HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Halachmi, I. Articles by Klopcic, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Halachmi, I. Articles by Klopcic, M.

Cow Body Shape and Automation of Condition Scoring

I. Halachmi^*,1, P. Polak, D. J. Roberts and M. Klopcic

^* Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Research Institute for Animal Production, Slovak Agricultural Research Center, 949 92 Nitra, Slovakia
Scottish Agricultural College Dairy Research Centre, Crichton Royal Farm, Dumfries DG1 4SZ, UK
Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1230 Domzale, Slovenia

¹ Corresponding author: halachmi{at}volcani.agri.gov.il

The feasibility of including a body shape measure in methods for automatic monitoring of body reserves of cattle was evaluated. The hypothesis tested was that the body shape of a fatter cow is rounder than that of a thin cow and, therefore, may better fit a parabolic shape. An image-processing model was designed that calculates a parameter to assess body shape. The model was implemented, and its outputs were validated against ultrasonic and thermal camera measurements of the thickness of fat and muscle layers, and manual body condition scoring of 186 Holstein-Friesian cows. The thermal camera overcomes some of the drawbacks of a regular camera; the hooks and the tailhead nadirs of a thin cow diverged from the parabolic shape. The correlation between thermal camera’s measurements and fat and muscle thickness was 0.47. Mean body condition scorings were 2.18, 2.15, and 2.23, with no significant difference found across the assessment methods. Further research is needed to achieve fully automatic, accurate body condition scoring.

Key Words: body condition scoring • thermal camera • dairy cow • image processing

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Halachmi, E. Shoshani, R. Solomon, E. Maltz, and J. Miron Feeding soyhulls to high-yielding dairy cows increased milk production, but not milking frequency, in an automatic milking system J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2009; 92(5): 2317 - 2325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]