|
|
||||||||
* Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock Department of Animal and Poultry Science University of Guelph Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin Madison, WI 53706, USA
Corresponding author:
J. Jamrozik; e-mail: jamrozik{at}sherlock.aps.uoguelph.ca.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: international evaluation test-day model multiple trait genetic parameter
Abbreviation key: INTERBULL = International Bull Evaluation Service, MACE = multiple-trait, across-country evaluation, TD = test-day, PE = permanent environment
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A research project using individual animal performance records for international comparison originated in 2000. Data from 17 countries were used to estimate genetic parameters from a multiple-trait sire model, and lactation yields were analyzed in a multiple-trait sire model for the purpose of international genetic evaluation (Weigel et al., 2001).
Test-day (TD) models have been applied by several countries for genetic evaluation of dairy production traits (INTERBULL, 2000). Accounting for the shape of an animals lactation curve through regressions and modeling short-term environmental effects provide more accurate genetic evaluations for cows (4 to 8%) and bulls (2 to 5%) over evaluations from 305-d yields (Kistemaker, 1997). Despite computational difficulties associated with multiple-trait TD models, prospects exist for applying this methodology for international genetic evaluation of animals.
The objective of this study was to estimate covariance components and genetic parameters for both single- and multiple-trait test-day models for four selected countries: Australia, Canada, Italy, and New Zealand. Between-country genetic correlations of lactation curve parameters can be an indicator of genotype x environment interactions for the shape of lactation curve. Multiple-trait estimates of covariance components can be used to rank animals internationally, using a multiple-country TD model.
| MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Number of sires of cows with data (Table 2
) ranged from 3000 (New Zealand) to over 22,000 (Italy). Only 173 sires had progeny in all four countries. This group of bulls included 113 sires with US registration numbers, 57 Canadian bulls, and three sires with the Netherlands as the country code in the registration number. Genetic links (through common sires) between countries (Table 3
) were strongest between Canada and Australia, with 657 common sires, and the weakest between Italy and New Zealand, with 238 common sires. Overall edits on TD records included: DIM between 5 and 305 d, age at calving between 18 and 38 mo., and daily milk yield between 0.1 and 100 kg.
|
|
Estimation of covariance components for both single- and multiple-trait random regression TD models required additional selection of data. The full dataset as described above could not be used for these purposes because of its size. Two subsets of the total data were created. Single-trait models were applied on data with rather weak genetic links between countries, and multiple-trait models required strong genetic ties between countries.
Single-Trait Models.
The following steps were applied to select data for single-trait (within-country) parameter estimation:
Characteristics of selected datasets are shown in Table 4
. BSA was defined as a joint subclass for breed composition (100% Holstein or <100% Holstein, for Australia and New Zealand cows only), season of calving (four seasons for Italy and two seasons for other countries), and age at calving class (<26, 26 to 30, and >30 mo). Plots of average lactation curves (by country) estimated from this reduced dataset are shown in Figure 2
.
|
|
The resulting dataset (316,967 TD records on 51,489 cows) is characterized in Table 4
. Plots of average lactation curves (by country), estimated from this data, are shown in Figure 3
. Shapes of average lactation curves were very similar between datasets for each country (Figures 1
, 2
, and 3
). Because of smaller number of records per DIM, selected subset of data had less regular shapes of lactation curves compared with the overall curves. Cows selected for the single-trait estimation procedure had slightly higher levels of production compared with overall curve. Cows selected for the multiple-trait estimation had higher levels of production compared with single-trait datasets. Despite these differences, both selected subsets of data were assumed to be representative samples from the respective overall populations. New Zealand showed a sharp increase in average TD milk yield at the end of lactation. Only 6% of TD records in this country were collected beyond 260 DIM, compared with 11, 12, and 11% for Australia, Canada, and Italy, respectively. Longer lactations in New Zealand data are usually from herds with superior management practices. Those herds have much higher levels of feeding in the second half of lactation (W. A. Montgomerie, personal communication).
|
![]() |
where:
| Yijkt | = | milk yield of cow k made on day t of lactation, within herd-test day effect i, for a cow belonging to subclass j for breed composition, age at calving, season of calving, and DIM interval
|
| HTDi | = | fixed herd-test day effect
|
| (BSA x DIM)j | = | fixed breed composition, age at calving, season of calving and DIM interval effect
|
| akl | = | random regression genetic coefficients specific to cow k
|
| pkl | = | random regression coefficients for permanent environment (PE) effect on cow k
|
| eijkt | = | residual effect for each observation
|
| ztl | = | covariates, assumed to be the same for genetic and PE regressions
|
Regression curves were modeled by Legendre polynomials of order four, i.e.,
| zt0 | = | 1.0,
|
| zt1 | = | 3.00.5x,
|
| zt2 | = | 5.00.5(1.5x2 – 0.5),
|
| zt3 | = | 7.00.5(2.5x3 – 1.5x),
|
| zt4 | = | 9.00.5(35x4 – 30x2 +3)/8,
|
where x = 2(t–5)/300 – 1 is a standardized (in interval from –1 to +1) time.
Twenty-nine DIM classes were formed as [5,20], [291,305], and 10-d intervals for DIM from 21 to 290. Classes were used in place of regressions to model fixed lactation curves. Residual variances were assumed to be constant within DIM intervals; all residual covariances were equal to zero.
Multiple-Trait Model.
The multiple-trait (country) TD model combined the within-country models through an appropriate covariance structure between countries. Models were assumed to be the same for each country, with possible differences in definition (number of levels) of fixed effects. In matrix notation, the multiple-trait model was:
![]() |
where
| y | = | vector of observations on four traits defined as milk yield within country borders
|
| h | = | vector of fixed contemporary group (HTD) effects (nested within countries)
|
| b | = | vector of fixed BSA x DIM effects (nested within countries)
|
| p | = | vector of random regression coefficients for PE effect
|
| a | = | vector of random regression coefficients for animal genetic effect
|
| e | = | vector of residual effects
|
| H, X, W, and Z | = | incidence matrices assigning observations to effects
|
Expectations and covariance matrices for random effects were:
![]() |
and
![]() |
where P = I
P0, G = A
G0; A is an additive relationship matrix; P0 (block-diagonal matrix) and G0 are 20 x 20 covariance matrices for environmental and genetic regression coefficients, respectively. Residual covariance matrix E can be written as diag(ekt).
Methods
Bayesian methods with Gibbs sampling were used to estimate posterior means of covariance components and selected functions thereof for the single-trait models. Single chains of 55,000 samples (with 5000 discarded) were generated for each country model. Flat prior distributions were assumed for all fixed effects. For genetic and PE effects, normal prior distributions were used. Priors for covariances were as estimated previously from Canadian Holstein data (Jamrozik, unpublished data), with small numbers of degrees of freedom. Gibbs sampling employed conditional normal distributions for systematic effects, multivariate normal distributions for genetic and PE effects, and inverted Wishart and chi-square distributions for genetic and PE covariances, and residual variances, respectively. For the multiple-trait model, a chain of 105,000 samples (with 10,000 as burn-in period) was generated. Similar distributional assumptions were made as for single-trait models. Preliminary estimates of covariance components based on the same data were taken as priors for multiple-trait analysis.
Convergence of Gibbs chains were monitored by inspecting plots of selected realizations. Average effective sample size of genetic variance and covariance components for single-trait models ranged from 76 (New Zealand) to 104 (Canada). Average number of independent genetic components was equal to 20 for the multiple-country model. The PE and residual components had larger effective sample sizes for both single- and multiple-country models. Heritabilities of the Legendre parameters, and genetic and PE correlations between those parameters were estimated. Principal component analyses were performed on estimates of genetic and PE covariances. Values of genetic (PE) eigenfunctions were calculated as
in the interval from 5 to 305 DIM, where cij is the jth element of the ith eigenvector of genetic (PE) covariance matrix.
Due to the orthogonal properties of Legendre polynomials, BV for the total yield in lactation (defined as sum of daily yields between DIM 5 and 305) of the ith animal is easily calculated as 301 x BV(ai0), while the genetic variance of the total yield can be expressed as 3012 x var(ai0). Between-country genetic correlations for total yields are the same as respective correlations for the genetic intercept (a0).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90% of the genetic variance in TD yields for all countries. Corresponding eigenfunctions described an overall level of production during lactation, and a persistency component, acting differently in early and late parts of lactation. Differences between countries were small with respect to principal component analyses of the genetic covariance matrices. Slightly higher persistency component could be noticed for New Zealand (17% vs. up to 13% for other countries). The PE eigenvalues and eigenfunctions (not presented) showed similar properties. Matrices of eigenvectors for both genetic and PE components (not shown) had a structure close to diagonal, with the most weights associated with the corresponding original variables in Legendre polynomials. This would indicate that, without loss of accuracy, a0 and a1 could be interpreted as a measure of total yield and persistency of lactation, respectively.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current study was the first attempt to apply a random regression TD model in a multi-country scenario. Several simplifying assumptions were made to facilitate computations. The same models were used for each of four participating countries. This could be a subject for improvement, allowing for specific within-country effects in the model. Estimation of across-country covariances required a subset of the data to be used, which further reduced opportunities for a correct modeling (e.g., small number of observations for certain levels of fixed effects). Both genetic and PE regressions were modeled by the same general function (fourth-order Legendre polynomials) for each country, and a maximum lactation length of 305 d was assumed. Finally, only one trait (i.e., milk yield in first lactation) was analyzed.
Comparison of single-trait estimates of variance components indicated that both genetic and environmental variation in lactation curve parameters differed between countries. This relates to the absolute value of estimates and also to the relationships between different parameters for a given country. One set of single-trait genetic and PE covariance matrices (even up to the scaling factors) cannot be used to model variation of regression coefficients for all four countries. The pattern of variation in TD milk yields, in terms of principal components, showed more similarity between countries. Two major principal components (total yield in lactation and persistency) were very consistent across countries.
Parameter estimation with multiple-country model was shown to be highly dependent on the quantity and quality of genetic ties between countries (Sigurdsson et al., 1996). An animal model was applied in this study that did not provide direct genetic links between countries (no cow had TD records in more than one country). All genetic ties were realized through sires with daughters in multiple countries. Selection of appropriate subsets of data for parameter estimation must balance data size and genetic connections.
Estimates of genetic correlations for the total yield in lactation between four analyzed countries were, in general, lower than reported elsewhere (Carabano et al., 1989; Stanton et al., 1991; Cienfuegos-Rivas et al., 1999; Weigel et al., 2001). Genetic correlations estimated by Weigel et al. (2001) with sire model- and daughter-performance milk records were: 0.82 (Australia and Canada), 0.84 (Australia and Italy), 0.96 (Australia and New Zealand), 0.94 (Canada and Italy), 0.89 (Canada and New Zealand), and 0.85 (Italy and New Zealand). These estimates were slightly larger than parameters currently used in INTERBULL international sire comparisons. Estimates of genetic correlations obtained in this study were higher, however, than corresponding correlations between sires (with at least 20 daughters) EBV estimated using single-trait models and all data from each country (results not shown). Correlation coefficients <0.8 give an indication of the existence of genotype x environment interaction (Robertson, 1959). Results of this study indicated genotype x country interaction for parameters of the shape of lactation curve, especially between New Zealand and countries with intense management systems for the total yield of milk in lactation, and all four countries for lactation persistency. Peterson (1991) reported evidence for genotype x environment interaction in milk yield between environments and sires within strains for Canada and New Zealand Holsteins.
Reasons for low values of estimates of between country genetic correlations obtained in this study might be the real differences in the genetics of lactation curve parameters between environments (countries). Lack of sufficient genetic ties might also contribute to possible underestimation of genetic correlations. Further studies are needed.
|
|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication December 3, 2001. Accepted for publication February 10, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Miglior, W. Gong, Y. Wang, G. J. Kistemaker, A. Sewalem, and J. Jamrozik Short communication: Genetic parameters of production traits in Chinese Holsteins using a random regression test-day model J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4697 - 4706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hammami, B. Rekik, H. Soyeurt, C. Bastin, J. Stoll, and N. Gengler Genotype x Environment Interaction for Milk Yield in Holsteins Using Luxembourg and Tunisian Populations J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3661 - 3671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Miglior, A. Sewalem, J. Jamrozik, J. Bohmanova, D. M. Lefebvre, and R. K. Moore Genetic Analysis of Milk Urea Nitrogen and Lactose and Their Relationships with Other Production Traits in Canadian Holstein Cattle J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2468 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Muir, G. Kistemaker, J. Jamrozik, and F. Canavesi Genetic Parameters for a Multiple-Trait Multiple-Lactation Random Regression Test-Day Model in Italian Holsteins J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1564 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Strabel and J. Jamrozik Genetic analysis of milk production traits of polish black and white cattle using large-scale random regression test-day models. J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3152 - 3163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Barrett, F. Miglior, G. Jansen, J. Jamrozik, and L. R. Schaeffer Joint International Evaluation of Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle for Production Traits J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3326 - 3336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jamrozik, I. Stranden, and L. R. Schaeffer Random Regression Test-Day Models with Residuals Following a Student's-t Distribution J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2004; 87(3): 699 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Wood, P. J. Boettcher, J. Jamrozik, G. B. Jansen, and D. F. Kelton Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Concentrations of Milk Urea Nitrogen J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2003; 86(7): 2462 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |