JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2008. 91:4610-4615. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1272
© 2008 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Toft, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Toft, N.

Colostrum and Milk as Risk Factors for Infection with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Dairy Cattle

S. S. Nielsen1, H. Bjerre and N. Toft

Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 8, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

1 Corresponding author: ssn{at}life.ku.dk

Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) infections cause major losses to the dairy industry. Transmission of MAP occurs primarily via feces and in utero, but MAP can also be excreted in colostrum and milk. The objective of this study was to determine whether colostrum and milk fed to calves are important risk factors for infection with MAP. A questionnaire was sent to 1,050 farms participating in the Danish control program on paratuberculosis in early 2007. Details on practices regarding colostrum and milk feeding between 1999 and 2006 were obtained from 808 (77%) herds. Nine vaccinated herds were excluded. Information on MAP antibody-ELISA results, date of birth, and herd of birth of 93,994 animals was obtained from the Danish Cattle Database. A 2-level logistic regression model was fitted with a dichotomized ELISA response, with outcome, age, source of colostrum, and milk as fixed effects, and herd as a random effect. Animals fed colostrum from multiple cows had an odds ratio of 1.24 of being ELISA positive compared with animals fed colostrum from their own dam only. Calves suckling with foster cows had an odds ratio of 2.01 of being ELISA positive compared with calves fed milk replacer. Feeding bulk tank milk and pooled milk from cows with high somatic cell counts did not increase the risk of being ELISA positive. Overall, the results of the study suggested that source of milk was not of great importance for the transmission of MAP, but colostrum should be fed only from the dam of that calf.

Key Words: colostrum and milk • paratuberculosis • retrospective study • risk factor







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.