JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2008. 91:4687-4703. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-0987
© 2008 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glasser, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chilliard, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glasser, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chilliard, Y.

Oilseed Lipid Supplements and Fatty Acid Composition of Cow Milk: A Meta-Analysis

F. Glasser1, A. Ferlay and Y. Chilliard

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UR1213 Herbivores, Site de Theix, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France

1 Corresponding author: fglasser{at}clermont.inra.fr

Numerous experiments have studied the use of oilseed supplements in cow diets to alter milk fatty acid (FA) composition, but no quantitative synthesis of these studies is currently available. This article reports a meta-analysis of the response of cow milk FA composition to oilseed lipid supplements from linseed, rapeseed, soybeans, and sunflower seed. First, from a database of 145 oilseed supplementation experiments, we collected the mean FA percentages observed with unsupplemented diets and diets supplemented with the 4 oilseeds given as seeds (after various types of processing), as oils (including Ca salts and amides), or in protected forms. Second, we studied the response of the major milk FA percentages to increasing amounts of supplemental lipids from the 4 oilseeds. Responses were nonsignificant, linear, or quadratic, depending on the FA studied and the supplement. Effects of interfering factors, such as supplement form, forage component of the diet, or lactation stage, were difficult to assess from the available data. Third, we studied the response of the major milk FA percentages to increasing dietary intakes of linoleic or linolenic acids, taken separately. Overall, these results confirm the high plasticity of milk FA composition, with the widest variations being observed in the percentages of medium-chain versus C18 FA, and among the C18 in 18:0, cis-18:1, and trans-18:1. The percentages of the polyunsaturated FA cis-9 cis-12-18:2 and 18:3 were less variable, except when protected lipids (mostly formaldehyde treated) were supplied. However, trans-18:1 and polyunsaturated FA (including conjugated linoleic acid) exhibited the greatest variations when expressed relative to their respective basal values (for unsupplemented diets). Oils, compared with seeds, induced greater percentages of trans-18:1 and tended to decrease C6 to C12 FA more. Intakes of 18:2- and 18:3-rich lipid sources did not differ greatly in their effects on short- and medium-chain FA and trans-18:1 percentages, although the profiles of individual 18:1 and 18:2 isomers in milk differed. This meta-analysis provides quantitative estimates, obtained from the extensive literature produced over more than 40 yr, of the impact of oilseed supplements on milk FA composition.

Key Words: dairy cow • milk fatty acid • plant oil • oil-seed







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.