JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2008. 91:2678-2683. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0840
© 2008 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ambrose, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kastelic, J. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ambrose, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kastelic, J. P.

Short Communication: Pregnancy Rates to Timed Artificial Insemination in Holstein Heifers Given Prostaglandin F2{alpha} Twenty-Four Hours Before or Concurrent with Removal of an Intravaginal Progesterone-Releasing Insert

D. J. Ambrose*,1, D. G. V. Emmanuel*, M. G. Colazo* and J. P. Kastelic{dagger}

* Dairy Research and Technology Centre, Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6H 5T6
{dagger} Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, T1J 4B1

1 Corresponding author: divakar.ambrose{at}gov.ab.ca

The objective was to compare pregnancy rates in nulliparous Holstein heifers given PGF2{alpha} 24 h before, or concurrent with, removal of an intravaginal progesterone-releasing (CIDR) insert in 3 timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols. Heifers (from 2 herds) were assigned randomly, over 11 mo, to 1 of 3 modified Ovsynch protocols. On d 0 (without reference to the stage of the estrous cycle), all heifers were given 100 µg of GnRH i.m. and a CIDR insert (containing 1.9 g of progesterone). In the PG-7/P4–8 protocol (n = 99), PGF2{alpha} was given on d 7, and CIDR inserts were removed on d 8. In the PG-7/P4–7 (n = 98) and PG-8/P4–8 (n = 102) protocols, PGF2{alpha} administration and CIDR removal occurred concurrently, on d 7 or 8, respectively. In all 3 protocols, a second GnRH treatment (100 µg) was given 48 h after PGF2{alpha} with TAI 16 to 20 h later. Blood samples were collected (subset of 124 heifers) on d 0, 7, 10 or 11 (i.e., at TAI), and 17. Pregnancy rates (32 d after TAI) for protocols PG-7/P4–8, PG-7/P4–7, and PG-8/P4–8 were 61.8, 55.6, and 54.1%, respectively. Pregnancy rate was higher when synchronization was initiated during diestrus than when initiated at other stages (57.0 versus 34.8%). Although pregnancy rates were not affected by season, there was an interaction between protocol and season; pregnancy rates were significantly lower in summer in heifers subjected to PG-7/P4–7 and PG-8/P4–8, but season did not affect pregnancy rates in heifers subjected to PG-7/P4–8. In summary, giving PGF2{alpha} 24 h before CIDR removal, followed by TAI (PG-7/P4–8 protocol), resulted in consistent pregnancy rates, regardless of season, relative to protocols involving PGF2{alpha} treatment concurrent with CIDR removal.

Key Words: dairy heifer • timed artificial insemination • intravaginal progesterone insert • pregnancy rate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.