HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fatehi, J. Articles by Boettcher, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fatehi, J. Articles by Boettcher, P. J.

Genetic Parameters for Feet and Leg Traits Evaluated in Different Environments

J. Fatehi^*, A. Stella^*,1, J. J. Shannon and P. J. Boettcher^*,2

^* Center for Genetic Improvement of Livestock Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Holstein Canada, Brantford, Ontario, Canada N3T 5K4

Corresponding author:
P. J. Boettcher; e-mail:
paulboettcher{at}anafi.it.

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES

 
The objective of this study was to test for genotype x environmental interaction (GXE) for feet and leg traits scored in different environments. Genetic correlations of seven feet and leg traits were estimated across different management systems: free versus tie stalls, slatted versus solid flooring, and intact versus trimmed hooves. Data were records from first-lactation Holstein cattle. Traits were claw uniformity, depth of heel, rear leg rear view, foot angle, bone quality, rear leg side view, and overall feet and legs. Different subsets of data were used for each comparison, resulting in 147,400; 53,550; and 145,160 records for housing, flooring, and hoof trimming management systems, respectively. Genetic parameters were estimated using REML and two-trait models in which for each animal a given trait was observed in one environment and missing in the other. Phenotypic scores were lower with tie stalls, slatted floors, and no trimming. Heritabilities tended to be greater in herds with tie stalls and slatted floors. Trimming had little effect on genetic parameters. The genetic correlations of feet and leg traits across pairs of management systems were 0.85, except for rear legs, rear view. Therefore, effects of GXE were assumed to be of little importance and modification of genetic evaluation procedures on the basis of housing, flooring, and hoof conditions seems unnecessary.

Key Words: genotype x environment interaction • conformation • housing • management

Abbreviation key: GXE= genotype x environmental interaction

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES

 
Lameness in one of the most costly diseases of dairy cattle (Enting et al., 1997). Direct costs of lameness include the costs of equipment, facilities, and chemicals for prevention and treatment, veterinary costs and increased labor. Indirect costs are also important. Feet and leg disorders are one of the most common reasons for involuntary culling in dairy cattle. Results of a survey by the National Animal Health Monitoring System (APHIS, 1996) reported that 15.0% of all culling was directly due to lameness or injury. According to this report, among factors associated with involuntary culling, only reproductive problems (26.7%) and udder and mastitis problems (26.5%) were cited more frequently as reasons for disposal. Feet and leg problems can contribute indirectly to culling for reproductive failures by decreasing expression of estrus. Increased open days, longer calving interval, and eventually lower profit and involuntary culling are the consequences of reproductive problems caused indirectly by feet and leg disorders.

The direct and indirect consequences of feet and leg problems can be reduced by selection. Two main pathways exist by which genetics can effect resistance to feet and leg disorders: metabolically and through structural differences in body conformation (McDaniel, 1997). The approach generally taken by breeding organizations is to emphasize the structural differences in the feet and legs of cattle. These structural differences can be scored directly by observation or measurement. On the basis of the linear type scoring systems introduced in the early 1980s, selection programs for conformation traits became more objective (Boelling and Pollott, 1998). Positive relationships between feet and leg traits and herd life have been shown in numerous studies (e.g., Foster et al., 1989; Boettcher et al., 1997; Passman and Reinhardt, 1999). Many countries include some measure of feet and legs conformation in their selection programs, often as a predictor of longevity (e.g., DeJong et al., 1999).

In addition to genetic effects, environmental factors also influence feet and leg traits. Diet, housing, and general management all affect the health of feet and legs (Enevoldsen et al., 1991; Greenough and Weaver, 1997). Therefore, the way in which cattle are managed could have an effect on their type scores for feet and legs. For example, tie stalls are likely to generally provide a drier environment than are free stalls. Cows in free stalls have more ability to move around and may have more opportunity for exercise. Among free-stall systems of housing, different flooring types could cause differences in scores for feet and leg traits. Some systems may be more challenging to the health of feet and legs. Scoring for these traits may also be affected by hoof trimming. In general, foot trimming is performed to minimize locomotive problems. Some breeders trim the feet of their cattle a short time before classification, to improve type scores. Thus, one might expect that mean scores for feet and leg traits would be higher in herds that regularly trim hooves than in herds that do not. In addition, variability could be reduced in these herds for some of the feet and leg traits.

Vermunt et al. (1996) found significant differences in claw conformation between the heifers that are housed indoors on concrete slats and kept out of doors in a dry lot. Gilmore (1978) indicated that measurements of foot structure were affected by a number of environmental factors, including type of housing (free stall vs. tie stall), age, breed, and time after trimming. He reported that 39% of variation in the length of rear claw was explained by breed, age, housing, time and interactions.

Differences in management among herds could have implications in genetic evaluations of type traits. If differences in phenotypic variability exist in different environments, then heritabilities may differ as well. Trimming may reduce the genetic variability of certain traits and thus decrease the heritability and accuracy of genetic evaluations. Problems transmitted by certain bulls will not be as evident if a large proportion of their daughters are treated for these problems by trimming before classification. Differences in management of cattle with respect to feet and legs could also cause genotype x environment interaction (GXE) among the feet and leg traits. For example, perhaps in free-stall environments, characteristics of the foot and hoof that resist effects of moisture would be more important than in tie-stall herds. These factors may affect the relationships between feet and legs and longevity. Burke and Funk (1993) reported that the relationship between locomotive traits and herd life differed by housing system.

To address concerns among breeders, in 1998 the Canadian Holstein Association began a program to record certain management factors at the herd level at each round of classification. The objective of this study was to use this information to test for genetic differences between the feet and leg traits for cows managed differently according to these management factors. The factors examined in this study were stall type (free vs. tie), flooring type (solid vs. slatted within free-stall herds), and frequency of trimming. Heritabilities of the feet and leg traits were estimated within these environments and genetic correlations were estimated for the same trait across environments.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES

 
Data were records of type classification and herd management surveys from the Canadian Holstein Association. The traits involved in the analysis were rear legs from the side and rear views, bone quality, foot angle, depth of heel, claw uniformity, and overall feet and leg conformation. Foot angle, heel depth, and claw uniformity are, in general, traits that describe the foot or the claw. Bone quality and rear legs, rear view describe the legs. Rear legs, rear view can be influenced by both the claw and the position of the thurls. All traits were scored on pseudo-continuous scales. This scale ranged from 1 to 9 for the first six traits and from 1 to 18 for overall feet and legs. For all traits except rear legs, side view, higher values are generally considered favorable. Table 1 has a brief description for each of the different traits. Additional details about these traits can be obtained from Holstein Canada (www.holstein.ca) of Brantford, Ontario.

The herd management surveys included four questions. The first dealt with type of housing and responses could be either tie stall, free stall, or other (including a combination of the two). The second question dealt with flooring and possible responses were cement (solid), slatted, or other. The final two dealt with hoof trimming. The first asked if hoof trimming had ever been done in the herd, and the other asked if hoof trimming was recently performed, with the definition of recent being within the previous 3 mo.

Three sets of data were obtained by grouping herds according to the results of the management surveys. To avoid problems associated with changes in environments for given cows, only those herds that answered all of the questions in the same way throughout the study period were considered. Most of the herds had been classified multiple times during the data collection period. The first dataset included data from the herds that had either tie or free stalls throughout the recording period. Herds with another type of housing were not considered. The second data set considered only free-stall herds, and grouped herds according to solid or slatted flooring. The third dataset divided herds on the basis of whether the cows had been recently trimmed or not. The housing dataset included 147,400 observations (93,664 tie stall and 53,736 free stall). The flooring set included 53,550 records (47,997 solid and 5553 slatted). The trimming file contained 145,160 records (78,063 intact and 67,097 trimmed).

A preliminary analysis used a simple ANOVA to test for effects of the different environmental groups on the traits. This model included fixed effects of the management system (e.g., tie vs. free stalls), stage of lactation, age at scoring, round and classifier, and sire.

Genetic parameters for the seven traits across the environments were estimated using REML and a series of two-trait animal models. Each of the seven feet and leg traits was dealt with separately. For each analysis, trait 1 was a given trait scored in one environment (tie stall, for example) and trait 2 was the same measure scored in the different environment (i.e., free stall). Each cow thus had the data observed for one trait and missing for the other.

The following multiple trait animal model equation was applied for estimation of variance components:

where

yijklm	=	dependent variable, a score for a feet and leg trait scored in either a tie stall or free-stall housing, on a solid or slatted floor, and in a hoof trimmed or nontrimmed animal.
µ	=	overall mean,
Si	=	fixed effect of ithstage of lactation at classification,
RCj	=	fixed effect of jthround-classifier,
HRCk	=	random effect of kthherd-rounder-classifier,
ß1	=	linear regression coefficient of dependent variable y on age effect,
ß2	=	quadratic regression coefficient of dependent variable y on age effect,
Xage	=	continuous variable representing age of animal at measurement,
Al	=	random additive genetic effect of animal 1, and
eijkl	=	random residual.

Stage effects were based on month of lactation and included eleven classes. The mean sizes of the herd-rounder-classifier classes were 6 and 13, 13 and 16, and 7 and 9 for the tie and free stall, solid and slatted flooring, and no trim and trim groups, respectively. Variances were assumed to be heterogeneous across herds (within a given environment) and classifiers.

The analysis was implemented using the VCE 4.0 software of Groeneveld and Garcia-Cortes (1998). Differences in the estimates of heritabilities for the same trait across environments were examined to see whether they differed significantly from zero. To approximate the standard error of this difference, the separate standard errors were squared and summed. The square root of this quantity was then taken as the standard error of the difference. Differences in heritability greater than twice this approximate standard error were deemed significant. To test the hypothesis of significant GXE, the difference from 1.0 of the estimated genetic correlation between two traits was compared to two times the estimated standard error.

	RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES

 
Means and standard deviations of the seven feet and leg traits for each management system are presented in Table 2. On the basis of the results from ANOVA, the effects of the two respective management systems defined in each analysis were highly significantly different (P < 0.001) in all cases except for claw uniformity in the two housing groups and rear legs, side view in the two trimming groups. Between the two housing systems, most traits were on average superior among cows housed in free stalls. The largest differences (0.3 to 0.5) were observed for heel depth, foot angle, rear leg side view, and overall feet and legs. Perhaps this result was associated with the fact that cattle in free stalls generally have more freedom of movement and opportunity to exercise than do cows in tie stalls. Greenough and Vermunt (1991) noted that standing on concrete was a risk factor for lameness. Alternatively, perhaps the increased moisture and manure on the floors of free-stall herds creates an opportunity for more transmission of infectious disease. In turn, culling for feet and leg problems may be more severe in these herds, resulting in higher means for phenotypic scores. Among the cows housed in free stalls, those on slatted floors tended to have slightly poorer scores for all traits than those housed on solid flooring. Boettcher and Van Dorp (1999) examined mobility scores from more than 3000 cows from free-stall herds in Ontario and observed a greater frequency of lameness among cows housed on slatted floors. Bergsten and Herlin (1996) studied lameness in a group of herds differing in a number of potential risk factors and also reported a higher rate of claw hemorrhages among cows housed on slatted floors. As expected, assuming the hoof trimming had been performed properly, scores for all traits (except rear legs, side view) were higher within herds where trimming had been performed within the 3 mo of classification. However, this trimming did not have appreciable effects on the variability of the scores. One might have expected that trimming would have most profoundly affected variability in the foot traits, claw uniformity; rear legs, rear view; and foot angle, but the standard deviations of scores were essentially equal across treatments for all three of these traits. Perhaps 3 mo was too long a period to actually observe direct effects of trimming. Recent hoof trimming may simply have been an indicator that these herds were managing foot and leg health more actively than those herds that did not trim the feet of their cattle, resulting in higher phenotypic means for the traits with little impact on variance.

Between flooring systems (Table 4) heritabilities were generally higher when measured on cows housed on slatted floors. The magnitude of these differences was comparable to the differences for housing systems, but these data included fewer observations and thus standard errors were higher and none of the differences in heritability across environments were statistically significant. The mean scores (Table 2) of the feet and leg traits suggest that slatted floors are a slightly harsher environment than solid floors, and this may allow for more expression of genetic variance for these traits. As had been observed for different housing systems, the correlation between environments was lowest for rear legs, rear view (0.82). This correlation was not significantly different from the threshold of 0.80 proposed by Robertson (1959). Perhaps the necessity for cows to place their feet in a certain position with respect to the open spaces between slats in the floor affected scoring for this trait.

Table 5 gives results for estimates in herds where the hooves of cattle were left intact or trimmed within the 3 mo previous to classifying. No differences in heritabilities were observed between environments. Also, no evidence of GXE was observed, as no estimates of genetic correlations were significantly different from 1.0. In fact, for only claw uniformity was the correlation less than 0.99. One interpretation of these results is that active management of feet and legs health improved the phenotypic scores (Table 2) of all cows by a similar degree and thus had little effect on genetic parameters. As mentioned earlier, the definition of "recently trimmed" as "within the last 3 mo" may have been too liberal to observe actual effects due directly to trimming. The hoof trimming may have occurred too far in advance of the classification for the observation of major effects on genetic parameters. Perhaps differences would have been evident if only herds with very recent hoof trimming (such as within the last month) had been considered, but the exact date of trimming had not been recorded.

	CONCLUSIONS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES

 
Effects of different environments and management systems on conformation of feet and legs were more pronounced for phenotypic scores than for genetic parameters. Cows housed in free stalls had higher scores for most traits than did cows housed in tie stalls. Cows housed on slatted floors had lower scores than did cows housed on solid flooring. Trimming of hooves was associated with improved scores, but variability in scores was unaffected. Heritabilities tended to be higher when measured in the environment associated with lower scores. Perhaps the more stressful environment allowed for more expression of genetic variance. Little effect of trimming was observed for estimates of genetic parameters.

Effects of GXE across environments were not large for most traits, but genetic correlations across both housing and flooring environments were only about 0.80 for rear legs, rear view. Therefore, the current across-herd system of genetic evaluations for feet and leg traits can be expected to predict daughter performance relatively well regardless of housing, flooring, and hoof trimming management systems. No major changes to the current system seem necessary. Holstein Canada has directed specific effort to the coordination of scoring for rear legs, rear view, adopting procedures to increase the consistency of scores for cattle evaluated while standing versus on the walk.

	FOOTNOTES

 
¹ Current address: CERSA, Via Fratelli Cervi 93, 20090 Segrate (MI), Italy.

² ANAFI, Via Bergamo 292, 26100 Cremona, Italy.

Received for publication October 4, 2001. Accepted for publication December 11, 2001.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES

 


Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.1996. Part 1. Reference of 1996 Dairy Management Practices. National Animal Health Monitoring System. United States Dept. Agr. Fort Collins, CO.

Begsten, C., and A. H. Herlin. 1996. Sole haemorrhages and heel horn erosion in dairy cows: the influence of housing system on their prevalence and severity. Acta Vet. Scand. 37:395–408.[Medline]

Boelling, D., and G. Pollott. 1998. Locomotion, lameness, hoof and leg traits in cattle. II. Genetic relationships and breeding values. Livest. Prod. Sci. 54:205–215.

Boettcher, P. J., L. K. Jairath, K. R. Koots, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 1997. Effects of interactions between type traits and milk production on survival traits of Canadian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2984–2995.[Abstract]

Boettcher, P. J., and R. van Dorp. 1999. Are your lame cows also your thin cows? Hoard’s Dairyman. 144(4):140.

Burke, B. P., and D. A. Funk. 1993. Relationship of linear type traits and herd life under different management systems. J. Dairy Sci. 76:2773–2782.[Abstract]

DeJong, G., A. R. Vollema, S. van der Beek, and A. Harbers. 1999. Breeding value for functional longevity in the Netherlands. Proc. Int. Workshop EU Concerted Action Genet. Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle; Longevity. Interbull Bull. No. 19:68–72.

Enevoldsen, C., Y. T. Grohn, and I. Thysen. 1991. Heel erosion and other interdigital disorders in dairy cows: associations with season, cow characteristics, disease, and production. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1299–1309.[Abstract]

Enting, H., D. Kooij, A. A. Dijkhuizen, R. B. M. Huirne, and E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen. 1997. Economic losses due to clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 49:259–267.

Foster, W. W., A. E. Freeman, and P. J. Berger. 1988. Linear type traits analysis with genetic parameter estimation. J. Dairy Sci. 71:223–231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Foster, W. W., A. E. Freeman, P. J. Berger, and A. Kuck. 1989. Association of type traits scored linearly with production and herdlife of Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 72:2651–2664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gilmore, J. A.1978. The effect of housing, age, breed and time after trimming on hoof measurements. J. Dairy Sci. 61(Suppl. 1):83. (Abstr.)

Greenough, P. R., and A. D. Weaver.1997. Lameness in Cattle. W. B. Saunders. Philadelphia, PA.

Greenough, P. R., and Vermunt, J. J. 1991. Evaluation of subclinical laminitis in a dairy herd and observations on associated nutritional and management factors. Vet. Rec. 128:11–17.[Abstract]

Groeneveld, E., and A. Garcia-Cortes. 1998. VCE4. 0, a covariance component package for frequentists and Bayesians. Proc. 6th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 27:455–456.

McDaniel, B. T. 1997. Breeding programs to reduce foot and leg problems. Proc. Int. Workshop EU Concerted Action Genet. Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle; Health. Interbull Bull. No.15:115–122.

Passman, E., and F. Reinhardt. 1999. Genetic relationships between type composites and length of productive life of black-and-white Holstein cattle in Germany. Proc. Int. Workshop EU Concerted Action Genet. Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle; Longevity. Interbull Bull. No. 19:117–121.

Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15:469–485.

Short, T. H., and T. J. Lawlor. 1992. Genetic parameters of conformation traits, milk yield, and herd life in Holstein. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1987–1998.[Abstract]

Vermunt, J. J., and P. R. Greenough. 1996. Claw conformation of dairy heifers in two management systems. Br. Vet. J. 152:3, 321–331.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Lassen and T. Mark Short Communication: Genotype by Housing Interaction for Conformation and Workability Traits in Danish Holsteins J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4424 - 4428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. M. Onyiro and S. Brotherstone Genetic Analysis of Locomotion and Associated Conformation Traits of Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows Managed in Different Housing Systems J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 322 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Perez-Cabal, C. Garcia, O. Gonzalez-Recio, and R. Alenda Genetic and Phenotypic Relationships Among Locomotion Type Traits, Profit, Production, Longevity, and Fertility in Spanish Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1776 - 1783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Berry, B. L. Harris, A. M. Winkelman, and W. Montgomerie Phenotypic Associations Between Traits Other than Production and Longevity in New Zealand Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2962 - 2974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R. Zwald, K. A. Weigel, and T. J. Lawlor Jr. Genetic Parameters for Conformation Traits in Herds that Differ in Mean Final Score and Completeness of Pedigree and Performance Data J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 386 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fatehi, J. Articles by Boettcher, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fatehi, J. Articles by Boettcher, P. J.