JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:3002-3011. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-430
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lassen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ducrocq, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lassen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ducrocq, V.

A Stochastic Simulation Study on Validation of an Approximate Multitrait Model Using Preadjusted Data for Prediction of Breeding Values

J. Lassen*,{dagger},1, M. K. Sørensen*, P. Madsen* and V. Ducrocq{ddagger}

* Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
{dagger} Department of Large Animal Sciences, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Ridebanevej 12, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
{ddagger} Station de Génétique Quantitative et Appliquée, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France

1 Corresponding author: jan.lassen{at}agrsci.dk

Three different models for prediction of breeding values were compared in a stochastic simulation study of a dairy cattle population of 100,000 cows. The simulation was done in 2 steps. The first step involved 15 yr of selection using breeding values obtained in a univariate model for production and a trivariate model for mastitis occurrence, udder depth, and somatic cell score, in which production and mastitis occurrence were included in the breeding goal. This was done to create an initial population that had already been under selection. The second step consisted of 20 replicates of 4 different scenarios set up to make it possible to compare the different models. Two scenarios were based on univariate evaluations and one for udder health traits on trivariate evaluations, with 2 different breeding goals. In another scenario, an approximate multitrait model using preadjusted data in a 2-step procedure was used and in the last scenario, a complete linear multitrait model was carried out. Differences in genetic response in total merit over the last 15 yr of selection were compared and used to rank the models. The linear multitrait model gave the highest regression coefficient of true genetic values on year (3.073 ± 0.069 in economic units), and this was significantly better than for the approximate multitrait model (2.819 ± 0.047), which again was significantly better than for the univariate approach (2.672 ± 0.060). The linear multitrait model cannot be applied to nearly the same number of traits as the approximate model. Therefore, the approximate model with developments handling breeding values from more complex models than presented in this paper is an option of choice in countries providing total merit indices that combine many traits because it does not neglect correlations between these traits.

Key Words: stochastic simulation • multitrait model • total merit







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.