HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Benefield, B. C. Articles by Overton, T. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Benefield, B. C. Articles by Overton, T. R.

Evaluation of rumen-protected methionine sources and period length on performance of lactating dairy cows within Latin squares¹

B. C. Benefield^*, R. A. Patton, M. J. Stevenson^,2 and T. R. Overton^*,3

^* Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Nittany Dairy Nutrition Inc., Mifflinburg, PA 17844
Evonik-Degussa Corporation, Kennesaw, GA 30144

³ Corresponding author: tro2{at}cornell.edu

Multiparous Holstein cows (n = 16) were used in a replicated (n = 4) Latin square design with 2-wk periods to determine whether length of the experimental period chosen within Latin square designs would influence experimental outcomes for performance-related variables. Cows were fed a basal TMR formulated to supply Lys in excess of the predicted requirements and either no rumen-protected Met (RP-Met; control), or 6 (M6) or 12 (M12) g/d of RP-Met (Mepron), or 12 (S12) g/d of RP-Met (Smartamine M). Performance outcomes were evaluated separately using data collected at the end of each week of each period, and as overall means for each period. Milk yield was not affected by treatment in any period. Supplementation of RP-Met from all sources tended to increase milk fat percentage when evaluated using wk-1 data, but responses evaluated using wk-2 data only were not significant. Supplementation of M12 and S12 tended to increase milk fat percentage over the entire experimental period. Supplementation of M6 and M12 tended to increase milk true protein percentage when evaluated using wk-1 data only; however, responses to treatments during wk 2 were not significant. All supplemental RP-Met treatments either tended to increase (M6 and S12) or increased (M12) milk true protein content over the entire experimental period relative to the control treatment. Yields of fat and true protein were not affected by treatment. Carryover effects of treatment on production variables were largely not significant. Predictions of nutrient supply with 3 models used in dairy ration formulation and evaluation (CPM-Dairy, AminoCow, and 2001 NRC Dairy) indicated that energy, protein, and Met all were supplied in excess of requirements for all treatments. Overall, results suggest that interpretation of performance outcomes can vary depending on selection of the experimental period in Latin squares, and responses to increased Met supply based on ratio-based formulation may not be independent of the grams of Met supplied.

Key Words: dairy cow • milk protein • methionine