JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:2305-2308. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-744
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association ®

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. S.

Short Communication: Rate of Propionate Infusion Within Meals Does Not Influence Feeding Behavior

B. J. Bradford1 and M. S. Allen2

Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824

2 Corresponding author: allenm{at}msu.edu

Propionate has been shown to depress the feed intake of ruminants, but whether the rate of propionate infusion influences this response is unknown. To test this possibility, the rate of propionate infused within meals was altered while the total amount of propionate infused was held constant. Eight multiparous Holstein cows (51 ± 19 d in milk, 44.0 ± 4.8 kg/d of milk; mean ± SD) were randomly assigned to the treatment sequence in a crossover experiment with a 10-d diet adaptation period, 24-h treatment periods, and 3 d between treatments. Treatments were intraruminal infusion of 1.26 mol of Na propionate (2.33 ± 0.06 L, 0.54 M, pH 6.0) over the course of either 5 min (fast) or 15 min (slow) at each spontaneous meal. The experimental diet included high-moisture corn and was formulated for 27% neutral detergent fiber, 36% starch, and 17.5% crude protein. Feeding behavior was monitored by a computerized data acquisition system that triggered infusion pumps at the initiation of meals, and consecutive infusions began at least 15 min apart under both treatment protocols. Feeding behavior data were analyzed to quantify the number, size, length, and time between all meals. Compared with pretreatment intake, propionate infusions depressed feed intake by 20 and 23%, respectively, for the slow and fast treatments. However, the rate of propionate infusion did not significantly alter dry matter intake, meals/day, meal size, meal length, or intermeal interval. We found no evidence that the rate of infusion, within the range of typical meal lengths, determines the extent of hypophagia from propionate.

Key Words: propionate • infusion rate • feeding behavior • feed intake




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. E. Wertz-Lutz, J. A. Daniel, J. A. Clapper, A. Trenkle, and D. C. Beitz
Prolonged, moderate nutrient restriction in beef cattle results in persistently elevated circulating ghrelin concentrations
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 564 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.