JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2009. 92:4301-4316. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2170
© 2009 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moyes, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Loor, J. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moyes, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Loor, J. J.

Dietary-induced negative energy balance has minimal effects on innate immunity during a Streptococcus uberis mastitis challenge in dairy cows during midlactation

K. M. Moyes*,{dagger}, J. K. Drackley{dagger}, J. L. Salak-Johnson{dagger}, D. E. Morin{ddagger}, J. C. Hope§ and J. J. Loor*,{dagger},1

* Mammalian NutriPhysioGenomics,
{dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, and
{ddagger} College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
§ Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Near Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN, United Kingdom

1 Corresponding author: jloor{at}illinois.edu

Ten multiparous Holstein cows were used to determine the effects of negative energy balance (NEB) on the immune response to a Streptococcus uberis (strain O140J) mastitis challenge during midlactation. Before the study, milk from all quarters of each cow was bacteriologically negative, with a composite somatic cell count of <200,000 cells/mL. Cows were paired based on parity, days in milk, and milk yield. At approximately 77 d in milk, half the cows (n = 5) were feed-restricted to 60% of calculated net energy for lactation requirements to induce NEB. Feed restriction lasted 7 d. Control cows (n = 5) were fed the same diet ad libitum (i.e., positive energy balance; PEB). After 5 d, one rear quarter in all cows was inoculated with 5,000 cfu of Strep. uberis. Jugular blood and aseptic quarter milk samples were collected daily until inoculation and every 6 h postinoculation for 36 h. Blood was analyzed for nonesterified fatty acids, β-hydroxybutyrate, insulin, cortisol, albumin, serum amyloid A (SAA), and haptoglobin (Hp). Periodically throughout the trial period, blood neutrophils were isolated for determination of cell morphology, chemotaxis, and phagocytosis capability in vitro. Quarter milk samples were analyzed for concentrations of SAA, Hp, cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, IL-10 and IL-1β), and activity of respiratory burst enzymes (superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase). All cows developed local and systemic signs of mastitis and calculated NEB was similar to that of cows experiencing postpartal NEB. Serum glucose and insulin concentrations increased in both groups after challenge, most likely because of enhanced glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis; results indicate that immune cell function may be glucose dependent. Serum cortisol concentration was higher in NEB than PEB cows during feed restriction only (before inoculation), and serum albumin concentration was higher in NEB than PEB cows during the infection period. Compared with PEB, cows in NEB had lower SAA concentrations in serum after 5 d of feed restriction but higher SAA concentrations in milk after Strep. uberis challenge. Serum Hp concentration was higher by 36 h postchallenge in NEB than in PEB cows. Phagocytic capability of neutrophils was lower in NEB than in PEB cows at 0 h of infection but decreased in both PEB and NEB cows through 36 h postinfection. Our results indicate that cows subjected to dietary-induced NEB during midlactation had relatively minimal alterations in immune function.

Key Words: energy balance • mastitis • immunity • dairy cow







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.