HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Bohmanova, J. Articles by Miglior, F. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bohmanova, J. Articles by Miglior, F.

Effect of pregnancy on production traits of Canadian Holstein cows

J. Bohmanova^*,1, J. Jamrozik^* and F. Miglior^,

^* Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1
Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1M 1Z3
Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1K 1E5

¹ Corresponding author: jbohmano{at}uoguelph.ca

Seven test-day models with different ways of accounting for the effect of pregnancy on production traits were compared by their residual variance, rank correlations of estimated breeding values of bulls and cows and number of nonpregnant cows in the top 500 for milk yield and milk persistency. Data were 22,546,696 first-parity test-day milk, fat, and protein yields and somatic cell score records of 2,677,862 Canadian Holstein heifers calved between 1988 and 2006. The first model fitted separate lactation curves to 8 days open classes and 1 curve to a nonpregnant cow class. Two other models adjusted for pregnancy by fitting the effect of month of pregnancy or stage of pregnancy. One model fitted regression on days pregnant. The remaining 3 models fitted interactions between stage of pregnancy and stage of lactation when conception occurred using either regression on days pregnant nested within days open or classes for specific stage of pregnancy and stage of lactation combination. All models were contrasted to a model without any adjustment for the effect of pregnancy. Both models that accounted for the effect of pregnancy and the model without the effect of pregnancy had similar residual variance. Adjusting for the effect of pregnancy did not cause reranking of sires for estimated breeding values for 305-d yield and persistency but influenced ranking of cows. Models that used days open for the effect of pregnancy overestimated breeding values of nonpregnant cows and cows with shorter days open. No interaction was found between stage of pregnancy and stage of lactation. Month of pregnancy and stage of pregnancy models, compared with the model without the effect of pregnancy, decreased overestimation of breeding values of nonpregnant cows and did not overestimate breeding values of cows with short days open like models fitting days open. Month of pregnancy and stage of pregnancy models are recommended for estimation of adjustment factors for the effect of pregnancy on production traits.

Key Words: test-day model • pregnancy status • days open • days pregnant

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bohmanova, F. Miglior, and J. Jamrozik Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 5314 - 5325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]