HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bicalho, R. C. Articles by Guard, C. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bicalho, R. C. Articles by Guard, C. L.

Association Between a Visual and an Automated Locomotion Score in Lactating Holstein Cows

R. C. Bicalho^*,1, S. H. Cheong^*, G. Cramer and C. L. Guard^*

^* Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada

¹ Corresponding author: rcb28{at}cornell.edu

Two studies were conducted to evaluate visual locomotion scoring (VLS) and Stepmetrix locomotion scoring (SLS) in detecting painful digit lesions. In study 1, one veterinarian performed VLS. Cows with VLS 3 were hoof trimmed and the presence or absence of a painful lesion (PL), defined as a reaction to digital pressure, was recorded. A strongly increasing pattern in the proportion of cows with PL was detected as VLS increased. The proportions of cows with painful lesions were 5.6% (n = 53), 20.1% (n = 78), 55.5% (n = 164), 79.9% (n = 159), and 100% (n = 5) for VLS 1 to 5, respectively. Study 2 was conducted on a different farm. The entire farm was visually locomotion scored by 3 veterinarians on the same day, and the cows were Stepmetrix locomotion scored by walking through the Stepmetrix system. Every cow was trimmed during the following 2 d by 1 of 8 professional hoof trimmers. The 3 veterinarians identified, scored, and recorded any PL. Interobserver agreement for the 3 veterinarians had a kappa coefficient of between 0.45 and 0.48 ± 0.05. In total, 518 cows were used in the analysis, from which 11.2% were identified with a PL. Of the cows diagnosed with a PL, 32.8% were detected with a sole ulcer, 25.9% with white line disease, 13.8% with white line abscess, and 27.5% with other diseases. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed; the area under the curve was larger for VLS (0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.83) than SLS (0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.66). When performed by trained veterinarians, VLS performed better than SLS in detecting PL.

Key Words: lameness • Stepmetrix • dairy cow

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Bicalho, L. D. Warnick, and C. L. Guard Strategies to Analyze Milk Losses Caused by Diseases with Potential Incidence Throughout the Lactation: A Lameness Example J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2653 - 2661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Bicalho, F. Vokey, H. N. Erb, and C. L. Guard Visual Locomotion Scoring in the First Seventy Days in Milk: Impact on Pregnancy and Survival J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4586 - 4591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]