HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Godden, S. M. Articles by Peterson, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Godden, S. M. Articles by Peterson, J.

Improving passive transfer of immunoglobulins in calves. II: Interaction between feeding method and volume of colostrum fed

S. M. Godden^*, D. M. Haines^,, K. Konkol^* and J. Peterson^*

^* Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
The Saskatoon Colostrum Co. Ltd., Saskatoon, Canada

¹ Corresponding author: godde002{at}umn.edu

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of method of feeding (nipple bottle vs. esophageal tube feeder) on passive transfer of immunoglobulin (Ig) G when either a large or small volume of colostrum was fed. Newborn bull calves were removed from the dam before suckling and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 colostrum replacer (CR) treatment groups: 1.5 L (100 g of IgG) of CR fed using a nipple bottle (group 1; n = 24); 1.5 L (100 g of IgG) of CR fed using an esophageal tube feeder (group 2; n = 24); 3.0 L (200 g of IgG) of CR fed using a nipple bottle (group 3; n = 24), or 3.0 L (200 g of IgG) of CR fed using an esophageal tube feeder (group 4; n = 25). Blood samples collected at 24 h of age showed that serum IgG levels were significantly greater in calves fed large (3 L) volumes of CR compared with calves fed small (1.5 L) volumes of CR, regardless of feeding method. These differences were attributed to the larger mass of IgG ingested by calves fed 3 L of CR (200 g of IgG) compared with calves fed 1.5 L of CR (100 g of IgG). For calves fed small (1.5 L) volumes of colostrum, serum total protein (TP, g/dL), serum IgG (IgG, mg/mL), acceptable passive transfer rates (APT, %), and apparent efficiency of absorption of IgG (AEA, %) were significantly greater for calves fed with a bottle (TP = 5.3 g/dL; IgG = 12.5 mg/mL; APT = 100%; AEA = 51.1%) compared with calves fed with an esophageal tube feeder (TP = 5.0 g/dL; IgG = 9.8 mg/mL; APT = 41.7%; AEA = 40.5%). However, for calves fed large (3 L) volumes of colostrum, there was no difference in passive transfer indices for calves fed with a bottle (TP = 5.8 g/dL; IgG = 19.7 mg/mL; APT = 100%; AEA = 41.1%) compared with calves fed with an esophageal tube feeder (TP = 5.9 g/dL; IgG = 18.7 mg/mL; APT = 100%; AEA = 39.0%).

Key Words: colostrum • nipple bottle • esophageal tube feeder • passive transfer