JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernal-Santos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Overton, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernal-Santos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Overton, T. R.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:3218-3228
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Production Responses of Dairy Cows to Dietary Supplementation with Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) During the Transition Period and Early Lactation1,2

G. Bernal-Santos3, J. W. Perfield, II, D. M. Barbano, D. E. Bauman and T. R. Overton

Department of Animal Science Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

Corresponding author: T. R. Overton; email: tro2{at}cornell.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Holstein cows (n = 30) entering second or greater lactation were fed fat supplements (90 g/d of fatty acids) consisting of Ca salts of either palm fatty acid distillate (control) or a mixture of palm fatty acid distillate and mixed isomers of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA, 30.4 g/d) from 2 wk prepartum through 20 wk postpartum to determine whether CLA would inhibit milk fat synthesis during early lactation and, in turn, affect energy metabolism of dairy cows during the transition period and early lactation. Feeding CLA did not affect DMI or plasma concentrations of glucose, nonesterfied fatty acids, or ß-hydroxbutyrate during the prepartum period and did not affect postpartum DMI. Feeding CLA reduced milk fat content by 12.5% during early lactation; however, cows fed CLA tended to produce approximately 3 kg/d more milk during the first 20 wk of lactation. Feeding CLA tended to decrease the contribution of short- and medium-chain (C <= 16) fatty acids to milk fat. Changes in milk yield, milk fat content, and milk fatty acid composition were not apparent until after the second week of lactation. Yield of 3.5% fat-corrected milk, milk protein content, milk protein composition, and calculated energy balance were not affected by treatment. Postpartum concentrations of glucose, nonesterfied fatty acids, and ß-hydroxbutyrate in plasma and hepatic content of glycogen and triglycerides were similar between treatments. These data imply that with CLA treatment in early lactation, dairy cows decreased milk fat synthesis and appeared to respond by partitioning more nutrients toward milk synthesis rather than improving net energy balance.

Key Words: conjugated linoleic acid • milk fat • lactation • transition cow

Abbreviation key: CLA = conjugated linoleic acid, NCN = noncasein nitrogen, NEB = net energy balance, TN = true nitrogen, TP = true protein


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a collective term for several positional and geometric configurations of octadecadienoic acid with a conjugated double-bond system. During established lactation studies that ranged in duration from 5 d (Loor and Herbein, 1998; Chouinard et al., 1999a, 1999b; Giesy et al., 2002) to 20 wk (Perfield et al., 2002), feeding supplements containing mixed isomers of CLA caused a reduction in the content and yield of milk fat by dairy cows. trans-10, cis-12 Conjugated linoleic acid has been shown to be a CLA isomer that affects milk fat and is a very potent inhibitor of milk fat synthesis (Baumgard et al., 2000, 2001; Peterson et al., 2002). Conjugated linoleic acid and the trans-10, cis-12 isomer also have been implicated in the biohydrogenation theory of diet-induced milk fat depression (Bauman and Griinari, 2001), and there is an inverse relationship between milk fat content of trans-10, cis-12 CLA and milk fat yield (Bauman and Griinari, 2001; Giesy et al., 2002; Peterson et al., 2002).

Economics generally favor prevention of milk fat depression on commercial dairy farms, but there are some scenarios in which reduced output of milk fat could be advantageous (Bauman et al., 2001; Perfield et al., 2002). These include markets where producers are regulated by a quota system based on milk fat and situations in which animals cannot consume sufficient energy to meet requirements such as occurs during heat stress or when poor weather limits forage growth in pasture-based systems. Parturition and early lactation is an additional period when intake is inadequate to meet nutrient requirements, so cows are dependent on the use of body reserves. If an imbalance occurs during this period, stress or metabolic disorders can occur, and prolonged negative energy balance can also compromise reproductive performance (Bell, 1995; Butler, 2001). Current management recommendations and most experimental approaches to decrease the severity and duration of negative energy balance involve strategies to maximize DMI during this transition period. However, the energy deficit also could be less pronounced if the fat content of milk were reduced. Our objective was to determine the effect of feeding a supplement containing rumen-protected CLA on milk fat synthesis at parturition and during early lactation in dairy cows. To obtain a more complete evaluation, we monitored lactational performance, metabolic status, and variables related to reproductive performance.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals, Treatments, and Sampling
The Cornell University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all procedures involving animals. Thirty pregnant Holstein cows entering their second or greater lactation were assigned to one of two treatment groups based on parity, and housed in tie stalls at the Cornell University Dairy Teaching and Research facility. Treatment administration was initiated 14 d before anticipated calving date and continued until 140 DIM. Each treatment group received a fat supplement that was top-dressed once daily on their TMR. Both fat supplements were provided as calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids to partially protect them from ruminal biohydrogenation. Rumen-protected fat supplements were 116 g/d of Ca-salts of palm fatty acid distillate (EnerGII; Bioproducts Inc. Fairlawn, OH) for the control treatment and 126 g/d of a mixture of Ca-salts of palm fatty acid distillate plus Ca-salts of CLA (Agribrands Purina Canada Inc., Woodstock, Ontario, Canada) for the CLA treatment group. Fatty acid composition of the supplements has been previously reported (Perfield et al., 2002), and each supplement provided about 90 g/d of fatty acids. The CLA supplement provided 30.4 g/d of CLA and the four predominant CLA isomers were: trans-8, cis-10 (9.2%), cis-9, trans-11 (25.1%), trans-10, cis-12 (28.9%), and cis-11, trans-13 (16.1%) (Perfield et al., 2002).

Cows were fed diets as TMR that were formulated using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (Fox et al., 1992) to meet or exceed predicted requirements for energy, protein, minerals, and vitamins (NRC, 2001). All cows were fed the same basal diet during the prepartum period beginning between 28 and 21 d before expected parturition and then switched to a common diet during the postpartum period. Ingredient and nutrient composition of the diets fed during the prepartum and postpartum phases of the experiment are provided in Table 1Go. Feeds were sampled weekly throughout the experiment, and DM content was determined by drying at 54°C until static weight. Amounts of individual feed components in the TMR were adjusted weekly based on changes in the DM content of feed components. Feed samples were composited at 4-wk intervals and analyzed by wet chemistry methods for CP, ADF, NDF, ether extact, and minerals (Dairy One Cooperative Inc., Ithaca, NY). Cows were fed ad libitum, with fresh feed provided each morning after milking. Orts were weighed and recorded daily. Water was available at all times.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Ingredient and chemical composition of the prepartum and postpartum diets.1
 
Body weights and BCS of each animal were recorded on 1 d each week throughout the study. Body condition scores were assigned using a five-point system (Wildman et al., 1982) by two individuals, and the average of these two scores was the assigned value. Daily observations and general health records were maintained throughout the study.

After parturition, cows were milked three times per day and yields were recorded at each milking. Through the 20-wk treatment period, milk samples were collected from each milking on one day per week and composited. The composite samples were stored at 4°C with a preservative (bronopol tablet; D&F Control System, San Ramon, CA) until analyzed for fat, protein, and lactose using infrared analysis (AOAC 2000: method 972.160), and SCC by an optical fluorescent method (AOAC 2000: method 978.26) (Dairy One Cooperative Inc.). The calibration reference methods for the infrared milk analysis were as follows: fat by modified Mojonnier ether extraction (AOAC 2000: method 989.05), Kjeldahl true protein (AOAC 2000: method 991.22), and lactose by difference of oven drying total solids (AOAC 2000: method 990.20) minus the sum of modified Mojonnier ether extraction, Kjeldahl true protein (AOAC 2000: method 991.22), estimated nonprotein nitrogen (0.19% on a protein basis), and estimated ash [(true protein x 0.596) + 0.5379]. Additional aliquots of the composite milk samples collected on wk 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 20 were stored at -20°C (without preservative) until analyzed for fatty acid and protein composition.

Blood samples were collected every other day beginning 1 wk before treatment (21 d prepartum) and continuing through 56 DIM, and thereafter once weekly until the study terminated (140 DIM). Blood was collected via venipuncture from the coccygeal vessels during the 30-min interval following the morning milking and before providing fresh feed. Sodium heparin (100 U/ml of blood) was used to prevent coagulation. Plasma was harvested following centrifugation (2800 x g, 15 min at 4°C) and stored at -20°C until analyses for metabolites and progesterone.

Liver samples were obtained from each cow via percutaneous trochar biopsy (Veenhuizen et al., 1991) on 1 d during the week preceding assignment to treatment and on d 10 and 21 postpartum. Liver was blotted to remove excess blood and connective tissue, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until analyzed for triglyceride and glycogen content.

Milk Fatty Acid Analysis
Milk fat was extracted using the method of Hara and Radin (1978) and fatty acid methyl esters were prepared by base-catalyzed transmethylation according to Christie (1982) with modifications by Chouinard et al. (1999a). Fatty acids in the rumen-protected supplements were methylated using 1% sulfuric acid in methanol as described by Christie (1989). Fatty acid methyl esters were quantified using a gas chromatograph (GCD system HP 6890+; Hewlett Packard, Avondale, PA) equipped with a SP-2560 fused silica capillary column (100 m x 0.25 mm [i.d.] with 0.2-µm film thickness; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) under conditions previously described (Perfield et al., 2002). Fatty acid peaks were identified using pure methyl ester standards (Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN). Additional standards for CLA isomers were obtained from Natural Lipids Ltd AS (Hovdebygda, Norway). A butter oil reference standard (CRM 164; Commission of the European Community Bureau of References, Brussels, Belgium) was used to determine recoveries and correction factors for individual fatty acids as well as acting as a reference sample for routine quality control.

Milk Protein Analysis
Total N (TN) (AOAC, 2000; method number 991.20) and N fractions of milk were determined using macro-Kjeldahl techniques. Milk NPN consisted of N that was soluble in 12% trichloroacetic acid (AOAC, 2000; method number 991.21). Noncasein N (NCN) was determined by precipitating casein at pH 4.6 and filtering, leaving the filtrate for N analysis (AOAC, 2000; method number 998.05). These milk N fractions were used in calculations as follows: CP equaled (TN x 6.38); true protein (TP) equaled (TN - NPN) x 6.38; casein protein equaled (TN - NCN) x 6.38; and whey protein equaled (NCN - NPN) x 6.38. Milk NCN and NPN were multiplied by 6.38 to convert to protein equivalents so they could be compared with other protein fractions.

Plasma and Tissue Analysis
Plasma glucose was determined by enzymatic analysis (glucose oxidase) using a commercial kit (kit 510-A; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). Plasma concentrations of NEFA were analyzed by enzymatic analysis (NEFA-C; WAKO Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) using modifications described by McCutcheon and Bauman (1986) and Sechen et al. (1990). Plasma concentrations of BHBA were quantified (BHBA dehydrogenase) using a commercial kit (kit 310-UV; Sigma Chemical). All spectrophotometric measurements were conducted using a Versamax tunable microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Interassay variation was maintained at <5%.

Plasma collected during the postpartum period was assayed for progesterone by radioimmunoassay (Staigmiller et al., 1979; Nara and First, 1981). Intra- and interassay CV were 5 and 13%, respectively. Ovulation was identified by three consecutive samples with progesterone levels greater than 1 ng/ml.

Glycogen content of liver was determined according to the procedures described in Hawk and Bergeim (1926) with modifications. Frozen liver tissue was pulverized in liquid nitrogen and approximately 0.1 g of powdered liver tissue was placed in a 15-ml polycarbonate centrifuge tube with 1.2 ml of 30% KOH. The tube was capped, vortexed, and placed in a boiling water bath for 20 min. The mixture was brought to room temperature, 1.4 ml of 95% ethanol added, and centrifuged at 4°C for 20 min at 1730 x g in a Beckman GS-6KR centrifuge. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was washed twice with 60% ethanol, using 10 ml the first time and 5 ml the second. Following each wash, the mixture was centrifuged under the same conditions as described above. After the second wash the pellet was resuspended in 8 ml of 0.2 N acetate buffer. Two hundred microliters of hydrolyzed liver sample was combined with 30 µl of amyloglucosidase (Sigma A-3514; Sigma Chemical) and incubated at 55°C for 1 h to convert liver glycogen to glucose. Glucose was then analyzed as described for plasma.

Liver triglyceride content was determined using the Folch extraction method (Folch et al., 1957) followed by a colorimetric method for estimating serum triglycerides (Fletcher, 1968) with modifications described by Foster and Dunn (1973).

Statistical Analysis
Daily intake and milk yield values were reduced to weekly means before data analysis. Pretreatment values for DMI, BW, BCS, blood metabolites, and liver composition were used as covariates during analysis of covariance applied to their corresponding measurements during the treatment period. Analysis of variance was conducted using the MIXED procedure of SAS (2001) for a completely randomized design with repeated measures. The model included the effects of treatment, time, and the interaction of treatment and time, with the random variable being the cow x treatment interaction. Parity was included as a term in the original model, but was not significant and was eliminated from the final model. Days to first ovulation for the two treatments were compared using a two-tailed t-test (Number Cruncher Statistical System; NCSS, 2000), median days to first ovulation was evaluated using nonparametric survival analysis (NCSS, 2000), and the number of cows with days to first ovulation less than or equal to 30 d was evaluated by chi-square analysis (NCSS, 2000). Least squares means are reported throughout, and significance was declared at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Cows were fed rumen-protected CLA beginning 2 wk before expected calving date. Performance parameters and plasma metabolites were measured during this timeframe, and no differences were observed between treatment groups for DMI, BW, BCS, or net energy balance (NEB; Table 2Go). Likewise, plasma concentrations of glucose, NEFA, and BHBA were similar between treatment groups during the prepartum period (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Least squares means for measurements of performance and plasma metabolites during the prepartum period.
 
Performance data for the first 20 wk postpartum are presented in Table 3Go. During this period, CLA-supplemented animals tended (P < 0.13) to yield approximately 3 kg/d more milk. Milk fat percentage was decreased by 12.5% for the CLA-supplemented group over the 20-wk period (P < 0.001), but milk fat yield was reduced by only 7.5% (P < 0.11) because of the increased milk yield (Table 3Go). The numerical differences in milk yield and milk fat percentage were offsetting, such that yield of 3.5% FCM and the net energy required for milk synthesis were essentially identical between the two treatment groups (Table 3Go). Temporal patterns for milk yield, milk fat percentage, and 3.5% FCM are shown in Figure 1Go. The yield and fat content of milk were nearly identical for the two treatment groups during the first 2 wk postpartum, and then differences occurred that persisted through the remainder of the period. In contrast, there were no significant differences in content of protein and lactose in milk between treatment groups throughout the treatment period (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Least squares means for performance measurements over the first 20 wk of lactation.
 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Temporal pattern of milk yield, milk fat, and 3.5% FCM for cows fed a rumen-protected fat supplement without (control) or with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Values are least squares means, n = 15 for each treatment group; SEM averaged 1.3 kg/d for milk yield, 0.08% for milk fat and 1.3 kg/d for 3.5% FCM; P-values for treatment x week of treatment interaction are 0.48 for milk yield, 0.06 for milk fat, and 0.97 for 3.5% FCM.

 
Similar to the prepartum period, DMI and NEB were not significantly affected by supplementation with rumen-protected CLA (Table 3Go). The temporal pattern of NEB also was similar between groups during the entire period of supplementation (Figure 2Go). Postpartum BW (Table 3Go; Figure 3Go) of cows fed CLA tended (P < 0.09) to be increased compared with controls; postpartum BCS (Table 3Go; Figure 3Go) tended (P < 0.14) to follow a similar pattern.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Temporal pattern of calculated net energy balance by week relative to calving for cows fed a rumen-protected fat supplement without (control) or with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Values are least squares means, n = 15 for each treatment group; SEM averaged 0.7 Mcal/d.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Temporal pattern of BW and BCS for cows fed a rumen-protected fat supplement without (control) or with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Values are least squares means, n = 15 for each treatment group; SEM averaged 6.5 kg for BW and 0.1 for BCS; P-values for treatment x week of treatment interaction are 0.92 for BW and 0.96 for BCS.

 
The CLA supplementation resulted in a shift in the fatty acid composition of milk fat (Table 4Go). When averaged over the entire postpartum treatment period, the reduction in the yield of the short- and medium-chain fatty acids (<16 carbons) was proportionally greater, causing a shift such that the milk fat of cows receiving CLA tended (P < 0.09) to have a greater content of long-chain fatty acids (>16 carbons) (Table 4Go). Statistically significant (P < 0.05) increases in content of trans-C18:1 fatty acids in milk fat also were measured; however, the total changes represented less than 0.3% of the total fatty acids. Similar to the temporal pattern of response observed for milk yield and milk fat content, the shift in milk fatty acid composition occurred after the second week of lactation and persisted through the remainder of the treatment period (Figure 4Go). In contrast, milk fat content of trans-10, cis-12 CLA was elevated during the first week of lactation and remained constant over the entire 20-wk period (Figure 5Go). Pairs of fatty acids comprising the desaturase index (Perfield et al., 2002) were not different between treatment groups (Table 4Go), indicating that {Delta}9-desaturase was not affected by CLA supplementation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Least squares means for fatty acid composition of milk fat from cows receiving rumen-protected fat supplements.
 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Temporal pattern of milk fatty acid compositional change over the first 20 wk of lactation for cows fed a rumen-protected fat supplement without (control) or with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Values are least squares means, n = 15 for each treatment group; SEM averaged 0.51, 0.45, and 0.87 g/100 g fatty acids and P-values for treatment x week of treatment interactions are 0.29, 0.08, and 0.16 for < 16, 16, and >16 carbons, respectively.

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Temporal pattern of concentration of trans-10, cis-12 CLA in milk fat over the first 20 wk of lactation for cows fed a rumen-protected fat supplement without (control) or with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Values are least squares means, n = 15 for each treatment group; SEM averaged 0.001 g/100 g; P-value for treatment x week of treatment interaction is 0.06.

 
Milk protein was analyzed for specific protein fractions as well as TP (Table 5Go). Consistent with the lack of change in yield and content of protein in milk during the entire 20-wk treatment period, there were no differences between treatment groups for any of the specific protein or N fractions in milk.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Least squares means for milk nitrogen fractions from cows receiving rumen-protected fat supplements.
 
Data for postpartum plasma metabolites and liver composition are presented in Table 6Go. Plasma concentrations of glucose and NEFA were not affected during either d 2 through 56 of lactation or d 63 through 140 of lactation. Consistent with the lack of effect of treatment on the temporal pattern of calculated NEB described above (Figure 2Go), the similar temporal pattern for plasma NEFA concentrations between treatments confirms the lack of effect on mobilization of body fat reserves (Figure 6Go). Concentrations of BHBA in plasma were increased (P < 0.01) during d 63 through 140; however, given the lack of effect (P > 0.15) of treatment on plasma BHBA concentrations from d 2 through 56 of lactation and the small magnitude of the effect during d 63 through 140, this effect is not likely to be of biological significance. Concentrations of glycogen and triglycerides in liver were not affected significantly by treatment (Table 6Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Least squares means for concentrations of metabolites in plasma and liver during the postpartum treatment period.
 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Temporal pattern of concentration of NEFA in plasma during the first 140 d of lactation for cows fed a rumen-protected fat supplement without (control) or with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Values are least squares means, n = 15 for each treatment group; SEM averaged 43 µEq/L; P-value for treatment x time interaction is 0.74.

 
Reflective of the lack of effect of treatment on plasma and liver measurements, incidence of displaced abomasum, retained placenta, ketosis, and milk fever was low in this experiment (data not shown). Although the number of cows per treatment was too small to enable us to statistically assess metabolic disorder incidence as affected by treatment, occurrence of each of these disorders was numerically similar between the two treatments.

Several variables of reproductive performance are presented in Table 7Go. Concentrations of progesterone in plasma from cows during early lactation were used to determine days to first ovulation. Cows fed rumen-protected CLA during the transition period and early lactation tended to have lower mean days (P < 0.13) and median days (P < 0.07) to ovulation, whereas the number of cows whose first ovulation occurred on or before 30 DIM was similar (Table 7Go). Although the number of cows assigned to each treatment was too small to assess other reproductive parameters statistically, it is interesting to note that the CLA treatment group had a numerical advantage in number of cows that became pregnant and conception rate. Overall, there was no evidence that supplementation with CLA had any negative effects on reproduction variables.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Reproductive performance during the transition period and early lactation.
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The period of transition between late pregnancy and early lactation is characterized by a shift in nutrient partitioning that requires extensive coordination of metabolism to ensure an adequate supply of nutrients to support milk synthesis (Bell, 1995; Drackley et al., 2001). We included these metabolic adaptations in the treatment period by beginning dietary supplementation with the two fat sources at 2 wk before the predicted calving date. This represents the first study to feed rumen-protected CLA during the prepartum period, and supplementation had no effect on measured performance variables or plasma metabolites (Table 2Go).

In the present study, CLA supplementation did not affect milk fat content until several weeks after the initiation of lactation (Figure 1Go). Likewise, there was no shift in milk fatty acid composition until several weeks postpartum (Figure 4Go). This differs from studies conducted with cows during established lactation where abomasal infusion of CLA (Baumgard et al., 2000, 2001) or feeding rumen-protected CLA (Giesy et al., 2002; Perfield et al., 2002) resulted in an immediate reduction in milk fat content and shift in milk fatty acid composition. A delayed effect of treatment also was observed by Selberg et al. (2002) when CLA supplementation was initiated 28 d prepartum.

An explanation for the lack of a CLA response in milk fat during the first few weeks postpartum is unknown. A CLA isomer that causes a reduction in milk fat is trans-10, cis-12 CLA (Baumgard et al., 2000), and our analysis indicates it was consistently transferred to milk fat throughout the treatment period (Figure 5Go). Thus, the lack of an effect immediately postpartum is unlikely to be related to any difference in uptake of trans-10, cis-12 CLA by the mammary gland. The source of fatty acids for milk fat synthesis is also a consideration, and this differs during the early postpartum period. The NEB characteristic of the onset of lactation is associated with an increased mobilization of body fat reserves, and this results in an increased mammary uptake of circulating NEFA and their use to synthesize milk fat triglycerides (Bell, 1995). However, it is not obvious why an increased contribution of NEFA for milk fat synthesis would completely abolish the CLA-induced reduction in milk fat. Another consideration is the mechanism and studies investigating the effect of trans-10, cis-12 CLA on milk fat synthesis have shown the mechanism involves coordinated decreases in mRNA abundance for key enzymes involved in the production of milk fat (Baumgard et al., 2002). Perhaps at the onset of lactation the essential cellular signaling systems are attenuated such that trans-10, cis-12 CLA is unable to elicit the coordinated reduction in the expression of genes for key lipogenic enzymes. Additional studies will be required to understand the basis for the delayed response to CLA, but the overall effect is that CLA supplementation did not reduce milk fat synthesis in the immediate postpartum period.

Results from the present study with transition cows also differ in other ways from those observed with administration of CLA to cows in established lactation. In established lactation, CLA administration or feeding affected the yield and content of milk fat, but milk yield and the yield of other milk components were relatively unaffected (Baumgard et al., 2000, 2001; Chouinard et al., 1999a; 1999b; Giesy et al., 2002; Perfield et al., 2002). In the present study the CLA-supplemented group exhibited an apparent increase in milk yield, beginning several weeks postpartum and continuing throughout the remainder of the treatment period (Figure 1Go). While statistically the milk yield increase (~3 kg/d) was only a trend (P < 0.13), it is underpinned by the simultaneous temporal pattern changes involving an increase in milk lactose yield (pattern not shown), a decrease in milk fat percentage (Figure 1Go), and shift in the fatty acid composition of milk fat (Figure 4Go). Thus, feeding rumen-protected CLA to early-lactation cows had a net effect of shifting nutrient partitioning, where energy spared from the reduction in milk fat was used to increase milk synthesis so that NEB was unchanged (Figure 2Go). This shift in nutrient partitioning when dietary CLA supplements were fed also has been reported by others. An increase in milk yield coinciding with decreased milk fat content was reported in studies in which cows were fed CLA supplements in early lactation (Giesy et al., 1999; Selberg et al., 2002) or on pasture-based systems (Medeiros et al., 2000). These studies have been reported only in abstract form, but are all situations in which energy intake would likely be less than optimal. In the case of pasture-fed cows where amino acid supply would likely be in excess, supplementation with rumen-protected CLA also resulted in a simultaneous increase in milk protein yield (Medeiros et al., 2000; Gulati et al., 2001).

The present study is the first to supplement CLA during the first 20 wk of lactation, an interval in which cows would typically be returned to reproductive service. Effects on reproduction were of special interest because studies with avian species indicated that CLA supplements resulted in high embryonic mortality and reduced hatchability of eggs (Aydin et al., 1999a, 1999b). However, no adverse effects were observed for conception, maintenance of pregnancy throughout the treatment period, or for the remainder of the pregnancy (Table 7Go). Perfield et al. (2002) reported that CLA supplementation over the last 20 wk of the lactation cycle caused no adverse effects on the maintenance of pregnancy or the development of the fetus. The CLA isomers are metabolized and a portion of their beneficial effects—for example, effects on enhancing immune function—are postulated to involve the formation of eicosanoids (Pariza et al., 2000). Polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic acid, may affect prostaglandin synthesis through a variety of mechanisms, which may contribute to a reduction in embryonic mortality (Mattos et al., 2000). Due to the limited number of animals per treatment group, it is difficult to make any definitive conclusions about the reproductive benefits of CLA supplementation, but all of the numerical changes in reproductive variables were all positive. Larger scale experiments will be required to elucidate the mechanisms underpinning these potential effects of CLA.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Feeding rumen-protected CLA to dairy cows during the transition period and early lactation resulted in a modest decrease in milk fat content and tended to increase milk yield. These changes, together with a shift in the fatty acid composition of milk fat, were not apparent until several weeks postpartum, indicating that milk fat synthesis was refractory to inhibition by CLA during the immediate postpartum period. The offsetting effects of feeding CLA on milk yield and milk fat content resulted in comparable NEB and plasma concentrations of NEFA and BHBA between treatments; however, days to first ovulation tended to decrease in cows fed CLA, and other indices of health and reproductive performance were not adversely affected by feeding rumen-protected CLA during the transition period and early lactation. Future research should investigate the carryover effects of feeding CLA on milk yield and extend these results on reproductive performance.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The support of K. Murphy (Bioproducts Inc.) and Dr. R. Spratt (Agribrands Purina Canada Inc.) in implementing the study is gratefully acknowledged. The assistance of the following students and colleagues at Cornell University is also appreciated: M. Partridge, T. Muscato, R. Slepetis, D. Dwyer, J. Lynch, Dr. W. R. Butler, M. Waldron, M. Piepenbrink, D. Ceurter, B. Corl, Dr. L. Baumgard, A. Ziegler, L. Ruzzi, M. Bischoff, and K. Vyhnal.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported in part by Bioproducts Inc. (Fairlawn, OH), Agribrands Purina Canada Inc. (Woodstock, Ontario), BASF AG (Ludwigshafen, Germany), and Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station. Back

2 Presented in part in abstract form at Annual Meeting of the American Dairy Science Association July 25, 2001 Indianapolis, IN [Bernal-Santos, G., J. W. Perfield II, T. R. Overton and D. E. Bauman. Production responses of dairy cows to dietary supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) during the transition period and early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 84(Suppl. 1):82. (Abstr.)] and at the 63rd Cornell Nutrition Conference, October 18, 2001 Rochester, NY [Overton, T. R., G. Bernal-Santos, J. W. Perfield II and D. E. Bauman. Effects of feeding conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) on metabolism and performance of transition dairy cows. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. pp. 179–187]. Back

3 Present address: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Querétaro, Qro. CP 76000, Mexico. Back

Received for publication December 16, 2002. Accepted for publication May 5, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Association of Official Analytical Chemists, International. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA.

Aydin, R., M. W. Pariza, and M. E. Cook. 1999a. Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on egg yolk fatty acids and hatchability in Japanese quail. J. Poultry Sci. 78(Suppl. 1):75. (Abstr.)

Aydin, R., M. W. Pariza, and M. E. Cook. 1999b. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid inhibits the hatchability of pigeon eggs. J. Poult. Sci. 78(Suppl. 1):115. (Abstr.)

Bauman, D. E., B. A. Corl, L. H. Baumgard, and J. M. Griinari. 2001. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and the dairy cow. Pages 221–250 in Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. P. C. Garnsworthy and J. Wiseman, eds. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.

Bauman, D. E., and J. M. Griinari. 2001. Regulation and nutritional manipulation of milk fat: Low-fat milk syndrome. Livest. Prod. Sci. 70:15–29.

Baumgard, L. H., B. A. Corl, D. A. Dwyer, A. Sæbø, and D. E. Bauman. 2000. Identification of the conjugated linoleic acid isomer that inhibits milk fat synthesis. Am. J. Physiol. 278:R179–R184.

Baumgard, L. H., E. Matitashvili, B. A. Corl, D. A. Dwyer, and D. E. Bauman. 2002. trans-10, cis-12 Conjugated linoleic acid decreases lipogenic rates and expression of genes involved in milk lipid synthesis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2155–2163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baumgard, L. H., J. K. Sangster, and D. E. Bauman. 2001. Milk fat synthesis in dairy cows is progressively reduced by increasing supplemental amounts of trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). J. Nutr. 131:1764–1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bell, A. W. 1995. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2804–2819.[Abstract]

Butler, W. R. 2001. Nutritional effects on resumption of ovarian cyclicity and conception rate in postpartum dairy cows. Anim. Sci. Occass. Publ. 26:133–145.

Chouinard, P. Y., L. Corneau, D. M. Barbano, L. E. Metzger, and D. E. Bauman. 1999a. Conjugated linoleic acids alter milk fatty acid composition and inhibit milk fat secretion in dairy cows. J. Nutr. 129:1579–1584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chouinard, P. Y., L. Corneau, A. Sæbø, and D. E. Bauman. 1999b. Milk yield and composition during abomasal infusion of conjugated linoleic acids in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2737–2745.[Abstract]

Christie, W. W. 1982. A simple procedure for rapid transmethylation of glycerolipids and cholesteryl esters. J. Lipid Res. 23:1072–1075.[Abstract]

Christie, W. W. 1989. Page 68 in Gas Chromatography and Lipids: A Practical Guide. The Oily Press, Ayr, Scotland.

Drackley, J. K., T. R. Overton, and G. N. Douglas. 2001. Adaptations of glucose and long-chain fatty acid metabolism in liver of dairy cows during the periparturient period. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E100–E112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fletcher, M. J. 1968. A colorimetric method for estimating serum triglycerides. Clin. Chim. Acta 22:393–397.[Medline]

Folch, J. M., M. Lees, and G. H. Sloane Stanley. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497–509.[Free Full Text]

Foster, L. B., and R. T. Dunn. 1973. Stable reagents for determination of serum triglycerides by a colorimetric Hantzsch condensation method. Clin. Chem. 19:338–340.[Abstract]

Fox, D. G., C. J. Sniffen, J. D. O’Connor, J. B. Russell, and P. J. Van Soest. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3578–3596.[Abstract]

Giesy, J. G., M. A. McGuire, B. Shafii, and T. W. Hanson. 1999. Effects of calcium salts of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on milk production and energy balance of early lactation Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 82(Suppl. 1):83. (Abstr.)

Giesy, J. G., M. A. McGuire, B. Shafii, and T. W. Hanson. 2002. Effect of dose of calcium salts of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on percentage and fatty acid content of milk fat in midlactation Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2023–2029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gulati, S. K., S. McGrath, P. C. Wynn, and T. W. Scott. 2001. Rumen protected conjugated linoleic acids: Effects on milk composition in dairy cows. Proc. Nutr. Soc. Australia. 25:S85. (Abstr.)

Hara, A., and N. S. Radin. 1978. Lipid extraction of tissues with a low-toxicity solvent. Anal. Biochem. 90:420–426.[Medline]

Hawk, P. B., and O. Bergeim. 1926. Pages 559–574 in Practical Physiological Chemistry. 9th ed. Maple Press Co., York, PA.

Loor, J. J., and J. H. Herbein. 1998. Exogenous conjugated linoleic acid isomers reduce bovine milk fat concentration and yield by inhibiting de novo fatty acid synthesis. J. Nutr. 128:2411–2419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mattos, R., C. R. Staples, and W. W. Thatcher. 2000. Effects of dietary fatty acids on reproduction in ruminants. Rev. Reprod. 5:38–45.[Abstract]

McCutcheon, S. N., and D. E. Bauman. 1986. Effect of chronic growth hormone treatment on responses to epinephrine and thyrotropin-releasing hormone in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 69:44–51.

Medeiros, S. R., D. E. Oliveira, L. J. M. Aroeira, M. A. McGuire, D. E. Bauman, and D. P. D. Lanna. 2000. The effect of long term supplementation of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) to dairy cows grazing tropical pasture. J. Dairy Sci. 83(Suppl. 1):169. (Abstr.)

Nara, B. S., and N. L. First. 1981. Effect of indomethacin and prostaglandin F2{alpha} on parturition in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 52:1360–1370.

National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

NCSS. 2000. Number Cruncher Statistical System. Kaysville, UT.

Pariza, M. W., Y. Park, and M. E. Cook. 2000. Mechanisms of action of conjugated linoleic acid: evidence and speculation. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 223:8–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Perfield II, J. W., G. Bernal-Santos, T. R. Overton, and D. E. Bauman. 2002. Effects of dietary supplementation of rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in dairy cows during established lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2609–2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peterson, D. G., L. H. Baumgard, and D. E. Bauman. 2002. Short communication: Milk fat response to low doses of trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). J. Dairy Sci. 85:1764–1766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SAS. 2001. SAS/STAT Users Guide (Release 8.0). SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

Sechen, S. J., F. R. Dunshea, and D. E. Bauman. 1990. Somatotropin in lactating cows—effect on response to epinephrine and insulin. Am. J. Physiol. 258:E582–E588.

Selberg, K. T., C. R. Staples, and L. Badinga. 2002. Production and metabolic responses to dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and trans-octadecenoic acid isomers in periparturient Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85(Suppl. 1):19. (Abstr.)[Abstract]

Staigmiller, R. B., R. E. Short, R. A. Bellows, and J. B. Carr. 1979. Effect of nutrition on response to exogenous FSH in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 48:1182–1190.

Veenhuizen, J. J., J. K. Drackley, M. J. Richard, T. P. Sanderson, L. D. Miller, and J. W. Young. 1991. Metabolic changes in blood and liver during development and early treatment of experimental fatty liver and ketosis in cows. J. Dairy Sci. 74:4238–4253.[Abstract]

Wildman, E. E., G. M. Jones, P. E. Wagner, R. L. Boman, H. F. Trout, and T. N. Lesch. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production variables in high producing Holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 65:495–501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. L. Smith, M. R. Waldron, L. C. Ruzzi, J. K. Drackley, M. T. Socha, and T. R. Overton
Metabolism of Dairy Cows as Affected by Prepartum Dietary Carbohydrate Source and Supplementation with Chromium Throughout the Periparturient Period
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2011 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. E. Bauman, J. W. Perfield II, K. J. Harvatine, and L. H. Baumgard
Regulation of Fat Synthesis by Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Lactation and the Ruminant Model
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 403 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Rodriguez-Sallaberry, C. Caldari-Torres, W. Collante, C. R. Staples, and L. Badinga
Plasma Prostaglandin and Cytokine Concentrations in Periparturient Holstein Cows Fed Diets Enriched in Saturated or Trans Fatty Acids
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5446 - 5452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, M. J. de Veth, A. L. Lock, D. A. Dwyer, K. D. Murphy, and D. E. Bauman
Effect of Supplementation with Calcium Salts of Fish Oil on n-3 Fatty Acids in Milk Fat
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4149 - 4156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, B. C. Benefield, M. J. de Veth, N. R. Santos, R. O. Gilbert, W. R. Butler, and D. E. Bauman
Evaluation of the Mechanism of Action of Conjugated Linoleic Acid Isomers on Reproduction in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4253 - 4264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. L. Smith, S. E. Stebulis, M. R. Waldron, and T. R. Overton
Prepartum 2,4-Thiazolidinedione Alters Metabolic Dynamics and Dry Matter Intake of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3660 - 3670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. A. Sinclair, A. L. Lock, R. Early, and D. E. Bauman
Effects of Trans-10, Cis-12 Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Ovine Milk Fat Synthesis and Cheese Properties
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3326 - 3335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. W. Perfield II, A. L. Lock, J. M. Griinari, A. Saebo, P. Delmonte, D. A. Dwyer, and D. E. Bauman
Trans-9, Cis-11 Conjugated Linoleic Acid Reduces Milk Fat Synthesis in Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2211 - 2218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. J. Odens, R. Burgos, M. Innocenti, M. J. VanBaale, and L. H. Baumgard
Effects of Varying Doses of Supplemental Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Production and Energetic Variables During the Transition Period
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 293 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. J. de Veth, E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, D. A. Dwyer, A. M. Pfeiffer, D. E. Putnam, and D. E. Bauman
Response to Conjugated Linoleic Acid in Dairy Cows Differing in Energy and Protein Status
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4620 - 4631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. W. Perfield II, P. Delmonte, A. L. Lock, M. P. Yurawecz, and D. E. Bauman
Trans-10, trans-12 conjugated linoleic acid does not affect milk fat yield but reduces delta9-desaturase index in dairy cows.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2559 - 2566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. L. Lock, B. M. Teles, J. W. Perfield II, D. E. Bauman, and L. A. Sinclair
A Conjugated Linoleic Acid Supplement Containing trans-10, cis-12 Reduces Milk Fat Synthesis in Lactating Sheep
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1525 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. P. Goff
Major advances in our understanding of nutritional influences on bovine health.
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1292 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. J. de Veth, S. K. Gulati, N. D. Luchini, and D. E. Bauman
Comparison of Calcium Salts and Formaldehyde-Protected Conjugated Linoleic Acid in Inducing Milk Fat Depression
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(5): 1685 - 1693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, T. R. Overton, W. R. Butler, and D. E. Bauman
Dietary Supplements of Two Doses of Calcium Salts of Conjugated Linoleic Acid During the Transition Period and Early Lactation
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1078 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. S. Piperova, U. Moallem, B. B. Teter, J. Sampugna, M. P. Yurawecz, K. M. Morehouse, D. Luchini, and R. A. Erdman
Changes in Milk Fat in Response to Dietary Supplementation with Calcium Salts of Trans-18:1 or Conj