JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2008. 91:4365-4371. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1129
© 2008 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Weller, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Weller, J. I.

Incorporation of Discrete Genotype Effects for Multiple Genes into Animal Model Evaluations when only a Small Fraction of the Population Has Been Genotyped

E. Baruch* and J. I. Weller{dagger},1

* Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
{dagger} Institute of Animal Sciences, A.R.O., The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

1 Corresponding author: weller{at}agri.huji.ac.il

An efficient algorithm is described for marker-assisted selection appropriate for large populations, even though only a small fraction of the population is genotyped. Genotype probabilities for specific loci are computed for all animals without genotypes. Effects of the quantitative trait loci (QTL) are then estimated by a "cow model" and the appropriate effects are subtracted from the cows’ records. Selection is based on genetic evaluations computed from the adjusted records after addition of each animal’s QTL genotype effect. The proposed scheme was applied to 10 simulated populations of 37,000 cows generated over 30 yr and compared with a selection scheme based on a standard animal model. Two diallelic QTL with substitution effects of 0.5 and 0.32 phenotypic standard deviations were simulated with initial frequencies of 0.5 for both alleles. Means and standard errors of estimates of the QTL effects at yr 30 were 0.498 ± 0.011 and 0.347 ± 0.008. Thus, estimation of the larger QTL was nearly exact, whereas the smaller QTL was slightly overestimated. At yr 9 through 12 after the beginning of the breeding program, genetic gain in the marker-assisted selection scheme was 0.17 standard deviations greater than the standard scheme. This corresponds to nearly 2 yr of genetic progress relative to the standard scheme, or more than 40% of the total genetic gain obtained by the standard scheme at yr 9. Although genetic gain of the 2 schemes was nearly equal by yr 30, the Gibson effect of eventual greater progress by trait-based selection was not observed. Extension of the methods proposed in the current study could be applied to rank sires accurately including both marker and pedigree information for the large number of segregating QTL that will be detected by whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism scans.

Key Words: marker-assisted selection • quantitative trait loci • animal model • dairy cattle breeding







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.