JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by López-Pedemonte, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Guamis, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by López-Pedemonte, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Guamis, B.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:3075-3081
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Inactivation of Spores of Bacillus cereus in Cheese by High Hydrostatic Pressure with the Addition of Nisin or Lysozyme

Tomás J. López-Pedemonte, Artur X. Roig-Sagués, Antonio J. Trujillo, Marta Capellas and Buenaventura Guamis

Centre Especial de Recerca, Planta de Tecnologia dels Aliments, CeRTA, XiT, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,08193 Bellaterra, Spain

Corresponding author: A. X. Roig-Sagues; e-mail: ArturXavier.Roig{at}uab.es.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The objective of this work was to study high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) inactivation of spores of Bacillus cereus ATCC 9139 inoculated in model cheeses made of raw milk, together with the effects of the addition of nisin or lysozyme. The concentration of spores in model cheeses was approximately 6-log10 cfu/g of cheese. Cheeses were vacuum packed and stored at 8°C. All samples except controls were submitted to a germination cycle of 60 MPa at 30°C for 210 min, to a vegetative cells destruction cycle of 300 or 400 MPa at 30°C for 15 min, or to both treatments. Bacillus cereus counts were measured 24 h and 15 d after HHP treatment. The combination of both cycles improved the efficiency of the whole treatment. When the second pressure-cycle was of 400 MPa, the highest inactivation (2.4 ± 0.1-log10 cfu/g) was obtained with the presence of nisin (1.56 mg/L of milk), whereas lysozyme (22.4 mg/L of milk) did not increase sensitivity of the spores to HHP. For nisin (0.05 and 1.56 mg/L of milk), no significant differences were found between counts at 24 h and 15 d after treatment. Considering that mesophilic spore counts usually range from 2.6 to 3.0 log10 cfu/ml in raw milk, HHP at mild temperatures with the addition of nisin may be useful for improving safety and preservation of soft curd cheeses made from raw milk.

Key Words: Bacillus cereus • high pressure • lysozyme • nisin

Abbreviation key: G = germination treatment, HHP = high hydrostatic pressure, L = lysozyme series of experiments, N1 = minor dose of nisin treatment, N2 = higher dose of nisin series of experiments


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Bacillus cereus has been reported to be a common contaminant of raw milk. It seems impossible to prevent its presence in milk samples, because spores adhere to stainless steel surfaces even after cleaning, due to their high hydrophobicity, low surface charge, and long appendages. The organism is commonly lecithinase-positive; therefore, it can attack the intact milk fat globule membrane and cause bitterness or sweet curdling (Andersson et al., 1995). The pathogenic nature of B. cereus adds the risk of two possible clinical forms of food poisoning. Three different enterotoxins and one emetic toxin are produced, even during growth in milk at refrigerated temperatures. The extracellular diarrhoeagenic enterotoxins are inactivated by temperature (56°C) and proteases and an emetic type nonprotein toxin that is extremely stable to heat and pH while being resistant to trypsin and pepsin (Granum and Lund, 1997). Milk and dairy products have been implicated in both types of intoxication (Meer et al., 1991; Andersson et al., 1995).

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) is generally effective at reducing most vegetative bacteria, yeasts, and molds between 300 and 700 MPa, but bacterial spores have demonstrated resistance to more than 1000 MPa (Smelt, 1998). Recommended treatments for direct destruction of spores to obtain shelf-stable, low-acid foods, involve two consecutive 1-min cycles of at least 621 MPa starting around 80°C and reaching final temperatures equal to or higher than 105°C (Meyer et al., 2000). Alternatively, bacterial spore inactivation can be achieved in two steps: first stimulating its germination by applying pressures of 50 to 300 MPa and then killing germinated cells by using relatively mild heat and pressure treatments (Gould et al., 1970; Sojka and Ludwig, 1994). However, a fraction of spores may survive.

It has been shown that efficiency of HHP against spores is enhanced when used in conjunction with other treatments including mild heat and antimicrobial agents (Shearer, et al., 2000). Hurdle technology relies on the synergistic combination of different moderate factors to improve food safety, compensating for individual process limitations and minimizing the use of extreme levels of any one treatment. As pressurization may inflict sublethal injury in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial cells, it makes them more susceptible to antibacterial compounds such as nisin or lysozyme among others (Kalchayanand et al., 1998; Masschalk et al., 2001). In Mató cheese, combining nisin with high pressure improved the effect of the latter on spores and aerobic mesophilic populations (Capellas et al., 2000).

Traditional soft curd cheeses cannot be submitted to temperatures above 40°C. The risk of causing food poisoning increases if cheeses are made from raw milk, and the safety of curing procedures alone as the main pathogen control step in cheese making is currently under review (Altekruse et al., 1998). Several studies with food as the assay medium have proved the influence of the food matrix on microbial sensitivity to pressure (Patterson et al., 1998; Capellas et al., 2000; Gervilla et al., 2000). Model cheeses are closer to real cheese than slurries and tube tests. They offer the possibility of testing single bacterial strains in a real washed-curd cheese environment (Ur-Rehman et al., 2001).

The objective of this work was to study the influence of HHP (one- vs. two-cycle treatments) on the inactivation of spores of B. cereus ATCC 9139 inoculated in model cheeses made from raw milk under controlled microbiological conditions. The possible increase of sensitivity to nisin or lysozyme produced by HHP was also studied.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation of Inocula of B. cereus Spores
A young culture (18 h, 37°C) of B. cereus ATCC 9139 (CECT 5144; Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo) in brain heart infusion (Oxoid, Unipath Ltd., UK) was spread plated on tryptone soy agar (Oxoid) containing (per liter) 0.05 mg of manganese and incubated for 3 d at 37°C until 80 to 90% sporulation was obtained. Spores were harvested by flooding the agar surface with 0.85% NaCl and scraping it with sterile glass balls. This suspension was heated for 10 min at 80°C and quickly cooled to 5°C. It was then centrifuged for 20 min at 4000 x g at 5°C and washed twice with sterile distilled water. Finally the spores were resuspended in 0.85% NaCl and stored at 4°C. Bacillus cereus spore counts were approximately 8-log10 cfu/ml.

Manufacture of Model Cheeses
Model washed-curd cheeses were manufactured under controlled microbiological conditions following a modification of the procedure described by Hynes et al. (2000). Raw milk was collected from a local farm, placed inside a sterile tank, and transported under refrigerated conditions in less than 2 h to the laboratory. Milk was brought to 31°C in a water bath. Strains of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (Ezal MAO 11, Rhodia Iberia S.A., Madrid, Spain), which do not produce bacteriocins, were added as starter of 2% (vol/vol), together with 0.01% (vol/vol) of a 35% (wt/vol) calcium chloride solution (Arroyo, Santander, Spain) to improve coagulation. A 0.02% (vol/vol) liquid rennet extract of calf origin (520 mg/L of active chymosin, Arroyo, Santander, Spain) was used as coagulating agent. Milk was poured in previously autoclaved long-necked centrifuge bottles of 225 ml containing B. cereus inocula (except blanks). Coagulation took place at 31°C. After 45 min, curds were gently cut with sterile stainless steel tools and heated for 15 min at 37°C. About 40% of whey was discarded and replaced by sterile water. Bottles were centrifuged at 7000 x g for 40 min at room temperature. Then they were kept in the water bath at 37°C until pH reached 5.5. The whey was discarded, and 20% sterile brine (200 g of NaCl per liter of tap water) was added directly inside the bottle. After 15 min, brine was removed and cheeses were taken out from the bottles and dried with sterile paper. All of these conditions had been previously adjusted to obtain 55% of DM, 1.5% salt-in-moisture content, and a final pH around 5. Inoculum density of spores was approximately 6-log10 cfu/g of cheese. Model cheeses of approximately 23 g were vacuum packed in plastic bags (Cryovac Packaging, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain) and stored at 8°C for 15 d.

Addition of Lysozyme
In one experiment series, egg white lysozyme (Larbus s.a., Madrid, Spain) was added to milk (22.4 mg/L) and then homogenized before pouring it into centrifuge bottles.

Addition of Nisin
Two series of experiments were carried out incorporating nisin (Nisaplin, Applin & Barret Ltd., Towbridge, UK) using two different doses: 0.05 and 1.56 mg/L of milk. Nisin was added and homogenized before pouring milk into centrifuge bottles.

HHP Treatments
Samples were pressurized 24 h after manufacture by using discontinuous HHP equipment (ALSTOM, Nantes, France). The pressure chamber and the pressurizing liquid inside were held at the appropriate temperature (30°C, monitored with a thermocouple) by circulating hot water through a coil. Before HHP treatments, cheeses were placed for 15 min inside a water bath to reach 30°C. Table 1Go shows all four series of experiments performed with HHP alone and in combination with nisin or lysozyme.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) treatments applied to all four series of experiments and their codification.
 
Microbiological Analysis
Microbiological cheese analysis was performed at 24 h and at 15 d after treatment, homogenizing 10 g of sample in 90 ml of buffered peptone water (Oxoid), for 1 min in an electromechanical blender (BagMixer, Interscience, France). Decimal dilutions in buffered peptone water were surface spread on B. cereus selective agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 h following the instructions of the manufacturer. Blank samples (not inoculated with spores) were included to assess the presence of naturally occurring B. cereus in raw milk and to correct counts if necessary. Inoculated model cheeses without additives and not submitted to any HHP treatment were called controls. Cheeses with additives and not submitted to HHP were called lysozyme controls and nisin controls, respectively. Lethality was calculated comparing control samples with treated ones.

Statistical Analysis
Each HHP experiment was run three separate times with duplicate analysis in each replicate. ANOVA of SPSS 10.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used. Tukey and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to obtain paired comparisons among sample means. Level of significance was P < 0.05.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Effect of 300 and 400 HHP Single Treatments on B. cereus
The application of a one-step treatment of HHP to model cheeses resulted in a small amount of inactivation, which did not reach 1-log10 reduction of B. cereus (Figure 1Go). This agrees with previous data (Meyer et al., 2000; McClements et al., 2001). Raso et al. (1998) studied germination and inactivation of B. cereus spores in saline buffer supplemented with sucrose. When B. cereus spores were obtained at 37°C and treatments of 250 MPa for 15 min at 25°C were applied, they found that although some germination took place while pH and water activity increased, no inactivation occurred at any pH between 3.5 and 7.8 combined with water activities between 0.92 and 1.00. This is similar to results obtained in our work for treatments 300 and 400, considering that pH and water activity of model cheeses lie between the values tested by them.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean lethality of Bacillus cereus ± confidence interval (No and N stand for initial and final counts of B. cereus). Comparison of each treatment for all series of experiments and comparison between different treatments for each particular series of experiments. In all series graphics, for each treatment, column means with different superscript differ (P < 0.05). In without additives (WA), lysozyme (L), minor dose of nisin (N1), and higher dose of nisin (N2) Series graphics, column means with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

 
Effect of HHP Treatments with Germinative Cycle on B. cereus
Because traditional soft curd cheeses cannot be submitted to temperatures above 40°C and based on surveys in which two-step treatments at mild temperatures were found to be best suited to initiate germination and then inactivate spores (Sojka and Ludwig, 1994; Capellas et al., 2000), the influence of one- vs. two-cycle HHP treatments (300 or 400 MPa vs. 60 + 300 or 60 + 400 MPa) at 30°C was studied.

When comparing lethalities obtained for treatments with or without the germinative step (Figure 1Go), it is clear that the addition of this first cycle at mild temperature and low pressure improved the efficiency of the whole treatment. In germination treatment alone (G) and in both two-step treatments (G + 300 and G + 400), mean lethality seemed to increase with pressure, although differences were not statistically significant.

Sojka and Ludwig (1994) have previously worked applying two-step HHP treatments to Bacillus subtilis spores. They proposed a treatment of 60 MPa for 210 min to initiate B. subtilis spore germination in an aqueous solution, followed by 500 MPa for 15 min to inactivate germinated cells. The reduction obtained was of 6-log10 at 40°C. In the present work, the maximum reduction obtained without additives was (1.6 ± 0.3)-log10 of B. cereus spores for G + 400 treatment, which is indeed lower. This is probably because they worked with aqueous solutions at higher temperatures and higher final pressures.

Capellas et al. (2000) have worked with B. subtilis spores in Mató cheese, applying the same pressure treatment at different temperatures. At 40°C they found a lethality value of 4.9-log10 of B. subtilis spores, whereas at 25°C reduction was of 2.7-log10. The inferior reduction values obtained in our work may be a consequence of applying 100 MPa less (400 MPa) in the second cycle. In addition, cheese characteristics were different. The influence of substrate on pressure sensitivity of bacteria has already been stated (Jaquette and Beuchat, 1998; Patterson, 1998). This may explain the lower lethality values obtained in our work even though B. subtilis seems to be more pressure resistant than B. cereus (Nakayama et al. 1996; Meyer et al., 2000; Moerman et al., 2001). Pressure-induced germination proceeds faster at neutral pH if pressure is between 50 and 300 MPa (Hauben et al., 1997). Model cheeses have a pH of around 5; this may also have caused decreased lethality values. Other factors such as strain within a species and stage of growth can also affect sensitivity of microorganisms to high pressure (Alpas et al., 1999; McClements et al., 2001).

Effects of Additives on B. cereus Control Samples
No significant differences were found between counts of controls and nisin or lysozyme controls (data not shown). The use of additives alone does not seem to affect B. cereus spores in model cheeses.

Effect of 300 and 400 HHP Single Treatments and Additives on B. cereus
For treatments 300 and 400, the addition of lysozyme (L) or a minor dose of nisin (N1) did not improve the efficacy of HHP alone. On the contrary, experiments with the higher dose of nisin (N2) achieved a significant increase compared with without aditives, N1, and L series, although they were never higher than 1-log10 reduction of B. cereus. The influence of both additives was hardly useful under these conditions.

Effect of HHP with Previous Germinative Cycle and Additives on B. cereus
When the germinative cycle alone was applied, N1 and N2 series values were not statistically different.

The addition of the second pressure cycle improved the efficacy of additives, as seen in lethality values. Counts of control samples and nisin control samples did not differ, so synergism between HHP and nisin is clearly observed. In particular, the germinating process may increase permeability of the spore coat. In this way, HHP facilitates the access of additives to germinated cell cytoplasmic membrane (Masschalk et al., 2001).

In both two-step treatments, lethalities obtained for N1 and N2 series were indeed significantly higher than without additives series. In G + 400 treatment, N2 series had the highest inactivation, although not statistically different from N1 series. It seems as if for these conditions, the higher dose of nisin was incapable of increasing synergism with HHP. Lethality values for this bacteriocin were in all cases higher than those for lysozyme. The effect of nisin against B. cereus is more pronounced as pH becomes more acidic (Jaquette and Beuchat, 1998). The pH of optimum activity for both additives is around 5, as it is in model cheeses, so in this case pH does not seem to be especially benefiting the activity of one additive over the other. However, the expected increase in sensitivity of B. cereus to lysozyme because of HHP turned out to be not significant enough to differentiate lethalities of L series from without additives ones.

Comparison of 24-h and 15-d B. cereus Counts
Processed samples were given an incubation period at 8°C of 15 d and then plate-counted to verify whether growth conditions obtained after HHP persisted. This 15-d period was chosen to allow surviving spores and cells to repair and grow. Comparison of B. cereus counts can be seen in Table 2Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Comparison of 24-h and 15-d Bacillus cereus counts in model cheeses stored at 8°C for all series of experiments.1
 
Most control samples experienced significant growth after 15 d at 8°C. This might be explained by the ability of B. cereus to grow at 8°C (Jaquette and Beuchat, 1998) and by its mechanisms of resistance to nisin and lysozyme. Increments were also observed in many counts of B. cereus for treatments 300, 400, and G at d 15. As well as in controls, the psychrotrophic nature of the remaining bacteria may be responsible for that increment. The presence of sublethally damaged organisms that may be able to repair and grow after a longer incubation period could also contribute (Smelt, 1998).

The germinative cycle alone was not able to ensure 15-d persistency of reductions for all series. On the contrary, in treatments G + 300 and G + 400 no statistical differences were found for without additives, N1, and N2 series between 24-h and 15-d counts. Thus, the second pressure cycle becomes essential to preserve the reductions seen in 24-h counts for 15 d at 8°C.

In L series for G + 300 and G + 400 treatments, 15-d counts were statistically higher than 24-h counts. This is another reason for choosing nisin over lysozyme as a preservative agent to be used with HHP.

Safety Implications
The ability of psychrotrophic B. cereus spores to survive thermal pasteurization and subsequently grow in foods held at refrigerated temperatures is of public concern (Jaquette and Beuchat, 1998). The maximum reduction obtained (2.4 ± 0.1-log10 cfu/g) may seem insuficient to assure safety of cheeses. However, initial load in our model cheeses is fairly high (more than 6-log10 cfu/g) and, after applying both pressure cycles, total levels obtained were around 4-log10 cfu/g. It seems the number of viable cells or spores required for causing enteric intoxication varies between 5-log10 and 8-log10 cfu/g of food. In most cases, the infective dose quoted is around 6-log10 cfu/g, although some strains of B. cereus might be capable of producing food poisoning at counts as low as 3 or 4-log10 cfu/g (Granum and Lund, 1997). Moreover, in raw milk, mesophilic spore counts usually range from 2.6 to 3.0-log10 cfu/ml, and between these values the fraction corresponding to B. cereus varies with farms and seasons (White, 2000). Considering all these facts, in cheeses made from raw milk, HHP at mild temperatures together with the addition of nisin may be useful for improving its safety and preservation.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors acknowledge the financial support received from the research project CAL-00-005-C2-1 (Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria) and the grant given to Tomás J. López by the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional. We also thank the Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo for providing the strain of B. cereus.

Received for publication February 13, 2003. Accepted for publication May 22, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Alpas, H., N. Kalchayanand, F. Bozoglu, A. Sikes, C. P. Dunne, and B. Ray. 1999. Variation in resistance to hydrostatic pressure among strains of food-borne pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4284–4251.

Altekruse, S. F., B. T. Babagaleh, J. C. Mowbray, N. H. Bean, and M. E. Potter. 1998. Cheese-associated outbreaks of human illness in the United States, 1973 to 1992: Sanitary manufacturing practices protect consumers. J. Food Prot. 61:1405–1407.[Medline]

Andersson, A., U. Rönner, and P. E. Granum. 1995. What problems does the food industry have with the spore-forming pathogens Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 28:145–155.[Medline]

Capellas, M., M. Mor-Mur, R. Gervilla, J. Yuste, and B. Guamis. 2000. Effect of high pressure combined with mild heat or nisin on inoculated bacteria and mesophiles of goats’ milk fresh cheese. Food Microbiol. 17:633–641.

Gervilla, R., V. Ferragut, and B. Guamis. 2000. High pressure inactivation of microorganisms inoculated into ovine milk of different fat contents. J. Dairy Sci. 83:674–682.[Abstract]

Granum, E., and T. Lund. 1997. Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 157:223–228.[Medline]

Hauben, K. J. A., D. H. Bartlett, C. C. F. Soontjens, K. Cornelis, E. Y. Wuytack, and C. W. Michiels. 1997. Escherichia coli mutants resistant to inactivation by high hydrostatic pressure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:945–950.[Abstract]

Hynes, E., J. C. Ogier, and A. Delacroix-Buchet. 2000. Protocol for the manufacture of model washed-curd cheeses under controlled microbiological conditions. Int. Dairy J. 10:733–737.

Jaquette, C. B., and L. R. Beuchat. 1998. Combined effects of pH, nisin, and temperature on growth and survival of psychrotrophic Bacillus cereus. J. Food Prot. 61:563–570.[Medline]

Kalchayanand, N., A. Sikes, C. P. Dunne, and B. Ray. 1998. Interaction of hydrostatic pressure, time and temperature of pressurization and pediocin AcH on inactivation of foodborne bacteria. J. Food Prot. 61:425–431.[Medline]

Masschalk, B., R. Van Houdt, E. G. R. Van Haver, and C. Michiels. 2001. Inactivation of Gram-negative bacteria by lysozyme, denatured lysozyme and lysozyme derived peptides under high hydrostatic pressure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:339–344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McClements, J. M. J., M. F. Patterson, and M. Linton. 2001. The effecth of growth stage and growth temperature on high hydrostatic pressure inactivation of some psychrotrophic bacteria in milk. J. Food Prot. 64:514–522.[Medline]

Meer, R. R., J. Baker, F. W. Bodyfelt, and M. W. Griffiths. 1991. Psychrotrophic Bacillus spp. in fluid milk products: A review. J. Food Prot. 54:969–979.

Meyer, R. S., K. L. Cooper, D. Knorr, and H. L. M. Lelieveld. 2000. High pressure sterilisation of foods. Food Technol. 54:67–72.

Moerman, F., B. Mertens, L. Demey, and A. Huyghebaert. 2001. Reduction of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, and Streptococcus faecalis in meat batters by temperature-high hydrostatic pressure pasteurisation. Meat Sci. 59:115–125.

Nakayama, A., Y. Yano, S. Kobayashi, M. Ishikawa, and K. Sakai. 1996. Comparison of pressure resistances of spores of six Bacillus strains with their heat resistances. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3897–3900.[Abstract]

Patterson, M. F., and D. J. Kilkpatrick. 1998. The combined effect of high hydrostatic pressure and mild heat on inactivation of pathogens in milk and poultry. J. Food Prot. 61:432–436.[Medline]

Raso, J., M. M. Góngora-Nieto, G. V. Barbosa-Cánovas, and B. G. Swanson. 1998. Influence of several environmental factors on the initiation of germination and inactivation of Bacillus cereus by high hydrostatic pressure. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 44:125–132.[Medline]

Shearer, A. E. H., C. P. Dunne, A. Sikes, and D. G. Hoover. 2000. Bacterial spore inhibition and inactivation in foods by pressure, chemical preservatives, and mild heat. J. Food Prot. 63:1503–1510.[Medline]

Smelt, J. P. P. M. 1998. Recent advances in the microbiology of high pressure processing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 9:152–158.

Sojka, B., and H. Ludwig. 1994. Pressure-induced germination and inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores. Pharmaz.Ind. 56:660–663.

Ur-Rehman, S., P. F. Fox, P. L. H. McSweeney, S. A. Madkor, and N. X. Farkye. 2001. Alternatives to pilot plant experiments in cheese–ripening studies. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 54:121–126.

White, C. H. 2000. Testing of milk and milk products. Pages 645–680 in Applied Dairy Microbiology. E. H. Marth and J. L. Steele, ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. M. Gut, A. M. Prouty, J. D. Ballard, W. A. van der Donk, and S. R. Blanke
Inhibition of Bacillus anthracis Spore Outgrowth by Nisin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2008; 52(12): 4281 - 4288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. C. Scharfen, D. A. Mills, and E. A. Maga
Use of Human Lysozyme Transgenic Goat Milk in Cheese Making: Effects on Lactic Acid Bacteria Performance
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4084 - 4091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. De Lamo-Castellvi, A. X. Roig-Sagues, T. Lopez-Pedemonte, M. M. Hernandez-Herrero, B. Guamis, and M. Capellas
Response of Two Salmonella enterica Strains Inoculated in Model Cheese Treated with High Hydrostatic Pressure
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 99 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. Lopez-Pedemonte, W. J. Brinez, A. X. Roig-Sagues, and B. Guamis
Fate of Staphylococcus aureus in Cheese Treated by Ultrahigh Pressure Homogenization and High Hydrostatic Pressure
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4536 - 4544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by López-Pedemonte, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Guamis, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by López-Pedemonte, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Guamis, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS