JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2009. 92:4507-4513. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1983
© 2009 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikolayunas-Sandrock, C.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, Y. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikolayunas-Sandrock, C.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, Y. M.

Effect of protein degradability on milk production of dairy ewes1

C. Mikolayunas-Sandrock*,2, L. E. Armentano{dagger}, D. L. Thomas* and Y. M. Berger{ddagger}

* Department of Animal Sciences, and
{dagger} Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706
{ddagger} Spooner Agricultural Research Station, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Spooner 54801

2 Corresponding author: mikolayunas{at}wisc.edu

The objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of protein degradability of dairy sheep diets on milk yield and protein utilization across 2 levels of milk production. Three diets were formulated to provide similar energy concentrations and varying concentrations of rumen-degradable protein (RDP) and rumen-undegradable protein (RUP): 12% RDP and 4% RUP (12–4) included basal levels of RDP and RUP, 12% RDP and 6% RUP (12–6) included additional RUP, and 14% RDP and 4% RUP (14–4) included additional RDP. Diets were composed of alfalfa-timothy cubes, whole and ground corn, whole oats, dehulled soybean meal, and expeller soybean meal (SoyPlus, West Central, Ralston, IA). Estimates of RDP and RUP were based on the Small Ruminant Nutrition System model (2008) and feed and orts were analyzed for Cornell N fractions. Eighteen multiparous dairy ewes in midlactation were divided by milk yield (low and high) into 2 blocks of 9 ewes each and were randomly assigned within block (low and high) to 3 pens of 3 ewes each. Dietary treatments were arranged in a 3 x 3 Latin square within each block and applied to pens for 14-d periods. We hypothesized that pens consuming high-RUP diets (12–6) would produce more milk and milk protein than the basal diet (12–4) and pens consuming high-RDP diets (14–4) would not produce more milk than the basal diet (12–4). Ewes in the high-milk-yield square consumed more dry matter and produced more milk, milk fat, and milk protein than ewes in the low-milk-yield square. There was no effect of dietary treatment on dry matter intake. Across both levels of milk production, the 12–6 diet increased milk yield by 14%, increased milk fat yield by 14%, and increased milk protein yield by 13% compared with the 14–4 and 12–4 diets. Gross N efficiency (milk protein N/intake protein N) was 11 and 15% greater in the 12–6 and 12–4 diets, respectively, compared with the 14–4 diet. Milk urea N concentration was greater in the 12–6 diet and tended to be greater in the 14–4 diet compared with the 12–4 diet, indicating that the excretion of urea N in this study was more closely related to dietary crude protein concentration than to protein degradability.

Key Words: dairy sheep • protein degradability







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.