HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Trénel, P. Articles by Skjøth, F. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Trénel, P. Articles by Skjøth, F.

Technical note: Quantifying and characterizing behavior in dairy calves using the IceTag automatic recording device

P. Trénel^*,1, M. B. Jensen, E. L. Decker and F. Skjøth^*

^* AgroTech A/S, Institute for Agro Technology and Food Innovation, Udkærsvej 15, DK 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
University of Aarhus, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Nutrition, Research Centre Foulum, Blichers Allé, Postbox 50, DK 8830 Tjele, Denmark

¹ Corresponding author: pht{at}agrotech.dk

The objectives of the current study were 1) to validate the IceTag (http://www.icerobotics.com) automatic recording device for measuring lying, standing, and moving behavior in dairy calves, and 2) to improve the information yield from this device by applying a filtering procedure allowing for the detection of lying versus upright. The IceTag device provides measures of intensity (I) of lying, standing, and activity measured as percent lying, percent standing, and percent active, but does not directly measure lying, standing, and moving behavior because body movements occurring while lying (e.g., shifts in lying position) and while upright (e.g., grooming) are recorded as activity. Therefore, the following 3-step procedure was applied. First, thresholds for I were determined by choosing the cutoff that maximized the sum of sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp). Second, a lying period criterion (LPC) was established empirically, and IceTag data were filtered according to the LPC, providing information on the posture of the animal as lying versus being upright. Third, a new threshold of I was estimated for moving activity conditional on the animal being upright. IceTag recordings from 9 calves were compared with video recordings during a 12-h period and analyzed using 2 x 2 contingency tables. Data from the first 4 calves were used to determine an LPC, whereas the remaining 5 calves served for validation of the procedure. An optimal LPC was found by modeling the deviance between IceTag and video recordings as a function of the LPC and choosing the LPC threshold that minimized the deviance. The IceTag device was found to accurately measure the high-prevalence behaviors (lying and standing; Se+Sp >1.90) and less accurately measure the low-prevalence behavior (moving; Se+Sp = 1.39). Application of the 3-step procedure using an optimal LPC estimate of 24.8 s resulted in an improved description of calf behavior, yielding a valid representation of the number and duration of lying and upright periods (Se+Sp = 2.00) within a precision of 0 to 49 s (95% confidence interval). In group-housed dairy calves, valid measures of the number and duration of lying and upright periods may be obtained from the IceTag device when applying the presented filtering procedure to the data. Measures regarding locomotion, on the other hand, should be used with caution.

Key Words: activity • lying • standing • validation