HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lukas, J. M. Articles by Kinsel, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lukas, J. M. Articles by Kinsel, M. L.

Predicting Somatic Cell Count Standard Violations Based on Herd’s Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Count. Part II: Consistency Index

J. M. Lukas^*, J. K. Reneau^*,1, C. Munoz-Zanzi and M. L. Kinsel

^* Department of Animal Science, and
School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
Agricultural Information Management Inc., Ellensburg, WA 98926

¹ Corresponding author: renea001{at}umn.edu

The present study examines the capability of 1,501 herds in the Upper Midwest and the performance of statistical process control charts and indices as a way of monitoring and controlling milk quality on the farm. For 24 mo, daily or every other day bulk tank somatic cell count (SCC) data were collected. Consistency indices for 5 different SCC standards were developed. The indices calculate the maximum variation allowed to meet a desired SCC level at a given mean bulk tank SCC and were used to identify herds not capable of meeting a specific SCC standard. Consistency index method was compared with a test identifying future bulk tank SCC standard violators based on herds’ past violations. The performance of the consistency index test and the past violation method was evaluated by logistic regression. The comparison focused on detection probability and certainty associated with a result. For the 5 SCC levels, detection probability and certainty associated with a result ranged from 51 to 98%. Detection probability of all violators and certainty associated with a negative result was greater for the consistency index across all 5 SCC levels (by 0.7 to 7.4% and 2.1 to 5.1%, respectively). Control charts were plotted and monthly consistency indices calculated for individual farms. Charts in combination with the consistency indices would warn from 66 to 80% of the herds about an upcoming violation within 30 d before it occurred. They offer a proactive approach to maintaining consistently high milk quality. By assessing process capability and distinguishing between significant changes and random variation in bulk tank SCC, tools presented in this article encourage fact-based decisions in dairy farm milk quality management.

Key Words: bulk tank somatic cell count • capability index • statistical process control