HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lievaart, J. J. Articles by Heesterbeek, J. A. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lievaart, J. J. Articles by Heesterbeek, J. A. P.

Effect of Herd Characteristics, Management Practices, and Season on Different Categories of the Herd Somatic Cell Count

J. J. Lievaart^*,1,2, H. W. Barkema, W. D. J. Kremer^*, J. van den Broek^*, J. H. M. Verheijden^* and J. A. P. Heesterbeek^*

^* Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

¹ Corresponding author: jlievaart{at}csu.edu.au

In this study, the contribution of management practices, herd characteristics, and seasonal variables to the herd somatic cell count (SCC) was quantified in herds with low (<150,000 cells/mL), medium (150,000–200,000 cells/mL), and high (>200,000 cells/mL) herd SCC (HSCC). Selection of the variables was performed using a linear mixed effect model; HSCC was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the individual cow’s SCC. The data concerning management practices were derived from 3 questionnaires on mastitis prevention and management practices on 246 Dutch dairy farms. The monthly Dairy Herd Improvement test data of these 246 farms were used to calculate the herd characteristics and seasonal effects. None of the management practices were associated with HSCC in all 3 HSCC categories. Some variables only had a significant association with HSCC in one HSCC category, such as dry premilking treatment (–9,100 cells/mL in the low HSCC category) or feeding calves with high SCC milk (11,100 cells/ mL in the medium HSCC category). Others had an opposite effect on HSCC in different HSCC categories, such as average parity (–6,400 and 11,000 cells/mL in the low and medium HSCC category, respectively) and feeding calves with fresh milk (10,300 and –9,700 cells/ mL in the low and high HSCC category, respectively). We conclude that, given the individual Dairy Herd Improvement data and information on management practices of an individual farm, it is possible to provide quantitative insight into the contribution of these different variables to the HSCC of an individual farm. Being able to provide such insight is a prerequisite for interpretation, prediction, and control of HSCC on individual dairy farms.

Key Words: herd somatic cell count • season • herd characteristic • management practice

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hovinen, M. D. Rasmussen, and S. Pyorala Udder health of cows changing from tie stalls or free stalls with conventional milking to free stalls with either conventional or automatic milking J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3696 - 3703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Haskell, F. M. Langford, M. C. Jack, L. Sherwood, A. B. Lawrence, and K. M. D. Rutherford The effect of organic status and management practices on somatic cell counts on UK dairy farms J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3775 - 3780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Green, A. J. Bradley, G. F. Medley, and W. J. Browne Cow, Farm, and Herd Management Factors in the Dry Period Associated with Raised Somatic Cell Counts in Early Lactation J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1403 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]