|
|
||||||||
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, 460 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Corresponding author:
S. Gunasekaran; e-mail:
GUNA{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: frozen storage meltability Mozzarella cheese stretchability
Abbreviation key: FDM = fat in the dry matter, LMPS = low-moisture, part-skim, MNFP = moisture in the nonfat portion, SEM = scanning electron microscopy
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initial studies of freezing of cheese were to evaluate the potential damage from freezing during sample transit (Sommer, 1928; McDowall, 1938). Freezing Cheddar cheese at -18°C caused the cheese to become crumbly but the texture was recovered after thawing at normal storage temperature. In the following years, interest in freezing cheese increased as a means of prolonging desirable cheese properties. Morris and Combs (1955) reported that Cheddar cheese could be satisfactorily frozen if cut into one pound or smaller pieces and wrapped in foil. Shannon (1974) observed that frozen Cheddar cheeses had a crumbly body and mealy texture but did not see any significant difference in firmness as measured by a shear test. Luck (1977) noted that high fat content helped cheese to withstand structural changes during frozen storage.
Cervantes et al. (1983) found that there were no statistically significant effects or consistent trends in textural and sensory evaluations of Mozzarella cheese with respect to freezing. Dahlstrom (1980) reported that frozen-thawed cheese evaluated immediately after thawing exhibited an acid flavor, free surface moisture, and poor cohesiveness as compared to the unfrozen cheese. Kasprzak (1992) reported that there were no statistically significant effects on texture, flavor and meltability of Cheddar cheese with respect to freezing and thawing. Oberg et al. (1992b) studied the effects of freezing, thawing, and shredding of low moisture, part-skim (LMPS) Mozzarella cheese on physical properties. They showed that shredded cheese frozen at -196°C stretched the best. However, block cheese frozen at -20°C melted the best.
Diefes et al. (1993) investigated the rheological behavior of frozen and thawed LMPS Mozzarella cheese. Their study showed that the frozen and thawed Mozzarella cheese tested at 20°C became harder and more elastic with storage time, while samples stored in a refrigerator became softer and more viscoelastic with time. Upon melting, both 90-d frozen and 90-d refrigerated cheeses were less elastic and viscous than 14-d refrigerated samples. Betola et al. (1996a) evaluated the effects of aging, ripening before or after freezing, and freezing rate on the physical properties of low moisture Mozzarella cheese. From extensive statistical analyses, they concluded that the low moisture Mozzarella cheese could be frozen and then stored at -20°C without loss of quality when aged from 14 to 21 d at 4°C before consumption.
The above studies indicate that freezing, thawing, and frozen storage modify the physical properties of cheeses. However, the specific causes contributing to the changes in cheese physical properties following freezing observed by those studies were not elucidated. Current industry practice is to freeze Mozzarella cheese soon after manufacture, but it is not clear if the timing of freezing and duration of frozen storage currently used in the industry is optimal to ensure desirable physical properties of the cheese. The objectives of this research were to: 1) study the effects of frozen storage, tempering, and aging on physical properties of pasta filata and nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheeses; 2) determine an optimal frozen storage, tempering, and aging combination for these cheeses; and 3) investigate the factors contributing to the changes in cheese physical properties.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Temperature profiles of the cheese samples were measured during freezing and thawing using type-T thermocouples connected to a data logger. Thermocouples were inserted into the block samples and positioned at about the center. The ambient temperature was also monitored.
Compositional Analysis
All compositional analyses were performed in duplicate at 28 d post-manufacture. The pH was measured by the gold electrode/quinhydrone method (Case et al., 1985). Salt analysis was performed according to the procedure given by Johnson and Olson (1985) using the chloride analyzer (Model 926, Corning Glass Works, Medfield, MA). Protein concentration was determined by the Kjeldahl method (Case et al., 1985). Moisture was determined by a vacuum oven technique (Case et al., 1985) and fat by the Babcock test (Case et al., 1985). Percentages of fat in the dry matter (FDM) and moisture in the nonfat portion (MNFP) were calculated (Tunick and Shieh, 1995).
Cheese Physical Properties
Meltability.
The UW Meltmeter, a modified squeeze flow apparatus (Wang et al., 1998) was used to measure melting behavior of cheese in triplicate. Cylindrical specimens of cheese, 30-mm diameter and 8-mm height, were cut out with a cork borer and used as described in Kuo et al. (2000). Meltability was calculated as the difference between the initial height and the height of melted cheese at one second.
Stretchability.
A uniaxial horizontal test procedure designed and developed by Ak et al. (1993) was modified and used to measure the stretchability of cheese in duplicate. Cheese samples of 38-mm x 20-mm x 6-mm were put into a sample holder (Figure 1A
) and heated in situ to 55°C and stretched horizontally in the sample chamber (Figure 1B
) using a uniaxial testing device (Instron Model 1130, Instron Corp., Canton, MA) with a 100-N load cell. Crosshead speed was set at 21.2 mm/s. The force required to pull the cheese strings and the length of the strings were obtained from the data. Reciprocal of maximum force was used as an indicator of sample stretchability. The higher the number, the better the stretchability.
|
Statistical Analysis
The data from the measurement of physical properties were subjected to ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS, Version 6, Cary, NC, 1989). The statistical model employed was: Yijkl = µ + Ai + Fj + Tk + (A x F)ij + (A x T)ik + (F x T)jk + (A x F x T)ijk +
ijkl where, Y = cheese physical properties, µ = reference, A = effect of aging (i = 1 to 3), F = effect of frozen storage (j = 1 to 2), T = effect of tempering (k = 1 to 2), A x F = effect of aging by frozen storage interaction, A x T = effect of aging by tempering interaction, F x T = effect of frozen storage by tempering interaction, A x F x T = effect of aging by frozen storage by tempering interaction, and
ijkl = residual variation. Significant interaction and main effects were compared using Fishers Protected LSD. A test was described as significant only when P < 0.05.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cheese Physical Properties
Refrigerated cheese (control samples).
The physical properties of control pasta-filata and nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheeses during 21-d storage are shown in Table 2
. Aging had a significant effect on meltability and stretchability of LMPS pasta filata and nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheeses stored at 7°C. The meltability of pasta filata Mozzarella cheese increased gradually during the 3 wk of storage. The increase in meltability of nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheese from 7 to 14 d was smaller than that from 14 to 21 d.
|
s1-casein and ß-casein in cheese by residual coagulant and milk plasmin (Farkye et al., 1991), the changes in the state of water in cheese (Kuo, 2001), and the increase in protein hydration sphere of cheese (McMahon et al., 1999; Kuo et al., 2001).
Frozen Cheese.
Effects of frozen storage and tempering on the physical properties of LMPS pasta filata and nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheeses of three aging periods before frozen storage are shown in Figure 3
. Meltability of frozen-stored pasta filata Mozzarella cheese sample increased as the aging increased from 2 to 14 d. The effect was pronounced for 1-wk frozen-stored sample as evidenced by the significant (P < 0.05) age x frozen storage interaction (Table 3
). Further tempering of frozen-stored samples resulted in increased meltability, but only the samples aged 2 and 14 d before frozen storage showed significant differences (P < 0.05). The effect was the same whether the duration of frozen storage was short or long, resulting in insignificant (P > 0.05) frozen storage x tempering interaction (Table 3
). The meltability of 1-wk frozen-stored cheese sample was similar to that frozen-stored for 4 wk. However, when the cheese sample was aged for 14 d before freezing then the meltability was higher for the sample stored frozen for 1 wk compared to 4 wk.
|
|
|
s1-casein and ß-casein (Tunick et al., 1993) reduced cohesiveness and softened the body, thus increasing meltability (Oberg et al., 1992b). Accordingly, the effect of aging and tempering on the meltability of both frozen-stored pasta filata and nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheeses might be due to proteolysis of the protein matrix during refrigerated storage.
Stretchability of frozen-stored pasta filata Mozzarella cheese samples aged 2 and 14 d before frozen storage increased with tempering time, but that of samples aged 7 d before frozen storage decreased with tempering time. The effect was more pronounced for the 1-wk frozen-stored samples, resulting in significant (P < 0.05) frozen storage x tempering interaction (Table 3
). Generally, cheese samples stored frozen for 1 wk had a higher stretchability than 4-wk frozen-stored samples.
Stretchability of frozen-stored nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheese samples decreased during aging from 2 to 14 d. The effect is more pronounced for 1-wk frozen-stored cheese samples, as evidenced by the significant (P < 0.05) age x frozen storage interaction (Table 4
). Stretchability of 4-wk frozen-stored samples decreased significantly during tempering, while stretchability of 1-wk frozen-stored samples aged 7 d before frozen storage increased and sample aged 14 d before frozen storage decreased during tempering, leading to a significant frozen storage x tempering interaction (Table 4
).
Harvey et al. (1982) stated that meltability might be related to the state of casein in the cheese and extent of proteolysis. Diefes et al. (1993) mentioned that local dehydration of proteins causes breaks in protein structure as cheese undergoes freezing. Bertola et al. (1996b) speculated that the protein network in cheese weakened by freezing is more susceptible to proteolysis. Fontecha et al. (1993; 1996) reported the conversion of
-helix and ß-(sheet or strand) structures of the casein in frozen ewes milk cheese in to unordered structure, particularly in slowly frozen samples, consistent with greater damage to the microstructure observed by SEM and greater proteolysis. The investigations on the effects of freezing on cheese microstructure are few (Fontecha et al., 1996; Perez-Munuera et al., 1999) and none pertinent to Mozzarella cheese were found.
Cheese Microstructure
A large portion of the reticular structure of the unfrozen pasta filata Mozzarella cheese (Figure 4A
) was damaged and the protein matrix became more porous in the frozen-stored pasta filata Mozzarella cheese sample (Figures 4B
and 4C
). Local dehydration of proteins and ice crystal formation in cheese during freezing and frozen storage might cause breaks in the protein structure (Diefes et al., 1993). Extended frozen storage might result in a more extensive breakdown of the cheese structure due to recrystallization of melted ice crystals. Upon tempering, the proteins are unable to fully rebind water (Diefes et al., 1993). Kuo (2001) reported that water is less confined to the protein matrix as evidenced by a sharp increase in water self-diffusion coefficient of frozen-stored pasta filata Mozzarella cheese sample as compare to the unfrozen sample. These pools of water might then lead to a more porous protein matrix in frozen-stored cheese samples.
|
The frozen-stored nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheese samples contained noticeable clumps of bacteria, about 0.8 µm in diameter (Figure 4E
), which were not observed in the unfrozen sample (Figure 4D
), resulting in the formation of cracks in the cheese sample. We postulate that the distribution of bacteria in nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheese samples was uneven. Upon frozen storage, the local cheese matrix where those bacteria are embedded might be more susceptible to damage. This observation can be made because there were clumps of granule-like bacteria in several areas in the frozen-stored cheese samples. The presence of numerous clumps of granule-like bacteria may present local discontinuities in the cheese matrix structure upon frozen storage. Cracks were also observed in the curd granule junctions of frozen-stored nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheese sample (Figure 4F
). Fontecha et al. (1996) suggested that ruptures in the curd granule junctions of cheese sample may be attributed either to ice crystal formation, or as a result of stresses in the matrix due to immobilization of the aqueous phase by freezing while the ice expands which results in cracks.
The areas where the cracks and the granule-like bacteria clusters are present may weaken the protein network, and consequently change the physical properties of the cheese sample. Extended frozen storage critically damages the cheese matrix (Fontecha et al., 1996), leading to increased meltability of the cheese sample frozen stored for 4 wk compared to 1 wk for nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheese.
Comparisons of Studied Factors
It has been reported that the most critical temperature range in terms of harming cheese quality due to the formation of ice crystals is ± 2°C surrounding the initial freezing point (Price, 1935). The more rapidly cheese passes through this freezing zone, the less damage is done to the cheese microstructure and consequently less change to the cheese physical properties. Temperature fluctuation of cheese samples caused by freezer defrost cycle during frozen storage as shown in Figure 2
might have resulted in recrystallization of melted ice crystals leading to some changes in cheese microstructure.
Kuo et al. (2001) reported that water-holding capacity of pasta filata Mozzarella cheese stored at 7°C increases from d 2 to 10. Water in pasta filata Mozzarella cheese exists in the fat-serum channel and is absorbed by the protein matrix during the early stages of maturation. This is accompanied by a swelling of the protein matrix that continues until the spaces between the fat globules are completely filled by the protein matrix (McMahon et al., 1999) as evidenced by the formation of a reticular structure in Figure 4A
. It may be presumed that a considerable amount of the water molecules in 7-d aged cheese are absorbed by the protein matrix, thus, the protein fibers suffer minor damage due to small ice crystals in the cheese matrix. During tempering, the remainder of the water molecules in cavities continuously migrate into the protein matrix as evidenced by the formation of new reticular structures in the localized area within the matrix (Kuo, 2001). Combining the observations of McMahon et al. (1999), Kuo et al. (2001), and the results presented in this study, it may be concluded that pasta filata Mozzarella should be aged 1 wk at 7°C before freezing and can be stored for 4 wk at -20°C to obtain good melt and stretch properties of the cheese as long as the final product is tempered for 7 d before consumption. In this case, minor damage to the protein matrix in cheese would not change the cheese physical properties to an extent that it is unacceptable to consumers.
Freezing and frozen storage of nonpasta filata Mozzarella cheese sample damaged the protein matrix structure at localized areas as evidenced by the formation of cracks and clumps of bacteria. Filchacova et al. (1983) reported that alterations in the structure of the protein matrix during freezing results in partial separation of the free water as evidenced by a lower water-holding capacity. Kuo (2001) observed a lower water self-diffusion coefficient in frozen-thawed cheese sample tempered for 7 d compared to 1 d, indicating that tempering might cause partial rebinding of water into the protein matrix. Thus, nonpasta filata Mozzarella could be frozen soon after manufacture (e.g., 2 d postmanufacture), but the cheese has to be tempered at least a week. However, prolonging the tempering period might result in extensive proteolysis of cheese and adversely affect its physical properties. Accordingly, to retain good melt and stretch properties, nonpasta filata Mozzarella can be stored up to 4 wk at -20°C as long as the product is aged at 7°C for a total (before and after frozen storage) of 9 to 16 d.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication March 18, 2002. Accepted for publication October 12, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Conte, C. Scrocco, M. Sinigaglia, and M. A. Del Nobile Innovative Active Packaging Systems to Prolong the Shelf Life of Mozzarella Cheese J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2126 - 2131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. W. Park, J. H. Lee, and S. J. Lee Effects of frozen and refrigerated storage on organic acid profiles of goat milk plain soft and Monterey Jack cheeses. J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(3): 862 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mizuno and J. A. Lucey Effects of Two Types of Emulsifying Salts on the Functionality of Nonfat Pasta Filata Cheese J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3411 - 3425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-I. Kuo, M. E. Anderson, and S. Gunasekaran Determining Effects of Freezing on Pasta Filata and Non-Pasta Filata Mozzarella Cheeses by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2003; 86(8): 2525 - 2536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |