three times a day, and placed on treatment with bovine somatotropin (bST, Posilac, Monsanto, Chesterfield, MO) beginning 60 to 70 d postpartum and as directed by the manufacturer. Pregnancy was determined by rectal palpation at 37 to 52 d after insemination. Beginning 21 d before expected calving, cows were fed a TMR based on chopped hay formulated to provide (per cow per day) 12.0 Mcal of NEL, 817 IU of vitamin E, and 8.5 mg of selenium. After calving, cows were fed a TMR based on corn silage and hominy formulated to provide (per day per cow) 36.0 Mcal of NEL, 412 IU of vitamin E, and 6.3 mg of selenium.
Experiment 2 was conducted at the University of Florida Dairy Research Unit (DRU) (Hague, Florida; 29°46'N 82°25W) using 137 Holstein cows. Estrous detection was based on visual observation of mounting behavior performed throughout the day and evaluation of chalk removal from tailheads. In addition, the majority of cows were subjected to a timed AI program (Pursley et al., 1997) for first insemination after calving. Timed AI was also used for a proportion of other inseminations. The voluntary waiting period for first insemination was 70 d postpartum. Cows were milked three times a day, and BST was utilized as directed by the manufacturer beginning 57 to 63 d postpartum. Pregnancy was determined by rectal palpation at 42 to 70 d after insemination. The prepartum and postpartum cows were fed a TMR based on corn silage, citrus pulp, corn meal, and alfalfa hay formulated to provide 35.2 Mcal of NEL per day per cow. The prepartum ration was formulated to provide (per day per cow) 530 IU of vitamin E and 7 mg of selenium, and the postpartum ration was formulated to provide (per day per cow) 350 IU of vitamin E and 7 mg of selenium.
Experiment 3 was conducted on a commercial dairy farm in Bell, Florida (29°45'N 82°52'W) using 307 Holstein cows. Estrous detection was performed as described for experiment 1. In addition, the majority of cows were subjected to a timed AI program (Pursley et al., 1997) for first insemination after calving; a proportion of other inseminations were also achieved using timed AI. The voluntary waiting period for insemination was 90 d postpartum. Cows were milked three times a day and were injected with BST as directed by the manufacturer beginning at 60 d postpartum. Pregnancy was determined by rectal palpation at 42 to 47 d after service. The prepartum cows were fed a TMR based on corn silage, wet brewers grains and alfalfa hay formulated to provide (per day per cow) 24.9 Mcal of NEL, 1209 IU of vitamin E and 7.5 of selenium. After calving, cows were fed a TMR based on corn silage and hominy formulated to provide (per day per cow) 38.0 Mcal of NEL, 1260 IU of vitamin E, and 14 mg of selenium.
Table 1
shows the frequency distribution of month of calving and month of first insemination for all the three experiments. For experiments 1 and 2, most first inseminations after calving were performed during the cool months of the year. For experiment 3, the majority of cows received first insemination in warm months.
|
-tocopherol analysis using HPLC, and the HPLC procedure were as described previously (Njeru et al., 1992). For experiment 1,
-tocopherol was determined in samples from 10 cows treated with vitamin E/selenium (41 samples) and 10 cows treated with placebo (44 samples). For experiment 2,
-tocopherol was determined for samples from 12 vitamin E/selenium treated cows (51 samples) and five cows treated with placebo (28 samples). For experiment 3,
-tocopherol was determined for samples from five cows treated with vitamin E/selenium (17 samples) and three cows treated with placebo (nine samples).
Experiments 4 to 6: Effects of Vitamin E on Susceptibility of Bovine Embryos to Heat Shock
Procedures for in vitro production of embryos were as described earlier (Paula-Lopes and Hansen, 2002). Briefly, cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were obtained by slicing 2- to 10-mm follicles on the surface of the ovary into a beaker containing oocyte collection medium. Cumulus-oocyte complexes that had at least one layer of compact cumulus cells were washed two times and matured in groups of 10 in 50-µl drops of oocyte maturation medium overlaid with mineral oil for 22 h at 38.5°C in an atmosphere of 5% (vol/vol) CO2 in humidified air. For fertilization, groups of ~ 30 COC were transferred to four well plates containing 600 µl of IVF-TALP (in vitro fertilization-TALP) per well. Oocytes were fertilized with 25 µl of sperm suspension and 25 µl of PHE [0.5 mM penicillamine, 0.25 mM hypotaurine and 25 µM epinephrine in 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl] added to each well. Presumptive zygotes were removed from fertilization wells, denuded of cumulus cells, washed 2 to 3 times in Hepes-TALP to remove remaining cumulus cells and associated spermatozoa, and placed in groups of ~ 25 to 30 in 50-µl drops of modified KSOM overlaid with mineral oil. Embryos at the two-cell stage were harvested at 28 to 30 h after insemination and morulae were collected on d 5 after insemination.
Because vitamin E is hydrophobic, it was first dissolved in absolute ethanol as a 0.2 M stock solution, stored in the dark at 4°C, and diluted in modified KSOM to a final concentration of 100 µM vitamin E and 0.05 % (vol/vol) ethanol at 3 h before culture. Embryos were cultured in 50-µl drops of modified KSOM containing either vehicle [0.05% (vol/vol) ethanol] or, 100 µM vitamin E in 0.05% ethanol. Microdrops were overlaid with mineral oil or, when microdrops contained vitamin E, in mineral oil containing 100 µM vitamin E. Incubations were in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 (vol/vol) in humidified air. Incubation temperature was 38.5°C unless stated otherwise.
Experiments 4 and 5 were each designed with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to determine whether vitamin E protects two-cell bovine embryos from heat shock. Embryos at the two-cell stage were harvested 28 to 30 h after insemination and placed in 50-µl drops. The number of embryos per drop were similar within a replicate. For experiment 4, there were 13 to 23 embryos per drop, while there were 11 to 21 embryos per drop for experiment 5. Embryos were preincubated for 5 h at 38.5°C in modified KSOM containing either vehicle [0.05% (vol/vol) ethanol] or 100 µM vitamin E in 0.05% (vol/vol) ethanol. Following preincubation, embryos were either maintained at 38.5°C continuously or exposed to a heat shock of 41°C for 9 h (experiment 4) or 4.5 h (experiment 5) and 38.5°C thereafter. The percentage of embryos developing to the blastocyst stage in each drop was determined on d 8 after insemination. Experiment 4 was replicated 4 times using 114 to 121 embryos/group (1 to 2 drops of embryos per treatment in each replicate). Experiment 5 was replicated 4 times using 92 to 137 embryos/group (1 to 2 drops of embryos per treatment in each replicate).
Experiment 6 utilized a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to determine whether vitamin E protects bovine embryos at the morula stage from heat shock. Embryos at the morula stage were harvested on d 5 after insemination, placed in 50-µl drops (10 to 23 embryos per drop; the number of embryos per drop were similar for all treatments within a replicate) and treated as for experiment 4. The percentage of embryos developing to the blastocyst stage in each drop was determined on d 8 after insemination. The experiment was replicated 4 times using 125 to 183 embryos/group (1 to 3 drops of embryos per treatment was prepared for each replicate).
Statistical Analyses
Data were analyzed by least-squares analysis of variance using the general linear models procedure and the mixed models procedure of SAS (SAS, 1989). Initial analysis of the reproductive data for experiments 1 and 2 included the main effects of treatment, parity (primiparous vs multiparous), and season of first breeding (cool season, cows inseminated from September to April; hot season, cows inseminated from May to August) as well as interactions between these terms. Initial analysis of data for experiment 3 included main effects of treatment, parity (primiparous vs. multiparous), season of first breeding (cool season cows inseminated from September to April; hot season cows inseminated from May to August) and the time of the prepartum injection relative to calving (cows injected > 14 d before expected calving; cows injected < 14 d and > 8 d before expected calving; cows injected < 8 d before expected calving). Nonsignificant terms were subsequently removed from the analysis. Thus, the mathematical model for the final analysis of reproductive data for experiments 1 to 3 included main effects of treatment and parity. The mathematical model for data on milk yield and composition included main effects of treatment, parity, and month of calving, all interactions, and DIM as a covariate. Plasma
-tocopherol concentration data were analyzed using main effects of treatment, time of sample collection relative to calving (prepartum, and 1 to 14, 15 to 28, 29 to 35, 36 to 42, and > 42 d postpartum), and cow. Effect of cow was considered a random effect and all other main effects were fixed.
For embryo studies, there was one or more drop per treatment for each replicate and the percentage of embryos developing to the blastocyst stage was calculated for each drop. Percentage data were transformed using the arcsin transformation before analysis. Data were analyzed using main effects of treatment, temperature, and replicate using the general linear models (GLM) procedure of SAS, where replicate (i.e., day of IVF procedure) was considered a fixed variable, and by the mixed models procedure of SAS, where replicate was considered a random variable (SAS, 1989). Probability values were similar for both methods, and probability values reported herein are derived from the analysis by GLM.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherol concentrations in any of the three experiments (Table 2
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dose of vitamin E injected into treated cows was less than the amount of vitamin E supplied in 2-d ration, and this dose may not be effective at altering chronic vitamin E status. In support of this idea is the observation that there was no effect of vitamin E and selenium injections on plasma concentrations of
-tocopherol measured at 2-wk intervals after injection. Similarly, Bass et al. (2000) failed to observe effects of injection of vitamin E on plasma concentrations of
-tocopherol 3 to 4 wk after injection. In contrast, the amount of selenium injected was probably sufficient to affect antioxidant status because intramuscular injection of selenium can increase glutathione peroxidase activity for at least 3 wk (Harrison et al., 1984).
It was reasoned that beneficial effects of vitamin E and selenium injections would be greater in experiment 3, where most of the cows were inseminated in hot weather, than for experiments 1 and 2, where most of the cows were inseminated in cool weather. The basis for this hypothesis was the idea that the increase in metabolism when cows are in environments above the upper critical temperature would result in increased oxygen consumption and free radical production. Indeed, heat stress has been reported to deplete plasma antioxidant activity (Harmon et al., 1997). There was, however, no beneficial effect of vitamin E and selenium in experiment 3. Pregnancy rates to first service were higher than is typically seen in the summer in Florida, and it is possible that cows in this study were less affected by heat stress than is typically the case because of effective environmental management practices at this farm. In addition, the high dietary content of vitamin E and selenium in experiment 3 may have negated any beneficial effect of injections of these molecules.
Other antioxidant treatments were also without effect on fertility of heat-stressed dairy cows including injection of 3000 IU of vitamin E at the time of AI (Ealy et al., 1994) and multiple injections of ß-carotene (Aréchiga et al., 1998b). Feeding supplemental ß-carotene to heat-stressed cows had only slight effects on reproductive function (Aréchiga et al., 1998a). Thus, it is likely that the failure of vitamin E and selenium to improve reproductive function during heat stress reflects the fact that antioxidant status is less important for determining reproductive function in the summer than had been hypothesized. Studies indicate that oxygen consumption of lactating cows actually decreases during heat stress (Kibler and Brody, 1956; Sorensen and Weniger, 1987), probably because feed consumption and milk yield is reduced, and such an effect would decrease whole-body, free-radical production.
The present experiments do not support the idea that vitamin E acts as an effective thermoprotectant or general antioxidant for cultured bovine embryos. Addition of vitamin E to culture medium did not enhance development of two-cell bovine embryos or morulae at 38.5°C or exposed to a heat shock of 41°C. In mice, vitamin E reduced the deleterious effect of heat shock on embryonic viability as determined by dye exclusion but did not block the inhibitory effect of heat shock on development to the blastocyst stage (Aréchiga et al., 1994a). Olson and Seidel (2000) observed that vitamin E supplementation during culture of bovine embryos increased embryonic development to the blastocyst stage. Variation between studies may be due to differences in the system for culturing embryos, i.e., in an atmosphere of 20% oxygen in the present study vs. 5% oxygen in the study by Olson and Seidel (2000). It is possible that the high oxygen concentration used in the present study resulted in exacerbated free radical production that could not be compensated for by the use of vitamin E as an antioxidant. Also, embryos in the present study were not exposed to vitamin E until the two-cell stage, whereas embryos in the earlier study were cultured with vitamin E beginning at the one-cell stage. The concentration of vitamin E used in the present experiments, 100 µM, was chosen because it was the concentration used by Olson and Seidel (2000). Possibly, thermoprotective effects of vitamin E would have been different at other concentrations.
As has been reported earlier (Edwards and Hansen, 1997), embryonic sensitivity to heat shock was reduced as embryos advanced in development. In particular, exposure of two-cell embryos to 41°C reduced the proportion of embryos that developed to the blastocyst stage, whereas a similar heat shock had no effect on development of morula to the blastocyst stage. Thus, embryos acquire resistance to elevated temperature as they advance in development.
In summary, the experiments in this study failed to yield evidence of a beneficial effect of supplemental vitamin E and selenium above estimated requirements on reproduction or milk yield of lactating dairy cows under cool or heat stress conditions or of vitamin E as an embryonic thermoprotectant or as a culture medium additive for enhancing development of preimplantation embryos in culture. It is concluded that multiple injections of vitamin E and selenium in the manner tested are unlikely to enhance reproductive or lactational performance of lactating dairy cows receiving dietary requirements of these nutrients.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
aban Tekin, Paolete Soto and Gabriel Couto for help in the field; Nancy Wilkinson for help with vitamin E assays; William Rembert for collecting ovaries; Marshall, Alex, and Adam Chernin and employees of Central Beef Packing Co. (Center Hill, FL) for providing ovaries; and Scott A. Randell and Southeastern Semen Services, Lake City, Florida, for donating semen. Special thanks go to employees of the University of Florida Dairy Research Unit, Dale and Connie Sauls and the employees of Condale Dairy, and Don Bennink and employees of North Florida Holstein Dairy, for providing research animals and assistance with animal handling. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Present address: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32610. ![]()
3 Present address: Department of Epidemiology and International Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Project San Francisco, PB 780, Kigali, Rwanda, Africa. ![]()
Corresponding author:
P. J. Hansen; e-mail:
Hansen{at}animal.ufl.edu.
Received for publication October 16, 2002. Accepted for publication February 19, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherol concentration in sheep after intramuscular injection of DL-
-tocopherol. J. Anim. Sci. 70:25622567.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ceballos, J. Sanchez, H. Stryhn, J. B. Montgomery, H. W. Barkema, and J. J. Wichtel Meta-analysis of the effect of oral selenium supplementation on milk selenium concentration in cattle J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2009; 92(1): 324 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hernandez-Ceron, F. D. Jousan, P. Soto, and P. J. Hansen Timing of Inhibitory Actions of Gossypol on Cultured Bovine Embryos J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 922 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.D. Jousan and P.J. Hansen Insulin-like Growth Factor-I as a Survival Factor for the Bovine Preimplantation Embryo Exposed to Heat Shock Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1665 - 1670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Rivera, G. M Dahlgren, L. A. de Castro e Paula, R. T Kennedy, and P. J Hansen Actions of thermal stress in two-cell bovine embryos: oxygen metabolism, glutathione and ATP content, and the time-course of development Reproduction, July 1, 2004; 128(1): 33 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |