|
|
||||||||
Animal Production Research, MTT, Agrifood Research Finland, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
Corresponding author: A. Vanhatalo; e-mail: aila.vanhatalo{at}mtt.fi.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: grass silage dairy cow glucose amino acids
Abbreviation key: AV = arteriovenous, BCAA = branched-chain AA, C = casein treatment, CG = casein and glucose treatment, EAA = essential AA, G = glucose treatment, ME = metabolizable energy, NEAA = nonessential AA, TAA = total AA
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, given that ruminal propionate production is low and grass silage diet is poor in postruminal starch, the glucose supply of the cows may be limited with these diets (Huhtanen, 1998; Hurtaud et al., 2000). It has been suggested that in this dietary situation, part of the AA in protein entering the lower tract may be utilized for gluconeogenesis decreasing mammary AA availability for milk protein synthesis (Huhtanen, 1998; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). Hepatic metabolism of propionate and glucogenic AA into glucose synthesis is regulated to a great extent by the availability of these substrates (Danfær,1995). However, increasing glucose supply either by ruminal propionate infusions or postruminal glucose infusion has given inconsistent results. Sometimes they have increased yields of milk, protein, and lactose (Huhtanen et al., 1998; Huhtanen et al. 2002) but not always (Kim et al., 2000; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). Sufficient glucose supply from the basal diet may explain the lack of responses to glucogenic substrates (Kim et al., 2000), but it is also possible that some other nutrient but glucose, such as first-limiting AA, has primarily limited milk production (Vanhatalo et al., 2003). This is supported by the recent finding that by increasing the supply of glucose efficiency of utilizing of the first-limiting AA, His, could be improved (Huhtanen et al., 2002). Therefore, question arises whether the milk production responses on grass silage-based diets are primarily restricted by limited supply of glucose or by limited supply of AA, or by both glucose and AA.
Thus, this experiment was designed to study if glucose supply of dairy cows fed restrictively fermented grass silage supplemented with a cereal-based concentrate is sufficient and if responses to AA in terms of casein are restricted by limited supply of glucose. The infusion trial was conducted with cows at early stage of lactation to evaluate if the negligible response to glucose was related to the low production level of cows in our recent experiment (Vanhatalo et al., 2003). Casein and glucose were infused both separately and in combination into the abomasum of cows to look at the effects of the infusates on milk production and plasma metabolites. The control diet was formulated to fulfil the requirements of nutrient supply in terms of total supply of metabolizable AA and energy (Tuori et al., 2000).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Procedures and Chemical Analyses
The experiment was designed as a 4 x 4 Latin square with 14-d experimental periods, of which the latter 5 d formed the collection period. The four treatments were continuous abomasal infusions of 1) water (Control), 2) casein 300 g/d (C), 3) glucose 300 g/d (G), and 4) casein 300 g/d + glucose 300 g/d (CG). Casein was given as sodium caseinate (Kainuun Osuusmeijeri, Sotkamo, Finland) and glucose as dextrose (Xyrofin Ltd, Helsinki, Finland). Both casein and glucose were dissolved in 6 L of water, and the solution was infused continuously via a peristaltic pump as described previously (Varvikko et al., 1999). Infusion equipment was checked daily during the experiment to ensure correct placement in the abomasum. Feed intake and milk yield of cows were recorded daily but data from collection period only were used in statistical analyses. Feeds were sampled for chemical analyses during each collection period. Milk samples were taken on four consecutive milkings on each collection period. In addition, a separate milk sample from evening and morning milking was taken for urea determination. Rumen fluid was sampled four times and blood from the mammary and tail vein three times during the feeding cycle on the last day of each experimental period. Both of these samples were taken just before the morning feeding and at 3-h intervals thereafter. In order to evaluate energy status of the cows, total digestibility of diets was measured using acid-insoluble ash as an internal marker. Fecal grab samples were collected for 5 d for this purpose. Sampling of feed, milk, blood, rumen fluid, and feces have been described in more detail previously (Varvikko et al., 1999).
The chemical composition of feeds and feces were analysed as described earlier (Varvikko et al., 1999). The procedures for VFA of grass silage and rumen fluid, and plasma glucose, NEFA and BHBA, as well as plasma AA and urea were described in detail in our previous papers (Varvikko et al., 1999; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). Plasma insulin was colorimetrically analyzed with Phadeseph Insulin RIA kit (cat. no. 10-9169-01, Pharmacia & Upjohn Diagnostics AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Plasma samples were reduced to period pools for each cow before the AA analyses. Milk fat, protein, lactose, and urea contents were analyzed as described previously (Varvikko et al., 1999).
Calculations and Statistical Analyses
Mammary extraction and uptake of blood metabolites and AA and plasma flow were calculated as described earlier (Vanhatalo et al., 1999). In brief, mammary extraction efficiency of blood metabolites and AA were calculated as arteriovenous (AV) difference divided by arterial concentration. Mammary plasma flow was estimated in reference to Phe and Tyr output in milk protein by application of Fick principle assuming that Phe and Tyr are incorporated directly into milk protein without no further metabolism or synthesis of these two AA.
Data were analyzed by the ANOVA for Latin square: cow (d.f. 3), period (d.f. 3), treatment (d.f. 3), and the residual effects (d.f. 6) were the sources of variation. The general linear models procedure of SAS (1996) was used. The data for rumen fermentation and blood metabolites except for plasma AA were analyzed by the ANOVA using split-plot approach model including cow, period, treatment, whole-plot error, time, interaction between time and the treatment, and subplot error. However, as there were not any significant (P > 0.05) treatment x time effects, data were averaged over time for all rumen fermentation and blood metabolite parameters. Treatment effects were further separated into a single d.f. comparison by orthogonal contrasts to evaluate effects of: 1) casein (control + G vs. C + CG), 2) glucose (control + C vs. G + CG), and 3) an interaction between casein and glucose (control + CG vs. C + G).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.07) to increase owing to infusion of casein.
|
|
|
|
0.06) plasma urea, total AA (TAA), essential AA (EAA), and branched-chain AA (BCAA) concentrations, but had no effect on nonessential AA (NEAA) concentration. Of the individual AA, infusion of casein increased (P
0.02) concentration of His, Ile, Leu, Lys, Trp, Val, Cys, Orn, and Pro, whereas infusion of glucose increased (P
0.02) that of Asp and Gly. As for Orn, casein infusion alone increased concentration of Orn, the increase being, however, less in the presence of glucose infusion (P < 0.05 for interaction C x G).
|
0.03) between casein and glucose in AV differences of TAA, EAA and BCAA indicated that casein increased the response variables mentioned but the increase was compromised by simultaneous infusion of glucose. The same was true (P < 0.03) for AV differences of His, Leu, Lys, Met, Val, and Orn. Significant interactions between casein and glucose (P
0.05) in AV differences of NEAA indicated that both of the infusions increased the response variable mentioned, but the effect was more pronounced when nutrients were infused separately rather than in combination. The same was found (P < 0.001) for AV difference of Phe.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lactation Responses
The small increase in ME intake owing to casein and glucose infusions was compromised with a minor decrease in grass silage intake so that total DMI or ME intake did not change between the treatments (Table 2
). Thus, the responses obtained in the present study can be related to the changes in the supply of infused nutrients. Infusions of casein and glucose either separately or in combination clearly increased yields of milk, protein and lactose in the present study. This indicates that neither the supply of AA nor glucose on the control diet was sufficient for potential milk production despite cows being near energy balance and calculated adequacy in total supply of AA. The colimitation of glucose and AA in the present dietary conditions may be more closely emphasized by comparing production responses of the combined and separate infusions of casein and glucose. With combined infusion increases in the yields of milk protein (+138 g/d) and lactose (+ 135 g/d) were nearly equal, whereas respective increases with separate casein infusion were +117 g/d for protein and +74 g/d for lactose, and with separate glucose infusion +87 g/d for protein and + 101 g/d for lactose. It can be calculated that the separate casein infusion accounted for 85% of the achieved protein response (117/138 g/d) and 64% of the achieved lactose response (87/135 g/d), whereas the separate glucose infusion accounted for 54% of the protein and 75% of the lactose responses, respectively. The greater response of protein than lactose produced with casein suggests that insufficient glucose supply possibly limited production response with casein alone treatment, whereas the greater lactose than protein response produced with glucose suggests that insufficient AA supply limited further production response with glucose alone treatment. Either way, increased lactose yield associated with the separate casein infusion puts forward that part of the casein AA were used for glucogenic purposes, whereas increased protein yield associated with separate glucose infusion may be explained with improved utilization of AA from the basal diet in the presence of glucose by sparing AA from utilization for gluconeogenesis.
As also found in the present study, abomasal infusions of casein have repeatedly increased milk protein concentration, yields of milk, and protein on grass silage-based diets irrespective of the stage of lactation or silage fermentation type (Choung and Chamberlain, 1993a; Huhtanen et al., 1997; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). However, the response mechanism to casein have depended on silage fermentation type extensively fermented silage benefiting from increased supply of AA and restrictively fermented silage in addition to AA also more indirectly from increased supply of glucose (Huhtanen et al., 1997; Vanhatalo et al. 2003). Increased lactose yield and milk urea concentration with separate casein infusion in the present study are in line with this explanation.
Opposite to casein infusions production responses to glucose infusions on grass silage based diets have been inconsistent. Calculation of the supply of glucose according to stoichiometric principles described elsewhere (Huhtanen, 1998) proposed that supply of glucose on the control diet was about 90% of that required for the observed milk production in the present study. The infusions of 300 g/d of glucose corresponded well with the calculated deficit of 285 g/d of glucose and led to positive milk production responses being in good agreement with recent data (Hurtaud et al., 2000; Rigout et al., 2002). In contrast, glucose was not primarily limiting milk production of cows at midlactation (Kim et al., 2000; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). However, recent reports on significant production responses to intravascularly (Kim et al., 2001) or abomasally (Huhtanen et al., 2002) infused glucose, especially in the presence of His infusion, indicate that glucose alone was furthermore limited by lack of first-limiting AA in the diet. Therefore, reasons for the inconsistent responses to glucose infusions may lie not only in the stage of lactation (Vanhatalo et al., 2003) but also in the adequacy of other nutrients such as AA on the basal diet.
In contrast to earlier study (Huhtanen et al., 1997) milk fat concentration tended to decrease with casein infusion, probably reflecting the dilution of fat into the greater amount of milk produced with casein infusion. That glucose infusion did not affect milk fat concentration is in line with earlier studies, where relatively small amounts of glucose were infused (Kim et al. 2000; Huhtanen et al., 2002; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). Also, unchanged NEFA and insulin concentrations due to glucose infusions (Table 4
) were in agreement with unchanged milk fat content.
N Utilization
The apparent N utilization (milk N/feed N) were 29.0, 31.0, 31.9, and 32.7% for control, C, G, and CG treatments, respectively, proposing that infusion of casein and glucose both improved N utilization, though glucose more than casein (+2.3 vs. +1.4% units). Higher N utilization with glucose than casein increment was in accordance with the reduced milk urea concentration with glucose infusion (28.2 vs. 26.7 mg/dl), suggesting that a greater proportion of AA with glucose than casein was partitioned into milk or tissue synthesis. For casein infusion increases in arterial plasma and milk urea concentrations (4.9 vs. 5.5 mM; 26.1 vs. 28.8 mg/dl, respectively), may be a consequence of the use of plasma AA for hepatic glucose synthesis. A tendency for increased plasma glucose concentration with infused casein supports this explanation. It should be noted, however, that present improved N utilization with incremental casein is rather exceptional. Generally, in spite of the positive production responses to protein supplement incremental N source in the diet impairs N utilization.
The marginal increases in milk protein yields for casein infusions (C and CG treatments) were 0.44 and 0.52 g/g, being in the range of values reported for casein (see Choung and Chamberlain 1993a). The clearly higher transfer rate for casein in the presence of infused glucose is parallel with our recent study in which efficiency of utilization of the first-limiting AA, His, increased from 11 to 24% with increased supply of glucose (Huhtanen et al., 2002). The positive interaction between increased AA and glucose supply in milk production has also been obtained in production trials. Cows given incremental AA supply in terms of rapeseed meal and incremental gluconeogenic precursors in terms of wet distillers solubles increased milk protein yield by 55 and 52 g/d when given these supplements separately, but by 99 g/d when given them simultaneously (Huhtanen et al., 1995). A similar tendency was found when supplementing restrictively fermented grass silage diet with incremental rapeseed meal and propylene glycol (Jaakkola et al., 1996). However, the same concept in another experiment (Shingfield et al., 2002) failed to result in a positive interaction. Lack of interaction was also found when supplementing corn silage-based diet with casein and propionic acid (Hurtaud et al., 1993). Differences in the lactation stage of cows in various experiments may explain contrasting results. It seems that positive responses to incremental AA in terms of casein (Hurtaud et al., 1993; Choung and Chamberlain 1993a Choung and Chamberlain 1999b) or rapeseed meal (Saarisalo et al., 2002) can be expected even with well-fed cows at late stage of lactation producing less than 20 kg of milk per day, whereas positive responses to glucose supplement (present study; Hurtaud et al., 2000; Rigout et al., 2002) or interactions with AA and glucose supplements (present study; Huhtanen et al., 1995; Jaakkola et al. 1996) may rather be expected with cows at early stage of lactation producing more than 25 to 30 kg of milk per day. The positive responses related to increased AA supply irrespective of the production level may be due to qualitative improvements in amino acid profile of NAN entering to the intestines (Korhonen et al., 2002), whereas the positive responses to incremental glucose supply may be related to quantitatively increased glucose need especially at the early stage of lactation.
Plasma Metabolites and AA
Unchanged plasma insulin and NEFA concentrations as well as slight increases in arterial glucose due to infused nutrients were in line with other studies in which relatively small amounts of casein and glucose were infused (Kim et al., 2000; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). That arterial NEFA was relatively low lends support to the interpretation that cows, despite being in early stage of lactation, were near energy balance without any apparent need for mobilizing extra energy from body fat stores. As reviewed by Rigout et al. (2002) increases in insulin concentration is known to inhibit gluconeogenesis. Based on the unchanged insulin concentration and relatively small amounts of casein and glucose infused, it is probable that incremental nutrients did not decrease hepatic production of glucose in the present study. Even combined infusion of casein and glucose could not provide more than approximately 447 g/d of incremental glucose assuming a glucose yield of 55 g from 100 g of AA (Krebs, 1964). However, decreased AV differences and extraction efficiencies of glucose due to added glucose refer to sufficient glucose supply on the CG treatment.
In spite of the production responses obtained, the relationship between glucose AV difference and arterial glucose concentration (r2 = 0.34, n = 16) was relatively weak. This suggests that mammary glucose uptake is not necessarily dependent on arterial concentration, in contrast to previous findings with restrictively fermented grass silage (Miettinen and Huhtanen, 1997). The stable insulin concentration together with the higher plasma glucose concentration on the control diet in the present study may explain this. Decreased BHBA with glucose infusions may arise from the increased glucose supply. As reviewed by Ørskov et al. (1999), exogenous glucose has been attributed to antiketogenic effects.
Plasma AA concentration of cows fed grass silage-cereal diets have been characterized with a low concentration of His (Vanhatalo et al., 1999; Kim et al., 2000; Korhonen et al., 2000). Increased plasma His as well as increased concentrations of other EAA with infused casein (Table 5
) indicated increased supply of these AA for the metabolism of mammary gland in agreement with previous studies (Miettinen and Huhtanen, 1997; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). However, opposite to our previous findings present infusion of casein did not decrease concentration of NEAA, which together with increased plasma urea have been attributed to increased utilization of NEAA for glucose synthesis (Miettinen and Huhtanen, 1997; Vanhatalo et al., 2003). A possible reason for this discrepancy was that the proportion of propionate in the rumen on the control diet was presently higher than previously providing higher glucose supply.
Despite the fact that infused glucose did not affect arterial concentrations of AA, it did, however, increase plasma AV differences of these AA, although usually less than did infusion of casein (P
0.05 for C x G interaction). This can be explained by higher extraction efficiencies of AA with glucose than with casein infusion over the control treatment (P
0.07 for C x G interaction). Thus, as evidenced by increased protein yield with glucose treatment, it seems that by infusing glucose on grass silage diet it was possible to spare part of AA supply from utilization for gluconeogenesis. An alternative explanation for the increased protein yield with glucose infusion might be that AA present in excess could be secreted in greater amounts due to an increase in their transport in secretory vesicles, which is dependent on the colocation of the transport of lactose and protein in the mammary gland (Hurtaud et al., 2000).
As discussed in our recent paper (Huhtanen et al., 2002) calculating mammary plasma flow by Fick principle based on uptake and output of Phe and Tyr, should provide useful data on mammary metabolism of plasma nutrients. The reduced plasma flows due to infused nutrients in the present study obviously reflect improved balance in supply of limiting nutrients over the basal diet to meet glucose and AA needs of mammary gland for supporting the increased milk protein and lactose yields. The higher plasma flow with combined rather than separate infusions indicated, however, that as soon as availability of both of the limiting nutrients increased simultaneously a more optimal balance in supply of nutrients could be achieved by increasing mammary plasma flow. This was evidenced by further increased milk protein and lactose yields with the combined infusion of C and G. The ability of mammary gland to adapt to changes in nutrient supply by regulating mammary blood flow has been demonstrated earlier in several studies (Bequette et al., 2000; Mackle et al., 2000; Huhtanen et al., 2002; Rigout et al. 2002).
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication October 2, 2002. Accepted for publication May 1, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lemosquet, G. Raggio, G. E. Lobley, H. Rulquin, J. Guinard-Flament, and H. Lapierre Whole-body glucose metabolism and mammary energetic nutrient metabolism in lactating dairy cows receiving digestive infusions of casein and propionic acid J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2009; 92(12): 6068 - 6082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Al-Trad, K. Reisberg, T. Wittek, G. B. Penner, A. Alkaassem, G. Gabel, M. Furll, and J. R. Aschenbach Increasing intravenous infusions of glucose improve body condition but not lactation performance in midlactation dairy cows J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2009; 92(11): 5645 - 5658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Raggio, S. Lemosquet, G. E. Lobley, H. Rulquin, and H. Lapierre Effect of casein and propionate supply on mammary protein metabolism in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4340 - 4351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nousiainen, K. J. Shingfield, and P. Huhtanen Evaluation of Milk Urea Nitrogen as a Diagnostic of Protein Feeding J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2004; 87(2): 386 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |