JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:4483-4497. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0030
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Østerås, O.
Right arrow Articles by Minsaas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Østerås, O.
Right arrow Articles by Minsaas, A.

Results and Evaluation of Thirty Years of Health Recordings in the Norwegian Dairy Cattle Population

O. Østerås*,{dagger},1, H. Solbu{ddagger},§, A. O. Refsdal{ddagger}, T. Roalkvam||, O. Filseth{ddagger} and A. Minsaas#

* Department of The Norwegian Cattle Health Services, TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, 1431 Ås, Norway
{dagger} Department of Production Animals Clinical Sciences, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, 0033 Oslo, Norway
{ddagger} GENO Breeding and AI Association, 2326 Hamar, Norway
§ Norwegian Quality System for Agriculture, 0135 Oslo, Norway
|| Department of The Norwegian Dairy Herd Recording System, TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, 1431 Ås, Norway
# Norwegian Veterinary Association, 7710 Sparbu, Norway

1 Corresponding author: olav.osteras{at}veths.no

The results are based on the Norwegian Cattle Health Recording System, which has been in place for the entire country since 1975. The dairy breeds in Norway consist of 94% Norwegian Red and 4% crossbreeds with Norwegian Red. No other breed consists of more than 0.5% of the total population. During the past 30 yr, there have been 11,563,692 dairy cows within the recording system, corresponding to 8,633,532 cow-years and 8,632,516 calvings. This population consisted of 3,038,675 first-calving cows. Altogether, 8,435,704 different diagnoses were recorded from 4,444,485 different cows each year. The general trend for all recordings was an increase in the incidence rate of all cases from 0.74 per 365 d at risk (cow-year) in 1976 to 1.36 in 1990, and then a decrease to 0.62 in 2002. The corresponding figures for cows treated per cow-year were 0.44 up to a maximum of 0.82, and then a decrease to 0.46 per cow-year in 2002. The most common diseases were acute (severe to moderate) clinical mastitis, chronic (mild) clinical mastitis, ketosis, milk fever, teat injuries, retained placenta, silent heat or anestrous, indigestion, cystic ovaries, and metritis. Clinical mastitis increased from 0.15 cows treated per cow-year in 1975 to 0.44 in 1994, and then decreased to 0.23 in 2002. Ketosis began at 0.10 in 1975, increased to 0.24 in 1985, and then decreased to 0.05 in 2005. For several of the most common diseases, there was a reduction of more than 50% from the 1990s to the years after 2000. Validation processes confirmed that this fluctuation reflected the general trend in the population. The disease recording system also reflected the known outbreaks of bovine respiratory syncytial virus during 1976, 1989 to 1990, and 1995. A marked increase in malformation diagnoses could be seen in 1986 and in 1989 and 1990. These could be related to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in April 1986. The diagnosis that showed the most stability throughout these 30 yr was retained placenta. The 3 main reasons for the large fluctuation for many of the diseases could be the following: a breeding effect, an effect of preventive work, and an effect of changing the therapeutic attitude. Many of the actions taken to bring about improvements would not have been possible without a functioning and practical recording system. Our experience is that an organ-related diagnosis system with up to 60 or 70 different diagnoses will meet the needs of the dairy industry.

Key Words: recording system • bovine health • disease recording




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. M. Gulliksen, K. I. Lie, T. Loken, and O. Osteras
Calf mortality in Norwegian dairy herds
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2782 - 2795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. M. Gulliksen, K. I. Lie, and O. Osteras
Calf health monitoring in Norwegian dairy herds
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1660 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Walsh, F. Buckley, K. Pierce, N. Byrne, J. Patton, and P. Dillon
Effects of Breed and Feeding System on Milk Production, Body Weight, Body Condition Score, Reproductive Performance, and Postpartum Ovarian Function
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4401 - 4413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. T. Garmo, A. O. Refsdal, K. Karlberg, E. Ropstad, A. Waldmann, J. F. Beckers, and O. Reksen
Pregnancy Incidence in Norwegian Red Cows Using Nonreturn to Estrus, Rectal Palpation, Pregnancy-Associated Glycoproteins, and Progesterone
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3025 - 3033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. M. Gulliksen, K. I. Lie, L. Solverod, and O. Osteras
Risk Factors Associated with Colostrum Quality in Norwegian Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 704 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.