JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Dairy Sci. 2009. 92:6033-6045. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2498
© 2009 American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purdy, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Straus, D. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Purdy, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Straus, D. C.

Ambient and indoor particulate aerosols generated by dairies in the southern High Plains1

C. W. Purdy*, R. N. Clark* and D. C. Straus{dagger},2

* USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, PO Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012
{dagger} Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock 79430

2 Corresponding author: David.Straus{at}ttuhsc.edu

The objectives were to quantify and size ambient aerosolized dust in and around the facilities of 4 southern High Plains dairies of New Mexico and to determine where health of workers might be vulnerable to particulate aerosols, based on aerosol concentrations that exceed national air quality standards. Ambient dust air samples were collected upwind (background) and downwind of 3 dairy location sites (loafing pen boundary, commodity, and compost field). The indoor milking parlor, a fourth site, was monitored immediately upwind and downwind. Aerosolized particulate samples were collected using high-volume sequential reference air samplers, laser aerosol monitors, and cyclone air samplers. The overall (main effects and estimable interactions) statistical general linear model statement for particulate matter (PM10; particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 10 µm) and PM2.5 resulted in a greater mean concentration of dust in the winter (PM10 = 97.4 ± 4.4 µg/m3; PM2.5 = 32.6 ± 2.6 µg/m3) compared with the summer (PM10 = 71.9 ± 5.0 µg/m3; PM2.5 = 18.1 ± 1.2 µg/m3). The upwind and downwind boundary PM10 concentrations were significantly higher in the winter (upwind = 64.3 ± 9.5 µg/m3; downwind = 119.8 ± 13.0 µg/m3) compared with the summer (upwind = 35.2 ± 7.5 µg/m3; downwind = 66.8 ± 11.8 µg/m3). The milking parlor PM10 and PM2.5 concentration data were significantly higher in the winter (PM10 = 119.5 ± 5.8 µg/m3; PM2.5 = 55.3 ± 5.8µg/m3) compared with the summer (PM10 = 88.6.0 ± 5.8 µg/m3; PM2.5 = 21.0 ± 2.1 µg/m3). Personnel should be protected from high aerosol concentrations found at the commodity barn, compost field, and milking parlor during the winter.

Key Words: dairy aerosolized dust • particulate size • disease potential






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.