HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Broderick, G. A. Articles by Muck, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Broderick, G. A. Articles by Muck, R. E.

Effect of alfalfa silage storage structure and rumen-protected methionine on production in lactating dairy cows¹

Agricultural Research Service, USDA, US Dairy Forage Research Center, 1925 Linden Drive West, Madison, WI 53706

² Corresponding author: glen.broderick{at}ars.usda.gov

The objective of this study was to determine whether production and nutrient utilization differed when lactating cows were fed diets based on 1 of 3 sources of alfalfa silage (AS) and whether performance was altered by feeding rumen-protected Met (RPM; fed as Mepron). Thirty-six lactating Holstein cows were blocked by parity and days in milk, then assigned to a randomized complete block design and fed a 3 x 2 arrangement of diets formulated from alfalfa ensiled in bag, bunker, or oxygen-limited silos, and supplemented with either 0 or 8 g of RPM/d. After feeding a covariate diet for 3 wk, treatment diets were fed for the remaining 12 wk of the trial. Experimental diets averaged [dry matter (DM) basis] 41% AS, 24% corn silage, 24% high-moisture corn, 3.7% soybean meal, 4% roasted soybeans, 2% ground shelled corn, 1.0% minerals and vitamins, 16.7% CP, and 31% NDF. Alfalfa from the oxygen-limited silo was lower in ash, higher in lactate, nonfiber carbohydrate, and in vitro NDF digestibility, had lower pH and ammonia content, and gave rise to greater DM intake and ADF digestibility than silage from the other 2 silos, indicating a more effective fermentation that, in turn, resulted in greater nutrient preservation. However, the more favorable composition, intake, and digestibility of alfalfa from the oxygen-limited silo were not reflected in improved milk production, which was not different among alfalfa sources. There was increased apparent N efficiency and trends for improved feed efficiency and protein yield with RPM supplementation across all 3 silages. The National Research Council (2001) model predicted that feeding RPM reduced Lys:Met ratio from 3.5 to 2.9, indicating that the diets were limiting in Met.

Key Words: alfalfa silage storage structure • rumen-protected methionine • milk yield • nitrogen efficiency