JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kennelly, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kennelly, J. J.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:1321-1324
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Short Communication: Postruminal Infusion of Conjugated Linoleic Acids Negatively Impacts Milk Synthesis in Holstein Cows

J. A. Bell and J. J. Kennelly

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5

Corresponding author:
John. J. Kennelly; e-mail:
john.kennelly{at}ualberta.ca.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In view of the potential of rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) as a means to increase the CLA content of bovine milk, a study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of synthetic CLA on milk production and composition. Four Holstein cows received abomasal infusion of: 1) control, no lipid infusion, 2) 150 g/d of synthetic CLA, 31.7% cis-9, trans-11; 30.4% trans-10, cis-12, 3) 150 g/d of safflower oil, and 4) 150 g/d of tallow. Infusion was carried out for 20 to 22 h/d for 11-d periods in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. The milk fat concentration of cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 isomers of CLA was significantly increased with infusion of CLA. However, CLA infusion had other unexpected effects on milk production and composition. Milk yield dropped significantly during the period of CLA infusion. Furthermore, as well as the typical depression in milk fat reported with trans-10 isomers of CLA, other negative effects specific to CLA infusion were observed including a drop in lactose concentration and yield, a drop in protein yield, and an elevated somatic cell count. The important difference between synthetically produced CLA and CLA produced naturally in the cow is the much higher proportion of trans-10 isomers of CLA in the former. The results of this study suggest that the extent of enrichment possible for trans-10 isomers of CLA, and hence the usefulness of synthetic CLA for this purpose, may be limited because of unacceptable effects on milk yield and composition.

Key Words: abomasal infusion • conjugated linoleic acid • dairy cow • milk

Abbreviation key: CLA = conjugated linoleic acid, CTL = control, SAFF = safflower, TALL = beef tallow, FA = fatty acid(s)


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) refers to a group of 18-carbon conjugated dienes of predominantly ruminant origin. Ruminant animals produce CLA through the biohydrogenation of dietary fat in the rumen and also by desaturation of trans-11 18:1 in the mammary gland and adipose tissue (Griinari et al., 2000). Conjugated linoleic acid can also be synthesized in the laboratory from vegetable oils, such as sunflower oil. Mixtures of CLA isomers have been reported to have anti-cancer, anti-obesity, and anti-diabetic properties in various animal models (Belury, 2002).

Conjugated linoleic acid of ruminant origin contains predominantly one isomer (cis-9, trans-11 18:2), whereas synthetically produced CLA tends to contain a considerable proportion of trans-10, cis-12, as well as cis-9, trans-11 and smaller quantities of other isomers. This type of product has reduced subcutaneous fat and increased lean in pigs (Dugan et al., 1997) and will likely become commercially available in the near future. The trans-10, cis-12 isomer has been associated with these effects on body composition, whereas the anticarcinogenic properties have been attributed to the cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 isomers (Pariza et al., 2001). Isomers of CLA have also had an inhibitory effect on bovine milk fat synthesis (Loor and Herbein, 1999). The trans-10, cis-12 CLA appears to be the isomer responsible for this effect (Baumgard et al., 2000). Rumen-protected CLA may therefore be beneficial as a tool to increase the protein to fat ratio in milk (Bauman and Griinari, 2001), and potentially improve the energy balance of early lactation cows (Perfield II et al., 2002).

In view of the ability of the trans-10, cis-12 isomer to reduce body fat in animals, interest has been shown in whether this isomer could have a benefit for weight reduction in humans. Feeding rumen-protected CLA could be a means of elevating the concentration of CLA isomers in bovine milk fat, thereby increasing the supply of these specific fatty acids (FA) in the human diet. Gulati et al (2000) fed goats 40g/d of a rumen-protected CLA mixture for 4 d and observed a significant increase in milk fat CLA concentration. Similarly, Chouinard et al. (1999a) showed that postruminal delivery of 150 g/d of a CLA mixture for 5 d was effective at increasing the concentration of CLA isomers in bovine milk fat. However, this level of CLA significantly depressed milk fat and reduced milk yield by more than 3 kg (Chouinard et al., 1999a). Our objective was to evaluate in greater detail the effect of postruminal delivery of CLA isomers on milk production and composition using abomasal infusion of 150 g/d for 11-d periods.

Four multiparous pregnant Holstein cows (168 ± 21 DIM; mean ± SD) were fed the same basal diet of 55% forage (alfalfa silage, barley silage, and alfalfa hay) and 45% concentrate (based on barley, corn, and canola meal). Each cow received abomasal infusion of: 1) control, no lipid infusion (CTL), 2) 150 g/d of synthetic CLA (Conlinco Inc, Detroit Lakes, MN), 31.7% cis-9, trans-11; 30.4% trans-10, cis-12 (CLA), 3) 150 g/d of safflower oil, 76% linoleic acid (SAFF), and 4) 150 g/d of beef tallow (TALL). Infusion was carried out for 20 to 22 h/d for 11-d periods in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. The lipids were infused daily in a 6-L carrier solution to give an adequate volume for infusion. The infusion solutions were made as follows. Briefly, 150 g of lipid was made into a paste with 56 g of spray-dried chicken protein (American Protein Corp., Ames, Iowa) in a steam-jacketed kettle. Six liters of water were added and the mixture was stirred and heated. When the temperature reached 70°C, 7 g of Tween-80 was added as an emulsifying agent. The emulsion was then homogenized in a one-stage homogenizer at 2500 psi and stored at 4°C until needed. The infusate was pumped using a Masterflex peristalic pump with L/S-16 Tygon tubing (Labcor Inc., Anjou, Quebec). The tubing was passed through a rumen cannula and anchored in the abomasum with a plastisol flange. DMI and milk yield were recorded daily. Milk was sampled during the last 2 d of each period for composition analysis. Milk was analyzed for protein, fat, lactose, and SCC using near infrared spectroscopy at the Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development Central Milk testing laboratory (Edmonton, Alberta). Fatty acid composition of milk was analyzed following preparation of FA methyl esters with sodium methoxide (Chouinard et al., 1999b). The data were analyzed as a 4 x 4 Latin square design using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS, 1989). Treatment differences were evaluated using the Duncan procedure with a significance level of P < 0.05.

The results of this study have been presented previously as an abstract (Bell and Kennelly, 2001). Infusion of CLA had dramatic effects on milk production and composition (Table 1Go). Milk yield declined steadily throughout the period of CLA infusion so that over the last 2 d of the period milk yield was 34.8 to 43.6% lower with CLA infusion compared to the other treatments. Concentration and yield of lactose and fat were also significantly lower with CLA infusion. Protein concentration was significantly higher with CLA although the yield of protein was lower compared to the other treatments. Analysis of FA composition showed that the concentration of 18:2n-6 and CLA increased significantly as a result of SAFF and CLA infusion, respectively (Table 2Go). Since the yield of milk fat was reduced with CLA infusion, the yield of all the FA (except CLA isomers) was significantly reduced with the CLA treatment (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Yield and composition of milk from cows receiving abomasal infusion of control (CTL), beef tallow (TALL), safflower oil (SAFF), or conjugated linoleic acid (CLA).
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fatty acid composition of milk fat from cows receiving abomasal infusion of control (CTL), beef tallow (TALL), safflower oil (SAFF), or conjugated linoleic acid (CLA).
 
Most interesting was the effect of treatment on milk SCC (Table 1Go). The SCC was approximately five to seven times greater as a result of CLA infusion compared to the other treatments, which had values at levels considered normal for healthy cows. SCC is a count of white blood cells and sloughed off epithelial cells in milk. High counts are generally indicative of an infection in the udder. However, we believe that infection was not the cause of the high SCC observed with CLA infusion. The high SCC was observed in each cow but only during the period when that cow received CLA infusion. Milk from the period preceding or following the CLA period always had much lower counts. The cows also showed no physical signs that may have indicated an infection. For instance, there was no effect of treatment on DMI (Table 1Go). Furthermore, there were no visible signs of mastitis during milking at any time in the course of the experiment. Bacterial analysis of the milk showed counts of Streptococcus spp./Enterococcus spp. well within the normal range for raw milk and no signs of Staphylococcus aureus (data not shown). The surprisingly low concentration of lactose with CLA was counterbalanced by a higher concentration of sodium. The concentration of chloride was also higher with CLA infusion. During the early stages of involution, similar changes are seen in the mammary secretion as were observed with infusion of CLA. Although purely speculative, it is possible that infusion of relatively large amounts of these synthetic CLA isomers was initiating dry-off mechanisms in the udder. Further work will be necessary to explore this by examining the changes in expression of genes involved in the process of bovine mammary involution.

This study demonstrated that postruminal delivery of a mixture of CLA isomers could significantly increase the concentration of these various FA in bovine milk. This is in contrast to methods that use modifications to the cow’s diet to increase the natural production of CLA where the increase is predominantly in cis-9, trans-11 CLA. This study showed that the extent of enrichment possible for trans-10 isomers of CLA is limited because of unacceptable effects on milk yield and composition. This places a constraint on the degree to which synthetic CLA preparations could be used to enrich milk CLA and the extent to which bovine milk could be used as a vehicle to increase the supply of trans-10, cis-12 CLA in the human diet.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors thank Alberta Agricultural Research Institute, Alberta Milk, Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Dairy Farmers of Canada for financial assistance for this research. We appreciate the help of the farm staff at the Dairy Research and Technology Centre for the feeding and care of the experimental animals, and fellow researchers and graduate students in sample collection.

Received for publication November 4, 2002. Accepted for publication December 20, 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Bauman, D. E., and J. M. Griinari. 2001. Regulation and nutritional regulation of milk fat: low-fat milk syndrome. Live. Prod. Sci. 70:15–29.

Baumgard, L. H., B. A. Corl, D. A. Dwyer, A. Sæbø, and D. E. Bauman. 2000. Identification of the conjugated linoleic acid isomer that inhibits milk fat synthesis. Am. J. Physiol. 278:R197–R184.

Bell, J. A., and J. J. Kennelly. 2001. Synthetic conjugated linoleic acid may cause mammary involution in dairy cows. Page 8 in Proc. Joint Mtg. ADSA, AMSA, ASAS, PSA, Indianapolis, Indiana, July, 2001.

Belury, M. A. 2002. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid in health: Physiological effects and mechanisms of action. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 22:505–531.[Medline]

Chouinard, P. Y., L. Corneau, D. M. Barbano, L. E. Metzger, and D. E. Bauman. 1999a. Conjugated linoleic acids alter milk fatty acid composition and inhibit milk fat secretion in dairy cows. J. Nutr. 129:1579–1584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chouinard, P. Y., L. Corneau, A. Sæbø, and D. E. Bauman. 1999b. Milk yield and composition during abomasal infusion of conjugated linoleic acids in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2737–2745.[Abstract]

Dugan, M. E. R., J. L. Aalhus, A. L. Schaefer, and J. K. G. Kramer. 1997. The effect of conjugated linoleic acid on fat to lean repartitioning and feed conversion in pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 77:723–725.

Griinari, J. M, B. A. Corl, S. H. Lacy, P. Y. Chouinard, K. V. V. Nurmela and D. E. Bauman. 2000. Conjugated linoleic acid is synthesized endogenously in lactating dairy cows by {Delta}9-desaturase. J. Nutr. 130:2285–2291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gulati, S. K., S. M. Kitessa, J. R., Ashes, E. Fleck, E. B. Byers, Y. G. Byers, and T. W. Scott. 2000. Protection of conjugated linoleic acids from ruminal hydrogenation and their incorporation into milk fat. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 86:139–148.[Medline]

Loor, J. J., and J. H. Herbein. 1998. Exogenous conjugated linoleic acid isomers reduce bovine milk fat concentration and yield by inhibiting de novo fatty acid synthesis. J. Nutr. 128:2411–2419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pariza, M. W., Y. Park, M. E. Cook. 2001. The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid. Prog. Lipid Res. 40(4):283–298.[Medline]

Perfield II, J. W., G. Bernal-Santos, T. R. Overton, and D. E. Bauman. 2002. Effects of dietary supplementation of rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid in dairy cows during established lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2609–2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT users guide, version 6, 4th ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. J. Harvatine, J. W. Perfield II, and D. E. Bauman
Expression of Enzymes and Key Regulators of Lipid Synthesis Is Upregulated in Adipose Tissue during CLA-Induced Milk Fat Depression in Dairy Cows
J. Nutr., May 1, 2009; 139(5): 849 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Glasser, A. Ferlay, M. Doreau, P. Schmidely, D. Sauvant, and Y. Chilliard
Long-Chain Fatty Acid Metabolism in Dairy Cows: A Meta-Analysis of Milk Fatty Acid Yield in Relation to Duodenal Flows and De Novo Synthesis
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2771 - 2785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. E. Bauman, J. W. Perfield II, K. J. Harvatine, and L. H. Baumgard
Regulation of Fat Synthesis by Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Lactation and the Ruminant Model
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 403 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. K. Kay, T. R. Mackle, D. E. Bauman, N. A. Thomson, and L. H. Baumgard
Effects of a Supplement Containing Trans-10, Cis-12 Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Bioenergetic and Milk Production Parameters in Grazing Dairy Cows Offered Ad Libitum or Restricted Pasture
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 721 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. J. Odens, R. Burgos, M. Innocenti, M. J. VanBaale, and L. H. Baumgard
Effects of Varying Doses of Supplemental Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Production and Energetic Variables During the Transition Period
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 293 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kennelly, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kennelly, J. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS