| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* Department of Animal Science and
Section of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, and
U.S. Plant, Soil and Nutrition Laboratory and U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, ARS, USDA, Ithaca, NY 14853
Corresponding author:
D. G. Fox; e-mail:
dgf4{at}cornell.edu.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Key Words: CNCPS • dairy cow • 15N kinetics • ruminal nitrogen deficiency
Abbreviation key: CNCPS = Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System, eNDF = effective NDF, GER = Gastrointestinal Entry Rate, GIT = gastrointestinal tract, HMC = high moisture corn, MP = metabolizable protein, MUUN = milk and urinary urea nitrogen, MUN = milk urea nitrogen, NDS = neutral detergent soluble, pTMR = pretrial TMR, PUN = plasma urea nitrogen, RNB = ruminal nitrogen balance, UER = urea-N entry rate, UUN = urinary urea-N
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Most ruminal bacteria can utilize NH3 as a nitrogen source, but some can be stimulated by peptides and amino acids (Allison, 1969). The amino acid and peptide stimulus effect varies, however, and may depend upon the degradability of the energy source (Cruz Soto et al., 1994). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) 3.0 had a peptide stimulation adjustment that enhanced microbial yield by as much as 17%, but did not have a provision for N-deficiency per se. In version 4.0 of the CNCPS (Fox et al., 2000), the predictions of fiber digestion and production of microbial mass from ruminal degradation of carbohydrates are adjusted when ruminal N is deficient (Tedeschi et al., 2000). While the rate of digestion of feeds may decrease due to a ruminal N deficiency (Mehrez et al., 1977; Erdman et al., 1986), data to mechanistically model a change in the rate of digestion of the CNCPS carbohydrate fractions are not currently available. Recent work has indicated that ruminal bacteria that do not digest fiber can spill energy when amino N is lacking and carbohydrates are in excess, but some of the decrease in apparent growth efficiency can be explained by the effect of amino N on growth rate (Van Kessel and Russell, 1996). When these same ruminal bacteria have only ammonia, growth is slower and they must devote a large fraction of their energy to maintenance functions (Russell and Strobel, 1993). In early versions of the CNCPS, bacterial growth was driven exclusively by the ratio of carbohydrate fermentation, and the peptide stimulation function could not accommodate both energy loss and the effect of amino N on bacterial growth rate (Russell et al., 1992).
CNCPS 4.0 (Fox et al., 2000) has equations that adjust microbial yield and fiber digestion when ruminal N is deficient (Tedeschi et al., 2000). Data for lactating dairy cattle were lacking, however, and the model was only evaluated for experiments involving growing cattle.
The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the CNCPS adjustments of ruminal microbial protein production and fiber digestion in animals fed high forage diets, using data on the performance of lactating dairy cattle sensitive to dietary N supplementation.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Housing and Feeding Management
All diets fed to ad libitum intake. The cows were housed in individual stalls, and were milked at 1130 and 2330 h. Water was provided at all times from automatic water bowls. All diets (Table 1
) were prepared daily, and contained the same proportion of high moisture corn (HMC), chopped grass hay, and minerals with urea substituted for corn silage as needed to reach 8, 10, and 13% CP (treatment diets 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Cows were fed at 0800. The amounts of minerals and vitamins supplied were based on NRC recommendations. Because a sulfur deficiency limits NPN utilization (Bouchard and Conrad, 1973), calcium sulfate was added to produce diets containing 0.20% sulfur. The amount of feed offered was adjusted to yield approximately 10% orts. The DM of individual diet feed ingredients was determined three times per week using a microwave drying oven to obtain data for this calculation.
|
The adjustment in N only modifies the predictions of fiber digestion and microbial protein synthesis if the ruminal N balance [RNB (percentage of N required predicted by the CNCPS)] is under 100% (Tedeschi et al., 2000). In order to determine the RNB in the CNCPS, the potential microbial growth from ruminally degraded fiber and nonfiber carbohydrates is computed. If fermentable energy is the first limiting nutrient, microbial protein production is dictated by energy. If, however, ruminal N is limiting (RNB is under 100%) a reduction in fiber carbohydrate bacterial yield and fiber carbohydrate digestion is computed.
Sampling, Collection and Analysis
General.
Milk production was recorded daily at 1130 and 2330. Milk samples were collected at each milking. Samples were preserved with 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1, 3 diol and were analyzed for fat, protein, milk urea nitrogen (MUN), and SCC at the New York DHIA milk testing laboratory (infrared analysis; Foss 605B Milko-Scan; Foss Electric, Hillerod, Denmark). On days 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 of the lactation trial, milk sub-samples were also analyzed for MUN by manual urease/Berthelot determination (Sigma urea nitrogen procedure no. 640, Sigma Diagnostic, St. Louis, MO). All cows were bled from the coccygeal vein 3 h after the morning feeding during the last day of each of the 4 weeks of the lactation trial. Samples were immediately placed on ice, and subsequently centrifuged at 3000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Then, plasma was collected and stored at –20°C. Plasma was analyzed for urea N (PUN) using a Technicon autoanalyzer (Technicon Instruments Corporation, Tarrytown, NY) using the diacetyl monoxime method of Marsh et al. (1965).
During the pre-trial and lactation trials, DMI was measured daily by weighing feed offered and refused. Samples of the diet and orts were dried at 60°C in a forced-air oven for 48 h to determine DM. During the lactation trial, all diet feed ingredients were sampled weekly. Corn silage and HMC samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen, stored at –20°C, and subsequently freeze-dried. Feed samples (corn silage, HMC, and hay) were ground to pass a 1 mm screen in a Wiley mill (Model 4, Arthur H. Thomas Co. Philadelphia, PA). Samples were combined for each week. All feed samples were analyzed for Kjeldahl N using boric acid in the distillation flasks (Pierce and Haenisch, 1947), NDF with sodium sulfite and ADF, and acid detergent lignin (Van Soest et al., 1991). All protein fractions, buffer-soluble protein, NPN, ADIN, and neutral-detergent insoluble N were determined according to the procedures of Licitra et al. (1996). Ash and ether extract were analyzed according to the AOAC (1990). The digestion kinetics of the carbohydrate fractions of the hay, HMC, and corn silage were determined with the gas production procedure as described by Pell and Schofield (1993). The rate of digestion of the neutral detergent soluble (NDS) fractions in the hay (combined carbohydrate fractions A and B1) were measured using a curve subtraction technique with in vitro gas production data from the whole forage and the isolated neutral detergent extracted fiber (Schofield and Pell, 1995). The in vitro fermentation of the HMC was conducted with fresh samples, and because of the low gas contribution of the corn B2 fraction, the HMC B2 digestion rate value used was that obtained by Chen et al. (1999). The B2 digestion rate value of the corn silage was obtained from the isolated corn silage neutral detergent extracted fiber fermentation, and the value assigned to the corn silage A+B1 digestion rate fraction was the value obtained from the HMC.
Digestion and nitrogen balance trial.
The 9 ruminally fistulated cows (3 cows per treatment) were kept in metabolism stalls, and a 7-d fecal-urine collection period was conducted during d 17 to 23 of the lactation trial. Feed offered and samples of the orts were collected for each cow. Samples were dried at 60°C in a forced-air oven for 48 h for DM determination. Samples were subsequently ground to pass a 1 mm screen in a Wiley mill, and combined by volume across the 7-d period. Samples were analyzed for NDF and Kjeldahl N as described previously.
Urine was collected from the nine fistulated cows via a Foley catheter. In order to assess the amount of acid needed to bring urinary pH to 3, urine samples were collected by eliciting micturition by manual stimulation of the vulva 1 d before the catheters were inserted. Urine was collected twice daily in buckets with 350 ml of 20% H2SO4. Each morning at the end of a 24-h period, the two collections were mixed, and a daily sample (1% of volume) was collected, and stored at –20°C. Samples were thawed, subsequently combined by cow, and analyzed for Kjeldahl N as described previously.
Feces were collected every 24 h. A daily sample (3 % of volume on a wet matter basis) was collected and stored at –20°C. After the experiment was completed, fecal samples were thawed, combined by cow, and analyzed for DM, NDF, and Kjeldahl N (on wet samples) as previously described.
The amount of N in the milk was calculated from DHIA milk true protein data.
Ruminal fermentation, blood sampling, and in situ NDF digestibility.
Ruminal fluid was collected every 3 h for a 48 h period during d 17 to 18 of the lactation trial. Ruminal fluid was collected by suction from at least five locations in the rumen. The samples were combined (500 ml total) and strained through four layers of cheesecloth. A sub-sample (50 ml) was chilled to 5°C, transported to the laboratory and centrifuged at 500 x g (5 min, 5°C) to remove feed particles and protozoa. The sample was then centrifuged at 10,000 x g (15 min, 5°C) to remove bacteria. A portion of the clarified ruminal fluid (10 ml) was frozen for ammonia and VFA analyses. The pH of the ruminal fluid was measured as described by Ruiz et al. (2001). Ammonia in cell-free ruminal fluid was measured by the colorimetric method of Chaney and Marbach (1962). Ruminal VFA were quantified by HPLC (Beckman model 334 liquid chromatograph, Model 156 refractive index detector, Model 421 CRT data controller, CR1A integrator, Bio-Rad HPX-87H organic acid column, 20-µL loop, 0.013 N H2SO4, 0.5 ml/min, 50°C).
One day before the rumen sampling period, the nine fistulated cows were catheterized in the jugular vein. While a rumen sample was taken, a blood sample from the jugular vein catheter was taken for PUN determination and analyzed as previously described.
The ruminally fistulated cows were used to measure in situ NDF digestibilies at the end of the pre-trial period and at the end of each of the 4 weeks of the lactation trial. Before the beginning of the experiment, a 7-kg sample of the corn silage used during the trial was dried at 60°C in a forced-air oven for 48 h, had its DM determined, and was subsequently ground to pass through a 4-mm screen (Wiley mill, Model 4, Arthur H. Thomas Co. Philadelphia, PA). Samples weighing approximately 5.0 g were placed in 10-cm x 20-cm Dacron polyester bags with a pore size of 53 µm. Eight bags and a blank (empty bag) were placed in a zippered nylon mesh lingerie sack (38 x 46 cm; 4 x 6 mm mesh) and incubated in the rumen of each fistulated cow for 30 h. All bags were simultaneously removed from the rumen and rinsed with cold tap water to remove material adhering to the outside of bags and to arrest microbial fermentation. The NDF was determined directly on the bag using the ANKOM200/220 Fiber Analyzer (ANKOM Technology Corp., Fairport, NY).
Nitrogen kinetics.
On d 2 of the N balance, immediately after the 1130 milking, 900 mg of double labeled urea (99.2 % 15N, Mass Trace Inc, Woburn MA) prepared in sterile saline (9 g NaCl/L), was infused intravenously into the jugular vein as a single dose in each animal. Catheters were then flushed with saline to ensure that all the tracer had entered the animal. Urine was collected for the next 72 h, and urea was isolated using a 2 ml column containing a cation exchange resin (AG-50, 100-200 mesh, H+ form; Biorad, Richmond, VA). Urea was diluted to 16.6 mg/dl, degassed and frozen. Rittenberg type tubes were removed from the vaccum line and 0.5 ml of lithium hypobromite (LiOBr), previously bubbled with He, were added and frozen on top of the urea solution. The head space was pumped out, the stopcock closed, and the hydrolysis tube was incubated at 60°C for 20 min. Under these conditions, the nonmonomolecular degradation of urea, calculated as the contribution of mass 29 when a solution of 15N15N urea was (after correcting for the 15N14N-urea present) degraded into N2,was 6%, similar to the observation of Sarraseca et al. (1998). The N2 resulting from urea degradation was introduced into a NC2500 Carlo Erba dual inlet elemental analyzer (Thermoquest, Milan, Italy) using a Finnigan delta plus multiport (Finnigan, San Jose, CA) and mass/charge 28, 29, and 30 were determined.
Urea-N entry rate (UER) into the urea pool was calculated from the dilution of the infused 15N15N urea in the urine. Urinary urea-N (UUN) was measured using a Technicon autoanalyzer (Technicon Instruments Corporation, Tarrytown, NY) using the method of Marsh et al. (1965) and was added to the urea excreted in milk to yield excreted urea nitrogen [milk and urinary urea-N, (MUUN)]. The amount of urea-N transferred to the GI tract [Gastointestinal Entry Rate (GER)] was calculated as the difference between the amount of urea-N produced and the amount excreted in the urine and the milk (GER = UER – MUUN). The urea-N that entered the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) was hydrolyzed to ammonia, and the fraction of this N that returned for the synthesis of a new molecule of urea (ROC, returned to the ornithine cycle) was calculated from the ratio of 15N14N-urea to [15N14N + 15N15N] according to the model of Lobley et al. (2000).
Statistical Methods
For all statistical analyses, the plot of the studentized or standardized residuals against predicted values, treatments, blocks, or cows were used to identify outliers and homogeneous variance (Kuehl, 2000).
Lactation data.
The lactation data were analyzed as a repeated measure design with the PROC MIXED of SAS (1999). We used the restricted maximum likelihood method to estimate the covariance parameters and the Satterthwaite method for computing degrees of freedom for tests of fixed effects in the denominator. The autoregressive order was selected to model the covariance structure. The subject was cow within treatment. The statistical model following notation is described below:
 |
where Yijkl = all dependent variables, µ = overall mean, 
i = fixed effect of treatments, ßj = fixed effect of days, 
k = random effect of blocks, c(a)l(i) = cow within treatment, (ß)ij = fixed effect of the interaction between treatment and day, ()ik = random effect of the interaction between treatment and block, (ß)jk = random effect of the interaction between block and time, and eijkl = identical-independent normally-distributed random error.
Additionally, treatment effects were modeled as a polynomial function of days using the PROC MIXED of SAS following the procedures outlined by (Littell et al. (1999).
Digestion, and nitrogen balance and kinetics data.
The 7-d fecal-urine collection period was analyzed as a complete randomized design using the GLM procedure of SAS (1999). The treatment means were compared using the least square means (LSMeans) test. The statistical model is shown below:
 |
where Yij = all dependent variables, µ = overall mean, i = fixed effect of treatments, and eij = identical-independent normally-distributed random error.
Rumen, PUN, and in situ NDF digestibility data.
A statistical model similar to that of the lactation analysis was used to examine ruminal data (pH, acetate, propionate, butyrate, total VFA, acetate:propionate ratio, ammonia, PUN, and indigestible NDF). The LSMeans test was used to compare treatment effects.
 |
where Yijkl = all dependent variables, µ = overall mean, i = fixed effect of treatments, ßj = fixed effect of time (sampling time for the 48-h sampling period, and week number for the in situ 30-h rumen incubation), c(a)k(i) = cow within treatment, (ß)ij = interaction between treatment and time effects, eijkl = identical-independent normally-distributed random error.
Carbohydrate digestion rates.
The parameters related to the rate of digestion of the corn silage, hay, and HMC sample gas production curves were obtained by fitting the following equations (Mertens and Loften, 1980):
 | Equation 1. |
 | Equation 2. |
where:
| V | = | volume of gas (ml) produced at time t,
|
| VF | = | volume of gas (ml) from complete substrate digestion,
|
| k | = | digestion rate constant (%/h), and
|
| L | = | discrete lag time (h).
|
The parameters of equation 1
were obtained by the NLIN procedure in SAS (1999). The data used in this curve-fitting included observations from the fermentation of the unfractionated hay and fresh HMC and the isolated neutral detergent extracted fiber of the corn silage and hay samples.
Model evaluation.
The objective of a model evaluation is to determine the precision (repeatability of a prediction), and accuracy (the closeness with which a prediction approaches its true value) of the model being investigated (Cochran and Cox, 1957). Accuracy, the most important characteristic of a model, can be assessed by computing the mean bias (Cochran and Cox, 1957):
 |
A regression analysis of model predictions was conducted by regressing the observed milk production against the model predicted milk production, as described by Mayer and Butler (1993). We used the first limiting nutrient, MP allowable milk, as the model predicted milk production (Kohn et al., 1998). The slope of the regression when forced through the origin minus one has been referred to as the model bias. Because of the ambiguity of testing whether the slope of the regression differs significantly from 1 when there is much scatter around the line (Mitchell, 1997), the model bias was calculated by dividing the mean of the Y-variate minus the mean of the X-variate by the mean of the X-variate (Tedeschi et al., 2000). We used the following statistical measures of model precision: the regression r2, standard error (SE), and the residual plot, which is the studentized residuals plotted against regression predicted values (Mayer and Butler, 1993). Residual plots were analyzed for outliers and systematic bias (Neter et al., 1996). Regression parameters were estimated by PROC REG, and the statistical comparison between observed and predicted values was performed using the two-sample t-test (SAS, 1999) assuming unequal variances. The CNCPS evaluation was performed using feed carbohydrate digestion rates from the feed library, and from rates obtained using in vitro gas production measurements and fitting equation 1 or 1 and 2 combined.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
. The mean milk production and mean DMI during the pre-trial and lactation trial periods are shown in Figures 1A and 1B, respectively. Milk production was significantly (P < 0.001) different among treatment diets (Table 3). Milk protein percentage increased (P < 0.05) with increasing level of dietary CP, with diet 1 differing from diets 2 and 3. Increases in the level of dietary CP significantly resulted in increased (P < 0.01) milk fat percentage in diets 2 and 3 compared to diet 1. Using either the DHI values or the urease method, MUN values were higher (P < 0.001) in diet 3 than for diets 1 and 2. The DHI and the urease MUN methods differed (P < 0.001), with the urease method being 2.1 units higher than the DHI values. These differences, however, were diet dependent. The two methods yielded similar values for diet 1, but the urease method was 1.9 and 4.7 units higher (P < 0.001) than DHI values for diets 2 and 3, respectively (data from comparison analysis not shown). PUN values increased (P < 0.001) with increasing level of dietary CP. DMI was depressed by diet 1, and no significant differences were found between diets 2 and 3.
|
|
|
. Nitrogen intake increased (P < 0.05) with the increasing level of dietary CP. Urinary N increased (P < 0.001) with increasing level of dietary CP. Diets 1 and 2 did not differ (P > 0.05), however. Increasing the level of dietary CP increased the apparent DM and NDF digestibility (P < 0.05) and apparent N digestibility (P < 0.001).
|
. Urea production (UER) increased linearly (P < 0.01) with increasing the level of dietary protein (Table 4) although diet 2 did not differ (P > 0.1) from diet 1. The amount of urea-N excreted in urine and milk increased quadratically (P < 0.01) while the proportion of urea excreted from the total produced increased linearly (P < 0.01). Increasing the level of protein in the diet did not change (P = 0.77) the total amount of urea-N recycled to the GIT. The amount of nitrogen returning for urea synthesis increased with increasing levels of protein in the diet, but the variance was high, and there were no statistical differences among dietary TRT. The proportion of GER that re-entered to the ornithine cycle increased linearly (P < 0.01) with increasing levels of protein.
The 48-h rumen and blood sampling data are shown in Table 5. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of treatment diets on ruminal pH, and individual or total VFA concentration. Ruminal ammonia N and PUN differed (P < 0.001) among treatment diets, and values increased as the level of dietary CP increased.
|
. Treatment diets significantly affected fiber digestibility (P < 0.05). The overall (4-week period) least square means (LSMeans) are 62.4, 61.0, and 54.2% indigestible NDF in corn silage for treatment diets 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The time effect (week number) excluding the pretrial data was significantly (P < 0.001) quadratic, and there was no interaction between time and treatment effect. The CP of dietary ingredients varied throughout the lactation trial. While the variance of the corn silage and HMC CP content throughout the lactation trial was low (9.4 ± 0.3% CP, and 8.7 ± 0.5% CP; respectively) the variance of the hay CP content was high (8.3 ± 1.5% CP), and therefore, the variable CP may explain the variation in the indigestible NDF values by week.
|
. The overall CNCPS predictions of performance using feed carbohydrate digestion rates obtained using in vitro gas production measurements (rates obtained by fitting either equations 1 and 2 combined or only using equation 1) or using the CNCPS feed library values, with or without the N adjustment, are shown in Table 7.
|
|
and 2, and when the CNCPS feed library carbohydrate digestion rate values were used. Using carbohydrate digestion rates obtained from the in vitro fermentation and fitting equation 1 resulted in an under prediction of metabolism (MP) allowable milk production by the CNCPS without and with the N adjustment (Table 7). The CNCPS predicted ruminal N balance (% of required), and treatment diet mean and model biases without and with the N adjustment, and with measured or feed library carbohydrate digestion rates are in Table 8. The LSMeans for RNB (% of required) predicted by the CNCPS differed (P < 0.0001) among treatment diets for either measured or feed library carbohydrate digestion rate values. The predictions of milk production by the CNCPS without and with the N adjustment, and with library carbohydrate digestion rates, using individual cow data throughout the lactation trial are shown in Figure 3.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
The lower DMI of treatment diet 1 compared to diets 2 and 3 could be explained by a lower DM digestibility, and due to a reduction in NDF digestibility (Table 4). Data on fiber digestibility in dairy cows consuming highly fermentable feeds and with a ruminal N deficiency are not available. However, ruminal N deficiencies in steers consuming low quality forages (Olson et al., 1999), and goats consuming wheat straw diets (Oosting and Waanders, 1993) caused a reduction in fiber digestibility, a decrease in fiber passage rate, and a depression in DMI. Van Soest (1994) concluded that diet CP levels must be at least 6 to 8% CP to satisfy the N requirements of ruminal bacteria on poor quality fiber diets, and that below that level, DMI and digestibility are depressed. In the present study, calculations from Table 4 show that the depression in fiber digestibility occurred at higher CP levels (9.6% of CP). This was expected, given the higher digestibility and quality of the fiber in our diets compared to the data evaluated by Van Soest. Increased fiber digestibility of diets in the present study support a greater growth of fiber-digesting bacteria that require ammonia (Bryant, 2001).
VFA can contribute up to 70% of the caloric requirement (Bergman, 1990) in domestic ruminants such as sheep and cattle. There were no dietary treatment differences in individual and total VFA concentrations (Table 5) in the present study. Henderson et al. (1969) reported that fermentation was uncoupled from bacterial growth under N limited conditions. While VFA concentrations in the rumen are widely used in the literature to make inferences about ruminal fermentation, our results are in agreement with those from Dijkstra et al. (1993), which indicated that ruminal VFA concentrations might not reflect net production.
The early in vitro work of Satter and Slyter (1974) suggested that increasing ammonia N concentration above 5 mg/dl had no effect on microbial protein production. Further work suggested that whenever ration protein in lactating cows was higher than 12.5% or rumen ammonia N concentration was higher than 4 mg/dl, the addition of NPN would not improve milk production (Roffler and Satter, 1975). Mehrez et al. (1977) found that the minimal ammonia concentration to maximize the rate of fermentation in sheep fed barley supplemented with different levels of urea was 23.5 mg/dl. Apparently, different substrates require different concentrations of ammonia for optimal yield (Ørskov, 1992). Using in situ fermentations, Erdman et al. (1986) concluded that the ruminal ammonia concentrations needed to maximize digestion are a function of fermentability of the diet. Odle and Schaefer (1987) reported greater demand for ruminal ammonia N concentrations to maximize the degradation rate of barley than that required to maximize the degradation rate of maize. In steers fed diets based on dry rolled corn (85% rolled corn), the supplementation of urea resulted in an increase in ruminal ammonia N from 6.3 mg/dl to 10.0 mg/dl, and ruminal digestion was improved (Milton et al., 1997). In the present study, where a source of highly degradable carbohydrates was available, increasing ruminal ammonia N concentrations from 4.5 mg/dl to 10.0 mg/dl (Table 5) resulted in an improvement in ruminal NDF digestibility (Figure 2), with a consequent increase in DMI and milk production (Table 3).
In this study, the in situ corn silage 30-h rumen incubation showed no (P > 0.05) overall differences in NDF digestibility between treatment diets 1 and 2 (62.4 vs. 61.0% indigestible NDF, respectively). However, treatment diet 2 had a greater total tract NDF digestibility than diet 1 (Table 4). It is possible that the 30-h rumen incubation time might have been shorter than the actual feed retention time in the rumen, which would explain why a difference was not found. It is also possible that the higher total tract NDF digestibility in treatment diet 2 than in diet 1 might have been due to digestibility compensation in the lower gut. In cattle fed concentrates, approximately 65 to 75% of the total urea-N recycled to the GIT enters the forestomachs (Lobley et al., 2000). In the present study, there was no difference among diets in the total amount of urea-N recycled to the GIT (Table 4). However, the method used considers the gastrointestinal tract as a single compartment (Lobley et al., 2000). Because intake of diet 2 was greater than that for diet 1 (Table 3), if more nonfermented carbohydrates reached the lower digestive tract on this diet it is possible that an influx of urea-N occurred, and therefore, improved the total tract NDF digestibility (Table 4). Given that VFA are readily absorbed from the rumen as well as from all segments of the lower digestive tract (Bergman et al., 1990), an improvement in lower digestive tract fiber fermentation could yield the extra acetate needed for de novo synthesis of fatty acids (Bauman, 1976), which was reflected in a greater milk fat percentage of milk from cows fed treatment diet 2 than the treatment diet 1 (Table 3). Treatment diet 2, however, had a greater milk protein percentage than treatment diet 1 (Table 3), and when MP is the first limiting nutrient, it is likely that a positive impact on milk production will result from greater amounts of microbial protein flow from the rumen. While data on N recycling to the gastrointestinal tract in dairy cows are lacking, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the urea-N entering the rumen compared with that entering the intestines can be affected by the carbohydrate fermentation site in the GIT. The use of more complex approaches that separate the GIT into different compartments such as rumen, small intestine, and lower digestive tract (Siddons et al., 1985) are needed in order to assess the nutritional importance of the N recycling to the lower digestive tract.
In the CNCPS, carbohydrates are divided into four fractions: A (sugars, short oligosaccharides, and organic acids), B1 (starch and soluble fiber), B2 (digestible fiber), and C (indigestible residue) (Sniffen et al., 1992). Because of the small size of the A fraction in corn (Chen et al., 1999) and the lack of uniformity of the NDS fraction in forages (Schofield and Pell, 1995) and in byproduct feeds (Hall et al., 1998), separate measurement of the digestion rate of the A and B1 fractions remains problematic. As a result, the digestion rate of the combined A+B1 fraction was determined using a curve subtraction approach with data from fermentations of the whole forage and the isolated fiber extracted with neutral detergent. In the present study, the rate of digestion of the NDS fraction of the HMC obtained from the in vitro fermentation data was highly affected by including the fermentation data before the lag time (Table 6). This had a great impact on the prediction of milk production by the CNCPS (Tables 7 and 8). Combining equations 1 and 2 to fit the in vitro gas production measurements for the HMC resulted in a better fit than only using equation 1 (larger F-value, data not shown). The better fit obtained by combining equations 1 and 2 is due to the sigmoidal shape of the fermentation curve. While the changes in the B2 digestion rate of the corn silage and hay are not as large as those for the HMC (Table 6), combining equations 1 and 2 also resulted in a better fit of the fermentation data to the mathematical model due to the sigmoidal shape of the fermentation curve. The hay NDS fraction, obtained by curve subtraction, has a clear exponential shape, and no lag; therefore, its digestion rate was not affected by inclusion or exclusion of the data before the lag time (Table 6). The validity of the curve subtraction approach requires that the digestibility of the NDF fraction not be affected by the ND-extraction (Schofield and Pell, 1995). While previous researchers have found either small (Schofield and Pell, 1995) or no changes (Doane et al., 1998) in fiber digestibility after ND extraction, the extraction process increased (P < 0.001) the digestibility of the NDF fraction in the present study by 17.6% for the hay samples and by 9.9% for the corn silage samples. Schofield and Pell (1995) found that on average, the digestibility of the NDF fraction from clover and timothy samples increased 6.7 percentage units, which represented a 10.6% increase in digestibility of the extracted samples. The magnitude of that increase is comparable to that seen for the corn silage samples in the present study. The influence of the increase in the digestibility of the ND residue on the rate of digestion should be considered. Van Soest et al. (2000) proposed an approach for predicting fiber digestion rates; the calibration data set was limited to alfalfa and grasses, however, and further work is needed to improve and validate the proposed method.
While the rates of digestion of the B2 fraction in the hay and corn silage samples are similar to the CNCPS feed library values when the fermentation data before the lag time is included (Equation 1), the rate of digestion of the A+B1 fraction of the HMC is more closely related to the values obtained by zeroing the fermentation data before the lag (Equation 1+2, Table 6). Because of the better fit of the exponential mathematical model to the in vitro gas fermentation data when the values before the lag time are zeroed, researchers (Schofield and Pell, 1995; France et al., 2000) have been determining the rate of degradation of ruminant feeds by zeroing the fermentation data before the lag time. In the CNCPS the rates of digestion are from in situ data (Sniffen et al., 1992) without zeroing the data before the lag. The length of the lag in vitro could be affected by the nature of the substrate fermented, the microbial species inoculated, and the amount of inoculum added (Pell and Schofield, 1993), and its existence in vivo is not certain. Forages must be chewed and ruminated extensively to reduce particle size and enable rumen microbes to penetrate feed particles and initiate digestion (Beauchemin, 1991). Ewing and Johnson (1987) concluded that both in vitro and in situ techniques underestimate ruminal starch digestion rates. The rate and extent of starch digestion depends on starch type, processing prior to ingestion, and other feedstuffs in the diet (Mills et al., 1999). Therefore, the nonuniformity of the carbohydrate fractions in feedstuffs will cause differences in the shapes of the curves from in vitro fermentation, and mathematical equations used to model the in vitro fermentation data yield different fits. While Schofield and Pell (1994) found that two bacterial growth models (logistic and Gompertz) used to fit in vitro fermentation data gave optimal fits, Dhanoa et al. (2000), using a broader set of samples, found differences between the models.
The complexity of the rumen system and the technical difficulties of estimating microbial protein synthesis have yielded few reliable predictors of either microbial protein synthesis or microbial efficiency (Dewhurst et al., 2000). Because of this problem, Firkins et al. (1998) concluded that empirical approaches to predicting microbial N flow to the duodenum seem likely to be more accurate than mechanistic models. In the present study, we did not measure microbial protein synthesis in the rumen, and the improvements in performance due to the expected increase in rumen microbial yield by increasing N availability were assessed by the animal’s milk production responses, which was a sensitive test of the CNCPS rumen microbial growth model. The adjustment for N deficiency reduced the overprediction of milk production using the CNCPS feed library rates and when the digestion rates were obtained by excluding the fermentation data before the lag (Equation 1+2) (Table 7). When the digestion rates were obtained including the fermentation data before the lag (Equation 1) the CNCPS was already underpredicting milk production, and therefore, the N adjustment increased the bias towards underprediction. The N adjustment modifies the predictions of fiber digestion and microbial protein synthesis only if the RNB is under 100% (Tedeschi et al., 2000). The carbohydrate digestion rates dictated whether or not the CNCPS-predicted RNB was positive or negative. In Table 8, the RNB are shown on a treatment basis. Similar results are obtained when using the CNCPS feed library rates and when the digestion rates were obtained zeroing the fermentation data before the lag (Equation 1+2). While it appears that the N adjustment is overadjusting the predictions of milk production in treatment diet 1, the analysis of that particular treatment had some limitations. The CNCPS uses a fixed coefficient for the efficiency of use of MP during lactation of 65%, which is comparable to the 67% efficiency used in the NRC (2001). However, with N deficient diets, the efficiency of use of N can be as high as 75% (NRC, 1985). Using an efficiency of MP of 75% for treatment diet 1 resulted in no bias for that particular treatment (data not shown). The CNCPS model overpredicted milk production in treatment diet 3 using either the CNCPS feed library rates or zeroing of the fermentation data before the lag (Equation 1+2). The origin of the over-prediction using the feed library rates came primarily from higher A and B1 digestion rate values, which suggests that they are too high for the feeds used in this study. The latter overprediction is mainly a consequence of higher B2 digestion rate values (Table 6).
The CNCPS uses an equation from the NRC(1985) to calculate rumen N recycling. While the method used in the current study estimates N recycling to the entire GIT, the NRC equation predicts N recycling to the rumen. The ratios between the predicted urea recycled to the rumen and the measured urea recycled to the total GIT were 1.24, 1.22, and 0.77 for treatment diets 1, 2, and 3, respectively. While the value for treatment 3 falls within the range reported by Lobley et al. (2000), values for treatment diets 1 and 2 suggest that predicted N recycling to the rumen was greater than what was measured for the whole GIT, which implies that the equation does not accurately predict N recycling from N deficient diets fed to lactating cows.
In the CNCPS, ruminal pH is predicted from the effective NDF (eNDF) content of the ration, but the effect of nonfiber carbohydrate digestion rate is not considered. When diet NDF is lower than 20% of the DM, microbial yield is reduced in a linear fashion regardless of the other carbohydrates (Russell et al., 1992). Likewise, if the eNDF value of a diet is lower than 24.5% the digestibility of the B2 carbohydrate fraction is decreased for the effect of ruminal pH (Fox et al., 2000). According to the CNCPS the eNDF value of the treatment diets averaged 29%, and therefore, there was no ruminal pH adjustment which meant the predicted ruminal pH value was 6.46 for all treatment diets. While the NDF content of the treatment diets was adequate to provide an ideal fermentation, the source of carbohydrate used was highly fermentable. Treatment diet 3 had the greatest DMI, and ruminal pH was the lowest; therefore, microbial yield and the B2 carbohydrate digestibility might have been overestimated with the consequent overprediction of milk production.
|
CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Current address: Poulin Grain Inc., 24 Railroad Square, Newport, VT 05855. Phone: (802)334-6731, E-mail: rr44{at}cornell.edu.
Received for publication July 12, 2001. Accepted for publication April 20, 2002.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
), 2 (11.1 % CP, 
), and 3 (14.1 % CP, 
), respectively.
