JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oba, M.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oba, M.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:174-183
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Effects of Corn Grain Conservation Method on Feeding Behavior and Productivity of Lactating Dairy Cows at Two Dietary Starch Concentrations

M. Oba1 and M. S. Allen

Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1225

Corresponding author:
M. S. Allen; e-mail:
allenm{at}pilot.msu.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Effects of conservation method of corn grain and dietary starch concentration on dry matter intake (DMI) and productivity of lactating dairy cows were evaluated. Eight ruminally and duodenally cannulated Holstein cows (55 ± 15.9 d in milk; mean ± SD) were used in a duplicated 4 x 4 Latin square design with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Experimental diets contained either ground high-moisture corn (HM) or dry ground corn (DG) at two dietary starch concentrations (32 vs 21%). Mean particle size and dry matter (DM) concentration of corn grain were 1863 µm and 63.2%, and 885 µm and 89.7%, for HM and DG, respectively. DMI was lower for HM compared to DG treatment in high-starch diets (20.8 vs 22.5 kg/d), but similar for the HM and DG treatments in low-starch diets (19.7 vs 19.6 kg/d). This reduction in DMI is attributed to smaller meal size for HM compared to DG in high-starch diets (1.9 vs 2.3 kg of DM for high-starch diets; 2.1 vs 2.0 kg of DM for low-starch diets). Faster starch fermentation for HM in high-starch diets might result in satiety with smaller meal size. Milk yield was greater when cows were fed high-starch diets compared to low-starch diets (38.6 vs 33.9 kg/d) regardless of corn grain treatment. High-starch diets increased solids-corrected milk yield by 3.3 kg (35.2 vs 31.9 kg/d) compared to low-starch diets for cows fed DG, but did not increase for cows fed HM. This was because of a lower milk fat concentration for cows fed HM in high-starch diets. Reducing ruminal starch fermentation by substituting DG for HM can increase the productivity of lactating cows fed high-starch diets.

Key Words: conservation method of corn • feeding behavior • intake • nutrient utilization

Abbreviation key: DG = dry ground corn, HM = high-moisture corn, TRDOM = true ruminally degraded organic matter


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
An important goal in dairy cow management is the maximization of energy intake. Cows in early lactation often experience a negative energy balance, and energy status greatly affects peak milk yield and persistency of milk production. One approach to increasing energy intake is to increase the energy density of diets by feeding more fermentable grains. Theurer et al. (1999) summarized studies comparing steam-flaked corn with steam-rolled corn, and steam-flaked sorghum with dry-rolled sorghum, and concluded that steam-flake processing increases milk yield without decreasing DMI. They attributed the positive production responses to greater starch digestibility in the rumen and enhanced microbial protein flow to the duodenum. However, greater starch digestibility results in variable responses in animal productivity. A recent review (Allen, 2000) showed that greater starch digestibility in the rumen is sometimes associated with sharp reductions in DMI, which can decrease energy intake. Inconsistent responses to increased ruminally degraded starch might be the result of differences in the fermentability of basal diets and energy requirements of animals across the studies (Allen, 2000). However, the interaction between fermentability of grain and dietary starch concentration on productivity of lactating dairy cows has not been studied extensively.

Although effects of starch fermentability on DMI were extensively studied, few experiments evaluated effects of starch fermentability on feeding behavior. DMI is a function of meal size and intermeal interval, which are determined by satiety and hunger, respectively. Evaluation of feeding behavior is needed to elucidate regulation mechanisms for feed intake when cows are fed fermentable diets. Corn grain is the major source of dietary starch for lactating dairy cows in the United States. Ruminal starch digestibility of corn grain can be altered by fineness of grinding and by conservation method. Ying et al. (1998) reported that ruminal starch digestibility was reduced more than 19% when dry ground corn (DG; mean particle size = 0.8 mm) was substituted for ground high-moisture corn (HM; mean particle size = 2.0 mm), with no difference in total tract starch digestibility. We hypothesized that effects of starch digestibility of corn grain on productivity of dairy cows differ by concentration of starch in diets. Greater ruminally degraded starch from HM is expected to increase the productivity of lactating dairy cows compared to DG when cows are fed low-starch diets, but to decrease DMI and productivity when cows are fed high-starch diets because of excess starch fermentation in the rumen.

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate effects of high-moisture and dry conservation methods of corn grain on feeding behavior, DMI, and productivity for lactating dairy cows fed two dietary starch concentrations.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This article is the one of three in a series from one experiment that evaluated effects of corn grain conservation method at two dietary starch concentrations. This article discusses treatment effects on feeding behavior and productivity, and the companion articles focus on ruminal digestion kinetics (Oba and Allen, 2002a) and efficiency of microbial nitrogen production (Oba and Allen, 2002b). Experimental procedures were approved by the All University Committee on Animal Use and Care at Michigan State University.

Treatments and Cows
Eight multiparous Holstein cows (55 ± 15.9 DIM; mean ± SD) from the Michigan State University Dairy Cattle Teaching and Research Center were assigned randomly to duplicated 4 x 4 Latin squares balanced for carry-over effects with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Cows were cannulated ruminally and duodenally prior to calving, and assigned randomly to a treatment sequence within a square. At the beginning of the experiment, empty BW (ruminal digesta removed) of cows was 565.5 ± 58.5 kg (mean ± SD). Treatments were dietary starch concentration (21 vs 32%) and conservation method of corn grain (HM vs DG). Treatment periods were 21 d, with the final 10 d used to collect samples and data.

One corn hybrid (Pioneer 3730; Pioneer Hi-bred International, Inc., Johnston, IA) was grown in 1998, and half of the field was harvested as HM at a DM concentration of 63.2%. High-moisture corn was ground to a mean particle size of 1863 µm and ensiled in a 2.4 x 9.0-m silage bag (Ag Bagger, Ag Bag Corp., Blair, NE). The remaining half of the field was harvested as dry corn at 89.7% DM. Dry corn was finely ground to a mean particle size of 885 µm. Nutrient composition for corn grain treatments is shown in Table 1Go. Experimental diets contained either HM or DG, corn silage (50% of forage DM), alfalfa silage (50% of forage DM), a premix of protein supplements (soybean meal, distillers grains, and blood meal), and a premix of minerals and vitamins (Table 2Go). All diets were formulated for 18% dietary CP concentration, and fed as TMR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Nutrient composition of corn grains used to formulate experimental diets.1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Ingredients and nutrient composition of experimental diets (% of dietary DM).1
 
Data and Sample Collection
Throughout the experiment, cows were housed in tie stalls, and fed once daily (1400 h) at 110% of expected intake. The amount of feed offered and orts were weighed for each cow daily during the collection period. Samples of all dietary ingredients (0.5 kg) and orts (12.5%) were collected daily and composited into one sample per cow, per period. Cows were milked twice daily in their stalls during the feeding-behavior monitoring period (d 16 to 19), and in a milking parlor for the rest of period. Milk yield was measured daily during the collection period and was averaged over the collection period. Milk was sampled at every milking on d 12, 16, and 19 of each period and analyzed for fat, CP, and lactose with infrared spectroscopy by Michigan DHIA (East Lansing), and SCM yield was calculated (Tyrrell and Reid, 1965). Empty BW was measured after evacuation of ruminal digesta on two consecutive days immediately prior to the start of the first period, and on d 19 and 21 of each period. BCS was determined according to Wildman (1982; five-point scale where 1 = thin and 5 = fat) by three trained investigators blinded to treatments immediately prior to the start of the first period and on d 21 of each period.

Feeding behavior and ruminal pH were monitored from d 16 to 19 (96 h) of each period by a computerized data acquisition system (Dado and Allen, 1993). Data on chewing activities, feed disappearance, water consumption, and ruminal pH were recorded for each cow every 5 s. Chewing activity for 24-h periods from feeding to feeding were deleted when chewing halters were out of adjustment. Electrodes for ruminal pH determination were checked daily and calibrated as needed, and ruminal pH data were deleted for the entire day if pH drifted more than 0.1 unit at pH 7 and 4. The system successfully collected 92.2% of the total chewing behavior data (4 d observations per cow per period), and 90.6% of the total ruminal pH data (69,120 observations per cow per period). Daily means were calculated for number of meal bouts per day, interval between meals, meal size, eating time, ruminating time, and total chewing time. These response variables were calculated as daily means, and then averaged over the 4 d for each period. Blood samples and ruminal fluid samples were collected every 20 min for 24 h by an automated sample collection system (Allen et al., 2000), starting at 1200 h on d 16. Blood was sampled from a jugular vein through a catheter inserted 1 d prior to sample collection. This system successfully collected 99.5 and 97.9% of the total samples (4608 each) for blood and ruminal fluid, respectively.

Ruminal fluid was centrifuged at 2000 x g for 15 min immediately after collection, and supernatants were frozen at -20°C until analysis. Blood samples were collected into two tubes, one with lithium heparin and the other with potassium oxalate and sodium fluoride as a glycolytic inhibitor. Both were centrifuged at 2000 x g for 15 min immediately after sample collection, and plasma was harvested and frozen at -20°C until analysis.

Sample and Statistical Analysis
Diet ingredients and orts were dried in a 55°C forced-air oven for 72 h and analyzed for DM concentration. All samples were ground with a Wiley mill (1-mm screen; Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA). Samples were analyzed for ash, NDF, ADF, lignin, indigestible NDF, CP, and starch. Ash concentration was determined after 5 h of oxidation at 500°C in a muffle furnace. Concentrations of NDF and ADF were determined (Van Soest et al., 1991; method A for NDF). Crude protein was analyzed according to Hach et al. (1985). Starch was measured by an enzymatic method (Karkalas, 1985) after samples were gelatinized with sodium hydroxide; glucose concentration was measured with a glucose oxidase method (Glucose kit #510; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO); and absorbance was determined with a microplate reader (SpectraMax 190, Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, CA). Indigestible NDF was estimated as NDF residue after 120 h of in vitro fermentation (Goering and Van Soest, 1990). Ruminal fluid for the in vitro incubations was collected from a nonpregnant dry cow fed alfalfa hay only. Concentrations of all nutrients except for DM were expressed as percentages of DM determined by drying at 105°C in a forced-air oven for more than 8 h. Corn grain was dry sieved (Sieve apertures: 4750, 2360, 1180, 600, 300, 150, 75 µm and bottom pan) using a sieve shaker (model RX-86, W.S. Tyler Inc., Gastonia, NC) for approximately 20 min until the bottom pan weight was constant, and the mean particle size of the corn grain was calculated (ASAE, 1968). True ruminally degraded OM (TRDOM) was calculated as described by Oba and Allen (2002a).

Ruminal fluid was analyzed for VFA and lactate concentrations. Samples were centrifuged at 26,000 x g for 15 min, and supernatant (600 µl) was mixed with 600 µl Ca(OH)2 and 300 µl of CuSO4 containing crotonic acid as an internal marker in 1.7 ml microcentrifuge tubes. Samples were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min, and supernatant (1000 µl) was taken and mixed with 28 µl of H2SO4 in 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes. Samples were frozen and thawed twice, and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min to precipitate and remove protein thoroughly. Supernatant was transferred to HPLC vials. Concentrations of VFA and lactate of the supernatant were determined by HPLC as described by Dado and Allen (1995). Rate of VFA production (moles/d) was estimated from the measured TRDOM (Oba and Allen, 2002a) and microbial efficiency (Oba and Allen, 2002b) according to Allen (1997). However, rate of VFA production might be underestimated for this experiment; microbial efficiency observed in this experiment was relatively high (Oba and Allen, 2002b) and overestimation of microbial efficiency could result in the underestimation of calculated rate of VFA production.

Plasma samples were analyzed for concentrations of acetate, glucose, NEFA, insulin, and growth hormone. Plasma was processed to quantify acetate concentration as described for ruminal fluid. Due to greater protein concentration for plasma samples, the first stage of sample processing was duplicated to obtain enough supernatant (1000 µl) to be mixed with 28 µl of H2SO4 in 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes. Plasma growth hormone concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay (Gaynor et al., 1995). Commercial kits were used to determine the plasma concentration of glucose (Glucose kit #510; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), NEFA (NEFA C-kit; Wako Chemicals USA, Richmond, VA), and insulin (Coat-A-Count, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA). Frequency and amplitude of insulin peaks were quantified according to Merriam and Wachter (1982).

All data were analyzed using the fit model procedure of JMP according to the following model:


where µ = overall mean, Ci = random effect of cow (i = 1 to 8), Pj = fixed effect of period (j = 1 to 4), Tk = fixed effect of treatment (k = 1 to 4), eijkl = residual, assumed to be normally distributed.

Period x treatment interaction was originally evaluated, but it was removed from the statistical model because interaction was not significant for response variables of primary interest. Orthogonal contrasts were performed for effects of dietary starch concentration, conservation method of corn grain, and interaction of dietary starch concentration and conservation method. Treatment effects and their interactions were declared significant at P< 0.05 and P < 0.10, respectively, and tendencies for treatment effects were declared atP < 0.10. When interactions of main effects were significant, treatment means were compared using Student’st-test, and differences were declared significant atP < 0.05.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
DMI and Ruminal Fermentation
Cows fed high-starch diets had greater DMI compared to cows fed low-starch diets (P < 0.001; Table 3Go). This could be attributed to greater distension by physical fill in the rumen for low-starch diets. Low-starch diets contained more forage NDF compared to high-starch diets (25.3 vs 16.5% DM), and forage NDF is a primary factor reducing DMI by physical fill in the rumen (Allen, 2000). Interaction of dietary starch concentration and conservation method of corn grain was significant for DMI (P < 0.07). The HM treatment decreased DMI by 1.7 kg (20.8 vs 22.5 kg/d) compared to the DG treatment when fed in high-starch diets, but had no effect (19.7 vs 19.6 kg/d) when fed in low-starch diets. Consistent with treatment effects on DMI, meal size was greater for the DG treatment compared to the HM treatment (2.3 vs 1.9 kg) when cows were fed high-starch diets, but not when cows were fed low-starch diets (2.0 vs 2.1 kg).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effects of corn grain conservation method at two dietary starch concentrations on feeding behavior.
 
The number of meal bouts per day was greater for high-starch diets compared to low-starch diets (P < 0.04). The HM treatment tended to increase the number of meal bouts compared to DG treatment (P < 0.09), and the difference between HM and DG treatments was numerically greater when cows were fed high-starch diets (11.4 vs 9.9/d) compared to low-starch diets (9.7 vs 9.5/d). Although DMI is a function of meal size and meal frequency, greater DMI for the DG treatment in high-starch diets is explained solely by greater meal size because DG treatments did not increase meal frequency. On the contrary, cows consuming HM corn tended to eat more frequently, but could not compensate for the decreased meal size, resulting in an overall depression in DMI.

The reduction in DMI and meal size for HM treatment in high-starch diets can likely be attributed to greater ruminal fermentation. Because dietary forage NDF concentration was similar between HM and DG treatment within the same dietary starch concentration, differences in physical fill were not likely responsible for differences in DMI. The TRDOM was greater for high-starch diets compared to low-starch diets (P < 0.001; Table 4Go) and for HM compared to DG treatment (P < 0.03), and calculated rate of total VFA production was greater for cows fed HM compared to DG treatment (P < 0.01). A reduction in DMI with increased ruminal fermentation has been reported previously. McCarthy et al. (1989) increased starch digestibility in the rumen by replacing ground-shelled corn with steam-rolled barley in diets containing more than 40% starch on a DM basis, and reported an approximately 3-kg depression in DMI. Overton et al. (1995) also showed that increased substitution of barley for dry corn linearly decreased DMI for lactating dairy cows.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Effects of corn grain conservation method at two dietary starch concentrations on rumen fermentation.
 
Lower DMI for HM treatment when cows were fed high-starch diets might be explained by higher propionate production in the rumen (Table 4Go). Propionate has greater hypophagic effects than acetate (Farningham and Whyte, 1993; Sheperd and Combs, 1998). Intraruminal infusion of propionate decreased DMI compared to acetate on both an isomolar (Farningham and Whyte, 1993) and isoenergetic basis (Sheperd and Combs, 1998). Although greater fermentation in the rumen is often associated with low ruminal pH and greater osmolarity of ruminal fluid, the specific effects of pH and osmolarity on feed intake have not been shown. Choi and Allen (1999) showed that hypophagic effects from ruminal infusions of VFA did not differ when the VFA were infused as acids or salts. They also found that infusion of hyperosmotic solutions of NaCl decreased meal size, but did not affect DMI because cows compensated for smaller meal size by increasing meal frequency.

When cows were fed low-starch diets, HM treatment did not decrease DMI compared to DG treatment. Greater starch digestibility in the rumen does not necessarily decrease DMI (Grings et al., 1992; Knowlton et al., 1998; Callison et al., 2001). Grings et al. (1992) compared diets containing ground corn or barley at approximately 30% of dietary DM, but found that DMI was not affected by treatments. Knowlton et al. (1998) and Callison et al. (2001) fed lactating dairy cows corn grains differing in processing method or particle size at 42 and 37% of dietary DM, respectively. In both experiments, corn grain treatment altered starch digestibility in the rumen, but did not affect DMI. Inconsistent effects of ruminal starch digestibility on feed intake might imply that a threshold exists for propionate to affect DMI. Feeding behavior might be controlled by a dominant mechanism related to the stimulation of tension receptors by ruminal fill until a mechanism possibly related to propionate begins to dominate on highly fermentable diets.

High-starch diets decreased molar ratio of acetate (P < 0.001; Table 4Go), isobutyrate (P < 0.001), and isovalerate (P < 0.03) compared to low-starch diets. High-starch diets increased the molar ratio of propionate (P < 0.001) and valerate (P < 0.01) concentration compared to low-starch diets. VFA profile was not affected by the conservation method of corn grain. Total VFA concentration was not affected by treatments. It is noteworthy that the concentration of total VFA in ruminal fluid did not reflect the amount of OM truly fermented in the rumen. Although treatment means for TRDOM varied from 7.7 to 11.3 kg/d in this experiment, no relationship was observed between TRDOM and total VFA concentration (Figure 1Go). Total VFA concentration did not reflect fermentation acid production in the rumen because VFA concentration in the rumen is not solely determined by rate of production, and treatment effects on rates of absorption and passage compensated for treatment effects of production rate on VFA concentration in the rumen.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between true ruminally degraded OM (TRDOM) and total ruminal VFA concentration (r2= 0.05, P > 0.21). Closed circle denotes high-moisture corn in high-starch diets; closed triangle denotes dry ground corn in high-starch diets; open circles denote high-moisture corn in low-starch diets; and open triangles denote dry ground corn in low-starch diets.

 
Daily mean ruminal pH was lower for high-starch diets compared to low-starch diets (P < 0.01), but was not affected by corn grain treatment. In this experiment, daily mean ruminal pH was above 6.1 even for high-starch diets regardless of corn grain treatments, and it was close to the pKa for bicarbonate, the major buffer secreted in saliva. This supports the idea that diet fermentability does not negatively affect ruminal pH if the buffering capacity of ruminal digesta exceeds fermentation acid production in the rumen (Allen, 1997). In this experiment, eating time, ruminating time, and total chewing time were greater for low-starch diets compared to high-starch diets (P < 0.001). These observations were consistent with higher ruminal pH for low-starch diets because of greater salivary buffer secretion and less fermentation acid production in the rumen for low-starch diets compared to high-starch diets. However, chewing activities were not affected by corn grain treatment. Despite greater fermentation in the rumen, HM treatment did not decrease ruminal pH, possibly because the buffering capacity of ruminal digesta was maintained by sufficient chewing activity and saliva flow. Because ruminal pH and total VFA concentration were not directly related to fermentation acid production in the rumen, neither explained the hypophagic effects of the HM treatment.

Milk Production and Plasma Metabolites
Milk and SCM yields were greater for high-starch diets compared to low-starch diets (P < 0.001 and P < 0.02; Table 5Go). An interaction of dietary starch concentration and conservation method of corn grain was detected for SCM yield (P < 0.10). High-starch diets increased SCM yield by 3.3 kg (35.2 vs 31.9 kg/d) compared to low-starch diets for cows fed DG, but not for cows fed HM. Significant interactions of main effects were also observed for milk fat concentration (P < 0.06) and milk protein concentration (P < 0.07). The HM treatment decreased milk fat concentration compared to the DG treatment when fed in high-starch diets (3.05 vs 3.59%), whereas corn grain treatment did not affect milk fat concentration when fed in low-starch diets. Milk protein concentration was greater for high-starch diets compared to low-starch diets for cows fed DG (3.02 vs 2.87%), but not for cows fed HM.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Effects of corn grain conservation method at two dietary starch concentrations on productivity.
 
Corn grain treatments did not affect productivity of cows fed low-starch diets, but when DG replaced HM in high-starch diets, productivity of lactating cows was enhanced, possibly from greater DMI. In agreement with our observation, Moore et al. (1992) reported greater milk yield when starch digestibility was increased by replacing dry-rolled sorghum with steam-flaked sorghum (flake density of 0.40 kg/L). However, flaked sorghum with a density of 0.27 kg/L (associated with more rapid starch hydrolysis) decreased DMI and milk yield. Theurer et al. (1999) showed that greater starch digestibility by steam-flake processing of corn and sorghum grain increased milk yield with similar DMI. Greater starch digestibility in the rumen might improve milk yield if DMI is maintained and if extra energy is not directed to body reserves by greater insulin secretion. Experiments in which a reduction in milk yield was associated with enhanced starch digestibility in the rumen also reported reduced DMI with greater ruminal starch digestion (McCarthy et al., 1989; Overton, 1995). Optimal ruminal starch digestibility is dependent upon starch concentration and fermentability of diets.

High-starch diets decreased milk fat concentration, but increased BW gain (P < 0.01) and BCS gain (P < 0.01) compared to low-starch diets. High-starch diets decreased daily mean ruminal pH, but increased daily variance for ruminal pH. We previously proposed that partitioning of absorbed fuels to milk or body reserves is influenced by variation in ruminal pH because it determines pattern of supply of metabolic fuels from the rumen to the blood circulation (Oba and Allen, 2000). Rate of fermentation acid absorption from the rumen is affected by ruminal pH. Ruminal pH with less daily fluctuation might result in a more consistent supply of metabolic fuels from the rumen to the blood circulation, whereas a greater fluctuation in ruminal pH might indicate more pulsatile energy supply. A more pulsatile energy supply may stimulate insulin secretion, increasing energy metabolite utilization in adipose tissues more than milk fat synthesis (Oba and Allen, 2000). In agreement with this theory, high-starch diets increased insulin concentration (P < 0.01; Table 6Go). Diurnal pattern for plasma insulin concentration (Figure 2Go) shows that high-starch diets consistently increased plasma insulin concentration compared to low-starch diets. Greater daily means for plasma insulin concentration for high-starch diets are attributed to a greater baseline of insulin secretion (P < 0.001) and enhanced amplitude of insulin peaks (P < 0.001) compared to low-starch diets. However, daily variance for plasma concentration of acetate was not affected by dietary starch concentration and did not appear to support this theory. Plasma acetate concentration is determined by flux from the rumen and utilization by tissues, and does not necessarily reflect the fluctuation in supply from the rumen especially for samples taken from a jugular vein. Treatment effects on acetate utilization by tissues might have compensated for the possible treatment effects on pulsatility of acetate supply from the rumen.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Effects of corn grain conservation method at two dietary starch concentrations on plasma metabolite and hormone concentration.
 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of dietary starch concentration on plasma insulin concentration relative to feeding time.

 
A significant interaction of dietary starch concentration and conservation method of corn grain was observed for milk fat concentration and milk fat yield, indicating milk fat was depressed for HM treatment only for cows fed high-starch diets. However, the reasons for this milk fat depression are not known. Corn grain treatment did not affect mean plasma insulin concentration, although the change in plasma insulin concentration during a meal was greater for cows fed HM compared to DG (P < 0.03). Corn grain treatment affected insulin secretion only transiently. Certaintrans-C18:1 fatty acids produced in the rumen can decrease milk fat yield, and increased trans-C18:1 fatty acid production in the rumen was related to low ruminal pH when cows were fed high-concentrate diets (Kalscheur et al., 1997; Kennelly et al., 1999). However, ruminal pH was not different between HM and DG treatments for cows fed high-starch diets. Although milk fat depression in this experiment might not have been caused by enhanced production of trans-C18:1 fatty acids in the rumen, they were not measured.

High-starch diets decreased plasma concentrations of growth hormone (P < 0.01), NEFA (P < 0.07), and acetate (P < 0.04) compared to low-starch diets. Estimated rate of acetate production in the rumen was not affected by dietary starch concentration but was greater for HM treatment compared to the DG treatment (Table 4Go). Lower plasma acetate concentration for high-starch diets might be a result of greater acetate utilization in peripheral tissues from stimulation by insulin compared to low-starch diets. Plasma concentration of glucose was greater for high-starch diets compared to low-starch diets (P < 0.01; Figure 3Go), but it is noteworthy that plasma glucose concentration decreased after feeding, regardless of diet. This reduction in plasma glucose concentration is partially attributed to an increase in plasma insulin concentration after feeding. Because insulin decreases gluconeogenesis and increases glycogen synthesis in the liver, we speculate that absorbed propionate is not directly metabolized to glucose but that glucose 6 phosphate is transiently utilized for glycogen synthesis after feeding, and glucose is released from glycogen storage over time.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of dietary starch concentration on plasma glucose concentration relative to feeding time.

 

    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Substitution of DG for HM reduced ruminal fermentation and TRDOM, and increased DMI compared to HM in high-starch diets. This is consistent with hypophagic effects of propionate previously reported. High-starch diets increased SCM yield compared to low-starch diets for cows fed DG but not for cows fed HM. The DG treatment increased productivity of lactating cows fed high-starch diets because of greater DMI. However, corn grain treatment did not affect the productivity of lactating dairy cows fed low-starch diets. Optimal ruminal starch digestibility is dependent upon the starch concentration and fermentability of diets.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We wish to acknowledge the Corn Marketing Program of Michigan and the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station for their financial support of this research. The authors thank N. K. Ames for performing duodenal and ruminal cannulation surgery, and thank J. Davidson, R. E. Kreft, R. A. Longuski, D. G. Main, C. S. Mooney, R. J. Tempelman, and Y. Ying for their technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Current address: Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland. Back

Received for publication March 18, 2002. Accepted for publication June 11, 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


Allen, M. S. 1997. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physical effective fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1447–1462.[Abstract]

Allen, M. S. 2000. Effects of diet on short–term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1598–1624.[Abstract]

Allen, M. S., M. Oba, and C. S. Mooney. 2000. Automated system for collection of ruminal fluid and blood of ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 83(Suppl. 1):288.

American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1968. Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed material by sieving. ASAE Standard S319. St. Joseph, MI.

Callison, S. L., J. L. Firkins, M. L. Eastridge, and B. L. Hull. 2001. Site of nutrient digestion by dairy cows fed corn of different particle sizes or steam–rolled. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1458–1467.[Abstract]

Choi, B. R., and M. S. Allen. 1999. Intake regulation by volatile fatty acids and physical fill. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 29(ISRP):40–41(Abstr.).

Dado, R. G., and M. S. Allen. 1993. Continuous computer acquisition of feed and water intake, chewing reticular motility, and ruminal pH of cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 76:1589–1600.[Abstract]

Dado, R. G., and M. S. Allen. 1995. Intake limitations, feeding behavior, and rumen function of cows challenged with rumen fill from dietary fiber or inert bulk. J. Dairy Sci. 78:118–133.[Abstract]

Farningham, D. A. H., and C. C. Whyte. 1993. The role of propionate and acetate in the control of food intake in sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 70:37–46.[Medline]

Gaynor, P. J., K. J. Lookingland, and H. A. Tucker. 1995.5–hydroxytryptaminergic receptor–stimulated growth hormone secretion occurs independently of changes in peripheral somatostatin concentration. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 209:79–85.[Medline]

Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS–USDA, Washington, DC.

Grings, E. E., R. E. Roffler, and D. P. Deitelhoff. 1992. Evaluation of corn and barley as energy sources for cows in early lactation fed alfalfa–based diets. J. Dairy Sci. 75:193–200.[Abstract]

Hach, C. C., B. K. Bowden, A. B. Lopelove, and S. V. Brayton. 1987. More powerful peroxide Kjeldahl digestion method. J. AOAC 70:783–787.

Kalscheur, K. F., B. B. Teter, L. S. Piperova, and R. A. Erdman. 1997. Effect of dietary forage concentration and buffer addition on duodenal flow of trans–C18:1 fatty acids and milk fat production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2104–2114.[Abstract]

Karkalas, J. 1985. An improved enzymatic method for the determination of native and modified starch. J. Sci. Food Agric. 36:1019–1027.

Kennelly, J. J., B. Robinsion, and G. R. Khorasani. 1999. Influence of carbohydrate source and buffer on rumen fermentation characteristics, milk yield, and milk composition in early–lactation Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2486–2496.[Abstract]

Knowlton, K. F., B. P. Glenn, and R. A. Erdman. 1998. Performance, ruminal fermentation, and site of starch digestion in early lactation cows fed corn grain harvested and processed differently. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1972–1984.

McCarthy, Jr., R. D., T. H. Klusmeyer, J. L. Vicini, J. H. Clark, and D. R. Nelson. 1989. Effects of source of protein and carbohydrate on ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the small intestine of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 72:2002–2016.

Merriam, G. R., and K. W. Wachter. 1982. Algorithms for the study of episodic hormone secretion. Am. J. Physiol. 243:E310–E318.

Moore, J. A., M. H. Poore, T. P. Eck, R. S. Swingle, J. T. Huber, and M. J. Arana. 1992. Sorghum grain processing and buffer addition for early lactation cows. J. Dairy Sci. 75:3465–3472.[Abstract]

Oba, M., and M. S. Allen. 2000. Effect of brown midrib 3 mutation in corn silage on productivity of dairy cows fed two levels of dietary NDF: 1. Feeding behavior and nutrient utilization. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1333–1341.[Abstract]

Oba, M., and M. S. Allen. 2003a. Effects of corn grain conservation method on ruminal digestion kinetics for lactating dairy cows at two dietary starch concentrations. J. Dairy Sci. 86:184–194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oba, M., and M. S. Allen. 2003b. Effects of diet fermentability on efficiency of microbial nitrogen production in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:195–207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Overton, T. R., M. R. Cameron, J. P. Elliott, and J. H. Clark, and D. R. Nelson. 1995. Ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the duodenum of lactating cows fed mixtures of corn and barley. J. Dairy Sci. 78:1981–1998.[Abstract]

Sheperd, A. C., and D. K. Combs. 1998. Long–term effects of acetate and propionate on voluntary feed intake by midlactation cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2240–2250.[Abstract]

Theurer, C. B., J. T. Huber, A. Delgado–Elorduy, and R. Wanderley. 1999. Invited review: summary of steam–flaking corn or sorghum grain for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1950–1959.[Abstract]

Tyrrell, H. F., and J. T. Reid. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow’s milk. J. Dairy Sci. 48:1215–1223.

Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.[Abstract]

Wildman, E. E., G. M. Jones, P. E. Wagner, R. L. Boman, H. F. Troutt, Jr., and T. N. Lesch. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 65:495–501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ying, Y., M. S. Allen, M. J. VandeHaar, and N. K. Ames. 1998. Effects of fineness of grinding and conservation method of corn grain on ruminal and whole tract digestibility and ruminal microbial protein production of Holstein cows in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 81(Suppl. 1):339.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. S. Allen, B. J. Bradford, and M. Oba
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3317 - 3334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. R. Mullins, K. N. Grigsby, and B. J. Bradford
Effects of alfalfa hay inclusion rate on productivity of lactating dairy cattle fed wet corn gluten feed-based diets,
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3510 - 3516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Raeth-Knight, H. Chester-Jones, S. Hayes, J. Linn, R. Larson, D. Ziegler, B. Ziegler, and N. Broadwater
Impact of conventional or intensive milk replacer programs on Holstein heifer performance through six months of age and during first lactation
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2009; 92(2): 799 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. A. Longuski, Y. Ying, and M. S. Allen
Yeast culture supplementation prevented milk fat depression by a short-term dietary challenge with fermentable starch
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2009; 92(1): 160 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Nikkhah, C. J. Furedi, A. D. Kennedy, G. H. Crow, and J. C. Plaizier
Effects of Feed Delivery Time on Feed Intake, Milk Production, and Blood Metabolites of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4249 - 4260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Voelker Linton and M. S. Allen
Nutrient Demand Affects Ruminal Digestion Responses to a Change in Dietary Forage Concentration
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4770 - 4779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Bradford and M. S. Allen
Depression in Feed Intake by a Highly Fermentable Diet Is Related to Plasma Insulin Concentration and Insulin Response to Glucose Infusion
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3838 - 3845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Bradford and M. S. Allen
Short Communication: Rate of Propionate Infusion Within Meals Does Not Influence Feeding Behavior
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2305 - 2308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. J. Bradford and M. S. Allen
Phlorizin Administration Does Not Attenuate Hypophagia Induced by Intraruminal Propionate Infusion in Lactating Dairy Cattle
J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 326 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. J. Bradford, A. D. Gour, A. S. Nash, and M. S. Allen
Propionate Challenge Tests Have Limited Value for Investigating Bovine Metabolism
J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 1915 - 1920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. B. Huntington, D. L. Harmon, and C. J. Richards
Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E14 - E.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. J. Harvatine and M. S. Allen
Effects of Fatty Acid supplements on ruminal and total tract nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows.
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(3): 1092 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. J. Loor, A. Ferlay, A. Ollier, K. Ueda, M. Doreau, and Y. Chilliard
High-Concentrate Diets and Polyunsaturated Oils Alter Trans and Conjugated Isomers in Bovine Rumen, Blood, and Milk
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3986 - 3999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. C. Taylor and M. S. Allen
Corn Grain Endosperm Type and Brown Midrib 3 Corn Silage: Site of Digestion and Ruminal Digestion Kinetics in Lactating Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1413 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. C. Taylor and M. S. Allen
Corn Grain Endosperm Type and Brown Midrib 3 Corn Silage: Feeding Behavior and Milk Yield of Lactating Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1425 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. J. Loor, A. Ferlay, A. Ollier, M. Doreau, and Y. Chilliard
Relationship Among Trans and Conjugated Fatty Acids and Bovine Milk Fat Yield Due to Dietary Concentrate and Linseed Oil
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 726 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Bradford and M. S. Allen
Milk Fat Responses to a Change in Diet Fermentability Vary by Production Level in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3800 - 3807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Oba and M. S. Allen
Dose-Response Effects of Intrauminal Infusion of Propionate on Feeding Behavior of Lactating Cows in Early or Midlactation
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2003; 86(9): 2922 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Oba and M. S. Allen
Extent of Hypophagia Caused by Propionate Infusion Is Related to Plasma Glucose Concentration in Lactating Dairy Cows
J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1105 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Oba and M. S. Allen
Effects of Corn Grain Conservation Method on Ruminal Digestion Kinetics for Lactating Dairy Cows at Two Dietary Starch Concentrations
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2003; 86(1): 184 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Oba and M. S. Allen
Effects of Diet Fermentability on Efficiency of Microbial Nitrogen Production in Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2003; 86(1): 195 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oba, M.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oba, M.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS